Unnecessary interventions for the management of hip osteoarthritis: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients aged 40-60 years who require total hip arthroplasty (THA) often first receive unindicated hip arthroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our objective was to identify potentially inappropriate resource utilization before THA, specifically reporting on the proportion of patients aged 40-60 years who underwent hip arthroscopy or MRI in the year before THA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, population-based study at the provincial level. We retrieved data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). We included all Ontario residents who underwent an elective, primary THA for osteoarthritis between Apr. 1, 2004, and Mar. 31, 2016. We identified the rates and timing of patients who underwent an MRI or hip arthroscopy before their index THA. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who underwent an MRI before THA increased significantly over the study period, from 8.7% in 2004 to 23.8% in 2015. There was also a significant but variable trend in the percentage of patients who underwent a hip arthroscopy before THA. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate a high, gradually increasing proportion of patients who received a hip MRI and a low but increasing proportion of patients who received hip arthroscopy in close proximity to THA. Multidisciplinary collaboration may improve knowledge translation and help reduce the rate of clinically unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in this population of patients who require THA.

Re-Purposing the Ordering of Routine Laboratory Tests in Hospitalized Medical Patients (RePORT): protocol for a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial to evaluate the impact of a multicomponent intervention bundle to reduce laboratory test over-utilization.

BACKGROUND: Laboratory test overuse in hospitals is a form of healthcare waste that also harms patients. Developing and evaluating interventions to reduce this form of healthcare waste is critical. We detail the protocol for our study which aims to implement and evaluate the impact of an evidence-based, multicomponent intervention bundle on repetitive use of routine laboratory testing in hospitalized medical patients across adult hospitals in the province of British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: We have designed a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to assess the impact of a multicomponent intervention bundle across 16 hospitals in the province of British Columbia in Canada. We will use the Knowledge to Action cycle to guide implementation and the RE-AIM framework to guide evaluation of the intervention bundle. The primary outcome will be the number of routine laboratory tests ordered per patient-day in the intervention versus control periods. Secondary outcome measures will assess implementation fidelity, number of all common laboratory tests used, impact on healthcare costs, and safety outcomes. The study will include patients admitted to adult medical wards (internal medicine or family medicine) and healthcare providers working in these wards within the participating hospitals. After a baseline period of 24 weeks, we will conduct a 16-week pilot at one hospital site. A new cluster (containing approximately 2-3 hospitals) will receive the intervention every 12 weeks. We will evaluate the sustainability of implementation at 24 weeks post implementation of the final cluster. Using intention to treat, we will use generalized linear mixed models for analysis to evaluate the impact of the intervention on outcomes. DISCUSSION: The study builds upon a multicomponent intervention bundle that has previously demonstrated effectiveness. The elements of the intervention bundle are easily adaptable to other settings, facilitating future adoption in wider contexts. The study outputs are expected to have a positive impact as they will reduce usage of repetitive laboratory tests and provide empirically supported measures and tools for accomplishing this work. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered on April 8, 2024, via ClinicalTrials.gov Protocols Registration and Results System (NCT06359587). https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT06359587?term=NCT06359587&recrs=ab&draw=2&rank=1.

Reducing Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Ordering: De-implementation and Diagnostic Stewardship.

OBJECTIVES: The Choosing Wisely campaign recommends against the routine use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for the assessment of acute undiagnosed inflammation or infection. We examined ESR and C-reactive protein (CRP) ordering practices at a large, freestanding children's hospital. We found that 80% of ESR orders were placed concurrently with a CRP order. We aimed to reduce the ESR testing rate by 20% within 6 months in both inpatient and emergency department (ED) settings. METHODS: Applying Lean process improvement principles, we interviewed stakeholders from multiple subspecialties and engaged the institutional laboratory stewardship committee to identify the root causes of ESR ordering and design interventions. We conducted provider education (November 2020) and employed clinical decision support through an order panel in the electronic health record (April 2021). The outcome measures were monthly ESR testing rate per 1000 patient days (inpatient) and per 1000 ED visits, analyzed using statistical process control charts. CRP testing rate was a balancing measure. RESULTS: After intervention implementation, the ESR testing rate decreased from 11.4 to 8.9 tests per 1000 inpatient patient days (22% decrease) and from 49.4 to 29.5 tests per 1000 ED visits (40% decrease). This change has been sustained for >1 year postintervention. Interventions were effective even during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic when there was a rise in baseline ED ESR ordering rate. CRP testing rates did not increase after the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Education and clinical decision support were effective in reducing the ESR ordering rate in both inpatient and ED settings.

Thyroid imaging reporting and data system with MRI morphological features for thyroid nodules: diagnostic performance and unnecessary biopsy rate.

BACKGROUND: To assess MRI-based morphological features in improving the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS) for categorizing thyroid nodules. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 728 thyroid nodules (453 benign and 275 malignant) that postoperative pathology confirmed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to find independent predictors of MRI morphological features in benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The improved method involved increasing the ACR-TIRADS level by one when there are independent predictors of MRI-based morphological features, whether individually or in combination, and conversely decreasing it by one. The study compared the performance of conventional ACR-TIRADS and different improved versions. RESULTS: Among the various MRI morphological features analyzed, restricted diffusion and reversed halo sign were determined to be significant independent risk factors for malignant thyroid nodules (OR = 45.1, 95% CI = 23.2-87.5, P < 0.001; OR = 38.0, 95% CI = 20.4-70.7, P < 0.001) and were subsequently included in the final assessment of performance. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for both the conventional and four improved ACR-TIRADSs were 0.887 (95% CI: 0.861-0.909), 0.945 (95% CI: 0.926-0.961), 0.947 (95% CI: 0.928-0.962), 0.945 (95% CI: 0.926-0.961) and 0.951 (95% CI: 0.932-0.965), respectively. The unnecessary biopsy rates for the conventional and four improved ACR-TIRADSs were 62.8%, 30.0%, 27.1%, 26.8% and 29.1%, respectively, while the malignant missed diagnosis rates were 1.1%, 2.8%, 3.7%, 5.4% and 1.2%. CONCLUSIONS: MRI morphological features with ACR-TIRADS has improved diagnostic performance and reduce unnecessary biopsy rate while maintaining a low malignant missed diagnosis rate.

National myeloma patient survey shows continuing inappropriate imaging and geographical inequalities.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the provision of imaging at diagnosis of myeloma from the service user perspective with a specific focus on how the experiences of patients align with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines (NG35, 2016) on first-line imaging practice for myeloma in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A national survey was performed to evaluate access to imaging from the patient's perspective. Patients with myeloma who received their diagnosis between 2017 and March 2022 were invited to participate. Data were collected using an online survey from 895 patients and carers between 4 and 14 March 2022. RESULTS: Most patients had more than one imaging test. First-line MRI was used in 69.2% of respondents. First-line skeletal survey (SS, whole body X-rays) remained common (48.7% of respondents). 18F-fluorodexyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) was used least often (23.1% of respondents). SS was used more often in East England (57.9%) and Scotland (61.2%) than in South East England (36.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite NICE recommendations, first-line MRI was not used in a third of patients surveyed, with geographical variation in imaging practice. Patients are still undergoing multiple imaging tests at diagnosis. Healthcare professionals should continue to emphasize the superiority of MRI compared to SS to drive for improvements in care. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Current recommendations on first-line imaging for myeloma are not provided consistently across the United Kingdom. There is a need to drive change and support healthcare professionals to deliver guidance-based recommendations to improve experience and outcomes for patients.

Appropriate use of blood cultures in the emergency department through machine learning (ABC): study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

INTRODUCTION: The liberal use of blood cultures in emergency departments (EDs) leads to low yields and high numbers of false-positive results. False-positive, contaminated cultures are associated with prolonged hospital stays, increased antibiotic usage and even higher hospital mortality rates. This trial aims to investigate whether a recently developed and validated machine learning model for predicting blood culture outcomes can safely and effectively guide clinicians in withholding unnecessary blood culture analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing current practice with a machine learning-guided approach. The primary objective is to determine whether the machine learning based approach is non-inferior to standard practice based on 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes include hospital length-of stay and hospital admission rates. Other outcomes include model performance and antibiotic usage. Participants will be recruited in the EDs of multiple hospitals in the Netherlands. A total of 7584 participants will be included. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Possible participants will receive verbal information and a paper information brochure regarding the trial. They will be given at least 1 hour consideration time before providing informed consent. Research results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. This study has been approved by the Amsterdam University Medical Centers' local medical ethics review committee (No 22.0567). The study will be conducted in concordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act, General Data Privacy Regulation and Medical Device Regulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06163781.

Deep learning of mammogram images to reduce unnecessary breast biopsies: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 mammogram are currently recommended for biopsy. However, 70-80% of the biopsies are negative/benign. In this study, we developed a deep learning classification algorithm on mammogram images to classify BI-RADS 4 suspicious lesions aiming to reduce unnecessary breast biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 847 patients with a BI-RADS 4 breast lesion that underwent biopsy at a single institution and included 200 invasive breast cancers, 200 ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), 198 pure atypias, 194 benign, and 55 atypias upstaged to malignancy after excisional biopsy. We employed convolutional neural networks to perform 4 binary classification tasks: (I) benign vs. all atypia + invasive + DCIS, aiming to identify the benign cases for whom biopsy may be avoided; (II) benign + pure atypia vs. atypia-upstaged + invasive + DCIS, aiming to reduce excision of atypia that is not upgraded to cancer at surgery; (III) benign vs. each of the other 3 classes individually (atypia, DCIS, invasive), aiming for a precise diagnosis; and (IV) pure atypia vs. atypia-upstaged, aiming to reduce unnecessary excisional biopsies on atypia patients. RESULTS: A 95% sensitivity for the "higher stage disease" class was ensured for all tasks. The specificity value was 33% in Task I, and 25% in Task II, respectively. In Task III, the respective specificity value was 30% (vs. atypia), 30% (vs. DCIS), and 46% (vs. invasive tumor). In Task IV, the specificity was 35%. The AUC values for the 4 tasks were 0.72, 0.67, 0.70/0.73/0.72, and 0.67, respectively. CONCLUSION: Deep learning of digital mammograms containing BI-RADS 4 findings can identify lesions that may not need breast biopsy, leading to potential reduction of unnecessary procedures and the attendant costs and stress.

Imaging overuse in the emergency department: The view of radiologists and emergency physicians.

PURPOSE: To identify the perceived factors contributing to imaging overuse in the emergency department, according to radiologists and emergency physicians. METHOD: A survey study on imaging overuse in the emergency department was conducted among 66 radiologists and 425 emergency physicians. Five-point Likert scales (not a problem at all/strongly disagree [score 1] to very serious problem/strongly agree [score 5]) were used to score the various aspects of overimaging. RESULTS: Both radiologists and emergency physicians gave a median score of 4 to the question if imaging overuse is a problem in their emergency department. CT accounts for the vast majority of imaging overuse, according to both radiologists (84.8%) and emergency physicians (75.3%). Defensive medicine/fear of malpractice, the presence of less experienced staff, and easy access to imaging all were given a median score of 4 as factors that influence imaging overuse, by both physician groups. Median ratings regarding the influence of pressure from patients and a lack of time to examine patients on imaging overuse varied between 3 and 4 for radiologists and emergency physicians. Pressure from consultants to perform imaging, the use of imaging to decrease turnaround time in the emergency department, a lack of space in the emergency department, a lack of proper medical education, and inability to access outside imaging studies, were also indicated to give rise to imaging overuse. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging overuse in the emergency department (particularly CT overuse) is a problem according to most radiologists and emergency physicians, and is driven by several factors.

Inappropriate Ordering of Multitarget Stool DNA Tests for Colon Cancer Screening.

BACKGROUND: CRC screening is recommended for adults aged 45-75. Mt-sDNA is indicated for asymptomatic individuals between the ages of 45 and 85, but not for those with rectal bleeding, iron deficiency anemia, adenomatous polyps, previous colonoscopy within 10 years, family history of CRC, positive results from CRC screening tests within the past 6 months, or age less than 45 and greater than 85. We aimed to determine the prevalence of mt-sDNA use when not indicated and factors associated with inappropriate testing. METHODS: 7,345 patients underwent mt-sDNA testing and were randomized using EMERSE. Charts for the first 500 patients were reviewed to determine whether mt-sDNA was ordered appropriately according to the USPSTF criteria. Seven patients were excluded due to having more than one inappropriate ordering for mt-sDNA. RESULTS: Of 500 patients, 22.2% had an inappropriately ordered mt-sDNA test. The most common reason for inappropriate ordering was having a previous colonoscopy done within the past 10 years. Rates of inappropriate testing significantly varied by race and the specialty of the ordering provider, with internal medicine providers ordering the most mt-sDNA tests. Rates of inappropriate testing did not significantly vary by sex or type of insurance. DISCUSSION: Our study suggests that providers may not be familiar with guidelines for the indicated use of mtsDNA, leading to inappropriate referrals and increased costs. Patients at increased CRC risk would benefit from a more sensitive procedure such as a colonoscopy. Future studies could understand the motivation to order testing outside approved indications through provider surveys and interviews.

Current practice of pre-operative assessment at a public sector hospital in Pakistan - a clinical audit.

Objective: To assess the practice of ordering unnecessary laboratory investigations by primary surgical teams. METHODS: The clinical audit was conducted from December 17, 2022, to January 15, 2023, at the Civil Hospital, Karachi, and comprised primary surgeons working in different surgical units who ordered laboratory investigations for patients as a part of preoperative assessment. Data was collected using a self-administered questionnaire. Data was analysed using SPSS 20. RESULTS: Of the 280 surgeons approached, 249(89%) responded. The units covered were General surgery 96(38.5%), Gynaecology 74(29.7%), Neurosurgery 5(2.0%), Ear, Nose and Throat 19(7.6%), Plastic surgery 15(6.02%), Paediatric surgery 13(5.2%), Vascular surgery 8(3.21%), Oromaxilofacial 9(3.61%), Opthalmology 6(2.4%), and Orthopaedics 4(1.60%).As part of baseline investigations, 244(98%) surgeons ordered complete blood count, 173(69.5%) ordered urea and creatinine, 229(92%) ordered viral markers, 197(78.7%) ordered fasting and random blood glucose, and 178(71.5%) focussed on cardiac fitness. Conclusion: A need was found to establish standard protocols for pre-surgery evaluation so that unnecessary investigations may be avoided.

Appropriateness and imaging outcomes of ultrasound, CT, and MR in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis from an urban academic center.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the appropriateness and outcomes of ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance (MR) orders in the ED. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive US, CT, and MR orders for adult ED patients at a tertiary care urban academic center from January to March 2019. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria (ACRAC) guidelines were primarily used to classify imaging orders as "appropriate" or "inappropriate". Two radiologists in consensus judged specific clinical scenarios that were unavailable in the ACRAC. Final imaging reports were compared with the initial clinical suspicion for imaging and categorized into "normal", "compatible with initial diagnosis", "alternative diagnosis", or "inconclusive". The sample was powered to show a prevalence of inappropriate orders of 30% with a margin of error of 5%. RESULTS: The rate of inappropriate orders was 59.4% for US, 29.1% for CT, and 33.3% for MR. The most commonly imaged systems for each modality were neuro (130/330) and gastrointestinal (95/330) for CT, genitourinary (132/330) and gastrointestinal (121/330) for US, neuro (273/330) and gastrointestinal (37/330) for MR. Compared to inappropriately ordered tests, the final reports of appropriate orders were nearly three times more likely to demonstrate findings compatible with the initial diagnosis for all modalities: US (45.5 vs. 14.3%, p < 0.001), CT (46.6 vs. 14.6%, p < 0.001), and MR (56.3 vs. 21.8%, p < 0.001). Inappropriate orders were more likely to show no abnormalities compared to appropriate orders: US (65.8 vs. 38.8%, p < 0.001), CT (62.5 vs. 34.2%, p < 0.001), and MR (61.8 vs. 38.7%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of inappropriate imaging orders in the ED was 59.4% for US, 29.1% for CT, and 33.3% for MR. Appropriately ordered imaging was three times more likely to yield findings compatible with the initial diagnosis across all modalities.

Inappropriate laboratory test utilization in outpatient tertiary care: Implications for value-based healthcare.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the rate of inappropriate repetition of laboratory testing and estimate the cost of such testing for thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), total cholesterol, vitamin D, and vitamin B12 tests. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out in the Family Medicine and Polyclinic Department at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Clinical and laboratory data were collected between 2018-2021 for the 4 laboratory tests. The inappropriate repetition of tests was defined according to international guidelines and the costs were calculated using the hospital prices. RESULTS: A total of 109,929 laboratory tests carried out on 23,280 patients were included in this study. The percentage of inappropriate tests, as per the study criteria, was estimated to be 6.1% of all repeated tests. Additionally, the estimated total cost wasted amounted to 2,364,410 Saudi Riyals. Age exhibited a weak positive correlation with the total number of inappropriate tests (r=0.196, p=0.001). Furthermore, significant differences were observed in the medians of the total number of inappropriate tests among genders and nationalities (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The study identified significantly high rates of inadequate repetitions of frequently requested laboratory tests. Urgent action is therefore crucial to overcoming such an issue.

Teleconsulting in wound care: Connecting the primary care to the wound specialist reduces unnecessary referrals.

In the Netherlands the primary care (General Practitioner or homecare nurse) encounter a variety of wounds ranging from traumatic to diabetic foot ulcers. According to a recent study 82.4% of the patients with a wound can be treated in a primary setting with the GP as medical supervisor. The remaining 17.6% of patients need more extensive care including advice by a specialised doctor, diagnosis and treatment. Prompt analyses and treatment of underlying causes by specialised doctors in a multidisciplinary setting is necessary for treating patients with complicated wound. This article describes the impact of Electronic Health Consultation on all wounds treated in the primary care. And describes the effect on the duration until referral to the hospital and the influence on the amount of unnecessary referrals to the hospital. All data was collected prospectively from June 2020 until October 2021. The study involved a process where primary care could seek advice from a Wound Physician at the Alrijne Wound Centre through a specialised Electronic Health Consultation. A total of 118 patients were analysed. 41/118 (34.7%) patients required a physical consultation with analysis and treatment in the hospital, after teleconsultation. The remaining 77/118 (65.3%) could be treated in primary care after Electronic Health Consultation. The mean duration of wound existence until Electronic Health Consultation was 39.3 days (range 5-271, SD: 38.5). 3/41 (7.3%) of the referrals were unnecessary. Electronic Health Consultation serves as a valuable and efficient tool for enhancing wound care, ultimately contributing to improved patient management and resource allocation within the healthcare system. This article describes the impact of Electronic Health Consultation on all wounds treated in the primary care and the influence on the duration until referral to the hospital and the influence on the amount of unnecessary referrals to the hospital.

Combination of prostate volume and apparent diffusion coefficient can stratify patients with a PI-RADS score of 3 to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, there are many patients who undergo unnecessary prostate biopsies after receiving a prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score of 3. Our purpose is to identify cutoff values of the prostate volume (PV) and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) to stratify those patients to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. METHODS: Data from 224 qualified patients who received prostate biopsies from January 2019 to June 2023 were collected. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare non-normal distributed continuous variables, which were recorded as median (interquartile ranges). The correlation coefficients were calculated using Spearman's rank correlation analysis. Categorical variables are recorded by numbers (percentages) and compared by χ2 test. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the independent predictors. The receiver-operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of clinical variables. RESULTS: Out of a total of 224 patients, 36 patients (16.07%) were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), whereas 72 patients (32.14%) were diagnosed with any grade prostate cancer. The result of multivariate analysis demonstrated that the PV (p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR]: 0.952, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.927-0.978) and ADCmin (p < 0.01, OR: 0.993, 95% CI: 0.989-0.998) were the independent factors for predicting csPCa. The AUC values of the PV and ADCmin were 0.779 (95% CI: 0.718-0.831) and 0.799 (95% CI: 0.740-0.849), respectively, for diagnosing csPCa. After stratifying patients by PV and ADCmin, 24 patients (47.06%) with "PV < 55 mL and ADCmin < 685 µm2/s" were diagnosed with csPCa. However, only one patient (1.25%) with PV ≥ 55 mL and ADCmin ≥ 685 µm2/s were diagnosed with csPCa. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found the combination of PV and ADCmin can stratify patients with a PI-RADS score of 3 to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. These patients with "PV ≥ 55 mL and ADCmin ≥ 685 µm2/s" may safely avoid prostate biopsies.

A Comparative Study of Two Radiomics-Based Blood Flow Modes with Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Predicting Malignancy of Thyroid Nodules and Reducing Unnecessary Fine-Needle Aspiration Rate.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare superb microvascular imaging (SMI)-based radiomics methods, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-based radiomics methods to the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) for classifying thyroid nodules (TNs) and reducing unnecessary fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled a dataset of 472 pathologically confirmed TNs. Radiomics characteristics were extracted from B-mode ultrasound (BMUS), SMI, and CEUS images, respectively. After eliminating redundant features, four radiomics scores (Rad-scores) were constructed. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, four radiomics prediction models incorporating Rad-score and corresponding US features were constructed and validated in terms of discrimination, calibration, decision curve analysis, and unnecessary FNAB rate. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of the BMUS + SMI radiomics method was better than ACR TI-RADS (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.875 vs. 0.689 for the training cohort, 0.879 vs. 0.728 for the validation cohort) (P < 0.05), and comparable with BMUS + CEUS radiomics method (AUC: 0.875 vs. 0.878 for the training cohort, 0.879 vs. 0.865 for the validation cohort) (P > 0.05). Decision curve analysis showed that the BMUS+SMI radiomics method could achieve higher net benefits than the BMUS radiomics method and ACR TI-RADS when the threshold probability was between 0.13 and 0.88 in the entire cohort. When applying the BMUS+SMI radiomics method, the unnecessary FNAB rate reduced from 43.4% to 13.9% in the training cohort and from 45.6% to 18.0% in the validation cohorts in comparison to ACR TI-RADS. CONCLUSION: The dual-modal SMI-based radiomics method is convenient and economical and can be an alternative to the dual-modal CEUS-based radiomics method in helping radiologists select the optimal clinical strategy for TN management.

Choosing Wisely audit: CT KUB ordering in emergency department renal colic presentations.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to safely reduce unnecessary CT KUBs (kidneys, ureters, bladder) in patients with renal colic. METHODS: This was a before and after intervention observational study of 74 patients in April 2023 and 57 patients in October 2023. RESULTS: Seventy-five per cent of patients with suspected renal colic underwent a CT KUB in the pre-audit period. Following education, an update in the ED Renal Colic Policy, electronic medical record ordering and short stay pathway, a re-audit was undertaken in October 2023 resulting in an absolute reduction of 15% of CT KUBs ordered. CONCLUSIONS: Audit interventions can reduce unnecessary CT KUBs in renal colic.

A Canadian survey of perceptions and practices related to ordering of blood tests in the intensive care unit.

PURPOSE: The ordering of routine blood test panels in advance is common in intensive care units (ICUs), with limited consideration of the pretest probability of finding abnormalities. This practice contributes to anemia, false positive results, and health care costs. We sought to understand practices and attitudes of Canadian adult intensivists regarding ordering of blood tests in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide Canadian cross-sectional survey consisting of 15 questions assessing three domains (global perceptions, test ordering, daily practice), plus 11 demographic questions. The target sample was one intensivist per adult ICU in Canada. We summarized responses using descriptive statistics and present data as mean with standard deviation (SD) or count with percentage as appropriate. RESULTS: Over seven months, 80/131 (61%) physicians responded from 77 ICUs, 50% of which were from Ontario. Respondents had a mean (SD) clinical experience of 12 (9) years, and 61% worked in academic centres. When asked about their perceptions of how frequently unnecessary blood tests are ordered, 61% responded "sometimes" and 23% responded "almost always." Fifty-seven percent favoured ordering complete blood counts one day in advance. Only 24% of respondents believed that advanced blood test ordering frequently led to changes in management. The most common factors perceived to influence blood test ordering in the ICU were physician preferences, institutional patterns, and order sets. CONCLUSION: Most respondents to this survey perceived that unnecessary blood testing occurs in the ICU. The survey identified possible strategies to decrease the number of blood tests.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La prescription à l'avance de tests sanguins de routine est courante dans les unités de soins intensifs (USI), avec une prise en compte limitée de la probabilité de découverte d'anomalies avant le test. Cette pratique contribue à l'anémie, aux résultats faussement positifs et aux coûts des soins de santé. Nous avons cherché à comprendre les pratiques et les attitudes des intensivistes pour adultes au Canada en ce qui concerne la prescription d'analyses sanguines chez la patientèle gravement malade. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené un sondage transversal à l'échelle nationale au Canada en posant 15 questions évaluant trois domaines (perceptions globales, commande de tests, pratique quotidienne), ainsi que 11 questions démographiques. L'échantillon cible était composé d'un·e intensiviste par unité de soins intensifs pour adultes au Canada. Nous avons résumé les réponses à l'aide de statistiques descriptives et présenté les données sous forme de moyennes avec écarts type (ET) ou de dénombrements avec pourcentages, selon le cas. RéSULTATS: Sur une période de sept mois, 80 médecins sur 131 (61%) ont répondu dans 77 unités de soins intensifs, dont 50% en Ontario. Les répondant·es avaient une expérience clinique moyenne (ET) de 12 (9) ans, et 61% travaillaient dans des centres universitaires. Lorsqu'on leur a demandé ce qu'ils ou elles pensaient de la fréquence à laquelle des tests sanguins inutiles étaient prescrits, 61% ont répondu « parfois ¼ et 23% ont répondu « presque toujours ¼. Cinquante-sept pour cent étaient en faveur de la réalisation d'une formule sanguine complète un jour à l'avance. Seulement 24% des personnes interrogées estimaient que la prescription de tests sanguins à l'avance entraînait fréquemment des changements dans la prise en charge. Les facteurs les plus souvent perçus comme influençant la prescription d'analyses sanguines à l'unité de soins intensifs étaient les préférences des médecins, les habitudes institutionnelles et les ensembles d'ordonnances. CONCLUSION: La plupart des répondant·es à ce sondage ont l'impression que des tests sanguins inutiles sont prescrits aux soins intensifs. L'enquête a permis d'identifier des stratégies possibles pour réduire le nombre de tests sanguins.

Recommendations for Choosing Wisely in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: Five Opportunities to Improve Value.

Unnecessary diagnostic tests and treatments in children cared for in emergency departments (EDs) do not benefit patients, increase costs, and may result in harm. To address this low-value care, a taskforce of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians was formed to create the first PEM Choosing Wisely recommendations. Using a systematic, iterative process, the taskforce collected suggested items from an interprofessional group of 33 ED clinicians from 6 academic pediatric EDs. An initial review of 219 suggested items yielded 72 unique items. Taskforce members independently scored each item for its extent of overuse, strength of evidence, and potential for harm. The 25 highest-rated items were sent in an electronic survey to all 89 members of the American Academy of Pediatrics PEM Committee on Quality Transformation (AAP COQT) to select their top ten recommendations. The AAP COQT survey had a 63% response rate. The five most selected items were circulated to over 100 stakeholder and specialty groups (within the AAP, CW Canada, and CW USA organizations) for review, iterative feedback, and approval. The final 5 items were simultaneously published by Choosing Wisely United States and Choosing Wisely Canada on December 1, 2022. All recommendations focused on decreasing diagnostic testing related to respiratory conditions, medical clearance for psychiatric conditions, seizures, constipation, and viral respiratory tract infections. A multinational PEM taskforce developed the first Choosing Wisely recommendation list for pediatric patients in the ED setting. Future activities will include dissemination efforts and interventions to improve the quality and value of care specific to recommendations.

Avoiding unnecessary biopsy: the combination of PRIMARY score with prostate-specific antigen density for prostate biopsy decision.

BACKGROUND: Avoiding unnecessary biopsies for men with suspected prostate cancer remains a clinical priority. The recently proposed PRIMARY score improves diagnostic accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The aim of this study was to determine the best strategy combining PRIMARY score or MRI reporting scores (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS]) with prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) for prostate biopsy decision making. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 343 patients who underwent both 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and MRI before prostate biopsy was performed. PSA was restricted to <20 ng/ml. Different biopsy strategies were developed and compared based on PRIMARY score or PI-RADS with PSAD thresholds. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was plotted to define the optimal biopsy strategy. RESULTS: The prevalence of csPCa was 41.1% (141/343). According to DCA, the strategies of PRIMARY score +PSAD (strategy #1, strategy #2, strategy #6) had a higher net benefit than the strategies of PI-RADS + PSAD at the risk threshold of 8-20%. The best diagnostic strategy was strategy #1 (PRIMARY score 4-5 or PSAD ≥ 0.20), which avoided 38.2% biopsy procedures while missed 9.2% of csPCa cases. From a clinical perspective, strategies with a lower risk of missing csPCa were strategy #2 (PRIMARY score ≥4 or PSAD ≥ 0.15), which avoided 28.6% biopsies while missed 5.7% of csPCa cases, or strategy #6 (PRIMARY score≥3 or PSAD ≥ 0.15), which avoided 20.7% biopsies while missed only 3.5% of csPCa cases. The limitations of the study were the retrospective single-center nature. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PRIMARY score +PSAD allows individualized decisions to avoid unnecessary biopsy, outperforming the strategies of PI-RADS + PSAD. Further prospective trials are needed to validate these findings.