Ultrasound-guided vs. non-guided trigger finger release: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Trigger finger (TF) is a common hand condition that can be treated with surgery. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether ultrasound-guided (US-guided) percutaneous surgery is superior to other conventional surgical methods. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing US-guided TF release with blind percutaneous or open approaches. We combined Risk Ratios (RR) and Mean Differences (MD) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) across studies. Data processing and analysis were conducted using R software, version 4.3.1. RESULTS: Our analysis included eight RCTs and two observational studies with 555 patients. US-guided surgery significantly reduced postoperative DASH scores (MD -3.75 points; 95% CI = -7.48, -0.02; p < 0.01), shortened time to resume activities (MD -11.52 days; 95% CI = -16.13, -6.91; p < 0.01), hastened discontinuation of oral analgesics (MD -4.44 days; 95% CI = -8.01, -0.87; p < 0.01), and improved patient satisfaction scores (RR 1.13; 95% CI = 1.04, 1.23; p = 0.75). There were no significant differences in VAS scores, time to movement recovery, or surgical success rate. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release is a safe, effective, and superior alternative for treating TF compared to other methods, leading to improved DASH scores, quicker recovery, faster cessation of oral analgesics, and enhanced patient satisfaction.

Presentation and Management of the Pediatric Trigger Finger: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Pediatric trigger finger (PTF) is an acquired condition that is uncommon and anatomically complex. Currently, the literature is characterized by a small number of retrospective case series with limited sample sizes. This investigation sought to evaluate the presentation, management, and treatment outcomes of PTF in a large, multicenter cohort. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients with a diagnosis of PTF between 2009 and 2020 was performed at three tertiary referral hospitals. Patient demographics, PTF characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical records. Patients and families also were contacted by telephone to assess the downstream persistence or recurrence of triggering symptoms. RESULTS: In total, 321 patients with 449 PTFs were included at a mean follow-up of 3.9 ± 4.0 years. There were approximately equal numbers of boys and girls, and the mean age of symptom onset was 5.4 ± 5.1 years. The middle (34.7%) and index (11.6%) fingers were the most and least commonly affected digits, respectively. Overall, PTFs managed operatively achieved significantly higher rates of complete resolution compared with PTFs managed nonsurgically (97.1% vs 30.0%). Seventy-five percent of PTFs that achieved complete resolution with nonsurgical management did so within 6 months, and approximately 90% did so within 12 months. Patients with multidigit involvement, higher Quinnell grade at presentation, or palpable nodularity were significantly more likely to undergo surgery. There was no significant difference in the rate of complete resolution between splinted versus not splinted PTFs or across operative techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Only 30% of the PTFs managed nonsurgically achieved complete resolution. Splinting did not improve resolution rates in children treated nonsurgically. In contrast, surgical intervention has a high likelihood of restoring motion and function of the affected digit. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

What Is the Infection Rate of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Trigger Finger Release Performed Under Wide-Awake Anesthesia?

BACKGROUND: High infection rates have been reported in hand procedures using the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) method, causing some to question the validity of this approach. However, little evidence exists surrounding the direct use of WALANT compared with monitored anesthetic care (MAC). This study was conducted to directly compare the postoperative infection rates of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and trigger finger (TF) release surgeries performed under WALANT and MAC. METHODS: A retrospective study comparing postoperative infection rates between patients undergoing CTS and TR releases was conducted. Our primary outcome measure was postoperative infection. Our secondary outcome was postoperative complications. Comparative statistics were used to compare means of infection between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 526 patients underwent CTS release (255 with WALANT and 271 with MAC), and 129 patients underwent TF release (64 with WALANT and 65 with MAC). Patients undergoing WALANT and MAC were statistically comparable in terms of sex, smoking status, diabetes, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification. In patients undergoing CTS release, there were no infections with WALANT and 6 infections (2.2%) with MAC. In patients undergoing TF release, there were no infections in either group. There were similar rates of complications in patients undergoing WALANT and MAC for CTS and TF releases. CONCLUSION: There was no increased risk of infection with WALANT compared with MAC in CTS or TR surgeries. These surgeries can be safely conducted with lidocaine and epinephrine without a concern for increased risk of infections or complications.

Trigger Finger Treatment / Tratamento do Dedo em Gatilho

Abstract Trigger finger is a frequent condition. Although tenosynovitis and the alteration of pulley A1 are identified as triggering factors, there is no consensus on the true cause in the literature, and its true etiology remains unknown. The diagnosis is purely clinical most of the time. It depends solely on the existence of finger locking during active bending movement. Trigger finger treatment usually begins with nonsurgical interventions that are instituted for at least 3 months. In patients with initial presentation with flexion deformity or inability to flex the finger, there may be earlier indication of surgical treatment due to pain intensity and functional disability. In the present review article, we will present the modalities and our algorithm for the treatment of trigger finger.

Resumo O dedo em gatilho é uma afecção frequente. Não obstante a tenossinovite e a alteração da polia A1 serem identificados como fatores desencadeantes, não há consenso sobre a verdadeira causa na literatura, sendo que a sua verdadeira etiologia permanece desconhecida. O diagnóstico é puramente clínico na maior parte das vezes. Ele depende unicamente da existência do travamento do dedo no decorrer da movimentação flexão ativa. O tratamento do dedo em gatilho geralmente se inicia com intervenções não cirúrgicas que são instituídas por pelo menos 3 meses. Nos pacientes em quem haja apresentação inicial com deformidade em flexão ou incapacidade de flexão do dedo, pode haver indicação mais precoce do tratamento cirúrgico em razão da intensidade do quadro álgico e da incapacidade funcional do paciente. No presente artigo de revisão, apresentaremos as modalidades e o nosso algoritmo para o tratamento do dedo em gatilho.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Trigger Finger in Brazil - A Cross-Sectional Study / Diagnóstico e tratamento do dedo de gatilho no Brasil - Estudo transversal

Abstract Objective The present paper aims to evaluate the therapeutic planning for trigger finger by Brazilian orthopedists. Methods This is a cross-sectional study with a population composed of participants from the 2018 Brazilian Congress on Orthopedics and Traumatology (CBOT-2018, in the Portuguese acronym), who answered a questionnaire about the conduct adopted for trigger finger diagnosis and treatment. Results A total of 243 participants were analyzed, with an average age of 37.46 years old; most participants were male (88%), with at least 1 year of experience (55.6%) and from Southeast Brazil (68.3%). Questionnaire analysis revealed a consensus on the following issues: diagnosis based on physical examination alone (73.3%), use of the Quinnell classification modified by Green (58.4%), initial nonsurgical treatment (91.4%), infiltration of steroids combined with an anesthetic agent (61.7%), nonsurgical treatment time ranging from 1 to 3 months (52.3%), surgical treatment using the open approach (84.4%), mainly the transverse open approach (51%), triggering recurrence as the main nonsurgical complication (58%), and open surgery success in > 90% of the cases (63%), with healing intercurrences (54%) as the main complication. There was no consensus on the remaining variables. Orthopedists with different practicing times disagree on treatment duration (p = 0.013) and on the complication rate of open surgery (p = 0.010). Conclusions Brazilian orthopedists prefer to diagnose trigger finger with physical examination alone, to classify it according to the Quinnell method modified by Green, to institute an initial nonsurgical treatment, to perform infiltrations with steroids and local anesthetic agents, to sustain the nonsurgical treatment for 1 to 3 months, and to perform the surgical treatment using a transverse open approach; in addition, they state that the main nonsurgical complication was triggering recurrence, and report open surgery success in > 90% of the cases, with healing intercurrences as the main complication.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar o planejamento terapêutico para o dedo em gatilho por ortopedistas brasileiros. Métodos Estudo transversal, cuja população foi composta por participantes do Congresso Brasileiro de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2018 (CBOT-2018). Foi aplicado um questionário sobre a conduta adotada no diagnóstico e tratamento do dedo em gatilho. Resultados Foram analisados 243 participantes com média de idade de 37.46 anos, na maioria homens (88%), tempo de experiência de pelo menos 1 ano (55,6%), e da região Sudeste (68.3%). A análise dos questionários evidenciou que há consenso nos seguintes quesitos: diagnóstico somente com exame físico (73,3%), classificação de Quinnell modificada por Green (58,4%), tratamento inicial não cirúrgico (91,4%), infiltração de corticoide com anestésico (61,7%) tempo de tratamento não cirúrgico de 1 a 3 meses (52,3%), tratamento cirúrgico pela via aberta (84,4%), principalmente via aberta transversa (51%), recidiva do engatilhamento como principal complicação não cirúrgica (58%), e o sucesso da cirurgia aberta em > 90% (63%), sendo a sua principal complicação as complicações cicatriciais (54%). Sem consenso nas demais variáveis. De acordo com a experiência, foram observadas diferenças referentes ao tempo de tratamento (p = 0.013) e a taxa de complicação da cirurgia aberta (p = 0.010). Conclusões O ortopedista brasileiro tem preferência pelo diagnóstico do dedo em gatilho apenas com exame físico, classifica segundo Quinnell modificado por Green, tratamento inicial não cirúrgico, infiltrações com corticoide e anestésico local, tempo de tratamento não cirúrgico de 1 a 3 meses, tratamento cirúrgico por via aberta transversa, principal complicação não cirúrgica a recidiva do engatilhamento, e considera o sucesso da cirurgia aberta em > 90% dos casos, tendo como principal complicação as complicações cicatriciais.

Tenosinovitis estenosante de tendones flexores de la mano: revisión de la literatura / Stenosing flexor tenosynovitis of the hand: literature review

Flexor tendon tenosynovitis is an entrapment of the flexor tendons at its entrance to the pulley system. Because there is a high incidence of this pathology, it should be well known by physicians, rheumathologists and orthopaedic surgeons. On this paper we present a literature review, analyzing the anatomic facts, biomechanics, diagnosis, classification, therapeutic options and we propose some general recommendations for physicians.

Evaluación de resultados clínicos postoperatorios a corto y largo plazo de liberación percutánea con aguja vs técnica abierta de dedo en gatillo / Evaluation of postoperative results short and long term of percutaneous liberation vs open technique for trigger finger

Resumen: Introducción: El dedo en gatillo es muy frecuente en la población, con un riesgo de vida de padecer la enfermedad de 2.6% en la población general y con un aumento de 4 a 10% en diabéticos. Dado que no hay un estándar de oro de tratamiento quirúrgico y aún hay controversia en ello, es importante evaluar los resultados de las distintas técnicas quirúrgicas. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar resultados postoperatorios de ambas técnicas quirúrgicas en pacientes con seguimiento de uno a 12 meses de postoperatorio. Material y métodos: Se trata de un estudio prospectivo, longitudinal, descriptivo y observacional realizado en un período de Enero de 2015 a Diciembre de 2017. Se incluyeron pacientes postoperados de liberación con técnica abierta (grupo 1) y percutánea con aguja (grupo 2). Se llevó a cabo la revisión de expedientes de todos los pacientes y se les hizo una encuesta mediante vía telefónica. Los resultados de la comparación de ambas técnicas se analizaron mediante χ2 para resultados paramétricos y mediante la prueba de Fisher para los no paramétricos. Resultados: Se encontró que los pacientes del grupo 2 manifestaron mayor satisfacción, de los cuales 21.8% (n = 12) estuvieron totalmente satisfechos con el procedimiento percutáneo, a diferencia de los del grupo 1 quienes manifestaron satisfacción total sólo en 3.8% (n = 2). Conclusiones: En este estudio podemos concluir que ambas técnicas son efectivas para el tratamiento de dedo en gatillo, siendo la liberación percutánea con aguja la que ofrece mayor grado de satisfacción en los pacientes.

Abstract: Indroduction: Trigger finger is very common in the population, with a life-threatening risk of developing the disease of 2.6% in the general population and increasing to 4 to 10% in diabetics. Since there is no standard gold of surgical treatment and there is still controversy in this, it is important to evaluate the results of the different surgical techniques. The objective of this study is to evaluate postoperative results of both surgical techniques in patients with follow-up of 1 to 12 months postoperative. Material and methods: It is a prospective, longitudinal, descriptive and observational study carried out in a period from January 2015 to December 2017. Postoperative open (group 1) and percutaneous needle (group 2) patients were included. All patients were reviewed and surveyed by telephone. The comparison results of both techniques were analyzed using χ2 for parametric results and by the Fisher test for nonparametric results. Results: It was found that patients in group 2 expressed greater satisfaction, where 21.8% (n = 12) were fully satisfied with the percutaneous procedure, unlike those in group 1 where total satisfaction was only manifested at 3.8% (n = 2). Conclusions: In this study we can conclude that both techniques are effective for the treatment of trigger finger, with percutaneous needle release offering the highest degree of satisfaction in patients.

[Evaluation of postoperative results short and long term of percutaneous liberation vs open technique for trigger finger]. / Evaluación de resultados clínicos postoperatorios a corto y largo plazo de liberación percutánea con aguja vs técnica abierta de dedo en gatillo.

INDRODUCTION: Trigger finger is very common in the population, with a life-threatening risk of developing the disease of 2.6% in the general population and increasing to 4 to 10% in diabetics. Since there is no standard gold of surgical treatment and there is still controversy in this, it is important to evaluate the results of the different surgical techniques. The objective of this study is to evaluate postoperative results of both surgical techniques in patients with follow-up of 1 to 12 months postoperative. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It is a prospective, longitudinal, descriptive and observational study carried out in a period from January 2015 to December 2017. Postoperative open (group 1) and percutaneous needle (group 2) patients were included. All patients were reviewed and surveyed by telephone. The comparison results of both techniques were analyzed using 2 for parametric results and by the Fisher test for nonparametric results. RESULTS: It was found that patients in group 2 expressed greater satisfaction, where 21.8% (n = 12) were fully satisfied with the percutaneous procedure, unlike those in group 1 where total satisfaction was only manifested at 3.8% (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: In this study we can conclude that both techniques are effective for the treatment of trigger finger, with percutaneous needle release offering the highest degree of satisfaction in patients.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El dedo en gatillo es muy frecuente en la población, con un riesgo de vida de padecer la enfermedad de 2.6% en la población general y con un aumento de 4 a 10% en diabéticos. Dado que no hay un estándar de oro de tratamiento quirúrgico y aún hay controversia en ello, es importante evaluar los resultados de las distintas técnicas quirúrgicas. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar resultados postoperatorios de ambas técnicas quirúrgicas en pacientes con seguimiento de uno a 12 meses de postoperatorio. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se trata de un estudio prospectivo, longitudinal, descriptivo y observacional realizado en un período de Enero de 2015 a Diciembre de 2017. Se incluyeron pacientes postoperados de liberación con técnica abierta (grupo 1) y percutánea con aguja (grupo 2). Se llevó a cabo la revisión de expedientes de todos los pacientes y se les hizo una encuesta mediante vía telefónica. Los resultados de la comparación de ambas técnicas se analizaron mediante 2 para resultados paramétricos y mediante la prueba de Fisher para los no paramétricos. RESULTADOS: Se encontró que los pacientes del grupo 2 manifestaron mayor satisfacción, de los cuales 21.8% (n = 12) estuvieron totalmente satisfechos con el procedimiento percutáneo, a diferencia de los del grupo 1 quienes manifestaron satisfacción total sólo en 3.8% (n = 2). CONCLUSIONES: En este estudio podemos concluir que ambas técnicas son efectivas para el tratamiento de dedo en gatillo, siendo la liberación percutánea con aguja la que ofrece mayor grado de satisfacción en los pacientes.

[Ultrasound-guided selective nerve blocks for trigger finger surgeries to maintain flexion/extension of fingers - Case series]. / Bloqueios seletivos guiados por ultrassom para cirurgias de dedo em gatilho para manutenção da flexão/extensão dos dedos ­ Série de casos.

BACKGROUND: A patient's ability to move his/her fingers during hand surgery may be helpful to surgeons because it allows the effectiveness of the intervention evaluation and prediction of hand function in the postoperative period. The purpose of this case series is to demonstrate the efficacy of an ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block technique to maintain the hand flexor and extensor muscles motor function and discuss the benefits of the technique for trigger finger surgery. CASE REPORT: Ten patients scheduled to undergo trigger finger surgery were selected. The goal was to maintain flexion and extension of the fingers during the procedure. Thus, ultrasound-guided ulnar, radial, and medial nerve block was performed in the distal third of the forearm, at 5-7cm proximal to the wrist. The block was performed with 5mL of 0.375% bupivacaine on each nerve. All procedures were uneventfully performed maintaining the flexion and extension of the fingers. In two cases, it was observed that the motricity maintenance and the patients' ability to move their fingers when requested allowed the success of the surgical procedure after the third intraoperative evaluation. CONCLUSION: This case series shows that it is possible to maintain the motor function of the hand flexor and extensor muscles to perform finger trigger surgeries using specific ultrasound-guided distal blocks.

Pediatric Trigger Finger due to Osteochondroma: A Report of Two Cases.

Background: The trigger finger is characterized by the painful blocking of finger flexor tendons of the hand, while crossing the A1 pulley. It is a rare disease in children and, when present, is usually located in the thumb, and does not have any defined cause. Methods: We report 2 pediatric trigger finger cases affecting the long digits of the hand that were caused by an osteochondroma located at the proximal phalanx. Both children held the diagnosis of juvenile multiple osteochondromatosis. They had presented at the initial visit with a painful finger blocking. Surgical approach was decided with wide regional exposure, as compared with the trigger finger traditional surgical techniques, with the opening of the A1 pulley and the initial portion of the A2 pulley, along with bone tumor resection. Results: Patients evolved uneventfully, and recovered the affected finger motion. Conclusion: It is important to highlight that pediatric trigger finger is a distinct ailment from the adult trigger finger, and also in children is important to differentiate whenever the disease either affects the thumb or the long fingers. A secondary cause shall be sought whenever the long fingers are affected by a trigger finger.

Treatment of trigger finger: randomized clinical trial comparing the methods of corticosteroid injection, percutaneous release and open surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of CS injection, percutaneous pulley release and conventional open surgery for treating trigger finger in terms of cure, relapse and complication rates. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-seven patients with a total of 150 fingers were randomly assigned and allocated into one of the treatment groups, with treatments allocated into 150 opaque and sealed envelopes. We included patients >15 years of age with a trigger on any finger of the hand (Types II-IV) and used a minimum follow-up time of 6 months. The primary outcome measures were cures, relapses and failures. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were assigned to the conservative group to undergo CS injections, whereas 45 and 56 were assigned to undergo percutaneous release and outpatient open surgery, respectively. The trigger cure rate for patients in the injection method group was 57%, and wherever necessary, two injections were administered, which increased the cure rate to 86%. For the percutaneous and open release methods, remission of the trigger was achieved in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The percutaneous and open surgery methods displayed similar effectiveness and proved superior to the conservative CS method regarding the trigger cure and relapse rates. Trial registration. Current Controlled Trials, http://www.controlled-trials.com/, ISRCTN19255926.

Liberação percutânea do dedo em gatilho com micro bisturi oftalmológico vitreorretiniano de lâmina 19 / Percutaneous trigger finger release with microvitreoretinal 19 gauge ophtalmologic knife

OBJETIVO: Desenvolver uma nova técnica de liberação percutânea do dedo em gatilho, usando microbisturi oftalmológico vitreorretiniano (MVR) de lâmina 19. MÉTODO: O tratamento conservador do dedo em gatilho inclui, com frequência, injeção local de esteroide. Esse método apresenta alta taxa de falha, sendo necessárias injeções repetitivas. Quando o tratamento conservador falha, recomenda-se a liberação a céu aberto da polia A1. Foram relatados vários métodos que empregam diversos instrumentos. Usamos um microbisturi oftalmológico vitreorretiniano (MVR, de microvitreoretinal blade) de lâmina 19 na liberação percutânea do dedo em gatilho. RESULTADOS: Liberamos 50 dedos em gatilho por via percutânea com essa lâmina. CONCLUSÃO: Foram obtidos resultados satisfatórios em 45 deles (90 por cento). Nivel de Evidência VI, série de casos.

OBJECTIVE: Conservative treatment of trigger finger includes often local injection of steroid. This has a high rate of failure and repeated injections may be required.METHODS: When conservative treatment fails, open release of the A1 pulley is recommended. Various methods using various instruments have been reported. We used 19 gauge microvitreoretinal (MVR) ophthalmic knife in percutaneous release of trigger finger.RESULTS: We released 50 trigger fingers percutaneously with this knife. Satisfactory results were achieved in 45 of them (90%). Conclusion: Object of this study is to produce a new technique for percutaneous release of trigger finger using 19 gauge microvitreoretinal (MVR) ophthalmic knife.CONCLUSION: Satisfactory results were achieved in 45 of them (90%). Level of Evidence: Level IV cases series.

Diagnóstico precoce e o tratamento cirúrgico do polegar em gatilho congênito na criança utilizando o sistema de internação hospital-dia / Early diagnosis and surgical treatment of congenital trigger thumb in children using the day hospital admission system

Introdução: o polegar em gatilho congênito ou tenossinovite estenosante do polegar é a dificuldade de extensão do polegar, identificada nos primeiros meses de vida. Objetivo: a proposta deste estudo foi discutir o tratamento cirúrgico com os resultados, as complicações e as vantagens na utilização da internação hospital-dia. Método: no período de fevereiro de 2001 até janeiro de 2008, verificaram-se 25 crianças entre 3 meses e 6 anos, portadoras de polegar em gatilho congênito. Foram operadas 35 mãos, e 10 casos eram bilaterais. Observamos que a manifestação clínica quanto à dificuldade de extensão do polegar estava presente em todas as mãos operadas e nenhuma criança queixava-se de dor. As crianças foram submetidas à mesma técnica cirúrgica, anestesia geral inalatória, com incisão transversa na prega volar metacarpofalangeana do polegar acometido e abertura longitudinal da polia flexora A1. Não foi utilizado antibiótico e as crianças foram internadas pelo sistema hospital-dia. Resultados: Quinze crianças eram do sexo masculino e dez do sexo feminino. Dos pacientes com lesão bilateral, sete eram do sexo masculino e três do feminino. Quanto ao lado acometido, obtivemos sete polegares direitos, oito esquerdos e dez bilaterais. Como complicações, não houve nenhuma recidiva; um polegar evoluiu com infecção cutânea superficial e dois polegares apresentaram deiscência parcial da sutura após a retirada dos pontos. Conclusões: o polegar em gatilho congênito ou tenossinovite estenosante do polegar na criança pode ser tratado com segurança através da abertura simples da polia flexora A1, utilizando-se a internação hospital-dia.

The congenital trigger disorder or stenosing tenosynovitis of the thumb is the difficulty of extending the thumb, identified in early months of life. Objective: The purpose this study was to discuss the operative results, complications and advantages of the day hospital system. Method: This study was carried out from February 2001 to January 2008, with 25 children aging from 3 months to 6 years old with congenital trigger finger thumb. Thirty-five hands were submitted to surgery, and ten children had both hands attacked. The limited extension of the thumb was the clinical characteristic observed in all operated hands and no child had pain complaint. All children were submitted to the same surgical technique, by the use of inhalational general anesthetics, with transversal incision in the metacarpophalangeal volar pleat of the thumb and longitudinal resection of the flexor pulley A1. Antibiotic therapy was not used and all children were admitted by the day hospital system. Results: fifteen were boys and ten were girls. Seven boys and three girls had the pathology in both hands. Comparing the incidence of each side, we have found seven right congenital trigger thumbs, eight left and ten occurring in both sides. The complications found were: one thumb had superficial cutaneous infection and two thumbs presented dehiscence of the incision after the removal of the suture. There were no cases of recurrence of the disease after surgery. Conclusion: we concluded that congenital trigger disorder or stenosing tenosynovitis in children can be safely treated with simple incision of flexor pulley A1 and with day hospital system.

[Risk factors associated with trigger finger. Case-control study]. / Factores de riesgo asociados a tenosinovitisestenosante. Estudio de casos y controles.

OBJECTIVE: We undertook this study to identify risk factors in our population associated with trigger finger. The study was conducted at the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, UMAE 21, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. METHODS: This was a case-control, retrospective, and observational study. There were 250 patients in each group. For cases, patients who were operated on for trigger finger from March 2006 to August 2006 were included. Controls included patients admitted to the Emergency Department with hand injuries that fulfilled the selection criteria. Risk factors analyzed were diabetes, hypertension, smoking, sex, age, weight, and 19 different occupations. RESULTS: Mean age of the cases was 52 years (SE +/- 14.19 years) with a median and mode of 53 years. The right hand was the most common with the middle, thumb, ring, index and little fingers, respectively. A significant statistical relationship was found: females (OR 7.57, 95% CI 5.07-11.31); diabetes (OR 3.72, 95% CI 2.43-5.70); obesity (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.02-2.19). With regard to occupation, a statistical relationship was found: homemaker (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.62-3.69); seamstress (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.3-21.6); and secretary (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.38-5.52). CONCLUSIONS: Trigger finger is a common pathology in our population and is more frequent in women >53 years old. It may be related to diabetes, body mass index (obesity) and certain occupations such as secretary, seamstress and homemaker.

Factores de riesgo asociados a tenosinovitisestenosante: estudio de casos y controles / Risk factors associated with trigger finger: case-control study

OBJECTIVE: We undertook this study to identify risk factors in our population associated with trigger finger. The study was conducted at the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, UMAE 21, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. METHODS: This was a case-control, retrospective, and observational study. There were 250 patients in each group. For cases, patients who were operated on for trigger finger from March 2006 to August 2006 were included. Controls included patients admitted to the Emergency Department with hand injuries that fulfilled the selection criteria. Risk factors analyzed were diabetes, hypertension, smoking, sex, age, weight, and 19 different occupations. RESULTS: Mean age of the cases was 52 years (SE +/- 14.19 years) with a median and mode of 53 years. The right hand was the most common with the middle, thumb, ring, index and little fingers, respectively. A significant statistical relationship was found: females (OR 7.57, 95% CI 5.07-11.31); diabetes (OR 3.72, 95% CI 2.43-5.70); obesity (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.02-2.19). With regard to occupation, a statistical relationship was found: homemaker (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.62-3.69); seamstress (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.3-21.6); and secretary (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.38-5.52). CONCLUSIONS: Trigger finger is a common pathology in our population and is more frequent in women >53 years old. It may be related to diabetes, body mass index (obesity) and certain occupations such as secretary, seamstress and homemaker.

A prospective clinical study of the A1 pulley in trigger thumbs.

A prospective study was performed in 19 patients with trigger thumbs to define the anatomy of the A1 pulley of the thumb in this condition and to evaluate biomechanical parameters of the thumb after complete division of the A1 pulley. Pre- and postoperatively, flexion of the interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints, key pinch strength and tip pinch strength were measured and compared with these measurements on the contralateral thumb. We identified three types of A1 pulley. The clinical data showed that there is no deficit with respect to motion and strength of the thumb after completely sectioning any of the three types of A1 pulley.

Liberación percutánea de Dedo en Gatillo mediante técnica de Eastwoo: serie de casos / Percutaneous release of trigger finger by Eastwoo technique: case series

El propósito del estudio fue mostrar las ventajas y evaluar el resultado del tratamiento quirúrgico del “Dedo en Gatillo” utilizando la técnica de liberación percutánea de Eastwood en consultorio. Estudio observacional descriptivo tipo serie de casos operados entre Septiembre 2003 y Octubre 2004 en 30 dedos y 21 pacientes con diagnóstico de dedo en gatillo, con mas de 3 meses de evolución sin respuesta favorable al tratamiento médico conservador y con un seguimiento mínimo de tres meses y un máximo de seis meses. Se realizaron controles a los ocho y quince días, luego uno mensual los primeros 6 meses. Las variables evaluadas fueron: síntomas, función, reintegro laboral y satisfacción del paciente. La evolución fue satisfactoria en todos los pacientes, salvo un caso que fue necesario completar su liberación quirúrgica abierta. Esta técnica mostró ser eficaz, rápida, segura, económica y sencilla, con una rehabilitación y reintegro laboral post-operatorio inmediato.

Lesões crônicas de tendões flexores na mão: reconstrução em dois estágios / Chronic flexor tendon lesions: reconstruction in two stages

Os autores apresentam resultados de tratamento de lesões crônicas dos tendões flexores na mão, usando técnica em dois estágios. O primeiro pelo implante de prótese de silicone e o segundo com enxerto de tendão. Dão detalhes de técnica, e analisam seus resultados comparando-os com os da literatura. Chegam a conclusão que a técnica dá resultados satisfatórios na maioria dos casos.