Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus: Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes from a Multi-Institutional Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare hemodynamic performances and clinical outcomes of patients with small aortic annulus (SAA) who underwent aortic valve replacement by means of sutureless aortic valve replacement (SUAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: From 2015 to 2020, 622 consecutive patients with SAA underwent either SUAVR or TAVI. Through a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis, two homogeneous groups of 146 patients were formed. Primary endpoint: all cause-death at 36 months. Secondary endpoints: incidence of moderate to severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). RESULTS: All-cause death at three years was higher in the TAVI group (SUAVR 12.2% vs. TAVI 21.0%, P=0.058). Perioperatively, comparable hemodynamic performances were recorded in terms of indexed effective orifice area (SUAVR 1.12 ± 0.23 cm2/m2 vs. TAVI 1.17 ± 0.28 cm2/m2, P=0.265), mean transvalvular gradients (SUAVR 12.9 ± 5.3 mmHg vs. TAVI 12.2 ± 6.2 mmHg, P=0.332), and moderate-to-severe PPM (SUAVR 4.1% vs. TAVI 8.9%, P=0.096). TAVI group showed a higher cumulative incidence of MACCEs at 36 months (SUAVR 18.1% vs. TAVI 32.6%, P<0.001). Pacemaker implantation (PMI) and perivalvular leak ≥ 2 were significantly higher in TAVI group and identified as independent predictors of mortality (PMI: hazard ratio [HR] 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-6.94, P=0.008; PPM: HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.25-5.94, P=0.012). CONCLUSION: In patients with SAA, SUAVR and TAVI showed comparable hemodynamic performances. Moreover, all-cause death and incidence of MACCEs at follow-up were significantly higher in TAVI group.

Implante transcateter de prótese valvar aórtica população de risco intermediário / Transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis implantation in intermediate-risk population

INTRODUÇÃO: A estenose aórtica degenerativa é mais prevalente em idosos, que frequentemente apresentam comorbidades associadas, aumentando o risco de óbito relacionado aos procedimentos indicados para tratar os pacientes sintomáticos com estenose aórtica grave. A escolha do procedimento é realizada por uma equipe multidisciplinar (heart team), de acordo com as características de cada paciente. Embora o implante transcateter de prótese valvar aórtica (TAVI) seja indicado para pacientes inoperáveis, é necessária avaliar sua eficácia em pacientes de risco intermediário com base nas evidências disponíveis. A revisão rápida da literatura evidenciou dois ensaios clínicos randomizados comparando TAVI e troca valvar aórtica cirúrgica após 24 meses de acompanhamento e suas respectivas extensões com 60 meses, no paciente com risco intermediário. A metanálise dos dados extraído destes estudos não evidenciou diferença em relação a mortalidade em 30 dias, um, dois e cinco anos. Apenas os desfechos secundários apresentaram diferenças estatisticamente significativas, como a fibrilação atrial em 30 dias (a favor da TAVI), a insuficiência renal em 30 dias (a favor da TAVI) e a necessidade de reintervenção (relacionada a prótese aórtica) em 24 meses (a favor da cirurgia). OBJETIVO: Definir condutas institucionais para orientar a indicação de TAVI. JUSTIFICATIVA: A estenose aórtica degenerativa é mais prevalente em idosos, que frequentemente apresentam comorbidades associadas, aumentando o risco de óbito relacionado aos procedimentos indicados para tratar os pacientes sintomáticos com estenose aórtica grave. A escolha do procedimento é realizada por uma equipe multidisciplinar (heart team), de acordo com as características de cada paciente. Embora o implante transcateter de prótese valvar aórtica (TAVI) seja indicado para pacientes inoperáveis, é necessária avaliar sua eficácia em pacientes de risco intermediário com base nas evidências disponíveis. A revisão rápida da literatura evidenciou dois ensaios clínicos randomizados comparando TAVI e troca valvar aórtica cirúrgica após 24 meses de acompanhamento e suas respectivas extensões com 60 meses, no paciente com risco intermediário. A metanálise dos dados extraído destes estudos não evidenciou diferença em relação a mortalidade em 30 dias, um, dois e cinco anos. Apenas os desfechos secundários apresentaram diferenças estatisticamente significativas, como a fibrilação atrial em 30 dias (a favor da TAVI), a insuficiência renal em 30 dias (a favor da TAVI) e a necessidade de reintervenção (relacionada a prótese aórtica) em 24 meses (a favor da cirurgia). CRITÉRIOS DE INCLUSÃO: Pacientes adultos com estenose aórtica grave sintomática com risco de óbito em 30 dias igual ou superior a 4% e igual ou inferior a 8%, avaliado pelo escore da Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), ou com outras comorbidades não avaliadas por este escore, que seja considerada relacionada a aumento do risco cirúrgico. CRITÉRIOS DE EXCLUSÃO: Pacientes com Insuficiência aórtica grave associada a estenose aórtica grave, paciente com indicação de troca ou plastia de outras válvulas, além da aórtica, pacientes com endocardite infecciosa. TRATAMENTO: A cirurgia de troca valvar aórtica (TV Ao) com colocação de prótese biológica ou mecânica é o tratamento convencional em pacientes com EAo grave sintomática que se encontram em boas condições para o procedimento cirúrgico9. A mortalidade estimada deste procedimento é estimada em 3,2% nos estados Unidos, chegando a 13,9% a mortalidade intra-hospitalar no Brasil3. O tratamento clínico durante muito tempo foi a única opção para o paciente considerado de muito alto risco cirúrgico, podendo ser realizada a valvuloplastia por balão em casos selecionados9. O TAVI é um procedimento considerado menos invasivo, sem necessidade de esternotomia ou circulação extracorpórea, como ocorre nos casos cirúrgicos. O TAVI pode ser indicado para os pacientes de alto risco e os de muito alto risco, embasado nos dados dos estudos PARTNER 1 A, corevalve trial e PARTNER 1 B9­14. O relatório de recomendação do TAVI para o tratamento da EAo grave em pacientes inoperáveis, publicado em 2021, evidenciou os benefícios e a segurança da TAVI quando comparado ao tratamento farmacológico. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa para o desfecho primário (morte ou AVC incapacitante) no segundo ano do estudo entre os dois grupos (HR: 0,89; IC 95% 0,73-1,09, p=0,25)24 ou no quinto ano (HR: 1,09; IC 95% 0,95-1,25, p=0,21)15. Os desfechos que apresentaram diferença estatisticamente significativa foram: Fibrilação atrial, Insuficiência renal aguda, sangramento com risco de vida durante o período avaliado que favorecia o TAVI, já os desfechos: complicação vascular, reospitalização (cinco anos) e reintervenção (30 dias, dois anos e cinco anos) de válvula aórtica favoreciam a cirurgia. Em relação às complicações em 30 dias, fibrilação atrial, choque cardiogênico e insuficiência renal aguda foram mais frequentes no grupo cirúrgico, já na TAVI foram mais frequentes complicação vascular maior, sangramento com ameaça a vida e marcapasso permanente. CONCLUSÃO: Ao final da reunião realizada votação, com a participação dos cinco especialistas, com 60% dos votos para recomendação fraca a favor da TAVI. Após a primeira votação, realizada nova etapa com argumentação em relação aos pontos chaves, mantendo-se o grupo com 60% dos votos para recomendação fraca a favor da TAVI. A Recomendação institucional em relação ao tratamento da EAo sintomática para a população de risco cirúrgico intermediário foi fraca a favor do implante transcateter de prótese valvar.

High risk of coronary artery obstruction during TAVR, how to avoid it?

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery obstruction after percutaneous aortic replacement is a complication with high short-term mortality secondary to the lack of timely treatment. There are various predictors of coronary obstruction prior to valve placement such as the distance from the ostia, the degree of calcification, the distance from the sinuses; In such a situation some measures must be taken to prevent and treat coronary obstruction. CASE PRESENTATION: An 84-year-old male, with severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk, who was treated with TAVR. However, during the deployment of the valve he presented hemodynamic instability secondary to LMCA obstruction. The intravascular image showed obstruction of the ostium secondary to the displacement of calcium that he was successfully treated with a chimney stent technique. CONCLUSIONS: The high degree of calcification and the left ostium near the annulus are conditions for obstruction of the ostium at the time of valve release; In this context, provisional stenting prior to TAVR in patients at high risk of obstruction should be considered as a safe prevention strategy to achieve the success of the procedure.

The Effect of Aortic Angulation on Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of aortic angulation (AA) on periprocedural and in-hospital complications as well as mortality of patients undergoing Evolut™ R valve implantation. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 264 patients who underwent transfemoral-approach transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable valve at our hospital between August 2015 and August 2022. These patients underwent multislice computer tomography scans to evaluate AA. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement endpoints, device success, and clinical events were assessed according to the definitions provided by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3. Cumulative events included paravalvular leak, permanent pacemaker implantation, new-onset stroke, and in-hospital mortality. Patients were divided into two groups, AA ≤ 48° and AA > 48°, based on the mean AA measurement (48.3±8.8) on multislice computer tomography. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of cumulative events, utilizing variables with a P-value < 0.2 obtained from univariable logistic regression analysis, including AA, age, hypertension, chronic renal failure, and heart failure. AA (odds ratio [OR]: 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-3.38, P=0.104), age (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.99-1.10, P=0.099), hypertension (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 0.82-3.33, P=0.155), chronic renal failure (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 0.92-3.61, P=0.084), and heart failure (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.27-1.21, P=0.145) were not found to be significantly associated with cumulative events in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that increased AA does not have a significant impact on intraprocedural and periprocedural complications of patients with new generation self-expandable valves implanted.

Five-Year Follow-Up After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Concomitant Coronary Artery Disease: A Single-Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on the impact of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Therefore, the objective of this study was, in a single-center setting, to evaluate the five-year outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients with or without coronary artery disease. METHODS: All transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients between 2009 and 2019 were included and grouped according to the presence or absence of coronary artery disease. The primary endpoint, five-year all-cause mortality, was evaluated using Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, procedure years, and comorbidities. Comorbidities interacting with coronary artery disease were evaluated with interaction tests. In-hospital complications was the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: In total, 176 patients had aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease, while 170 patients had aortic stenosis only. Mean follow-up was 2.2±1.6 years. There was no difference in the adjusted five-year all-cause mortality between transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients with and without coronary artery disease (hazard ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.59-1.70, P=0.99). In coronary artery disease patients, impaired renal function, peripheral arterial disease, or ejection fraction < 50% showed a significant interaction effect with higher five-year all-cause mortality. No significant differences in complications between the groups were found. CONCLUSION: Five-year mortality did not differ between transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients with or without coronary artery disease. However, in patients with coronary artery disease and impaired renal function, peripheral arterial disease, or ejection fraction < 50%, we found significantly higher five-year all-cause mortality.

Prognostic Impact of Residual Moderate Mitral Regurgitation Following Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of mitral regurgitation (MR) on valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (VIV-TAVI) in patients with failed bioprostheses remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of residual moderate MR following VIV-TAVI. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 127 patients who underwent VIV-TAVI between March 2010 and November 2021. At least moderate MR was observed in 51.2% of patients before the procedure, and MR improved in 42.1% of all patients. Patients with postoperative severe MR, previous mitral valve intervention, and patients who died before postoperative echocardiography were excluded from further analyses. The remaining 114 subjects were divided into two groups according to the degree of postprocedural MR: none-mild MR (73.7%) or moderate MR (26.3%). Propensity score matching yielded 23 pairs for final comparison. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between groups before and after matching in early results. In the matched cohort, survival probabilities at one, three, and five years were 95.7% vs. 87.0%, 85.0% vs. 64.5%, and 85.0% vs. 29.0% in the none-mild MR group vs. moderate MR-group, respectively (log-rank P=0.035). Among survivors, patients with moderate MR had worse functional status according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) class at follow-up (P=0.006). CONCLUSION: MR is common in patients with failed aortic bioprostheses, and improvement in MR-status was observed in over 40% of patients following VIV-TAVI. Residual moderate MR after VIV-TAVI is not associated with worse early outcomes, however, it was associated with increased mortality at five years of follow-up and worse NYHA class among survivors.

Viability and Safety of Early Hospital Discharge after Minimalist TAVI in the Brazilian Unified Health System. / Viabilidade e Segurança de Alta Hospitalar Precoce após TAVI com Abordagem Minimalista no SUS.

Central Illustration : Viability and Safety of Early Hospital Discharge after Minimalist TAVI in the Brazilian Unified Health System Results after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a minimalist approach. CKD: chronic kidney disease; PO: postoperative days; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Figura Central : Viabilidade e Segurança de Alta Hospitalar Precoce após TAVI com Abordagem Minimalista no SUS Resultados após implante de prótese aórtica por cateter por abordagem minimalista. DRC: doença renal crônica; PO: dias pós-operativos; TAVI: implante por cateter de prótese aórtica.

Implante de válvula aórtica percutánea por acceso transcarotídeo: reporte del primer caso realizado en Chile / Percutaneous aortic valve replacement by trans-carotid approach: First case in Chile

La indicación en el implante de la válvula aortica percutánea (TAVI) se ha incrementado considerablemente en los últimos años, utilizando de preferencia el acceso transfemoral (TF), sin embargo, no queda claro cual debería ser la 2 vía de preferencia ante contraindicaciones a esta última. Presentamos un paciente de 81 años con alto riesgo quirúrgico en quien luego de discusión con heart team se decidió realizar TAVI y posterior a la identificación de obstrucción de la luz aortica descendente de 50%, se decidido realizar acceso transcarotideo izquierdo. Numerosos abordajes alternativos a la vía TF han sido descriptos en los últimos años. La vía transcarotidea ha sido la de mejores resultados en distintas revisiones clínicas y la que se ha presentado como 2° alternativa a la TF en algoritmos establecidos. Reportamos el primer implante de TAVI por vía transcarotidea en el hospital las Higueras, Chile.

The indication for percutaneous aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has increased considerably in recent years, preferably using transfemoral access (TF); however, it is not clear which should be the preferred access in the event of contraindications to the latter. We present an 81-year-old patient with high surgical risk in whom a 50% obstruction of the descending aortic lumen was identified and so, a left transcarotid access was chosen. Numerous alternative approaches to the TF approach have been described in recent years. The transcarotid approach has been the one with the best results in different clinical reviews and the one that has been presented as the second alternative to TF in established algorithms. We report the first transcarotid TAVI implantation in Las Higueras Hospital, Talcahuano, Chile.

Zero-contrast imaging for the assessment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in candidates with renal dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are currently evaluated using computed tomography angiography and invasive cardiac catheterization as an essential part of case selection and pre-procedure interventional planning. However, both imaging methods utilize iodinated agents, which may cause contrast-induced nephropathy, particularly in patients with baseline renal dysfunction. This study aimed to describe a zero-contrast imaging protocol for pre-TAVI evaluation in patients with advanced renal impairment. METHODS: The pre-TAVI zero-contrast scheme consisted of the following multi-modality combinations: (1) gadolinium-free magnetic resonance imaging (three-dimensional navigator-echo with electrocardiogram-gated steady-state free-precession series); (2) iodinated-free multislice computed tomography electrocardiogram-gated; (3) lower limb arterial duplex scan ultrasound; and (4) transesophageal echocardiography. Ultimately, TAVI was performed for those deemed good candidates, and contrast was allowed during the intervention; however, operators were strongly advised to utilize the least volume possible of iodinated agents. This pilot survey included ten patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis and renal dysfunction who underwent zero-contrast multi-modality imaging. RESULTS: All the patients ultimately underwent TAVI. The intervention was successful in all cases, without ≥ moderate residual aortic regurgitation, prosthesis embolization, annulus rupture, major vascular complications, stroke, or death during index hospitalization. The creatinine clearance remained stable throughout the observation period (baseline: 26.85 ± 12.55 mL/min; after multi-modality imaging: 26.76 ± 11.51 mL/min; post-TAVI at discharge: 29.84 ± 13.98 mL/min; p = 0.3 all). CONCLUSION: The proposed contrast-free imaging protocol appears to be a promising clinical tool for pre-TAVI evaluation in patients with severe renal dysfunction.

Como eu faço a avaliação pós-intervenções tricúspides: dicas e truques / My approach to assessment after tricuspid interventions: tips and tricks

A regurgitação tricúspide (RT) importante está associada à alta morbidade e mortalidade. Como o tratamento cirúrgico da RT isolada tem sido associado à alta mortalidade, as intervenções transcateter na valva tricúspide (VT) têm sido utilizadas para o seu tratamento, com risco relativamente mais baixo. Há um atraso na intervenção da RT e provavelmente está relacionado a uma compreensão limitada da anatomia da VT e do ventrículo direito, além da subestimação da gravidade da RT. Nesse cenário, faz-se necessário o conhecimento anatômico abrangente da VT, a fisiopatologia envolvida no mecanismo de regurgitação, assim como a sua graduação mais precisa. A VT tem peculiaridades anatômica, histológica e espacial que fazem a sua avalição ser mais complexa, quando comparado à valva mitral, sendo necessário o conhecimento e treinamento nas diversas técnicas ecocardiográficas que serão utilizadas frequentemente em combinação para uma avaliação precisa. Esta revisão descreverá a anatomia da VT, o papel do ecocardiograma no diagnóstico, graduação e fisiopatologia envolvida na RT, as principais opções atuais de tratamento transcateter da RT e a avaliação do resultado após intervenção transcateter por meio de múltiplas modalidades ecocardiográficas.(AU)

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Given that surgical treatment of TR alone has been associated with high mortality, transcatheter interventions in the tricuspid valve (TV) have been used for its treatment, with relatively lower risk. There is a delay in intervention for TR, and this is probably related to a limited understanding of the anatomy of the TV and the right ventricle, in addition to an underestimation of the severity of TR. In this scenario, it is necessary to have comprehensive anatomical knowledge of the TV, the pathophysiology involved in the mechanism of regurgitation, and more accurate grading. The TV has anatomical, histological, and spatial peculiarities that make its assessment more complex when compared to the mitral valve, requiring knowledge and training in the various echocardiographic techniques that will often be used in combination for accurate assessment. This review will describe the anatomy of the TV, the role of echocardiography in the diagnosis, grading, and pathophysiology involved in TR; the main transcatheter treatment options currently available for TR; and the assessment of outcomes after transcatheter intervention by means of multiple echocardiographic modalities.(AU)

Medição automática de valva mitral a partir de ecocardiograma utilizando processamento digital de imagens / Automatic measurement of the mitral valve based on echocardiography using digital image processing

Fundamento: A avaliação da área valvar mitral por meio da reconstrução multiplano na ecocardiografia tridimensional é restrita a softwares específicos e à experiência dos ecocardiografistas. Eles precisam selecionar manualmente o frame do vídeo que contenha a área de abertura máxima da valva mitral, dimensão fundamental para a identificação de estenose mitral. Objetivo: Automatizar o processo de determinação da área de abertura máxima da valva mitral, por meio da aplicação de Processamento Digital de Imagens (PDI) em exames de ecocardiograma, desenvolvendo um algoritmo aberto com leitura de vídeo no formato avi. Método: Este estudo piloto observacional transversal foi realizado com vinte e cinco exames diferentes de ecocardiograma, sendo quinze com abertura normal e dez com estenose mitral reumática. Todos os exames foram realizados e disponibilizados por dois especialistas, com autorização do Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa, que utilizaram dois modelos de aparelhos ecocardiográficos: Vivid E95 (GE Healthcare) e Epiq 7 (Philips), com sondas multiplanares transesofágicas. Todos os vídeos em formato avi foram submetidos ao PDI através da técnica de segmentação de imagens. Resultados: As medidas obtidas manualmente por ecocardiografistas experientes e os valores calculados pelo sistema desenvolvido foram comparados utilizando o diagrama de Bland-Altman. Observou-se maior concordância entre valores no intervalo de 0,4 a 2,7 cm². Conclusão: Foi possível determinar automaticamente a área de máxima abertura das valvas mitrais, tanto para os casos advindos da GE quanto da Philips, utilizando apenas um vídeo como dado de entrada. O algoritmo demonstrou economizar tempo nas medições quando comparado com a mensuração habitual. (AU)

Background: The evaluation of mitral valve area through multiplanar reconstruction in 3-dimensional echocardiography is restricted to specific software and to the experience of echocardiographers. They need to manually select the video frame that contains the maximum mitral valve opening area, as this dimension is fundamental to identification of mitral stenosis. Objective: To automate the process of determining the maximum mitral valve opening area, through the application of digital image processing (DIP) in echocardiography tests, developing an open algorithm with video reading in avi format. Method: This cross-sectional observational pilot study was conducted with 25 different echocardiography exams, 15 with normal aperture and 10 with rheumatic mitral stenosis. With the authorization of the Research Ethics Committee, all exams were performed and made available by 2 specialists who used 2 models of echocardiographic devices: Vivid E95 (GE Healthcare) and Epiq 7 (Philips), with multiplanar transesophageal probes. All videos in avi format were submitted to DIP using the image segmentation technique. Results: The measurements obtained manually by experienced echocardiographers and the values calculated by the developed system were compared using a Bland-Altman diagram. There was greater agreement between values in the range from 0.4 to 2.7 cm². Conclusion: It was possible to automatically determine the maximum mitral valve opening area, for cases from both GE and Philips, using only 1 video as input data. The algorithm has been demonstrated to save time on measurements when compared to the usual method. (AU)

[Percutaneous aortic valve replacement by trans-carotid approach: First case in Chile]. / Implante de válvula aórtica percutánea por acceso transcarotídeo: reporte del primer caso realizado en Chile.

The indication for percutaneous aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has increased considerably in recent years, preferably using transfemoral access (TF); however, it is not clear which should be the preferred access in the event of contraindications to the latter. We present an 81-year-old patient with high surgical risk in whom a 50% obstruction of the descending aortic lumen was identified and so, a left transcarotid access was chosen. Numerous alternative approaches to the TF approach have been described in recent years. The transcarotid approach has been the one with the best results in different clinical reviews and the one that has been presented as the second alternative to TF in established algorithms. We report the first transcarotid TAVI implantation in Las Higueras Hospital, Talcahuano, Chile.

Resultados del implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica (TAVI). Experiencia después de la primera década desde la introducción de la técnica / Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation. A ten years clinical experience

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) was introduced in 2002 and the first implants in our country were performed in 2010. AIM: To review the TAVI experience in our hospital, considering the technology improvements and gained experience throughout this period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients undergoing TAVI in our center were included. Results and complications were adjudicated according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) criteria. Patients were divided in 3 groups, according to procedural year: Period 1: 2010-2015 (n = 35); Period 2: 2016-2018 (n = 35); Period 3: 2019-2021 (n = 41). Mortality up to one year after the procedure was recorded. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2021, 111 TAVI procedures were performed. The mean age of patients was 82 years and 47% were women. Risk scores for in-hospital mortality were STS 6.7%, EUROSCORE II 8.0% and ACC/STS TAVR Score 4.9%. The trans-femoral route was used in 88% and a balloon-expandable valve was chosen in 82% of patients. A successful implant was achieved in 96%, with an in-hospital mortality of 1.8%. Mortality at 30 days and 1-year were 2.7 and 9.0%, respectively. During period 3, 100% of implants were successful, with no in-hospital mortality, less vascular complications (p < 0.01), less stroke (p = 0.04), less severe paravalvular leak (p = 0.01) and significantly lower rate of acute complications (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI achieves excellent results. With greater experience and better available technologies, these results are even more favorable.

Comparison of anesthesia management in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background and objectives We aimed to investigate the effects of two different anesthetic techniques in our patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods In this study, 303 patients who underwent TAVI procedure with a diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided according to the type of anesthesia given during each procedure as; general anesthesia (GA), local anesthesia (LA). Results LA was preferred in 245 (80.8%) of 303 patients who underwent TAVI, while GA was preferred in 58 patients (19.1%). Median ages ​​of our patients who received LA and GA were 83 and 84, respectively. The procedure and anesthesia durations of the patients in the GA group were longer than the LA group (p< 0.00001, p< 0.00001, respectively). Demographic and pre-operative clinical data were similar in comparison between two groups (p> 0.05) except for peripheral artery disease. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity in both groups. While the number of inotrope use was significantly higher in patients who received GA (p< 0.00001), no significant differences were found between LA and GA patients in terms of major complications and mortality (p> 0.05). Intensive care and hospital stays were significantly shorter in the LA group (p= 0.001, p= 0.023, respectively). Conclusion The anesthetic technique of TAVI procedure did not have a significant effect on outcomes including; complications, mortality and success of the procedure. LA provides shorter duration of procedure and hospital stay.

Recent Developments and Current Status of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Practice in Latin America - the WRITTEN LATAM Study. / Evolução e Estado Atual das Práticas de Implante Transcateter de Válvula Aórtica na América Latina ­ Estudo WRITTEN LATAM.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a worldwide adopted procedure with rapidly evolving practices. Regional and temporal variations are expected to be found. OBJECTIVE: To compare TAVR practice in Latin America with that around the world and to assess its changes in Latin America from 2015 to 2020. METHODS: A survey was applied to global TAVR centers between March and September 2015, and again to Latin-American centers between July 2019 and January 2020. The survey consisted of questions addressing: i) center's general information; ii) pre-TAVR evaluation; iii) procedural techniques; iv) post-TAVR management; v) follow-up. Answers from the 2015 survey of Latin-American centers (LATAM15) were compared with those of other centers around the world (WORLD15) and with the 2020 updated Latin-American survey (LATAM20). A 5% level of significance was adopted for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 250 centers participated in the 2015 survey (LATAM15=29; WORLD15=221) and 46 in the LATAM20. Combined centers experience accounted for 73 707 procedures, with WORLD15 centers performing, on average, 6- and 3-times more procedures than LATAM15 and LATAM20 centers, respectively. LATAM centers performed less minimalistic TAVR than WORLD15 centers, but there was a significant increase in less invasive procedures after 5 years in Latin-American centers. For postprocedural care, a lower period of telemetry and maintenance of temporary pacing wire, along with less utilization of dual antiplatelet therapy was observed in LATAM20 centers. CONCLUSION: Despite still having a much lower number of procedures, many aspects of TAVR practice in Latin-American centers have evolved in recent years, followingthe trend observed in developed country centers.

FUNDAMENTO: Implante transcateter de valva aórtica (TAVI) é um procedimento adotado em todo o mundo e suas práticas evoluem rapidamente. Variações regionais e temporais são esperadas. OBJETIVO: Comparar a prática de TAVI na América Latina com aquela no resto do mundo e avaliar suas mudanças na América Latina de 2015 a 2020. MÉTODO: A pesquisa foi realizada em centros de TAVI em todo o mundo entre março e setembro de 2015, e novamente nos centros latino-americanos entre julho de 2019 e janeiro de 2020. As seguintes questões foram abordadas: i) informação geral sobre os centros; ii) avaliação pré-TAVI; iii) técnicas do procedimento; iv) conduta pós-TAVI; v) seguimento. As respostas da pesquisa dos centros latino-americanos em 2015 (LATAM15) foram comparadas àquelas dos centros no resto do mundo (WORLD15) e ainda àquelas da pesquisa dos centros latino-americanos de 2020 (LATAM20). Adotou-se o nível de significância de 5% na análise estatística. RESULTADOS: 250 centros participaram da pesquisa em 2015 (LATAM15=29; WORLD15=221) e 46 na avaliação LATAM20. No total, foram 73.707 procedimentos, sendo que os centros WORLD15 realizaram, em média, 6 e 3 vezes mais procedimentos do que os centros LATAM15 e LATAM20, respectivamente. Os centros latino-americanos realizaram menor número de TAVI minimalista do que os do restante do mundo, mas aumentaram significativamente os procedimentos menos invasivos após 5 anos. Quanto à assistência pós-procedimento, observaram-se menor tempo de telemetria e de manutenção do marca-passo temporário, além de menor uso de terapia dupla antiplaquetária nos centros LATAM20. CONCLUSÃO: A despeito do volume de procedimentos ainda significativamente menor, muitos aspectos da prática de TAVI nos centros latino-americanos evoluíram recentemente, acompanhando a tendência dos centros dos países desenvolvidos.

Ring Fracture of Brazilian Aortic Valve Bioprostheses Using Non-Compliant High-Pressure Transcatheter Balloon, an Ex Vivo Test.

INTRODUCTION: Aortic valve bioprostheses ring fracture in valve-in-valve procedures has shown low complication rates and presents as an option in the treatment of patients at high risk for conventional surgery, avoiding high transvalvular gradients, which are associated with increased mortality. Some prostheses available in the market cannot be fractured. In an ex vivo test, the possibility of ring fracture of aortic valve bioprostheses produced in Brazil when submitted to radial force application using a high-pressure non-compliant balloon was evaluated. METHODS: One unit of each aortic valve bioprosthesis model, sizes 19 and 21 mm, produced by Brazilian companies (Braile Biomédica, Cardioprótese, and Labcor), was used. In the experiment, a non-compliant high-pressure balloon (Atlas®-Gold), 1 mm larger than the external diameter of the prosthesis, was positioned inside the valve annulus and inflated gradually aiming to fracture the prosthesis. Fracture pressures and photographic and radiological images of the prostheses before and after test were recorded. RESULTS: All prostheses were fractured. In the models with metal ring, the fracture pressures were between 23 and 25 atm. In the other prostheses, the rupture occurred between 10 and 13 atm. No deformations in the structure were observed, which could potentially damage the aortic root. CONCLUSION: All the Brazilian prostheses evaluated were fractured, although the presence of a metal ring in the prosthesis framework increases the pressure required for fracture. The information obtained helps in the planning of valve-in-valve procedures in patients with aortic valve bioprostheses.

Eficacia y seguridad del dispositivo de prótesis valvular aórtico percutáneo para estenosis aórtica severa / Efficacy and safety of the valve prosthesis device percutaneous aortic valve for severe aortic stenosis

INTRODUCCIÓN: La Estenosis Aórtica (EA) es la valvulopatía más frecuente en el mundo, cuya incidencia se va incrementando con el envejecimiento de la población; su etiología se asocia a la calcificación de la válvula con una prevalencia del 50%-70% en pacientes de la tercera edad; que por lo general son individuos que poseían una válvula aórtica anatómicamente normal que desarrolla calcificación entre la sexta y séptima década de la vida. La estenosis aórtica severa es una condición que afecta a las personas en edad avanzada, consiste en la obstrucción del flujo sanguíneo a través de la válvula aórtica debido a la fibrosis y calcificación de la misma, comprendida como un área de la válvula aórtica (AVA) < 1,0 cm2 y/o un gradiente medio de presión transaórtica (MPG) > 40 mm Hg y/o una velocidad máxima del chorro aórtico (Vmax) > 4 m/s. Un 30% del total de pacientes que padecen estenosis aórtica severa tienen riesgo quirúrgico muy elevado para cirugía convencional. Entre ellos figuran los pacientes de edad avanzada, a quienes se les debe evitar este tipo de cirugía, así como la circulación extracorpórea. Uno de los tratamientos más recientes para esta condición médica es el reemplazo percutáneo de la válvula aórtica o reemplazo transcatéter de la válvula aórtica. El Implante o reemplazo transcatéter de válvula aórtica, es una técnica en la que se puede implantar una válvula aórtica artificial guiada a través de un catéter introducido por punción de una arteria (femoral, axilar, aorta) o por la punta del corazón (vía apical). Todo ello sin parar el corazón ni necesitar seccionar de forma completa el esternón (como en la cirugía convencional) ni usar circulación extracorpórea. OBJETIVO: El objetivo de la presente Evaluación de tecnología sanitaria (ETS) es evaluar la eficacia y seguridad, así como documentos relacionados a la decisión de cobertura con el del dispositivo prótesis valvular aórtico percutáneo o transcatéter de válvula aórtica en el tratamiento de pacientes con estenosis aórtica severa y con elevado riesgo quirúrgico o inoperables por cirugía convencional. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas: MEDLINE, LILACS, COCHRANE, así como en buscadores genéricos de Internet incluyendo Google Scholar. TRIPDATABASE, hasta el 11 de mayo de 2022. Adicionalmente, se hizo una búsqueda dentro de la información generada por las principales agencias de tecnologías sanitarias y guías de práctica clínica. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 9 Revisiones sistemáticas (RS), 4 Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (ETS) y una evaluación económica (EC) realizada para Chile. No se identificaron EC para Perú, ni Guías de Práctica Clínica (GPC) que puedan responder la pregunta PICO. La más reciente revisión sistemática del año 2021, incorpora la evidencia actualizada de los dos grandes ensayos clínicos que responden la pregunta, mientras que las demás RS incluyen parte de estos ensayos. La evaluación de la calidad de la RS más reciente ha sido valorada como baja debido a que solo presenta un criterio crítico. CONCLUSIONES La evidencia identificada en relación al implante valvular aórtico percutáneo para estenosis aórtica severa en pacientes con elevado riesgo quirúrgico, encontró que no se encuentran diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ambos grupos en los desenlaces de: mortalidad por todas las causas, mortalidad por causa cardiovascular, stroke, stroke mayor discapacitante, infarto de miocardio, endocarditis, reintervención o reparación, hasta luego de 5 años de seguimiento. Se observó un menor riesgo para TAVI comparado con SAVR para los desenlaces: sangrado mayor, nuevo inicio o empeoramiento de fibrilación auricular. Por otro lado, se observó un mayor riesgo con TAVI comparado con SAVR para complicaciones vasculares mayores e implantación de marcapasos permanente.

[Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation. A ten years clinical experience]. / Resultados del implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica (TAVI). Experiencia después de la primera década desde la introducción de la técnica.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) was introduced in 2002 and the first implants in our country were performed in 2010. AIM: To review the TAVI experience in our hospital, considering the technology improvements and gained experience throughout this period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients undergoing TAVI in our center were included. Results and complications were adjudicated according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) criteria. Patients were divided in 3 groups, according to procedural year: Period 1: 2010-2015 (n = 35); Period 2: 2016-2018 (n = 35); Period 3: 2019-2021 (n = 41). Mortality up to one year after the procedure was recorded. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2021, 111 TAVI procedures were performed. The mean age of patients was 82 years and 47% were women. Risk scores for in-hospital mortality were STS 6.7%, EUROSCORE II 8.0% and ACC/STS TAVR Score 4.9%. The trans-femoral route was used in 88% and a balloon-expandable valve was chosen in 82% of patients. A successful implant was achieved in 96%, with an in-hospital mortality of 1.8%. Mortality at 30 days and 1-year were 2.7 and 9.0%, respectively. During period 3, 100% of implants were successful, with no in-hospital mortality, less vascular complications (p < 0.01), less stroke (p = 0.04), less severe paravalvular leak (p = 0.01) and significantly lower rate of acute complications (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI achieves excellent results. With greater experience and better available technologies, these results are even more favorable.