Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 563
Filter
1.
J Imaging Inform Med ; 37(2): 778-800, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343247

ABSTRACT

Monkeypox (MPox) is an infectious disease caused by the monkeypox virus, presenting challenges in accurate identification due to its resemblance to other diseases. This study introduces a deep learning-based method to distinguish visually similar diseases, specifically MPox, chickenpox, and measles, addressing the 2022 global MPox outbreak. A two-stage optimization approach was presented in the study. By analyzing pre-trained deep neural networks including 71 models, this study optimizes accuracy through transfer learning, fine-tuning, and ensemble learning techniques. ConvNeXtBase, Large, and XLarge models were identified achieving 97.5% accuracy in the first stage. Afterwards, some selection criteria were followed for the models identified in the first stage for use in ensemble learning technique within the optimization approach. The top-performing ensemble model, EM3 (composed of RegNetX160, ResNetRS101, and ResNet101), attains an AUC of 0.9971 in the second stage. Evaluation on unseen data ensures model robustness and enhances the study's overall validity and reliability. The design and implementation of the study have been optimized to address the limitations identified in the literature. This approach offers a rapid and highly accurate decision support system for timely MPox diagnosis, reducing human error, manual processes, and enhancing clinic efficiency. It aids in early MPox detection, addresses diverse disease challenges, and informs imaging device software development. The study's broad implications support global health efforts and showcase artificial intelligence potential in medical informatics for disease identification and diagnosis.

2.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 10: e49285, 2024 Feb 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38363593

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The worldwide spread of monkeypox (mpox) has witnessed a significant increase, particularly in nonendemic countries. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the changing clinical symptoms associated with mpox from 1970 to 2023 and explore their interrelations. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, 3 electronic databases were searched for English peer-reviewed studies conducted from January 1970 to April 2023 that reported any symptoms among confirmed mpox cases. We categorized the mpox epidemics into 3 periods: 1970-2002 (period 1, within the African region), 2003-2021(period 2, epidemics outside Africa), and 2022-2023 (period 3, worldwide outbreak). Following PRISMA guidelines, a meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence for each symptom. The correlation among symptoms was analyzed and visualized using network analysis. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 61 studies that reported 21 symptoms in 720 patients from period 1, 39 symptoms in 1756 patients from period 2, and 37 symptoms in 12,277 patients from period 3. The most common symptom among patients from all 3 periods was rash (period 1: 92.6%, 95% CI 78.2%-100%; period 2: 100%, 95% CI 99.9%-100%; and period 3: 94.8%, 95% CI 90.9%-98.8%), followed by lymphadenopathy (period 1: 59.8%, 95% CI 50.3%-69.2%; period 2: 74.1%, 95% CI 64.2%-84.1%; and period 3: 61.1%, 95% CI 54.2%-68.1%). Fever (99%, 95% CI 97%-100%), enlarged lymph nodes (80.5%, 95% CI 75.4%-85.0%), and headache (69.1%, 95% CI 4%-100%) were the main symptoms in period 1, with a significant decrease in period 3: 37.9%, 31.2%, and 28.7%, respectively. Chills/rigors (73.3%, 95% CI 60.9%-85.7%), fatigue (68.2%, 95% CI 51.6%-84.8%), and dysphagia/swallowing difficulty (61.2%, 95% CI 10.5%-100%) emerged as primary new symptoms in period 2 and decreased significantly in period 3. Most other symptoms remained unchanged or decreased in period 3 compared to the former 2 periods. Nausea/vomiting had the highest degree of correlation (with 13 symptoms) and was highly positively correlated with lymphadenopathy (r=0.908) and conjunctivitis (r=0.900) in period 2. In contrast, rash and headache were 2 symptoms with the highest degree of correlation (with 21 and 21 symptoms, respectively) in period 3 and were highly positively correlated with fever (r=0.918 and 0.789, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The manifestation of symptoms in patients with mpox has become more diverse, leading to an increase in their correlation. Although the prevalence of rash remains steady, other symptoms have decreased. It is necessary to surveil the evolving nature of mpox and the consequential changes in clinical characteristics. Epidemic countries may shift their focus on the potential association among symptoms and the high synergy risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration: CRD42023403282; http://tinyurl.com/yruuas5n.


Subject(s)
Mpox (monkeypox) , Humans , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Epidemics , Network Meta-Analysis , Symptom Assessment/statistics & numerical data
3.
Infect Disord Drug Targets ; 24(7): e020224226681, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38318833

ABSTRACT

Zika virus (ZIKV) is among the relatively new infectious disease threats that include SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus, monkeypox (Mpox) virus, etc. ZIKV has been reported to cause severe health risks to the fetus. To date, satisfactory treatment is still not available for the treatment of ZIKV infection. This review examines the last five years of work using natural biomolecules (BMs) to counteract the ZIKV through virtual screening and in vitro investigations. Virtual screening has identified doramectin, pinocembrin, hesperidins, epigallocatechin gallate, pedalitin, and quercetin as potentially active versus ZIKV infection. In vitro, testing has shown that nordihydroguaiaretic acid, mefloquine, isoquercitrin, glycyrrhetinic acid, patentiflorin-A, rottlerin, and harringtonine can reduce ZIKV infections in cell lines. However, in vivo, testing is limited, fortunately, emetine, rottlerin, patentiflorin-A, and lycorine have shown in vivo anti- ZIKV potential. This review focuses on natural biomolecules that show a particularly high selective index (>10). There is limited in vivo and clinical trial data for natural BMs, which needs to be an active area of investigation. This review aims to compile the known reference data and discuss the barriers associated with discovering and using natural BM agents to control ZIKV infection.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Zika Virus Infection , Zika Virus , Humans , Zika Virus/drug effects , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Zika Virus Infection/drug therapy , Zika Virus Infection/virology , Animals , Biological Products/pharmacology
4.
IJID Reg ; 10: 159-161, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38304759

ABSTRACT

This report elucidated the first two noteworthy cases of Mpox that manifested as an emerging concern in a densely populated city in Vietnam. Two male patients (22 and 27 years old) were admitted to the hospital due to the presence of small pustules on their faces, accompanied by symptoms of fatigue, drowsiness, and muscle pain. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction confirmed the presence of Mpox. The patients possessed a medical history involving four previous treatments for syphilis, a continuous antiretroviral regimen for over 3 years, no previous history of chickenpox, a lack of vaccination against chickenpox, and engagement in intimate contact with other men. Following a 14-day isolation period coupled with appropriate medical interventions, both patients exhibited stable health conditions, marked by the absence of fever and the desiccation of skin blisters. Subsequently, they were discharged with instructions for ongoing health monitoring. Comprehensive surveillance and monitoring approaches have been implemented for all individuals in close contact with the affected patients, adhering to established guidelines. Notably, no suspected cases have been identified during the current surveillance efforts. The collective findings underscore the significance of robust surveillance, continuous monitoring, and strategic vaccination initiatives, particularly in densely populated urban centers, to effectively manage and mitigate the impact of Mpox outbreaks.

5.
Public Health Rep ; 139(5): 566-572, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38264963

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Mpox surveillance was integral during the 2022 outbreak response. We evaluated implementation of mpox surveillance in Tennessee during an outbreak response and made recommendations for surveillance during emerging infectious disease outbreaks. METHODS: To understand surveillance implementation, system processes, and areas for improvement, we conducted 8 semistructured focus groups and 7 interviews with 36 health care, laboratory, and health department representatives during September 9-20, 2022. We categorized and analyzed session transcription and notes. We analyzed completeness and timeliness of surveillance data, including 349 orthopoxvirus-positive laboratory reports from commercial, public health, and health system laboratories during July 1-August 31, 2022. RESULTS: Participants described an evolving system and noted that existing informatics platforms inefficiently supported iterations of reporting requirements. Clear communication, standardization of terminology, and shared, adaptable, and user-friendly informatics platforms were prioritized for future emerging infectious disease surveillance systems. Laboratory-reported epidemiologic information was often incomplete; only 55% (191 of 349) of reports included patient address and telephone number. The median time from symptom onset to specimen collection was 5 days (IQR, 3-6 d), from specimen collection to laboratory reporting was 3 days (IQR, 1-4 d), from laboratory reporting to patient interview was 1 day (IQR, 1-3 d), and from symptom onset to patient interview was 9 days (IQR, 7-12 d). CONCLUSIONS: Future emerging infectious disease responses would benefit from standardized surveillance approaches that facilitate rapid implementation. Closer collaboration among informatics, laboratory, and clinical partners across jurisdictions and agencies in determining system priorities and designing workflow processes could improve flexibility of the surveillance platform and completeness and timeliness of laboratory reporting. Improved timeliness will facilitate public health response and intervention, thereby mitigating morbidity.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Tennessee/epidemiology , Humans , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Focus Groups , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control , Population Surveillance/methods , Public Health Surveillance/methods
6.
Infect Disord Drug Targets ; 24(4): 76-82, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38243966

ABSTRACT

Monkeypox is a viral disease; its outbreak was recently declared a global emergency by the World Health Organization. For the first time, a monkeypox virus (MPXV)-infected patient was found in India. Various researchers back-to-back tried to find the solution to this health emergency just after COVID-19. In this review, we discuss the current outbreak status of India, its transmission, virulence factors, symptoms, treatment, and the preventive guidelines generated by the Indian Health Ministry. We found that monkeypox virus (MPXV) disease is different from smallpox, and the age group between 30-40 years old is more prone to MPXV disease. We also found that, besides homosexuals, gays, bisexuals, and non-vegetarians, it also affects normal straight men and women who have no history of travel. Close contact should be avoided from rats, monkeys and sick people who are affected by monkeypox. To date, there are no monkeypox drugs, but Tecovirimat is more effective than other drugs that are used for other viral diseases like smallpox. Therefore, we need to develop an effective antiviral agent against the virulence factor of MXPV.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Monkeypox virus , Mpox (monkeypox) , Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Benzamides , Disease Outbreaks , India/epidemiology , Isoindoles , Monkeypox virus/pathogenicity , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/virology , Phthalimides , Virulence Factors , Adult
7.
Viruses ; 16(1)2024 01 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38257804

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mpox virus (MPXV) infections have increased in many countries since May 2022, increasing demand for diagnostic tests and research on the virus. To ensure personnel safety, appropriate and reliable measures are needed to disinfect and inactivate infectious samples; Methods: We evaluated the stability of infectious MPXV cultures stored at different temperatures and through freeze-thaw cycles. Heat physical treatment (56 °C, 70 °C, 95 °C), chemical treatment (beta-propiolactone (BPL)) and two commercialized disinfectants (Micro-Chem Plus (MCP) and ethanol) were tested against infectious MPXV cultures; Results: The results indicated that MPXV stability increases with lower temperatures. The MPXV titer was stable within three freeze-thaw cycles and only decreased by 1.04 log10 (lg) 50% cell culture infective dose (CCID50) per milliliter (12.44%) after twelve cycles. MPXV could be effectively inactivated at 56 °C for 40 min, 70 °C for 10 min, and 95 °C for 5 min. For BPL inactivation, a 1:1000 volume ratio (BPL:virus) could also effectively inactivate MPXV. A total of 2% or 5% MCP and 75% ethanol treated with MPXV for at least 1 min could reduce >4.25 lg; Conclusions: MPXV shows high stability to temperature and freeze-thaw. Heat and BPL treatments are effective for the inactivation of MPXV, while MCP and ethanol are effective for disinfection, which could help laboratory staff operate the MPXV under safer conditions and improve operational protocols.


Subject(s)
Disinfectants , Disinfection , Humans , Monkeypox virus , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Cell Culture Techniques , Ethanol/pharmacology , Propiolactone
8.
PLOS Glob Public Health ; 4(1): e0002731, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38236835

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To make inferences regarding the effectiveness of respiratory interventions and case isolation measures in reducing or preventing the transmission of mpox based on synthesis of available literature. METHODS: The WHO Clinical Management and Infection Prevention and Control 2022 guideline and droplet precautions in healthcare facilities and home isolation infection prevention control measures for patients with mpox. We conducted a systematic review that included a broad search of five electronic databases. In a two-stage process, we initially sought only randomized controlled trials and observational comparative studies; when the search failed to yield eligible studies, the subsequent search included all study designs including clinical and environmental sampling studies. RESULTS: No studies were identified that directly addressed airborne and droplet precautions and home isolation infection prevention control measures. To inform the review questions the review team synthesized route of transmission data in mpox. There were 2366/4309 (54.9%) cases in which investigators identified mpox infection occurring following transmission through direct physical sexual contact. There were no reported mpox cases in which investigators identified inhalation as a single route of transmission. There were 2/4309 cases in which investigators identified fomite as a single route of transmission. Clinical and environmental sampling studies isolated mpox virus in a minority of saliva, oropharangeal swabs, mpox skin lesions, and hospital room air. CONCLUSIONS: Current findings provide compelling evidence that transmission of mpox occurs through direct physical contact. Because investigators have not reported any cases of transmission via inhalation alone, the impact of airborne and droplet infection prevention control measures in reducing transmission will be minimal. Avoiding physical contact with others, covering mpox lesions and wearing a medical mask is likely to reduce onward mpox transmission; there may be minimal reduction in transmission from additionally physically isolating patients with mild disease at home.

9.
BMJ Open Gastroenterol ; 11(1)2024 01 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38184298

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Mpox is a viral infection caused by the monkeypox virus, a member of the Poxviridae family and Orthopoxvirus genus. Other well-known viruses of the Orthopoxvirus genus include the variola virus (smallpox), cowpox virus and vaccinia virus. Although there is a plethora of research regarding the dermatological and influenza-like symptoms of mpox, particularly following the 2022 mpox outbreak, more research is needed on the gastrointestinal (GI) effects. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review is to outline the GI manifestations of the monkeypox virus. METHODS: The authors conducted this systematic review using guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A search was conducted through the PubMed, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases from January 1958 to June 2023. The authors selected English language papers that discussed the GI symptoms in mpox patients. A manual search was also conducted in the reference sections of these publications for other relevant papers. RESULTS: 33 papers involving 830 patients were selected for this review. The GI manifestations in mpox patients are proctitis, vomiting, diarrhoea, rectal pain, nausea, tenesmus, rectal bleeding and abdominal pain. Although various papers explored transmission routes, one paper established a direct connection between anal-receptive sex transmission route and the development of a GI complication (proctitis). Another study reported that the mode of transmission could potentially impact the occurrence of GI symptoms and severity of the disease. The reviewed papers did not discover a relation between the severity of dermatological and influenza-like symptoms and the GI manifestations mentioned. CONCLUSION: This systematic review confirms that GI manifestations are observed in mpox patients. GI symptoms of mpox are crucial for gastroenterologists and other healthcare professionals to recognise in order to address patient discomfort and further understand the pathophysiology of the virus.


Subject(s)
Mpox (monkeypox) , Proctitis , Humans , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Vomiting/epidemiology
10.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 57(1): 1-10, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38177001

ABSTRACT

Monkeypox is a viral zoonotic disease rarely found outside Africa. Monkeypox can be spread from person to person through close contact with an infected person, and the rate of transmission is not very high. In addition, monkeypox and variola virus are both pox viruses, and the spread of monkeypox virus was also controlled to some extent by the smallpox campaign, so monkeypox was not widely paid attention to. However, as smallpox vaccination is phased out in various countries or regions, people's resistance to orthopoxviruses is decreasing, especially among people who have not been vaccinated against smallpox. This has led to a significant increase in the frequency and geographical distribution of human monkeypox cases in recent years, and the monkeypox virus has become the orthopoxvirus that poses the greatest threat to public health. Since the last large-scale monkeypox infection was detected in 2022, the number of countries or territories affected has exceeded 100. Many confirmed and suspected cases of monkeypox have been found in individuals who have not travelled to affected areas, and the route of infection is not obvious, making this outbreak of monkeypox a cause for concern globally. The purpose of this systematic review is to further understand the pathophysiological and epidemiological characteristics of monkeypox, as well as existing prevention and treatment methods, with a view to providing evidence for the control of monkeypox.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Monkeypox virus , Mpox (monkeypox) , Humans , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/virology , Mpox (monkeypox)/transmission , Animals , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Zoonoses/virology , Zoonoses/transmission , Vaccination
11.
Vet Q ; 44(1): 1-15, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38229485

ABSTRACT

As COVID-19 has shown, pandemics and outbreaks of emerging infections such as Zika, Nipah, monkeypox and antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, especially emerging zoonotic diseases, continue to occur and may even be increasing in Southeast Asia. In addition, these infections often result from environmental changes and human behaviour. Overall, public health surveillance to identify gaps in the literature and early warning signs are essential in this region. A systematic review investigated the prevalence of emerging zoonotic diseases over 11 years from 2011 to 2022 in Southeast Asia to understand the status of emerging zoonotic diseases, as well as to provide necessary actions for disease control and prevention in the region. During the 2011-2022 period, studies on pigs, poultry, ruminants, companion animals and wildlife in Southeast Asia were reviewed thoroughly to assess the quality of reporting items for inclusion in the systematic review. The review was performed on 26 studies of pigs, 6 studies of poultry, 21 studies of ruminants, 28 studies of companion animals and 25 studies of wildlife in Southeast Asia, which provide a snapshot of the prevalence of the emerging zoonotic disease across the country. The findings from the review showed that emerging zoonotic diseases were prevalent across the region and identified a few zoonotic diseases associated with poultry, mainly stemming from Cambodia and Vietnam, as high priority in Southeast Asia.Clinical relevance: Appropriate prevention and control measures should be taken to mitigate the emerging zoonotic diseases in Southeast Asia.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases, Emerging , Zoonoses , Animals , Humans , Animals, Wild , Asia, Southeastern/epidemiology , Poultry , Ruminants , Swine , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Vietnam/epidemiology , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Zoonoses/prevention & control , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control
12.
New Microbiol ; 46(4): 322-331, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252042

ABSTRACT

This meta-analysis aims to investigate demographic disparities in monkeypox (mpox) infections among various groups based on ethnicity, sexual partners, and gender. The study includes data from 2,646 to 4,002 patients across various outcomes. Among racial demographics, black populations show a lower odds ratio for mpox compared to white populations (OR=0.08 [0.01, 0.45], 95% CI, p=0.004). However, no statistically significant difference is found when comparing black populations with Hispanic or Asian populations (OR=0.72 [0.46, 1.11], p=0.13). There was a substantial disparity between gay, bisexual and other men-who-have-sex-with-men (GBMSM) and heterosexual populations, with significantly higher odds of mpox among the former (OR=393.80, 95% CI: [82.45, 180.85], p<0.00001). Analysis of sexual partners indicates a significant difference in infection risk between individuals with zero to one sexual partner and those with more than two partners (OR=0.06 [0.01, 0.28], p=0.0005). Additionally, there is a substantial difference in infection risk between male and female populations (OR=3868.02, p<0.00001). These findings emphasize the importance of considering demographic factors in understanding mpox transmission and risk profiles. Targeted research and intervention strategies are required to address the identified disparities and mitigate the spread of mpox.


Subject(s)
Mpox (monkeypox) , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Humans , Female , Male , Homosexuality, Male , Demography
13.
New Microbiol ; 46(4): 317-321, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252041

ABSTRACT

The 2022 outbreak of the human mpox virus, formerly known as monkeypox, raised global health concerns with widespread transmission across multiple countries. Sexual transmission emerged as a significant mode of spread, particularly among high-risk groups like MSM and PLWH. This manuscript focuses on the implications of seminal fluids in the transmission of mpox. The virus has been detected in various bodily fluids, including semen, indicating the potential for sexual transmission. Studies have reported high positivity rates of mpox DNA in seminal fluids. Despite some concern about possible contamination due to genital lesions, the presence of replication-competent virus in seminal fluids has been confirmed and mpox virus was also detected in this specimen among people who engaged only in receptive sexual intercourse. Antiviral treatment with tecovirimat showed efficacy in reducing viral presence in semen with detection of the antiviral in this specimen. Virus clearance from semen is relatively rapid and parallels healing from infection, with no reported cases of seminal fluid relapses. The WHO recommendation to avoid condomless intercourse for 12 weeks after clinical healing still appears prudent. Continued research and surveillance are essential to understand viral dynamics and develop effective prevention measures to combat the spread of mpox through sexual transmission and protect key-populations.


Subject(s)
Monkeypox virus , Mpox (monkeypox) , Humans , Semen , Feces , Antiviral Agents
14.
Rev Med Virol ; 34(1): e2508, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38282393

ABSTRACT

On 23 July 2022, the World Health Organization declared the global mpox outbreak as a public health emergency of international significance. The mpox virus (MPXV) that caused the outbreak was classified as clade IIb, which belongs to the West African clade. However, the relationship between MPXV clades and symptoms, as well as the severity of mpox outcomes, is not fully understood. Thus, we aimed to investigate the global mpox prevalence and the differences in clinical manifestations and outcomes among patients with mpox between pre-outbreak (2003-2021) and the current mpox outbreak. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Google Scholar were searched using the keyword "monkeypox" and "mpox" up to 13 October 2022. A random effects model was used to obtain the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals. This study included 27 articles, and 5698 patients with mpox with 19 distinctive features from 19 countries across five continents were assessed. Patients with mpox during the 2022 mpox outbreak showed mild clinical manifestations and outcomes compared with those before the 2022 mpox outbreak: mild rash (relative ratio [RR]: 5.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52-17.08), fever (0.68, 0.49-0.94), pruritus (0.25, 0.19-0.32), myalgia (0.50, 0.31-0.81), headache (0.56, 0.35-0.88), skin ulcer (0.32, 0.17-0.59), abdominal symptom (0.29, 0.20-0.42), pharyngitis (0.32, 0.18-0.58), nausea or vomiting (0.15, 0.02-0.93), conjunctivitis (0.11, 0.03-0.38), concomitant infection with HIV (1.70, 0.95-3 0.04), and death (0.02, 0.001-0.31). MPXV clade IIb exhibited higher infectivity but may cause mild disease symptoms and low mortality rate. It is important to consider MPXV infection in patients with mpox-related features and/or a history of sexual transmission to prevent the spread of the disease and recognise the current pandemic threat.


Subject(s)
Exanthema , HIV Seropositivity , HIV-1 , Mpox (monkeypox) , Humans , Disease Outbreaks , Public Health , Fever
15.
Mol Divers ; 2024 Jan 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38183513

ABSTRACT

Thymidylate kinase (TMPK) of monkeypox virus (MPXV) has emerged as a promising target for potential therapeutics due to its significant role in pyrimidine metabolism. While smallpox drugs are advised for treating monkeypox, the European Medicine Agency has sanctioned Tecovirimat due to its potent nanomolar activity. Nonetheless, there is a need for monkeypox-specific therapeutic options. In this work, we employed docking-based virtual screening and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to identify myxobacterial secondary metabolites as promising anti-viral natural compounds capable of inhibiting thymidylate kinase. The computational pharmacokinetics and manual curation of top-scoring compounds identified six lead compounds that were compared in terms of protein-ligand contacts and protein-essential dynamics. The study shows that among the six candidates, Aurachin A and the Soraphinol analogues such as Soraphinol A and Soraphinol C remain very stable compared to other compounds, enabling the active site integrity via a stable dynamics pattern. We also show that other compounds such as Phenoxan, Phenylnannolone C, and 8E-Aurafuron B remain unstable and have a negative impact on the active site integrity and may not be suitable binders for TMPK protein. Analyzing the Aurachin A and Soraphinol A binding, the established hydrogen bonds with Arg93 and the conserved hydrophobic interaction with Tyr101 are consistent with previous experimental interactions. Additionally, a deeper insight into the indole and the aromatic ring interaction through π-π stacking and π-cation interactions, as well as the background of Aurachin A and Soraphinol A as a bioactive compound, has significant implications not only for its potential as a promising drug but also for directing future drug discovery efforts targeting the TMPK protein.

16.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 35, 2024 01 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166776

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immunization, as a preventive strategy against infectious diseases, has consolidated its position as a fundamental pillar in the field of public health. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the prevalence of the intention to receive the monkeypox (Mpox) vaccine. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence was performed using five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and ScienceDirect) with a search strategy until July 24, 2023. Data analysis was performed in R software version 4.2.3. The quality of the included cross-sectional studies was assessed using the "JBI-MAStARI". In addition, a subgroup analysis by population and continent was developed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine cross-sectional articles with a total sample of 52 658 participants were included. The pooled prevalence of intention to vaccinate against Mpox was 61% (95% CI: 53-69%; 52,658 participants; 29 studies; I2 = 100%). In the subgroup analysis, the intention to be vaccinated against Mpox according to continents was 64% (95% CI: 53-74%; 13,883 participants; 17 studies; I2 = 99%) in Asian countries, 43% (95% CI: 39-47%; 1538 participants; 3 studies; I2 = 53%) in African countries, 62% (95% CI: 45-78%; 35,811 participants; 6 studies; I2 = 99%) in European countries, and 63% (95% CI: 32-89%; 1426 participants; 3 studies; I2 = 99%) in American countries. In the subgroup analysis on the intention to be vaccinated against Mpox, according to study subjects, it was 54% (95% CI: 45-62%; 10,296 participants; 11 studies; I2 = 99%) in the general population, 57% (95% CI: 33-79%; 3333 participants; 10 studies; I2 = 99%) in health care workers, and 76% (95% CI: 70-82%; 39,029 participants; 8 studies; I2 = 98%) in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) community. In addition, as a secondary outcome, a prevalence of refusal of Mpox vaccination was found to be 22% (95% CI: 16-30%; 45,577 participants; 21 studies; I2 = 99%). CONCLUSION: The study highlights the importance of recognizing regional and subgroup disparities in Mpox vaccine willingness and refusal. It emphasizes the importance of employing strategies to achieve widespread vaccination coverage and safeguard public health worldwide. TERMS USED: Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI), Prospective International Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).


Subject(s)
Mpox (monkeypox) , Smallpox Vaccine , Female , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Intention , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Male
17.
Vaccine ; 42(3): 548-555, 2024 Jan 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38218669

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: JYNNEOSTM vaccine has been used as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) during a mpox outbreak in New York City (NYC). Data on effectiveness are limited. METHODS: Effectiveness of a single dose of JYNNEOSTM vaccine administered subcutaneously ≤ 14 days as PEP for preventing mpox disease was assessed among individuals exposed to case-patients from May 22, 2022-August 24, 2022. Individuals were evaluated for mpox through 21 days post-exposure. An observational study was conducted emulating a sequence of nested "target" randomized trials starting each day after exposure. Results were adjusted for exposure risk and race/ethnicity. Analyses were conducted separately based on last (PEPL) and first (PEPF) exposure date. We evaluated the potential to overestimate PEP effectiveness when using conventional analytic methods due to exposed individuals developing illness before they can obtain PEP (immortal time bias) compared to the target trial. RESULTS: Median time from last exposure to symptom onset (incubation period) among cases that did not receive PEPL was 7 days (range 1-16). Time to PEPL receipt was 7 days (range 0-14). Among 549 individuals, adjusted PEPL and PEPF effectiveness was 19 % (95 % Confidence Interval [CI], -54 % to 57 %) and -7% (95 % CI, -144 % to 53 %) using the target trial emulation, respectively, and 78 % (95 % CI, 50 % to 91 %) and 73 % (95 % CI, 31 % to 91 %) using conventional analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Determining PEP effectiveness using real-world data during an outbreak is challenging. Time to PEP in NYC coupled with the observed incubation period resulted in overestimated PEP effectiveness using a conventional method. The target trial emulation, while yielding wide confidence intervals due to small sample size, avoided immortal time bias. While results from these evaluations cannot be used as reliable estimates of PEP effectiveness, we present important methodologic considerations for future evaluations.


Subject(s)
Mpox (monkeypox) , Vaccines , Humans , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , New York City/epidemiology , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
18.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 276, 2024 01 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38263135

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Monkeypox (Mpox) virus infection is a topic of growing interest today because of its potential public health impact and concern about possible outbreaks. Reliable and up-to-date sources of information that provide accurate data on its transmission, symptoms, prevention, and treatment are essential for understanding and effectively addressing this disease. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to determine the prevalence of sources of information on Mpox virus infection. METHODS: An exhaustive systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out using the information available in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and ScienceDirect databases up to August 3, 2023. The data were analyzed using R software version 4.2.3. The quality of the cross-sectional studies that formed part of this review was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) tool. In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed based on the study populations. RESULTS: Through electronic searches of five databases, a total of 1833 studies were identified. Twenty-four cross-sectional articles were included, with a total sample of 35,959 participants from 34 countries. The pooled prevalence of each of the included information sources was: social networks reached 59% (95% CI: 50-68%; 29,146 participants; 22 studies; I2 = 100%; p < 0.01); the Internet was 61% (95% CI: 44-77%; 14,002 participants; 5 studies; I2 = 100%; p < 0.01), radio reached 10% (95% CI: 07-13%; 8917 participants; 4 studies; I2 = 93%; p < 0.01), television accounted for 24% (95% CI: 09-43%; 14,896 participants; 8 studies; I2 = 100%; p < 0.01), and the combination of radio and television accounted for 45% (95% CI: 31-60%; 4207 participants; 7 studies; I2 = 99%; p < 0.01); for newspapers, it was 15% (95% CI: 05-27%; 2841 participants; 6 studies; I2 = 99%; p < 0.01), friends and relatives accounted for 19% (95% CI: 12-28%; 28,470 participants; 19 studies; I2 = 100%; p < 0.01), the World Health Organization (WHO) accounted for 17% (95% CI: 07-29%; 1656 participants; 3 studies; I2 = 97%; p < 0.01), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) accounted for 10% (95% CI: 03-21%; 2378 participants; 3 studies; I2 = 98%; p < 0.01), and the combination of WHO and CDC websites accounted for 60% (95% CI: 48-72%; 1828 participants; 4 studies; I2 = 96%; p < 0.01), and finally, scientific articles and journals accounted for 24% (95% CI: 16-33%; 16,775 participants; 13 studies; I2 = 99%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that people access a variety of information sources to gain knowledge about Mpox virus infection, with a strong emphasis on online sources such as social networks and the Internet. However, it is important to note that the quality and accuracy of information available from these sources can vary, underscoring the need to promote access to reliable and up-to-date information about this disease to ensure public health.


Subject(s)
Monkeypox virus , Mpox (monkeypox) , United States , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Academies and Institutes , Information Sources
19.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 4, 2024 01 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166685

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Mpox is a zoonotic viral disease that emerged in May 2022 and has since shown a high prevalence in non-mpox-endemic areas, resulting in an outbreak that caused more than 84,000 cases in 110 countries around the globe. Several vaccines are available to prevent the disease, and multiple studies have been conducted to assess the attitudes of different populations toward receiving the mpox vaccine. This study systematically reviews all the studies conducted on mpox vaccine acceptance/hesitancy among healthcare workers. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted through four electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, up to March 2023. Studies that described mpox vaccine acceptance/hesitancy among healthcare workers were included, and the data were extracted using a uniform extraction sheet. Following the extraction, the meta-analysis included ten studies with 7322 healthcare workers. Three researchers independently assessed the risk of bias in the included study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the review. This review indicates that the prevalence of mpox vaccine acceptance was 58.5%, and the prevalence of mpox vaccine hesitancy was 41.5%. There was a higher prevalence of acceptance in countries located in Asian and African areas compared to those in North America and Europe, estimated at 68% and 44.3%, respectively. Among the studies conducted solely among physicians, there was a high prevalence of mpox vaccine acceptance, at 77.1%, compared to 49% in studies that included all healthcare workers. CONCLUSION: There is a significant variation in the prevalence of mpox vaccine acceptance among different populations. Further research is needed to identify the factors that contribute to this variation and to develop interventions to increase vaccine acceptance. In addition, it is important to promote research on mpox vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among healthcare workers in countries where data is limited. This research will help policymakers develop effective policies to increase acceptance and reduce the disease burden.


Subject(s)
Mpox (monkeypox) , Physicians , Smallpox Vaccine , Humans , Health Personnel , Zoonoses
20.
J Med Virol ; 96(1): e29338, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38163280

ABSTRACT

Monkeypox (mpox), a viral zoonotic disease, is spreading worldwide. However, evidence that informs prevention and control strategies in the Asia Pacific Region is very limited. Our study aims to investigate the experiences of mpox patients from infection to treatment to provide scientific basis for the prevention and control. A multicenter qualitative design was used. A total of 15 mpox patients were recruited between July 6 and July 25, 2023, from six cities in China. Semistructured interviews were conducted by telephone and analyzed using the thematic analysis. The interview was divided into two sections: patients' experiences (prediagnosis experience, treatment-seeking experience, and quarantine experience) and advice. Prediagnosis experience was summarized into three themes: symptoms, possible routes of infection, and knowledge of mpox. Treatment-seeking experience was summarized into three themes: time of visit to hospital, diagnostic difficulties, and attitude toward diagnosis. Quarantine experience was summarized into three themes: body and mind reactions, reluctance to self-disclose infection status, and factors facilitating recovery. Themes identified from patients' advice were as follows: (1) Increase in testing channels and methods, (2) Development and introduction of vaccines, (3) Adjustment of quarantine program, (4) Improvement of treatment measures, and (5) Improvement of publicity and education. To effectively curb the mpox epidemic, structured measures are urgently needed to address the mpox-related stigma and discrimination. Targeted health education should be provided to MSM, focusing on the prevention, detection, and treatment services. Hospitals should enhance the training of clinicians in key departments including infectious disease and dermatology, to improve diagnostic capability and sensitivity. Furthermore, given the absence of specific antiviral medications, supervised home quarantine may be a good option.


Subject(s)
Mpox (monkeypox) , Humans , China/epidemiology , Asia , Antiviral Agents , Cities
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL