Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 5.080
Filter
1.
Clin Lab ; 70(7)2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965948

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The FilmArray Respiratory Panel RP 2.1 plus (FilmArray RP) is a point-of-care syndromic panel for respiratory pathogens. Although highly valuable in the clinical settings, the co-detection of pathogens in FilmArray RP may confound result interpretation. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swab specimens collected from patients with respiratory symptoms were analyzed by comparing co-detection results from FilmArray RP with those of Allplex Respiratory Panels (Allplex RP: Power-Chek for SARS-CoV-2). RESULTS: Out of 765 FilmArray RP tests, 143 (18.7%) showed co-detections (two: 122 (85.3%), three: 18 (12.6%), four: 2 (1.4%), and five viruses: 1 (0.7%). The most frequent co-detection was human rhinovirus/enterovirus (HRV/HEV) with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (22.3%, 32/143). The overall discordance rate between Film-Array RP and other tests was 32.9%. Notably, discordance in detecting adenovirus (AdV) was significant, with cases detected by FilmArray often not appearing in Allplex RP. CONCLUSIONS: Discordances were varied by virus combination. It is advisable to perform additional confirmatory testing based on clinical relevance.


Subject(s)
Coinfection , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Respiratory Tract Infections , Humans , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Coinfection/virology , Coinfection/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Adult , Aged , Nasopharynx/virology , Child , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Young Adult , Viruses/isolation & purification , Viruses/genetics , Viruses/classification , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/virology , Infant
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 14427, 2024 06 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38910140

ABSTRACT

The study presents a series of examples of magnetic nanoparticle systems designed for the diagnosis of viral diseases. In this interdisciplinary work, we describe one of the most comprehensive synthetic approaches for the preparation and functionalization of smart nanoparticle systems for rapid and effective RT-PCR diagnostics and isolation of viral RNA. Twelve different organic ligands and inorganic porous silica were used for surface functionalization of the Fe3O4 magnetic core to increase the number of active centres for efficient RNA binding from human swab samples. Different nanoparticle systems with common beads were characterized by HRTEM, SEM, FT-IR, XRD, XPS and magnetic measurements. We demonstrate the application of the fundamental models modified to fit the experimental zero-field cooling magnetization data. We discuss the influence of the nanoparticle shell parameters (morphology, thickness, ligands) on the overall magnetic performance of the systems. The prepared nanoparticles were tested for the isolation of viral RNA from tissue samples infected with hepatitis E virus-HEV and from biofluid samples of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. The efficiency of RNA isolation was quantified by RT-qPCR method.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Magnetite Nanoparticles , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Silicon Dioxide , Silicon Dioxide/chemistry , Humans , Magnetite Nanoparticles/chemistry , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , Surface Properties , Pathology, Molecular/methods , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/virology
3.
J Clin Virol ; 173: 105695, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823290

ABSTRACT

Metagenomics is gradually being implemented for diagnosing infectious diseases. However, in-depth protocol comparisons for viral detection have been limited to individual sets of experimental workflows and laboratories. In this study, we present a benchmark of metagenomics protocols used in clinical diagnostic laboratories initiated by the European Society for Clinical Virology (ESCV) Network on NGS (ENNGS). A mock viral reference panel was designed to mimic low biomass clinical specimens. The panel was used to assess the performance of twelve metagenomic wet lab protocols currently in use in the diagnostic laboratories of participating ENNGS member institutions. Both Illumina and Nanopore, shotgun and targeted capture probe protocols were included. Performance metrics sensitivity, specificity, and quantitative potential were assessed using a central bioinformatics pipeline. Overall, viral pathogens with loads down to 104 copies/ml (corresponding to CT values of 31 in our PCR assays) were detected by all the evaluated metagenomic wet lab protocols. In contrast, lower abundant mixed viruses of CT values of 35 and higher were detected only by a minority of the protocols. Considering the reference panel as the gold standard, optimal thresholds to define a positive result were determined per protocol, based on the horizontal genome coverage. Implementing these thresholds, sensitivity and specificity of the protocols ranged from 67 to 100 % and 87 to 100 %, respectively. A variety of metagenomic protocols are currently in use in clinical diagnostic laboratories. Detection of low abundant viral pathogens and mixed infections remains a challenge, implying the need for standardization of metagenomic analysis for use in clinical settings.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Metagenomics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Viruses , Metagenomics/methods , Metagenomics/standards , Humans , Viruses/genetics , Viruses/classification , Viruses/isolation & purification , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/standards , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/virology , Computational Biology/methods
4.
Analyst ; 149(12): 3335-3345, 2024 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695841

ABSTRACT

In this study, a microfluidic-based system utilizing colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is introduced for the quantitative analysis of nucleic acid targets. This system offers a user-friendly and cost-effective platform for the multiplexed genetic diagnosis of various infectious diseases across multiple samples. It includes time-lapse imaging equipment for capturing images of the microfluidic device during the LAMP assay and a hue-based quantitative analysis software to analyze the LAMP reaction, streamlining diagnostic procedures. An electric pipette was used to simplify the loading of samples and LAMP reagents into the device, allowing easy operation even by untrained individuals. The hue-based analysis software employs efficient image processing and post-processing techniques to calculate DNA amplification curves based on color changes in multiple reaction chambers. This software automates several tasks, such as identifying reaction chamber areas from time-lapse images, quantifying color information within each chamber, correcting baselines of DNA amplification curves, fitting experimental data to theoretical curves, and determining the threshold time for each curve. To validate the developed system, conventional off-chip LAMP assays were conducted with a 25 µL reaction mixture in 0.2 mL polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tubes using a real-time turbidimeter. The results indicated that the threshold time obtained using the colorimetric LAMP assay in the developed system is comparable to that obtained with real-time turbidity measurements in PCR tubes, demonstrating the system's capability for quantitative analysis of target nucleic acids, including those from human herpesviruses.


Subject(s)
Colorimetry , Lab-On-A-Chip Devices , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/instrumentation , Humans , Colorimetry/methods , Colorimetry/instrumentation , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/instrumentation , Microfluidic Analytical Techniques/instrumentation , Microfluidic Analytical Techniques/methods , DNA, Viral/analysis , DNA, Viral/genetics , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Limit of Detection
5.
Microbiol Spectr ; 12(6): e0357523, 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709030

ABSTRACT

Transplant patients are at risk of infections due to long-term immunosuppression contributing to morbidity and mortality in this population. Post-transplant testing guidelines were established to monitor and guide therapeutic interventions in transplant recipients. We hypothesize that there are gaps in adherence to the recommended frequency of laboratory testing in post-transplant patients. We analyzed national reference laboratory data to compare viral post-transplant infection (PTI) testing frequency with their respective published guidelines to understand patient uptake and compliance. We evaluated the ordering patterns, positivity rates, and frequency of molecular infectious disease tests (MIDTs). We included 345 patients with International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes for transplant (Z940-Z942, Z944, Z9481, Z9483, Z9484) with at least two tests (within 7 days) in January 2019 and at least one test in December 2020 to find patients in the post-transplant period. We analyzed two cohorts: kidney transplant recipients (KTRs; 40%) and non-KTR (60%) then followed them longitudinally for the study period. In KTR cohort, high-to-low proportion of ordered MIDT was blood BK virus (bBKV) followed by cytomegalovirus (CMV); in non-KTR cohort, CMV was followed by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). KTR cohort positivity was highest for urine BK virus (uBKV; 58%) followed by EBV (46%), bBKV (40%), and CMV (31%). Non-KTR cohort positivity was highest for uBKV (64%), EBV (51%), CMV (30%), bBKV (8%), and adenovirus (7%). All patients were tested at progressively longer intervals from the date of the first post-transplant ICD-10-coded test. More than 40% of the KTR cohort were tested less frequently for EBV and bBKV, and more than 20% of the non-KTR cohort were tested for EBV less frequently than published guidelines 4 months after transplant. Despite regular testing, the results of MIDT testing for KTR and non-KTR patients in the post-transplant period are not aligned with published guidelines.IMPORTANCEGuidance for post-transplant infectious disease testing is established, however, for certain infections it allows for clinician discretion. This leads to transplant center policies developing their own testing/surveillance strategies based on their specific transplant patient population (kidney, stem cell, etc.). The Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) has developed a strategic plan to improve and standardize the transplant process in the US to improve outcomes of living donors and recipients. Publishing national reference lab data on the testing frequency and its alignment with the recommended guidelines for post-transplant infectious diseases can inform patient uptake and compliance for these strategic OPTN efforts.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Transplant Recipients , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , BK Virus/isolation & purification , BK Virus/genetics , Virus Diseases/epidemiology , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/virology , Immunosuppression Therapy/adverse effects , Cytomegalovirus/isolation & purification , Cytomegalovirus/genetics , Herpesvirus 4, Human/isolation & purification , Herpesvirus 4, Human/genetics , Herpesvirus 4, Human/immunology , Retrospective Studies
6.
J Clin Microbiol ; 62(6): e0034524, 2024 Jun 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757981

ABSTRACT

Viral enrichment by probe hybridization has been reported to significantly increase the sensitivity of viral metagenomics. This study compares the analytical performance of two targeted metagenomic virus capture probe-based methods: (i) SeqCap EZ HyperCap by Roche (ViroCap) and (ii) Twist Comprehensive Viral Research Panel workflow, for diagnostic use. Sensitivity, specificity, and limit of detection were analyzed using 25 synthetic viral sequences spiked in increasing proportions of human background DNA, eight clinical samples, and American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) Virome Virus Mix. Sensitivity and specificity were 95% and higher for both methods using the synthetic and reference controls as gold standard. Combining thresholds for viral sequence read counts and genome coverage [respectively 500 reads per million (RPM) and 10% coverage] resulted in optimal prediction of true positive results. Limits of detection were approximately 50-500 copies/mL for both methods as determined by ddPCR. Increasing proportions of spike-in cell-free human background sequences up to 99.999% (50 ng/mL) did not negatively affect viral detection, suggesting effective capture of viral sequences. These data show analytical performances in ranges applicable to clinical samples, for both probe hybridization metagenomic approaches. This study supports further steps toward more widespread use of viral metagenomics for pathogen detection, in clinical and surveillance settings using low biomass samples. IMPORTANCE: Viral metagenomics has been gradually applied for broad-spectrum pathogen detection of infectious diseases, surveillance of emerging diseases, and pathogen discovery. Viral enrichment by probe hybridization methods has been reported to significantly increase the sensitivity of viral metagenomics. During the past years, a specific hybridization panel distributed by Roche has been adopted in a broad range of different clinical and zoonotic settings. Recently, Twist Bioscience has released a new hybridization panel targeting human and animal viruses. This is the first report comparing the performance of viral metagenomic hybridization panels.


Subject(s)
Metagenomics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Viruses , Humans , Metagenomics/methods , Metagenomics/standards , Viruses/genetics , Viruses/isolation & purification , Viruses/classification , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/virology , Reference Standards , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/standards , Limit of Detection , Nucleic Acid Hybridization/methods , Virome
7.
J Clin Virol ; 173: 105693, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38820916

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Viral respiratory Infections pose a health risk, especially to vulnerable patient populations. Effective testing programs can detect and differentiate these infections at an early stage, which is particularly important for high-risk clinical departments. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a multiplex PCR-panel for 16 different respiratory viruses on a fully-automated high-throughput platform. METHODS: Three multiplex-PCR assays were designed to run on the cobas5800/6800/8800 systems, consolidating 16 viral targets: RESP1: SARS-CoV-2, influenza-A/B, RSV; RESP2: hMPV, hBoV, hAdV, rhino-/ENV; RESP3: HPIV-1-4, hCoV-229E, hCoV-NL63, hCoV-OC43, hCoV-HKU1. Analytic performance was evaluated using digital-PCR based standards and international reference material. Clinical performance was determined by comparing results from clinical samples with reference assays. RESULTS: Analytical sensitivity (i.e. lower limit of detection (LoD), 95 % probability of detection) was determined as follows: SARS-CoV-2: 29.3 IU/ml, influenza-A: 179.9 cp/ml, influenza-B: 333.9 cp/ml and RSV: 283.1 cp/ml. LoDs of other pathogens ranged between 9.4 cp/ml (hCoV-NL63) and 21,419 cp/ml (HPIV-2). Linearity was verified over 4-7 log-steps with pooled standard differentials (SD) ranging between 0.18-0.70ct. Inter-/intra-run variability (precision) was assessed for all targets over 3 days. SDs ranged between 0.13-0.74ct. Positive agreement in clinical samples was 99.4 % and 95 % for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza-A respectively. Other targets were in the 80-100 % range. Negative agreement varied between 96.3-100 %. DISCUSSION: Lab-developed tests are a key factor for effective clinical diagnostics. The multiplex panel presented in this study demonstrated high performance and provides an easily scalable high-throughput solution for respiratory virus testing, e.g. for testing in high-risk patient populations.


Subject(s)
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Respiratory Tract Infections , Sensitivity and Specificity , Humans , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , High-Throughput Screening Assays/methods , Viruses/isolation & purification , Viruses/genetics , Viruses/classification , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/virology , Automation, Laboratory/methods , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/standards
8.
J Appl Lab Med ; 9(3): 599-628, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695489

ABSTRACT

Respiratory viral infections are among the most frequent infections experienced worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for testing and currently several tests are available for the detection of a wide range of viruses. These tests vary widely in terms of the number of viral pathogens included, viral markers targeted, regulatory status, and turnaround time to results, as well as their analytical and clinical performance. Given these many variables, selection and interpretation of testing requires thoughtful consideration. The current guidance document is the authors' expert opinion based on the preponderance of available evidence to address key questions related to best practices for laboratory diagnosis of respiratory viral infections including who to test, when to test, and what tests to use. An algorithm is proposed to help laboratories decide on the most appropriate tests to use for the diagnosis of respiratory viral infections.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Tract Infections , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Algorithms , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/virology
9.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 14: 1366908, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725449

ABSTRACT

Background: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a novel non-invasive and comprehensive technique for etiological diagnosis of infectious diseases. However, its practical significance has been seldom reported in the context of hematological patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia, a unique patient group characterized by neutropenia and compromised immune responses. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the results of plasma cfDNA sequencing in 164 hematological patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia. We assessed the diagnostic efficacy and clinical impact of mNGS, comparing it with conventional microbiological tests. Results: mNGS identified 68 different pathogens in 111 patients, whereas conventional methods detected only 17 pathogen types in 36 patients. mNGS exhibited a significantly higher positive detection rate than conventional methods (67.7% vs. 22.0%, P < 0.001). This improvement was consistent across bacterial (30.5% vs. 9.1%), fungal (19.5% vs. 4.3%), and viral (37.2% vs. 9.1%) infections (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The anti-infective treatment strategies were adjusted for 51.2% (84/164) of the patients based on the mNGS results. Conclusions: mNGS of plasma cfDNA offers substantial promise for the early detection of pathogens and the timely optimization of anti-infective therapies in hematological patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia.


Subject(s)
Febrile Neutropenia , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Metagenomics , Humans , Metagenomics/methods , Male , Retrospective Studies , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Female , Middle Aged , Febrile Neutropenia/microbiology , Febrile Neutropenia/blood , Febrile Neutropenia/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Aged, 80 and over , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacteria/classification , Mycoses/diagnosis , Mycoses/microbiology , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/virology
11.
Xenotransplantation ; 31(3): e12851, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747130

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The German Xenotransplantation Consortium is in the process to prepare a clinical trial application (CTA) on xenotransplantation of genetically modified pig hearts. In the CTA documents to the central and national regulatory authorities, that is, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI), respectively, it is required to list the potential zoonotic or xenozoonotic porcine microorganisms including porcine viruses as well as to describe methods of detection in order to prevent their transmission. The donor animals should be tested using highly sensitive detection systems. I would like to define a detection system as the complex including the actual detection methods, either PCR-based, cell-based, or immunological methods and their sensitivity, as well as sample generation, sample preparation, sample origin, time of sampling, and the necessary negative and positive controls. Lessons learned from the identification of porcine cytomegalovirus/porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV) in the xenotransplanted heart in the recipient in the Baltimore study underline how important such systems are. The question is whether veterinary laboratories can supply such assays. METHODS: A total of 35 veterinary laboratories in Germany were surveyed for their ability to test for selected xenotransplantation-relevant viruses, including PCMV/PRV, hepatitis E virus, and porcine endogenous retrovirus-C (PERV-C). As comparison, data from Swiss laboratories and a laboratory in the USA were analyzed. Furthermore, we assessed which viruses were screened for in clinical and preclinical trials performed until now and during screening of pig populations. RESULTS: Of the nine laboratories that provided viral diagnostics, none of these included all potential viruses of concern, indeed, the most important assays confirmed in recent human trials, antibody detection of PCMV/PRV and screening for PERV-C were not available at all. The situation was similar in Swiss and US laboratories. Different viruses have been tested for in first clinical and preclinical trials performed in various countries. CONCLUSION: Based on these results it is necessary to establish special virological laboratories able to test for all xenotransplantation-relevant viruses using validated assays, optimally in the xenotransplantation centers.


Subject(s)
Transplantation, Heterologous , Animals , Transplantation, Heterologous/methods , Swine , Humans , Viruses/isolation & purification , Laboratories , Germany , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Transplantation , Heterografts/virology
12.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 30(6): 1096-1103, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38781684

ABSTRACT

Viral respiratory illness surveillance has traditionally focused on single pathogens (e.g., influenza) and required fever to identify influenza-like illness (ILI). We developed an automated system applying both laboratory test and syndrome criteria to electronic health records from 3 practice groups in Massachusetts, USA, to monitor trends in respiratory viral-like illness (RAVIOLI) across multiple pathogens. We identified RAVIOLI syndrome using diagnosis codes associated with respiratory viral testing or positive respiratory viral assays or fever. After retrospectively applying RAVIOLI criteria to electronic health records, we observed annual winter peaks during 2015-2019, predominantly caused by influenza, followed by cyclic peaks corresponding to SARS-CoV-2 surges during 2020-2024, spikes in RSV in mid-2021 and late 2022, and recrudescent influenza in late 2022 and 2023. RAVIOLI rates were higher and fluctuations more pronounced compared with traditional ILI surveillance. RAVIOLI broadens the scope, granularity, sensitivity, and specificity of respiratory viral illness surveillance compared with traditional ILI surveillance.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Electronic Health Records , Respiratory Tract Infections , Humans , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/virology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/diagnosis , Population Surveillance/methods , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Adult , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Male , Adolescent , Child , Aged , Female , Seasons , Virus Diseases/epidemiology , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/virology , Child, Preschool , Young Adult
13.
Viruses ; 16(5)2024 05 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38793679

ABSTRACT

In recent years, an increasing number of viruses have triggered outbreaks that pose a severe threat to both human and animal life, as well as caused substantial economic losses. It is crucial to understand the genomic structure and epidemiology of these viruses to guide effective clinical prevention and treatment strategies. Nanopore sequencing, a third-generation sequencing technology, has been widely used in genomic research since 2014. This technology offers several advantages over traditional methods and next-generation sequencing (NGS), such as the ability to generate ultra-long reads, high efficiency, real-time monitoring and analysis, portability, and the ability to directly sequence RNA or DNA molecules. As a result, it exhibits excellent applicability and flexibility in virus research, including viral detection and surveillance, genome assembly, the discovery of new variants and novel viruses, and the identification of chemical modifications. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of the development, principles, advantages, and applications of nanopore sequencing technology in animal and human virus research, aiming to offer fresh perspectives for future studies in this field.


Subject(s)
Genome, Viral , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Nanopore Sequencing , Viruses , Nanopore Sequencing/methods , Animals , Humans , Viruses/genetics , Viruses/classification , Viruses/isolation & purification , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Virus Diseases/virology , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Genomics/methods , Nanopores
14.
Biologicals ; 86: 101763, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641502

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of viral agents causing reproductive failure in pigs in Korea. In addition, two types of multiplex real-time PCR (mqPCR) were developed for the simultaneous detection of Aujeszky's disease virus (ADV) and porcine parvovirus (PPV) in mqPCR and encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) in reverse transcription mqPCR (mRT-qPCR). A total of 150 aborted fetus samples collected from 2020 to 2022 were analyzed. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus was the most prevalent (49/150 32.7%), followed by porcine circovirus type 2 (31/150, 20.7%), and PPV1 (7/150, 4.7%), whereas ADV, EMCV, and JEV were not detected. The newly developed mqPCR and mRT-qPCR could simultaneously detect and differentiate with high sensitivities and specificities. When applied to aborted fetuses, the newly developed mqPCR for PPV was 33.3% more sensitivities than the previously established diagnostic method. Amino acid analysis of the VP2 sequences of PPV isolates revealed considerable similarity to the highly pathogenic Kresse strain. This study successfully evaluated the prevalence of viral agents causing reproductive failure among swine in Korea, the developed mqPCR and mRT-qPCR methods could be utilized as effective and accurate diagnostic methods for the epidemiological surveillance of ADV, PPV, EMCV, and JEV.


Subject(s)
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Swine Diseases , Animals , Swine , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/virology , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Prevalence , Female , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Pregnancy , Parvovirus, Porcine/genetics , Parvovirus, Porcine/isolation & purification , Abortion, Veterinary/virology , Abortion, Veterinary/epidemiology , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/epidemiology , Virus Diseases/virology
15.
Analyst ; 149(9): 2507-2525, 2024 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630498

ABSTRACT

Outbreaks of viral diseases seriously jeopardize people's health and cause huge economic losses. At the same time, virology provides a new perspective for biology, molecular biology and cancer research, and it is important to study the discovered viruses with potential applications. Therefore, the development of immediate and rapid viral detection methods for the prevention and treatment of viral diseases as well as the study of viruses has attracted extensive attention from scientists. With the continuous progress of science and technology, especially in the field of bioanalysis, a series of new detection techniques have been applied to the on-site rapid detection of viruses, which has become a powerful approach for human beings to fight against viruses. In this paper, the latest research progress of rapid point-of-care detection of viral nucleic acids, antigens and antibodies is presented. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of these technologies are discussed from the perspective of practical application requirements. Finally, the problems and challenges faced by rapid viral detection methods and their development prospects are discussed.


Subject(s)
Point-of-Care Testing , Viruses , Humans , Viruses/isolation & purification , Viruses/genetics , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Antigens, Viral/analysis , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Biosensing Techniques/methods , Point-of-Care Systems , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/genetics
16.
Vet J ; 305: 106124, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653339

ABSTRACT

Respiratory diseases due to viral or bacterial agents, either alone or in combination, cause substantial economic burdens to the swine industry worldwide. Rapid and reliable detection of causal pathogens is crucial for effective epidemiological surveillance and disease management. This research aimed to employ the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay for simultaneous detection of seven distinct pathogens causing respiratory problems in swine, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), swine influenza virus (SIV), porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV), porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2), Pasteurella multocida, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, and Glässerella parasuis. The results indicated no probe cross-reactivity among the seven target agents with other swine pathogens. The detection limits ranged from 5 to 34 copies per assay for the target organisms. The MLPA assay was evaluated with 88 samples and compared to real-time or multiplex PCR for the target pathogens. The MLPA assay demonstrated high relative test sensitivities (100 %) and reasonable to good relative specificities at 62.5 %, 95.1 %, 86.8 %, and 97.6 % for PRRSV, P. multocida, G. parasuis, and PCV2, respectively, relative to comparator PCR assays. In 71 samples where MLPA and comparator PCR assays matched exactly, infections were detected in 64 samples (90.1 %), with PRRSV being the most commonly found virus and 50.7 % of the samples showing co-infection with two to five of the pathogens. This approach serves as a valuable tool for conducting differential diagnoses and epidemiological investigations of pathogen prevalence within swine populations.


Subject(s)
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Swine Diseases , Animals , Swine , Swine Diseases/virology , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Respiratory Tract Infections/veterinary , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/isolation & purification , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/genetics , Virus Diseases/veterinary , Virus Diseases/virology , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/veterinary , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods
17.
Rev Esp Quimioter ; 37(3): 252-256, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38606841

ABSTRACT

The increased knowledge on virology and the increased potential of their diagnostic has risen several relevant question about the role of an early viral diagnosis and potential early treatment on the management of respiratory tract infections (RTI). In order to further understand the role of viral diagnostic tests in the management of RTI, a panel of experts was convened to discuss about their potential role, beyond what had been agreed in Influenza. The objective of this panel was to define the plausible role of aetiologic viral diagnostic into clinical management; make recommendations on the potential expanded use of such tests in the future and define some gaps in the management of RTI. Molecular Infection Viral Diagnostic (mIVD) tests should be used in all adult patients admitted to Hospital with RTI, and in paediatric patients requiring admission or who would be referred to another hospital for more specialised care. The increased use of mIVD will not only reduce the inappropriate use of antibiotics so reducing the antibiotic microbe resistance, but also will improve the outcome of the patient if an aetiologic viral therapy can be warranted, saving resource requirements and improving patient flows. Implementing IVD testing in RTI has various organizational benefits as well, but expanding its use into clinical settings would need a cost-effectiveness strategy and budget impact assessment.


Subject(s)
Respiratory Tract Infections , Humans , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Child
18.
J Med Virol ; 96(4): e29624, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38647075

ABSTRACT

Respiratory infections pose a serious threat to global public health, underscoring the urgent need for rapid, accurate, and large-scale diagnostic tools. In recent years, the CRISPR/Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated) system, combined with isothermal amplification methods, has seen widespread application in nucleic acid testing (NAT). However, achieving a single-tube reaction system containing all necessary components is challenging due to the competitive effects between recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) and CRISPR/Cas reagents. Furthermore, to enable precision medicine, distinguishing between bacterial and viral infections is essential. Here, we have developed a novel NAT method, termed one-pot-RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a, which combines RPA with CRISPR molecular diagnostic technology, enabling simultaneous detection of 12 common respiratory pathogens, including six bacteria and six viruses. RPA and CRISPR/Cas12a reactions are separated by paraffin, providing an independent platform for RPA reactions to generate sufficient target products before being mixed with the CRISPR/Cas12a system. Results can be visually observed under LED blue light. The sensitivity of the one-pot-RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a method is 2.5 × 100 copies/µL plasmids, with no cross-reaction with other bacteria or viruses. Additionally, the clinical utility was evaluated by testing clinical isolates of bacteria and virus throat swab samples, demonstrating favorable performance. Thus, our one-pot-RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a method shows immense potential for accurate and large-scale detection of 12 common respiratory pathogens in point-of-care testing.


Subject(s)
Bacteria , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Respiratory Tract Infections , Viruses , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Recombinases/genetics , Recombinases/metabolism , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Viruses/genetics , Viruses/isolation & purification
19.
Sci Total Environ ; 931: 172593, 2024 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642765

ABSTRACT

Wastewater surveillance has evolved into a powerful tool for monitoring public health-relevant analytes. Recent applications in tracking severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection highlight its potential. Beyond humans, it can be extended to livestock settings where there is increasing demand for livestock products, posing risks of disease emergence. Wastewater surveillance may offer non-invasive, cost-effective means to detect potential outbreaks among animals. This approach aligns with the "One Health" paradigm, emphasizing the interconnectedness of animal, human, and ecosystem health. By monitoring viruses in livestock wastewater, early detection, prevention, and control strategies can be employed, safeguarding both animal and human health, economic stability, and international trade. This integrated "One Health" approach enhances collaboration and a comprehensive understanding of disease dynamics, supporting proactive measures in the Anthropocene era where animal and human diseases are on the rise.


Subject(s)
Livestock , Wastewater , Animals , Wastewater/virology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Virus Diseases/veterinary , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Environmental Monitoring/methods , One Health
20.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 109(3): 116308, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688147

ABSTRACT

Syndromic testing, the simultaneous testing for multiple pathogens causing similar symptoms, has recently gained ground in clinical diagnostics. This approach can significantly shorten time to diagnosis and speed up decision-making, leading to an improved outcome for the patient. Here, we compared three automated multiplex PCR platforms for syndromic testing of respiratory samples in a retrospective study, and assessed their relative sensitivities. The PPA between BioFire and QIAstat compared to ePlex was 98.4 % and 93.8 %, respectively, and 6 discrepant results were observed. The BioFire was identified as the platform with the highest relative sensitivity. Overall, the platforms performed similarly and are all suitable for syndromic testing of respiratory samples.


Subject(s)
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Respiratory Tract Infections , Sensitivity and Specificity , Humans , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Retrospective Studies , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Viruses/isolation & purification , Viruses/genetics , Viruses/classification , Adult , Middle Aged , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/virology , Child , Male , Child, Preschool , Female , Adolescent , Aged , Infant , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...