Virtual Education in Urogynecology: Enhancing Understanding and Management of Pelvic Fistulas.

Introduction: Pelvic fistulas affect a significant number of patients globally, with a relatively low prevalence in the United States. Virtual education offers an effective, scalable solution to bridge this educational gap and lead to a deeper understanding of more common conditions, such as urinary and fecal incontinence. Methods: We developed two virtual cases on rectovaginal and vesicovaginal/ureterovaginal fistulas to enhance medical students' exposure, knowledge, and confidence regarding assessment of pelvic fistulas. The cases could be completed in approximately 30 minutes, asynchronously, and at students' own pace. The cases were integrated into an OB/GYN clerkship. We conducted a survey among students receiving the cases to gather feedback on usability, acceptability, and educational value, which guided subsequent improvements. Results: Forty medical students, ranging from first to third year, participated in the urogynecology elective; 21 (53%) completed the survey. Ninety-one percent agreed or strongly agreed they were satisfied with the cases. All respondents found the format easy to use and appropriate for their level of learning. Most reported the cases improved their confidence in nonsurgical and surgical management options for pelvic fistulas. Discussion: Offering virtual and interactive patient cases on e-learning platforms represents an innovative approach to increasing clinical exposure to urogynecologic disorders. By providing medical students with the opportunity to interact with pelvic fistulas virtually, these cases can help bridge a gap in clinical education. Future exploration is valuable for examining knowledge deficiencies and developing cost-effective, self-paced, easily accessible educational resources to advance medical training and optimize patient care.

An At-Home Laparoscopic Curriculum for Junior Residents in Surgery, Obstetrics/Gynecology, and Urology.

Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery requires significant training, and prior studies have shown that surgical residents lack key laparoscopic skills. Many educators have implemented simulation curricula to improve laparoscopic training. Given limited time for dedicated, in-person simulation center practice, at-home training has emerged as a possible mechanism by which to expand training and promote practice. There remains a gap in published at-home laparoscopic curricula employing embedded feedback mechanisms. Methods: We developed a nine-task at-home laparoscopic curriculum and an end-of-curriculum assessment following Kern's six-step approach. We implemented the curriculum over 4 months with first- to third-year residents. Results: Of 47 invited residents from general surgery, obstetrics/gynecology, and urology, 37 (79%) participated in the at-home curriculum, and 25 (53%) participated in the end-of-curriculum assessment. Residents who participated in the at-home curriculum completed a median of six of nine tasks (interquartile range: 3-8). Twenty-two residents (47%) responded to a postcurriculum survey. Of these, 19 (86%) reported that their laparoscopic skills improved through completion of the curriculum, and the same 19 (86%) felt that the curriculum should be continued for future residents. Residents who completed more at-home curriculum tasks scored higher on the end-of-curriculum assessment (p = .009 with adjusted R 2 of .28) and performed assessment tasks in less time (p = .004 with adjusted R 2 of .28). Discussion: This learner-centered laparoscopic curriculum provides guiding examples, spaced practice, feedback, and graduated skill development to enable junior residents to improve their laparoscopic skills in a low-stakes, at-home environment.

Revitalizing Urologists' Role in Transplantation as a Novel Strategy to Address Surgeon Shortage: Results from a Cross-Sectional Survey.

OBJECTIVES: Urologists represent functional alternatives for transplant surgeons, but their involvement is minimal. Evaluating urologists' interests in transplant and identifying associated factors may help to determine whether recruitment of more urological providers is a viable strategy to address transplant surgeon shortages in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We emailed a 10-question survey to individuals pursuing urology in the United States and collected demographic data, education and training backgrounds, and preferences for proposed integrated residency programs and abbreviated transplant fellowships. We stratified respondents based on transplant interest (yes/no); we made comparisons by using t-tests for continuous variables and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with interest in transplant surgery. RESULTS: Of 104 respondents, 98 were included in the final analysis, with 47% indicating a current or prior interest in transplantation. Male respondents were 3.7 times more likely than female respondents to be interested (odds ratio = 4.675; 95% CI, 1.411-15.495; P = .012). Participants aged <30 years were 93% less likely than older participants to be interested in transplantation (odds ratio = 0.071; 95% CI, 0.006-0.779; P = .03). International medical graduates reported higher enthusiasm for transplantation compared with US-trained counterparts (89% vs 42%), with a trend toward significance (P = .06). Nearly all (93%, 43/46) who expressed interest endorsed having an integrated training pathway. Only 70% (32/46) supported an abbreviated fellowship (<24 mo). Lifestyle concerns and insufficient exposure during residency were the most frequently cited reasons for lack of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with male and older urology trainees, female and younger urology trainees were less inclined to pursue transplant surgery. Nonetheless, urologists represent an untapped pool of transplant surgeons. Proposing an integrated training program for urologists and increasing exposure to transplantation during urology residency represent potential strategies to decrease transplant surgeon shortages.

Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on standardized urology knowledge assessment items in the United States: a descriptive study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) with respect to standardized urology multiple-choice items in the United States. METHODS: In total, 700 multiple-choice urology board exam-style items were submitted to GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, and responses were recorded. Items were categorized based on topic and question complexity (recall, interpretation, and problem-solving). The accuracy of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 was compared across item types in February 2024. RESULTS: GPT-4 answered 44.4% of items correctly compared to 30.9% for GPT-3.5 (P>0.0001). GPT-4 (vs. GPT-3.5) had higher accuracy with urologic oncology (43.8% vs. 33.9%, P=0.03), sexual medicine (44.3% vs. 27.8%, P=0.046), and pediatric urology (47.1% vs. 27.1%, P=0.012) items. Endourology (38.0% vs. 25.7%, P=0.15), reconstruction and trauma (29.0% vs. 21.0%, P=0.41), and neurourology (49.0% vs. 33.3%, P=0.11) items did not show significant differences in performance across versions. GPT-4 also outperformed GPT-3.5 with respect to recall (45.9% vs. 27.4%, P<0.00001), interpretation (45.6% vs. 31.5%, P=0.0005), and problem-solving (41.8% vs. 34.5%, P=0.56) type items. This difference was not significant for the higher-complexity items. Conclusion: s: ChatGPT performs relatively poorly on standardized multiple-choice urology board exam-style items, with GPT-4 outperforming GPT-3.5. The accuracy was below the proposed minimum passing standards for the American Board of Urology's Continuing Urologic Certification knowledge reinforcement activity (60%). As artificial intelligence progresses in complexity, ChatGPT may become more capable and accurate with respect to board examination items. For now, its responses should be scrutinized.

Urology pathways for the primary care physician.

Urology provides critical medical treatment that has the potential to save lives and greatly improve quality of life. Although there is a growing need for urological care, South Africa (SA) now faces an unmet need for these services, and junior doctors have limited exposure to urology. SA has a total of 347 urologists who are actively practising and registered with the Health Professions Council of South Africa. This means that there is a ratio of only 0.56 urologists per 100 000 people in the population. The ratio is even more dire if we only include urologists in the public sector. This article offers pragmatic strategies for addressing common urological conditions. These guidelines adhere to international standards and can be adopted at all levels of healthcare, with the exception of a few advanced imaging needs.

Estimated prospects of demand and supply of urologists in Korea over the next 10 years.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to provide the basic data needed to estimate future urologist supply and demand by applying various statistical models related to healthcare utilization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from multiple sources, including the Yearbook of Health and Welfare Statistics, Korean Hospital Association, Korean Medical Association, and the Korean Urological Association, were used for supply estimation. Demand estimation incorporated data on both clinical and non-clinical urologists, along with future population estimates. In-and-out moves and demographic methods were employed for supply estimation, while the Bureau of Health Professions model was utilized for demand estimation. Supply estimation assumptions included fixed resident quotas, age-specific death rates, migration rates, and retirement age considerations. Demand estimation assumptions included combining clinical and nonclinical urologist demands, adjusting population size for age-related healthcare usage variations. Urologist productivity was determined by adjusting productivity levels to 100%, 90%, and 80% of the base year based on actual clinical practice volumes. RESULTS: Estimations of both demand and supply consistently indicate an oversupply of urologists until 2025, followed by an expected shortage by 2035 owing to increased deaths and retirements attributed to the aging urologist population. This shortage becomes more pronounced when employing more reliable models, such as logit or ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average), underscoring the growing need for urologists in the future. CONCLUSIONS: All estimation models estimated an oversupply of urologists until 2025, transitioning to a deficit due to reduced supply thereafter. However, considering potential unaccounted factors, greater effort is needed for accurate predictions and corresponding measures.

Assessment of the gender gap in urology industry payments: An Open Payments Program data analysis.

PURPOSE: The Open Payments Program (OPP), established in 2013 under the Sunshine Act, mandated medical device and pharmaceutical manufacturers to submit records of financial incentives given to physicians for public availability. The study aims to characterize the gap in real general and real research payments between man and woman urologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample included all urologists in the United States who received at least one general or research payment in the OPP database from 2015 to 2021. Recipients were identified using the National Provider Identifier and National Downloadable File datasets. Payments were analyzed by geography, year, payment type, and years since graduation. Multivariable analysis on odds of being in above the median in terms of money received was done with gender as a covariate. This analysis was also completed for all academic urologists. RESULTS: There was a total of 15,980 urologists; 13.6% were woman, and 86.4% were man. Compared to man urologists, woman urologists were less likely to be in the top half of total payments received (odds ratio [OR] 0.62) when adjusted for other variables. When looking at academic urologists, 18.1% were woman and 81.9% were man. However, woman academic urologists were even less likely to be in the top 50% of payments received (OR 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to characterize the difference in industry payments between man and woman urologists. The results should be utilized to educate physicians and industry, in order to achieve equitable engagement and funding for woman urologists.

Machine learning enables automated screening for systematic reviews and meta-analysis in urology.

PURPOSE: To investigate and implement semiautomated screening for meta-analyses (MA) in urology under consideration of class imbalance. METHODS: Machine learning algorithms were trained on data from three MA with detailed information of the screening process. Different methods to account for class imbalance (Sampling (up- and downsampling, weighting and cost-sensitive learning), thresholding) were implemented in different machine learning (ML) algorithms (Random Forest, Logistic Regression with Elastic Net Regularization, Support Vector Machines). Models were optimized for sensitivity. Besides metrics such as specificity, receiver operating curves, total missed studies, and work saved over sampling were calculated. RESULTS: During training, models trained after downsampling achieved the best results consistently among all algorithms. Computing time ranged between 251 and 5834 s. However, when evaluated on the final test data set, the weighting approach performed best. In addition, thresholding helped to improve results as compared to the standard of 0.5. However, due to heterogeneity of results no clear recommendation can be made for a universal sample size. Misses of relevant studies were 0 for the optimized models except for one review. CONCLUSION: It will be necessary to design a holistic methodology that implements the presented methods in a practical manner, but also takes into account other algorithms and the most sophisticated methods for text preprocessing. In addition, the different methods of a cost-sensitive learning approach can be the subject of further investigations.

Endourological society fellowship program: a real contribution to improve surgical outcomes of stone patients treated with ureteroscopy.

PURPOSE: We assessed the impact of the one-year endourological society fellowship program (ESFP) on the achievement of optimal surgical outcomes (OSO) in stone patients treated with ureteroscopy (URS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 303 stone patients treated with URS from January 2018 to June 2022 by five experienced surgeons (ES). Of those, two attended ESFP. OSO was defined as the presence of residual fragments ≤ 4 mm at 1-month post-operative imaging (Ultrasound + X - Ray or CT scan). Descriptive statistics explored patients' characteristics and the rate of OSO according to the attendance of ESFP. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses (UVA and MVA) tested the impact of stone characteristics, surgical data, ESFP, and imaging technique on the rate of OSO. The LOWESS curve explored the graphical association between stone size and the multivariable-adjusted probability of OSO in the two groups of surgeons. RESULTS: Of 303 patients, 208 (69%) were treated by the two surgeons who attended ESFP. OSO was achieved in 66% and 52% of patients treated by ES with and without ESFP, respectively (p = 0.01). At UVA, ESFP (OR = 1.78; 95% CI = 1.09-2.90), stone diameter (OR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.88-0.96), stone location (kidney vs. ureter; OR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.21-0.58), imaging technique (CT scan vs. Ultrasound + X-Ray; OR = 0.28; 95% CI = 0.16-0.47) predicted OSO achievement (all p < 0.05). At MVA analyses, ESFP was associated with OSO (OR = 2.24; 95% CI = 1.29-3.88; p < 0.05), along with the other aforementioned variables. The LOWESS curve showed that the greater the stone size, the greater the difference in OSO in the two groups of surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: ESFP positively affects OSO achievement after URS, especially in patients with a high stone burden.

Current urethroplasty trends in recent GURS fellowship graduates.

PURPOSE: To assess self-reported urethroplasty success rates and outcomes of recent GURS fellowship graduates and compare these data to the large body of published urethroplasty outcomes literature. METHODS: A voluntary survey was distributed from June 1 to June 30, 2023 to GURS fellowship graduates of the last 5 years. Participants were surveyed on time since graduation, operative volume, outcomes, and quoted success rates for urethroplasty. Data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics, binary logistic regression, and correlative analyses. RESULTS: We received responses from 49/101 (48.5%) GURS graduates. Five-year post-graduates were most represented (44.7%). The majority (52.2%) consider 81-90% of urethroplasty successful, without significant change with years in practice. Approximately 65% quoted excision and primary anastomosis (EPA) as > 90% successful. Over half of the respondents had performed > 60 urethroplasties since graduation. Only 31.3% of respondents reported re-intervening in > 10% of their postop patients, with a weak positive correlation between years in practice and need for re-intervention (p 0.01). Nearly 20% of respondents referred patients to an external reconstructionist. CONCLUSION: Increased length of time in practice does not result in higher reported urethroplasty success rates, counseling on successful outcomes, or rates of re-intervention and complications. Our survey highlights that the traditionally used success rates for urethroplasty may not be reflective of new graduates and lower volume reconstructive surgeons in their early career.

Declining utilization of urodynamic studies in urological care in Germany: time to say goodbye?

INTRODUCTION: The number of urodynamic studies (UDS) has been declining steadily in recent decades, yet the reasons behind this trend remain poorly understood. This study aims to investigate the structural aspects of UDS in urology and explore the factors contributing to this decline. MATERIAL & METHODS: We surveyed all urological departments performing UDS as well as a representative sample of private practices in Germany in 2023. We examined structural situation, waiting times, capacities and limitations of UDS. All invasive urodynamic examinations were defined as UDS. RESULTS: In 2019, 259/474 (55%) urological departments in Germany performed UDS. 206/259 (80%) urological departments responded to the survey. 163/200 (82%) urological departments stated that their capacities were exhausted, a main reason being lack of medical and nursing staff. 54.8% urological departments performed more than 50% of their UDS for referring physicians. Urological departments with a low number of UDS/year (≤ 100) showed a shorter waiting time (up to 4 weeks: 49% vs. 30%; p = 0.01), reduced UDS capacities (55% vs. 12%; p < 0.001) and these capacities were often not fully utilized (25% vs. 9%; p = 0.007). 122/280 (44%) office urologists responded to the survey. 18/122 (15%) office urologists performed UDS. Main reasons for not offering UDS were lack of personnel and low reimbursement. CONCLUSION: In German urological departments, UDS capacities are consistently fully utilized, primarily due to staffing shortages. This trend towards centralization prompts questions about the role of UDS in urologists' training.

Patient Understanding and Perception of Urology Resident Training, Role, and Capabilities.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to identify patient understanding of urology residents and comfort with being cared for by residents. Through this pilot study, we aim to propose educational objectives to improve this knowledge gap and ultimately allow for an improved patient experience. METHODS: A prospective survey was distributed from September 2022 to October 2022. A patient knowledge about residents (KAR) score was calculated by combining correct responses to 5 questions (maximum = 5). Another score evaluating patient opinion of residents was calculated using Likert scale questions (range 3-19; higher scores correlate with positive opinion) denoting patient outlook on residents. RESULTS: A total of 88 surveys were completed. The average ± SD patient age was 62.7 ± 15.2 years. Patients previously seen by a resident had significantly higher KAR scores (3.591 ± 1.210) compared to patients never interacting with a resident or unsure (KAR = 2.381 ± 1.324; P < .0001). Additionally, those with higher levels of education had greater KAR scores (graduate-level KAR = 3.792 ± 1.179; P = .002). No variables were found to have a statistically significant impact on patients' average opinion of residents. CONCLUSIONS: Current patient understanding of the role of a urology resident is suboptimal. Given this knowledge gap, we hope to propose educational approaches to help aid in patient understanding of resident physicians, who play a critical role in their clinical care.

The New York Section EMPIRE Collaborative: Piloting a Multi-Institutional, Simulation-Based Surgical Skills Boot Camp for Junior Urology Residents.

INTRODUCTION: Since the integration of the intern year into urology residencies, programs are mandated to introduce fundamental skills to junior residents. Our goal was to assess the impact of one such program: the 2023 New York Section of the AUA (NYS-AUA) EMPIRE (Educational Multi-institutional Program for Instructing REsidents) Boot Camp. METHODS: Junior urology residents from all 10 NYS-AUA institutions attended a free EMPIRE Boot Camp on June 9, 2023. The seminar covered procedural skills including urethral catheterization, cystoscopy, renal and bladder ultrasound, transrectal prostate ultrasound with biopsy, and an introduction to robotics/laparoscopy. Sessions focused on urologic emergencies and postoperative scenarios. Participants completed questionnaires before, immediately after, and 6 months post course, assessing comfort with procedures and overall program quality using a 5-point Likert scale and free text responses. t Tests compared pre and immediate/6-month post scores. RESULTS: Forty junior residents, along with faculty and resident instructors from all 10 NYS-AUA programs, participated. Of the 40 trainees, 35 (87.5%) completed pre- and immediate post-boot camp surveys, while 23 (57.5%) responded to the 6-month follow-up survey. Ratings showed significant improvement in comfort with basic urologic technical skills for 13 out of 14 domains (93%) immediately after the course and at the 6-month mark. Attendees reported notably higher comfort levels in managing obstructive pyelonephritis (P = .003) and postoperative complications (P = .001) following didactic sessions. CONCLUSIONS: A skills-based, free collaborative urology boot camp for junior residents is feasible and can be effective. Trainees reported improved comfort performing certain technical skills and managing urologic emergencies both immediately after the course and at 6 months of follow-up.

Association of Unmet Social Needs With Missed In-Person Urology Clinic Appointments.

INTRODUCTION: Social determinants of health (SDH) are nonbiologic influencers of disease and health care disparities. This study focused on understanding the association between SDH and urology clinic "no-show" visits within a diverse urban population. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients scheduled for urology clinic visits from October 2015 to June 2022 who completed a 10-question social needs screener. For each patient, demographic variables, and number of missed clinic appointments were abstracted. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the association of unmet social needs and no-shows. RESULTS: Of 5761 unique patients seen in clinic, 5293 completed a social needs screener. Respondents were most commonly male (62.8%), Hispanic (50.3%), English-speaking (75.5%), and insured by Medicare (46.0%). Overall, 8.2%, 4.6%, and 6.1% reported 1, 2, and 3+ unmet social needs, respectively. Most patients (61.7%) had 0 no-shows; 38.3% had 1+ no-shows. Between the 0 and 1+ no-show groups, we found significant differences with respect to gender (P =.05), race/ethnicity (P = .002), preferred language (P = .006), insurance payer (P < .001), SDH status (P = .003), and total number of unmet social needs (P = .006). On multivariable analysis, patients concerned about housing quality (odds ratio [OR] = 1.50, P = .002), legal help (OR = 1.53, P = .009), and with 3+ unmet social needs (OR = 1.39, P = .006) were more likely to have 1+ no-shows. CONCLUSIONS: Unmet social needs were associated with increased no-show urology clinic visits. Routine social needs screening could identify at-risk patients who would benefit from services. This may be particularly pertinent for patients with urgent diagnoses or those requiring frequent office visits where missing appointments could impact morbidity and mortality.