Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 17.611
1.
J Vasc Nurs ; 42(2): 123-130, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823972

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of venous thromboembolism is steadily increasing in developing nations including Ethiopia. Nurses play a vital role in the prevention of venous thromboembolism. However, the level of nurses' knowledge, practice, and associated factors in venous thromboembolism prevention is not well-known across Ethiopia. This study aimed to assess nurses' knowledge, practice, and associated factors regarding venous-thromboembolism prevention in tertiary Hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia METHODS: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 339 randomly selected nurses working at tertiary hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A validated questionnaire was used to collect data. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 25. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to describe and test the association between selected variables. RESULTS: Out of the total 339 participants, only (51.6%) and (45.4%) had adequate knowledge and practice towards venous thromboembolism prevention respectively. Attending in-service training (AOR=1.701, p = 0.044) was significantly associated with knowledge of VTE prevention. Educational level (AOR= 3.871, P = 0.048), work experience (AOR=5.207, P<0.001), work location (AOR= 0.507, P = 0.019), working department (AOR= 2.959, P = 0.048), knowledge level (AOR= 0.477, P=0.005) were significantly associated with better preventive practice. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that nurses' level of knowledge and practice towards venous thromboembolism prevention was inadequate. Nurses' educational level, attending in-service training, work experience, work location, and working department were determinant factors associated with nurses' knowledge and practice towards venous thromboembolism prevention. Therefore, upgrading nurses' educational level and providing in-service training on venous thromboembolism prevention is crucial for positive patient outcomes.


Clinical Competence , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Tertiary Care Centers , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethiopia , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Female , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Male , Clinical Competence/standards , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Middle Aged , Nurses/statistics & numerical data
2.
Medicina (B Aires) ; 84 Suppl 2: 1-32, 2024 May.
Article Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823037

Venous thromboembolism disease (VTE) prevention strategy has to be constantly updated based on new evidence that is generated every year. Each institution must have a formal and active prevention policy against VTE and must develop guidelines or standards for thromboprophylaxis (TP) according to the local reality. During this process of adapting a guideline to the region and the generation of hospital recommendations, we must always consider the available local resources, the thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk of the patients, even after discharge, and also their considerations and preferences. Adherence to local TP recommendations is one of the most important items evaluated by organizations that measure institutional quality. Individualized prophylaxis should consider personal and family history of VTE, the use of validated risk assessment models or RAMs for thrombosis and bleeding events, as well as the special characteristics of each patient. Ideally, each center's own statistics should be available for decision-making. Extrapolating guidelines from developed countries could have a negative impact, if we ignore our hospital's reality. In this document we will find practical tools for health institutions that will allow them to prepare recommendations or guidelines for adequate VTE prophylaxis.


La prevención de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV) es motivo de continua actualización en función de nueva evidencia que se genera permanentemente. Cada institución debe contar con una estrategia activa de prevención contra la ETV y debe generar normas de tromboprofilaxis (TP) de acuerdo con la realidad local. Durante este proceso de adaptación de una guía a la región debemos siempre tener en cuenta los recursos locales disponibles, el riesgo tromboembólico y hemorrágico propio del paciente, de la enfermedad por la que se encuentra internado (ya sea clínica o quirúrgica) y las consideraciones o preferencias del paciente. La tasa de adherencia a recomendaciones locales de TP es uno de los indicadores de excelencia más importantes evaluados en organismos que califican la calidad de una institución de salud. Las medidas de profilaxis que propongamos para los centros de salud, deben ser individualizadas para cada paciente, tienen que considerar antecedentes personales y familiares del enfermo y utilizar modelos de evaluación de riesgo validados de trombosis y de sangrado. También deben incluir a la población con riesgo de trombosis persistente luego del alta. Lo ideal es tener estadísticas propias de cada nosocomio para la toma de decisiones de cómo implementar una correcta TP. Extrapolar guías de los países desarrollados a nuestro ámbito podría tener un impacto negativo, si no se conoce la propia realidad. En este documento encontraremos herramientas prácticas para las instituciones de salud de la región, que les permita orientarse al momento de confeccionar recomendaciones para una adecuada TP.


Practice Guidelines as Topic , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Guideline Adherence , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Risk Factors
3.
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue ; 36(5): 461-464, 2024 May.
Article Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845490

The incidence and mortality of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are high in critically ill patients, and there is still a risk of VTE and bleeding after the use of fixed-dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for prophylaxis. The level of anti-factor Xa is not up to standard after LMWH prophylaxis in patients with surgery or trauma. The condition of critically ill patients is complicated, and the proportion of patients with low antithrombin III is high, which can affect the prophylactic efficacy of LMWH and contribute to VTE occurrence. There is currently no consensus on whether adjusting LMWH dose according to anti-factor Xa levels can reduce VTE occurrence in critically ill patients. High-quality multicenter randomized controlled studies are needed in the future to establish new approaches for precise prevention of VTE in critically ill patients.


Critical Illness , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Factor Xa
5.
J Med Vasc ; 49(2): 72-79, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697713

BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to describe the clinical, paraclinical, therapeutic and outcomes of patients with venous thromboembolic event (VTE) associated with cancer in the context of limited resources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study over a period of six years from March 1, 2016 to March 31, 2022, in the cardiology department and the oncology unit of the Sylvanus Olympio Teaching Hospital of Lome. Our study examined medical records of patients who were at least 18 years old and had venous thromboembolic disease and cancer that was histologically confirmed. This study did not include records that were incomplete or records from patients with coronavirus disease. RESULTS: Our study included 87 patients with average age of 56.36±15.26 years. The discovery of VTE occurred incidentally in 28.74%. Venous thrombosis was isolated in 68.96% and proximal in 95%. Pulmonary embolism was bilateral in 77.77%. Gynaecological and urological cancers were found in 33.33% and 32.19% respectively. Adenocarcinoma was the histological type of cancer found in 47.13%. Cancers were at a very advanced stage in 74.71%. Treatment with antivitamin K was prescribed in 12.65%. In our study, there were 58 patients who passed away with a mortality rate of 66.66%. The cause of death was a complication of VTE in 22.42% and related to the course of cancer in 63.79% of cases. CONCLUSION: VTE during cancer is particular with a fatal evolution due to the severity of VTE and the very advanced stage of cancer.


Neoplasms , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Middle Aged , Female , Male , Togo/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aged , Adult , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/complications , Risk Factors , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vitamin K/antagonists & inhibitors , Venous Thrombosis/epidemiology , Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Aged, 80 and over
6.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10192, 2024 05 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702341

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are considered when patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) develop a contraindication to anticoagulation. Use of IVC filters is increasing, despite associated complications and lack of data on efficacy in reducing VTE-related mortality. We characterized the pattern of IVC filter use at a large community hospital between 2018 and 2022. Specifically, we assessed the indications for IVC filter insertion, filter removal rates, and filter-associated complications. Indications for IVC filters were compared to those outlined by current clinical practice guidelines. We reviewed 120 consecutive filter placement events. The most common indications included recent VTE and active bleeding (40.0%) or need for anticoagulation interruption for surgery (25.8%). Approximately one-third (30.0%) of IVC filters were inserted for indications either not supported or addressed by guidelines. Half (50.0%) of patients had successful removal of their IVC filter. At least 13 patients (10.8%) experienced a filter-related complication. In a large community-based practice, nearly one-third of IVC filters were inserted for indications not universally supported by current practice guidelines. Moreover, most IVC filters were not removed, raising the risk of filter-associated complications, and supporting the need for development of comprehensive guidelines addressing use of IVC filters, and post-insertion monitoring practices.


Hospitals, Community , Vena Cava Filters , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Aged , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Adult , Device Removal/methods
7.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ; 30: 10760296241256368, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38798129

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious, frequent, and preventable medical complication in hospitalized patients. Although the efficacy of prophylaxis (pharmacological and/or mechanical) has been demonstrated, compliance with prophylaxis is poor at international and national levels. AIM: To determine the indication and use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients in Uruguay. METHODS: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, multicentre study involving 31 nationwide healthcare facilities was conducted. Baseline characteristics associated with hospital admission, the percentage of the population with an indication for thromboprophylaxis, and the percentage of patients receiving pharmacological thromboprophylaxis were assessed. The VTE risk was determined using the Padua score for medical patients; the Caprini score for surgical patients; the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guidelines for pregnant-postpartum patients. RESULTS: 1925 patients were included, representing 26% of hospitalized patients in Uruguay. 71.9% of all patients were at risk of VTE. Of all patients at risk of VTE, 58.6% received pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. The reasons for not receiving thromboprophylaxis were prescribing omissions in 16.1% of cases, contraindication in 15.9% and 9.4% of patients were already anticoagulated for other reasons. Overall, just 68% of patients were "protected" against VTE. Recommendations of major thromboprophylaxis guidelines were followed in 70.1% of patients at risk. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the progress made in adherence to thromboprophylaxis indications, nonadherence remains a problem, affecting one in six patients at risk of VTE in Uruguay.


Hospitalization , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Uruguay , Female , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Risk Factors , Aged , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use
8.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1363598, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742101

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is known to be intricately linked to severe COVID-19 (sCOVID-19) occurrence. Herein, we employed univariable Mendelian randomization (MR) and transcriptome analysis to predict the causal association and associated signaling networks between VTE and sCOVID-19. Methods: Potential VTE and sCOVID-19 association was assessed using MR-Egger, weighted median, simple mode, weighted mode, and inverse variance weighted (IVW) regression. We conducted independent univariable analyses involving VTE and sCOVID-19. Using heterogeneity, pleiotropy, and the Leave-One-Out examinations, we performed sensitivity analyses. Thereafter, we performed transcriptome analysis of the GSE164805 dataset to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) linked to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Lastly, we conducted immune analyses. Results: Based on our univariable analysis, VTE was a strong indicator of sCOVID-19 development, and it was intricately linked to sCOVID-19. We further conducted sensitivity analysis to demonstrate the reliability of our results. Using differential analysis, we identified 15 major genes, namely, ACSS2, CEP250, CYP4V2, DDB2, EIF6, GBGT1, GSS, MADD, MAPK8IP1, MMP24, YBPC3, NT5DC3, PROCR, SURF6, and YIPF2, which were strongly connected to suppressive adaptive immune as well as augmented inflammatory cells. In addition, we uncovered strong associations with most differential immunologic gene sets, such as, the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC), immunoactivators, and immunosuppressors. Conclusion: Herein, we demonstrated we strong association between VTE and enhanced sCOVID-19 risk. We also identified 15 DEGs which potentially contribute to the shared immunologic pathogenesis between VTE and sCOVID-19.


COVID-19 , Gene Expression Profiling , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , SARS-CoV-2 , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , COVID-19/genetics , COVID-19/immunology , Venous Thromboembolism/genetics , Venous Thromboembolism/immunology , Transcriptome , Genetic Predisposition to Disease
9.
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) ; 82(2): 124-133, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739660

Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and costly complication following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Development of a refined thrombophilic screening panel will better equip clinicians to identify patients at high-est risk for developing VTEs. In this pilot study, 62 high-risk TJA recipients who had developed pulmonary emboli (PE) within 90-days of surgery were eligible to participate. Of these patients, 14 were enrolled and subsequently adminis-tered a pre-determined panel of 18 hematologic tests with the aim of identifying markers that are consistently elevated or deficient in patients developing PE. A separate cohort of seven high-risk TJA recipients who did not report a symp-tomatic VTE within 90-days of surgery were then enrolled and Factor VIII and lipoprotein(a) levels were assessed. The most common aberrance was noted in 10 patients (71.4%) who had elevated levels of Factor VIII followed by five patients (35.7%) who had elevated levels of lipoprotein(a). Factor VIII was significantly prevalent (p < 0.001) while lipoprotein(a) failed to achieve statistical significance (p = 0.0708). Of the patients who were within normal limits of Factor VIII, three-fourths were "high-normal" with Fac-tor VIII levels within 5% of the upper limit of normal. This study demonstrates the potential utility of this hematologic panel as part of a perioperative screening protocol aimed at identifying patients at risk for developing VTEs. However, future larger scale studies assessing the capabilities and limitations of our findings are warranted.


Pulmonary Embolism , Humans , Pilot Projects , Pulmonary Embolism/blood , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnosis , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Risk Factors , Risk Assessment/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/blood , Factor VIII/analysis , Biomarkers/blood , Lipoprotein(a)/blood , Arthroplasty, Replacement/adverse effects , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Venous Thromboembolism/blood , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology
11.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303148, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753690

BACKGROUND: As a geriatric syndrome, sarcopenia has a high prevalence in the old population and represents an impaired state of health with adverse health outcomes. A strong clinical interest in its relationship with venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is a complex trait disease with a heterogeneous annual incidence rate in different countries, has emerged. The relationship between sarcopenia and venous thromboembolism has been reported in observational studies but the causality from sarcopenia to VTE remained unclarified. We aimed to assess the causal effect of sarcopenia on the risk of VTE with the two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) method. METHODS: Two sets of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), derived from two published genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analyses and genetically indexing muscle weakness and lean muscle mass separately, were pooled into inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median and MR-Egger analyses. RESULTS: No evidence was found for the causal effect of genetically predicted muscle weakness (IVW: OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.76-1.06, p = 0.217), whole body lean mass (IVW: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.87-1.17, p = 0.881) and appendicular lean mass (IVW: OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.82-1.57, p = 0.445) on the risk of VTE. However, both genetically predicted whole-body lean mass and appendicular lean mass can causally influence diabetes mellitus (IVW of whole-body lean mass: OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78-0.96, p = 0.008; IVW of appendicular lean mass: OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.54-0.94, p = 0.014) and hypertension (IVW of whole-body lean mass: OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.87-0.98, p = 0.007; IVW of appendicular lean mass: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.73-0.96, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Genetically predicted sarcopenia does not causally influence VTE directly, but it might still have an indirect effect on VTE incidence via diabetes mellitus and hypertension.


Genome-Wide Association Study , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Sarcopenia , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Sarcopenia/genetics , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Sarcopenia/complications , Venous Thromboembolism/genetics , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Risk Factors
12.
Thromb Res ; 238: 197-205, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733691

IMPORTANCE: COVID-19 has disproportionately affected racialized populations, with particular impact among individuals of Black individuals. However, it is unclear whether disparities in venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications exist between Black individuals and those belonging to other racial groups with confirmed SARS-CoV2 infections. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the prevalence and moderators associated with VTE among Black COVID-19 patients in minoritized settings, and to compare this to White and Asian COVID-19 patients according to sex, age, and comorbid health conditions (heart failure, cancer, obesity, hypertension). DESIGN SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and CENTRAL for articles or reports published from inception to February 15, 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Reports on VTE among Black individuals infected with SARS-CoV2, in countries where Black people are considered a minority population group. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study characteristics and results of eligible studies were independently extracted by 2 pairs of reviewers. VTE prevalence was extracted, and risk of bias was assessed. Prevalence estimates of VTE prevalence among Black individuals with COVID19 in each study were pooled. Where studies provided race-stratified VTE prevalence among COVID19 patients, odds ratios were generated using a random-effects model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prevalence of VTE, comprising of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: Ten studies with 66,185 Black individuals reporting the prevalence of COVID-19 associated VTE were included. Weighted median age of included studies was 47.60. Pooled prevalence of COVID-19 associated VTE was 7.2 % (95 % CI, 3.8 % - 11.5 %) among Black individuals. Among individuals with SARS-CoV2 infections, Black population had higher risks of VTE compared to their White (OR = 1.79, [95 % CI 1.28-2.53], p < .001) or Asian (OR = 2.01, [95 % CI, 1.14-3.60], p = .017) counterparts, or patients with other racial identities (OR = 2.01, [95 % CI, 1.39, 2.92]; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Black individuals with COVID-19 had substantially higher risk of VTE compared to White or Asian individuals. Given racial disparities in thrombotic disease burden related to COVID-19, medical education, research, and health policy interventions are direly needed to ensure adequate disease awareness among Black individuals, to facilitate appropriate diagnosis and treatment among Black patients with suspected and confirmed VTE, and to advocate for culturally safe VTE prevention strategies, including pre-existing inequalities to the COVID-19 pandemic that persist after the crisis.


COVID-19 , Venous Thromboembolism , White People , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/ethnology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2 , Asian People , Female , Male , Risk Factors , Minority Groups/statistics & numerical data , Black People/statistics & numerical data
13.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 51(1)2024 May 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748549

BACKGROUND: Current venous thromboembolism guidelines recommend using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin regardless of obesity status; however, evidence remains limited for the safety and efficacy of DOAC use in patients with obesity. This retrospective analysis sought to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared with warfarin in a diverse population of patients with obesity in light of current prescribing practices. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a large academic health system between July 2014 and September 2019. Adults with an admission diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism, with weight greater than 120 kg or a body mass index greater than 40, and who were discharged on an oral anticoagulant were included. Outcomes included occurrence of a thromboembolic event (DVT, pulmonary embolism, or ischemic stroke), bleeding event requiring hospitalization, and all-cause mortality within 12 months following index admission. RESULTS: Out of 787 patients included, 520 were in the DOAC group and 267 were in the warfarin group. Within 12 months of index hospitalization, thromboembolic events occurred in 4.23% of patients in the DOAC group vs 7.12% of patients in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.32-1.1]; P = .082). Bleeding events requiring hospitalization occurred in 8.85% of DOAC patients vs 10.1% of warfarin patients (hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.57-1.5]; P = .82). A DVT occurred in 1.7% and 4.9% of patients in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.15-0.84]; P = .046). CONCLUSION: No significant differences could be determined between DOACs and warfarin for cumulative thromboembolic or bleeding events, pulmonary embolism, ischemic stroke, or all-cause mortality. The risk of DVT was lower with apixaban and rivaroxaban. Regardless of patient weight or body mass index, physicians prescribed DOACs more commonly than warfarin.


Anticoagulants , Obesity , Venous Thromboembolism , Warfarin , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Warfarin/adverse effects , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Obesity/complications , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies
14.
Am J Nurs ; 124(6): 40-46, 2024 Jun 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780339

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is a high-risk medication that can cause bleeding and/or thrombotic complications if not managed appropriately. Between January and July 2019, our institution experienced a high number of patient safety events related to UFH infusion for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). PURPOSE: The aim of this quality improvement (QI) initiative was to prevent these safety events by improving compliance with our institution's nurse-driven VTE UFH infusion protocol. METHODS: Baseline data for patients on the VTE UFH protocol were collected to identify improvement opportunities. Compliance with eight standards of care related to the VTE UFH infusion protocol was measured. Time to first therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was recorded to assess the benefit of improved compliance. INTERVENTIONS: Institutional policy updates were made to clarify the management of UFH infusions and documentation in the electronic health record. A multidisciplinary workgroup implemented order set changes, nursing communication orders, UFH infusion reports, and a nursing education module to promote compliance with the protocol. RESULTS: The overall rate of compliance with the VTE UFH infusion protocol increased from 79.4% at baseline to 85.2% following implementation of the QI initiative, and the median time to first therapeutic aPTT decreased from 831.5 minutes to 808 minutes over the same period. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary initiative to address improvement opportunities in a nurse-driven UFH protocol for VTE treatment increased compliance with the protocol and decreased the time to first therapeutic aPTT.


Anticoagulants , Guideline Adherence , Heparin , Quality Improvement , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/nursing , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Heparin/administration & dosage , Heparin/therapeutic use , Heparin/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Infusions, Intravenous , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Safety/standards
15.
Clin Podiatr Med Surg ; 41(3): 607-617, 2024 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789173

Every surgeon may have experienced a tragic event associated with death or debilitation secondary to deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) after foot and ankle trauma and surgery. Nevertheless, the prevention of such a tragic event needs to be carefully evaluated rationally with currently available epidemiologic data. With great postoperative protocols and access to care, most PE events can be prevented. There are modifiable risk factors, such as length/type of immobilization and operative trauma/time that can lower the incidence of DVT/PE. In addition, chemical prophylaxis may be warranted in certain people within the foot and ankle trauma population.


Ankle Injuries , Foot Injuries , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Ankle Injuries/complications , Ankle Injuries/surgery , Foot Injuries/complications , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/prevention & control , Pulmonary Embolism/therapy , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Incidence
16.
Cancer Med ; 13(9): e7231, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698697

OBJECTIVE: To create a nomogram for predicting the likelihood of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in colon cancer patients from China. METHODS: The data of colon cancer patients from Chongqing University Cancer Hospital between 2019 and 2022 were analyzed. Patients were divided into training set and internal validation set by random split-sample method in a split ratio of 7:3. The univariable and multivariable logistic analysis gradually identified the independent risk factors for VTE. A nomogram was created using all the variables that had a significance level of p < 0.05 in the multivariable logistic analysis and those with clinical significance. Calibration curves and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess model's fitting performance and clinical value. Harrell's C-index (concordance statistic) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were used to evaluate the predictive effectiveness of models. RESULTS: A total of 1996 patients were ultimately included. There were 1398 patients in the training set and 598 patients in the internal validation set. The nomogram included age, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, hypertension, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, platelet, absolute lymphocyte count, and D-dimer. The C-index of nomogram and Khorana score were 0.754 (95% CI 0.711-0.798), 0.520 (95% CI 0.477-0.563) in the training cohort and 0.713 (95% CI 0.643-0.784), 0.542 (95% CI 0.473-0.612) in the internal validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We have established and validated a nomogram to predict the VTE risk of colon cancer patients in China, which encompasses a diverse age range, a significant population size, and various clinical factors. It facilitates the identification of high-risk groups and may enable the implementation of targeted preventive measures.


Colonic Neoplasms , Nomograms , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Male , Female , Colonic Neoplasms/complications , Colonic Neoplasms/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Aged , Risk Assessment/methods , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Adult
19.
Hum Fertil (Camb) ; 27(1): 2352387, 2024 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38804228

The association between Medically Assisted Reproduction (MAR) and thromboembolic complications has been reported widely in multiple published studies. Although venous thromboembolism (VTE) is not thought to be a common complication of MAR, it is associated with high morbidity and is often preventable. Since VTE usually occurs after completion of MAR treatment and is often managed outside of the treating fertility unit, these complications are likely to be underreported and there may be limited awareness of the risks among clinicians. As we continue to see a rise in the total number of MAR treatment cycles, particularly in women over 40 years of age, along with a steady increase in the number of fertility preservation cycles for both medical and social indications, it is likely that we will see an increase in absolute numbers of VTE complications. Currently, there is a lack of management guidance and reporting of VTE events associated with assisted conception treatment. The aim of this guidance is to provide clinicians with information on VTE risk factors, guidance on assessing VTE risk and the best practice recommendations on risk reducing strategies for individuals at risk of VTE undergoing ovarian stimulation and embryo transfer cycles.


Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Venous Thromboembolism , Female , Humans , Risk Factors , United Kingdom , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Societies, Medical/standards
20.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 20(5): 359-376, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38712571

INTRODUCTION: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are the guideline-recommended therapy for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism. Since approximately 10% of patients using antiepileptic drugs (AED) also receive DOAC, aim of this review is to summarize data about drug-drug interactions (DDI) of DOAC with AED by using data from PubMed until December 2023. AREAS COVERED: Of 49 AED, only 16 have been investigated regarding DDI with DOAC by case reports or observational studies. No increased risk for stroke was reported only for topiramate, zonisamide, pregabalin, and gabapentin, whereas for the remaining 12 AED conflicting results regarding the risk for stroke and bleeding were found. Further 16 AED have the potential for pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic DDI, but no data regarding DOAC are available. For the remaining 17 AED it is unknown if they have DDI with DOAC. EXPERT OPINION: Knowledge about pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic DDI of AED and DOAC is limited and frequently restricted to in vitro and in vivo findings. Since no data about DDI with DOAC are available for 67% of AED and an increasing number of patients have a combined medication of DOAC and AED, there is an urgent need for research on this topic.


Anticoagulants , Anticonvulsants , Atrial Fibrillation , Drug Interactions , Secondary Prevention , Stroke , Humans , Stroke/prevention & control , Stroke/etiology , Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Anticonvulsants/pharmacokinetics , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Anticonvulsants/pharmacology , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/pharmacokinetics , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/pharmacology , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Administration, Oral , Secondary Prevention/methods , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Primary Prevention/methods , Animals
...