ABSTRACT
Quality improvement (QI) plays a vital role in practice management, patient care, and reimbursement. The authors implemented a 3-year longitudinal curriculum that combined QI didactics, intervention development, and implementation at university-based, community-based, and Veterans Administration-based practices. Highlights included Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle format, team-based collaboration to brainstorm interventions, interdisciplinary QI council to select and plan interventions, system-wide intervention implementation across entire clinic populations with outcome monitoring, and intervention modifications based on challenges. A pre-post survey assessed residents' confidence in QI skills and interdisciplinary team participation, while quarterly quality data assessed patient outcomes. All 150 internal medicine residents participated. Confidence in QI and interdisciplinary team participation improved significantly (P < .001). Patient outcomes improved for 6 of 9 targeted projects and were sustained at 1 year. This curriculum is a systems-based innovation designed to improve patient care and encourage interdisciplinary teamwork and can be adopted by residencies seeking to improve engagement in QI.
Subject(s)
Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Hospitals, Community/organization & administration , Hospitals, University/organization & administration , Humans , Quality Indicators, Health Care , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administrationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Access to high-quality healthcare, including mental healthcare, is a high priority for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Meaningful monitoring of progress will require patient-centered measures of access. To that end, we developed the Perceived Access Inventory focused on access to VA mental health services (PAI-VA). However, VA is purchasing increasing amounts of mental health services from community mental health providers. In this paper, we describe the development of a PAI for users of VA-funded community mental healthcare that incorporates access barriers unique to community care service use and compares the barriers most frequently reported by veterans using community mental health services to those most frequently reported by veterans using VA mental health services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted mixed qualitative and quantitative interviews with 25 veterans who had experience using community mental health services through the Veterans Choice Program (VCP). We used opt-out invitation letters to recruit veterans from three geographic regions. Data were collected on sociodemographics, rurality, symptom severity, and service satisfaction. Participants also completed two measures of perceived barriers to mental healthcare: the PAI-VA adapted to focus on access to mental healthcare in the community and Hoge's 13-item measure. This study was reviewed and approved by the VA Central Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: Analysis of qualitative interview data identified four topics that were not addressed in the PAI-VA: veterans being billed directly by a VCP mental health provider, lack of care coordination and communication between VCP and VA mental health providers, veterans needing to travel to a VA facility to have VCP provider prescriptions filled, and delays in VCP re-authorization. To develop a PAI for community-care users, we created items corresponding to each of the four community-care-specific topics and added them to the 43-item PAI-VA. When we compared the 10 most frequently endorsed barriers to mental healthcare in this study sample to the ten most frequently endorsed by a separate sample of current VA mental healthcare users, six items were common to both groups. The four items unique to community-care were: long waits for the first mental health appointment, lack of awareness of available mental health services, short appointments, and providers' lack of knowledge of military culture. CONCLUSIONS: Four new barriers specific to veteran access to community mental healthcare were identified. These barriers, which were largely administrative rather than arising from the clinical encounter itself, were included in the PAI for community care. Study strengths include capturing access barriers from the veteran experience across three geographic regions. Weaknesses include the relatively small number of participants and data collection from an early stage of Veteran Choice Program implementation. As VA expands its coverage of community-based mental healthcare, being able to assess the success of the initiative from the perspective of program users becomes increasingly important. The 47-item PAI for community care offers a useful tool to identify barriers experienced by veterans in accessing mental healthcare in the community, overall and in specific settings, as well as to track the impact of interventions to improve access to mental healthcare.
Subject(s)
Mental Health Services/classification , Perception , Veterans/psychology , Adult , Aged , Community Health Services/classification , Community Health Services/methods , Female , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Interviews as Topic/methods , Male , Mental Health Services/trends , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical data , Veterans/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
The current study evaluates changes in access as a result of the MyVA Access program-a system-wide effort to improve patient access in the Veterans Health Administration. Data on 20 different measures were collected, and changes were analyzed using t tests and Chow tests. Additionally, organizational health-how able a system is to create health care practice change-was evaluated for a sample of medical centers (n = 36) via phone interviews and surveys conducted with facility staff and technical assistance providers. An organizational health variable was created and correlated with the access measures. Results showed that, nationally, average wait times for urgent consults, new patient wait times for mental health and specialty care, and slot utilization for primary and specialty care patients improved. Patient satisfaction measures also improved, and patient complaints decreased. Better organizational health was associated with improvements in patient access.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , Humans , Organizational Innovation , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Program Evaluation , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Waiting ListsABSTRACT
Introduction: A total of 3.6 million Americans and over 250,000 veterans use wheelchairs. The need for advancements in mobility-assistive technologies is continually growing due to advances in medicine and rehabilitation that preserve and prolong the lives of people with disabilities, increases in the senior population, and increases in the number of veterans and civilians involved in conflict situations. The purpose of this study is to survey a large sample of veterans and other consumers with disabilities who use mobility-assistive technologies to identify priorities for future research and development. Materials and Methods: This survey asked participants to provide opinions on the importance of developing various mobility-assistive technologies and to rank the importance of certain technologies. Participants were also asked to provide open-ended comments and suggestions. Results: A total of 1,022 individuals, including 500 veterans, from 49 states within the USA and Puerto Rico completed the survey. The average age of respondents was 54.3 yr, and they represented both new and experienced users of mobility-assistive technologies. The largest diagnostic group was spinal cord injury (SCI) (N = 491, 48.0%). Several themes on critical areas of research emerged from the open-ended questions, which generated a total of 1,199 comments. Conclusion: This survey revealed several themes for future research and development. Advanced wheelchair design, smart device applications, human-machine interfaces, and assistive robotics and intelligent systems emerged as priorities. Survey results also demonstrated the importance for researchers to understand the effects of policy and cost on translational research and to be involved in educating both consumers and providers.
Subject(s)
Community Participation/psychology , Self-Help Devices/psychology , Veterans/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Community Participation/methods , Disabled Persons/psychology , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Equipment Design/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Self-Help Devices/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between clinics' extent of patient-centered medical home (PCMH) implementation and improvements in chronic illness care quality. DATA SOURCE: Data from 808 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) primary care clinics nationwide implementing the Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) PCMH initiative, begun in 2010. DESIGN: Clinic-level longitudinal observational study of clinics that received training and resources to implement PACT. Clinics varied in the extent they had PACT components in place by 2012. DATA COLLECTION: Clinical care quality measures reflecting intermediate outcomes and care processes related to coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes, and hypertension care were collected by manual chart review at each VHA facility from 2009 to 2013. FINDINGS: In adjusted models containing 808 clinics, the 77 clinics with the most PACT components in place had significantly larger improvements in five of seven chronic disease intermediate outcome measures (e.g., BP < 160/100 in diabetes), ranging from 1.3 percent to 5.2 percent of the patient population meeting measures, and two of eight process measures (HbA1c measurement, LDL measurement in CAD) than the 69 clinics with the least PACT components. Clinics with moderate levels of PACT components showed few significantly larger improvements than the lowest PACT clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Veterans Health Administration primary care clinics with the most PCMH components in place in 2012 had greater improvements in several chronic disease quality measures in 2009-2013 than the lowest PCMH clinics.
Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/therapy , Health Plan Implementation , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/standards , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/standards , VeteransABSTRACT
PROBLEM: Today, with almost 23 million veterans in the nation, and currently only about 10 million, or less, of them seeking active services associated with the Veterans Administration (VA) health facilities, these men and women veterans will be seeking some, more, or even all of their health care over their life time in civilian-based facilities. METHODS: Pertinent literary sources were reviewed to gather applicable data about the problem. FINDINGS: Every patient that enters your health facility should be asked an essential assessment question: "Have you served in the military?" Importantly, to gain effective rapport when they present, civilian nurses will need to anticipate their health needs and provide culturally sensitive care. Specific issues of deployed women veterans are provided in a series of two articles. CONCLUSION: This article provides a snapshot of the uniquely entrenched military culture, as well as women service member experiences in wartime, including the Global War on Terror (Iraq and Afghanistan). The next article discusses the various healthcare differences (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder and military sexual trauma), difficulties (e.g., reproductive, gynecologic, urinary, employment, homelessness issues), and gender disparities (varied treatment patterns) so the civilian nurse can better advocate for women veterans.
Subject(s)
Culturally Competent Care/methods , Culturally Competent Care/standards , Veterans/psychology , Afghan Campaign 2001- , Female , Ill-Housed Persons/psychology , Ill-Housed Persons/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Iraq War, 2003-2011 , Poverty/psychology , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , Veterans/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
In 2011, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented a pilot telementoring program across seven healthcare networks called the Specialty Care Access Network-Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (SCAN-ECHO) for pain management. A VHA healthcare network is a group of hospitals and clinics administratively linked in a geographic area. We created a series of county-level maps in one network displaying (1) the location of Veterans with chronic pain, (2) VHA sites (i.e., coordinating center, other medical centers, outpatient clinics), (3) proportion of Veterans being seen in-person at pain specialty clinics, and (4) proportion of Veterans with access to a primary care provider participating in Pain SCAN-ECHO. We calculated the geodesic distance from Veterans' homes to nearest VHA pain specialty care clinics. We used logistic regression to determine the association between distance and Pain SCAN-ECHO primary care provider participation. Mapping showed counties closer to the Pain SCAN-ECHO coordinating center had a higher rate of Veterans whose providers participated in Pain SCAN-ECHO than those further away. Regression models within networks revealed wide heterogeneity in the reach of Pain SCAN-ECHO to Veterans with low spatial access to pain care. Using geographic information systems can reveal the spatial reach of technology-based healthcare programs and inform future expansion.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Pain Management/methods , Telemedicine/organization & administration , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , Veterans Health , Veterans , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Spatial Analysis , United StatesABSTRACT
This study examined how aspects of quality improvement (QI) culture changed during the introduction of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patient-centered medical home initiative and how they were influenced by existing organizational factors, including VHA facility complexity and practice location. A voluntary survey, measuring primary care providers' (PCPs') perspectives on QI culture at their primary care clinics, was administered in 2010 and 2012. Participants were 320 PCPs from hospital- and community-based primary care practices in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, and Ohio. PCPs in community-based outpatient clinics reported an improvement in established processes for QI, and communication and cooperation from 2010 to 2012. However, their peers in hospital-based clinics did not report any significant improvements in QI culture. In both years, compared with high-complexity facilities, medium- and low-complexity facilities had better scores on the scales assessing established processes for QI, and communication and cooperation.
Subject(s)
Organizational Culture , Perception , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , Communication , Community Health Centers/organization & administration , Cooperative Behavior , Leadership , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/standardsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Persons with serious mental illness (SMI) may benefit from collocation of medical and mental health healthcare professionals and services in attending to their chronic comorbid medical conditions. We evaluated and compared glucose control and diabetes medication adherence among patients with SMI who received collocated care to those not receiving collocated care (which we call usual care). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional, observational cohort study of 363 veteran patients with type 2 diabetes and SMI who received care from one of three Veterans Affairs medical facilities: two sites that provided both collocated and usual care and one site that provided only usual care. Through a survey, laboratory tests, and medical records, we assessed patient characteristics, glucose control as measured by a current HbA1c, and adherence to diabetes medication as measured by the medication possession ration (MPR) and self-report. RESULTS: In the sample, the mean HbA1c was 7.4% (57 mmol/mol), the mean MPR was 80%, and 51% reported perfect adherence to their diabetes medications. In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, there were no differences in glucose control and medication adherence by collocation of care. Patients seen in collocated care tended to have better HbA1c levels (ß = -0.149; P = 0.393) and MPR values (ß = 0.34; P = 0.132) and worse self-reported adherence (odds ratio 0.71; P = 0.143), but these were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In a population of veterans with comorbid diabetes and SMI, patients on average had good glucose control and medication adherence regardless of where they received primary care.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Mental Disorders/complications , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Severity of Illness Index , United States/epidemiology , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administrationABSTRACT
The Rural Home Care Project is one of eight clinical demonstration pilots in an initiative of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Sunshine Network in Florida and Puerto Rico. In this project three care coordinators consisting of two nurse practitioners and a social worker collaborate with primary care providers in the management of high-risk, high-cost veterans with multiple chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart failure. The project staff uses home telehealth devices to monitor and educate patients to prevent health crises. The evaluation methodology is a quasiexperimental design that uses a nonequivalent control group of usual care veterans. Data were gathered through personal interviews with patients and providers, and statistical analysis was based on a series of repeated-measure of covariance modeling designed by a research team from the University of Maryland. Findings demonstrate that care coordination enhanced by technology reduces hospital admissions, bed days of care, emergency room visits, and prescriptions as well as providing high patient and provider satisfaction. Veterans also had improved perception of physical health as evidenced by a standardized functional status measure.