Gender health care inequalities in health crisis: when uncertainty can lead to inequality.

BACKGROUND: In health crisis, inequalities in access to and use of health care services become more evident. The objective of this study is to analyse the existence and evolution of gender inequalities in access to and use of healthcare services in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using data from all individuals with a confirmed COVID-19 infection from March 2020 to March 2022 in Aragón (Spain) (390,099 cases). Health care access and use was analysed by gender for the different pandemic waves. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate the effect of sex in health care. Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition methods were performed to explain gender gaps observed. RESULTS: The health care received throughout the COVID-19 pandemic differed between men and women. Women were admitted to hospital and intensive care units less frequently than men and their stays were shorter. Differences observed between men and women narrowed throughout the pandemic, but persisted even after adjusting for age, socioeconomic status, morbidity burden or the patient's place of residence. Differences in sociodemographic characteristics and morbidity burden could explain partially the gender inequalities found, mainly in the later phases of the pandemic, but not in the earlier waves. CONCLUSIONS: There were gender inequalities in access to and use of health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Inequalities were greater in the first waves of the pandemic, but did not disappear. Analysis of health crises must take into account an intersectional gender perspective to ensure equitable health care.

An intersectionality framework for identifying relevant covariates in health equity research.

Introduction: Health equity research uses impact evaluations to estimate the effectiveness of new interventions that aim to mitigate health inequities. Health inequities are influenced by many experiential factors and failure of research to account for such experiential factors and their potential interactions may jeopardize findings and lead to promoted methods that may unintentionally sustain or even worsen the targeted health inequity. Thus, it is imperative that health equity impact evaluations identify and include variables related to the circumstances, conditions, and experiences of the sample being studied in analyses. In this review, we promote intersectionality as a conceptual framework for brainstorming important yet often overlooked covariates in health equity related impact evaluations. Methods: We briefly review and define concepts and terminology relevant to health equity, then detail four domains of experiential factors that often intersect in ways that may obscure findings: Biological, Social, Environmental, and Economic. Results: We provide examples of the framework's application to lupus-related research and examples of covariates used in our own health equity impact evaluations with minority patients who have lupus. Discussion: Applying an intersectionality framework during covariate selection is an important component to actualizing precision prevention. While we do not provide an exhaustive list, our aim is to provide a springboard for brainstorming meaningful covariates for health equity evaluation that may further help unveil sustainable solutions to persisting health inequities.

Universal Exome Sequencing in Critically Ill Adults: A Diagnostic Yield of 25% and Race-Based Disparities in Access to Genetic Testing.

Numerous studies have underscored the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of exome or genome sequencing in critically ill pediatric populations. However, an equivalent investigation in critically ill adults remains conspicuously absent. We retrospectively analyzed whole exome sequencing (WES) data available through the PennMedicine Biobank (PMBB) from all 365 young adult patients, aged 18-40 years, with intensive care unit (ICU) admissions at the University of Pennsylvania Health System who met inclusion criteria for our study. For each participant, two Medical Genetics and Internal Medicine-trained clinicians reviewed WES reports and patient charts for variant classification, result interpretation, and identification of genetic diagnoses related to their critical illness. Of the 365 individuals in our study, 90 (24.7%) were found to have clearly diagnostic results on WES; an additional 40 (11.0%) had a suspicious variant of uncertain significance (VUS) identified; and an additional 16 (4.4%) had a medically actionable incidental finding. The diagnostic rate of exome sequencing did not decrease with increasing patient age. Affected genes were primarily involved in cardiac function (18.8%), vascular health (16.7%), cancer (16.7%), and pulmonary disease (11.5%). Only half of all diagnostic findings were known and documented in the patient chart at the time of ICU admission. Significant disparities emerged in subgroup analysis by EHR-reported race, with genetic diagnoses known/documented for 63.5% of White patients at the time of ICU admission but only for 28.6% of Black or Hispanic patients. There was a trend towards patients with undocumented genetic diagnoses having a 66% increased mortality rate, making these race-based disparities in genetic diagnosis even more concerning. Altogether, universal exome sequencing in ICU-admitted adult patients was found to yield a new definitive diagnosis in 11.2% of patients. Of these diagnoses, 76.6% conferred specific care-altering medical management recommendations. Our study suggests that the diagnostic utility of exome sequencing in critically ill young adults is similar to that observed in neonatal and pediatric populations and is age-independent. The high diagnostic rate and striking race-based disparities we find in genetic diagnoses argue for broad and universal approaches to genetic testing for critically ill adults. The widespread implementation of comprehensive genetic sequencing in the adult population promises to enhance medical care for all individuals and holds the potential to rectify disparities in genetic testing referrals, ultimately promoting more equitable healthcare delivery.

Reducing no-show visits and disparities in access: The impact of telemedicine.

BACKGROUND: No-show visits have serious consequences for patients, providers, and healthcare systems as they lead to delays in care, increased costs, and reduced access to services. Telemedicine has emerged as a promising alternative to in-person visits by reducing travel barriers, but risks exacerbating the digital divide. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of telemedicine (video and phone) at a tertiary care academic center on no-show visits compared to in-person visits. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of all weekday clinic visits among in-state adult patients at a single tertiary care center in the southeast from January 2020 to April 2023 was performed. Rates of no-show visits for patients who were seen via phone and video were compared with those who were seen in-person. Demographic and clinical characteristics of these groups were also compared, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and visit type. The primary outcome was the rate of no-show visits for each visit type. RESULTS: Our analysis included 3,105,382 scheduled appointments, of which 81.2% were in-person, 13.4% via video, and 5.4% via phone calls. Compared to in-person visits, phone calls and video visits reduced the odds of no-show visits by 50% (aOR 0.5, CI 0.49-0.51) and 15% (aOR 0.85, CI 0.84-0.86), respectively. Older patients, Black patients, patients furthest from clinic, and patients from counties with the greatest degree of vulnerability and disparities in digital access were more likely to use phone visits. No-shows were more common among non-white, male, and younger patients from counties with lower socioeconomic status. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine effectively reduced no-show visits. However, limiting telemedicine to video-based visits only exacerbated disparities in access. Phone calls allow historically underserved patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds to access healthcare and should be included within the definition of telemedicine.

International disparities in diagnosis and treatment access for cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has revolutionized cystic fibrosis (CF) treatment. However, previous research has demonstrated profound global disparities in diagnosis and treatment access. If unaddressed, these threaten to widen existing health inequities. Therefore, in this analysis we aimed to reappraise gaps and evaluate progress in diagnosis and treatment equity in high-income (HIC) versus low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: Estimates of the global CF population were made in 158 countries using patient registries, systematic literature searches, and an international survey of 14 CF experts. Estimates of the global burden of undiagnosed CF were made using epidemiological studies identified in literature searches and registry coverage data. The proportion of people receiving ETI was estimated using publicly available revenue data and a survey of 23 national drug pricing databases. RESULTS: 188,336 (163,421-209,204) people are estimated to have CF in 96 countries. Of these, 112,955 (60%) were diagnosed and 51,322 (27%) received ETI. The undiagnosed patient burden is estimated to be 75,381 people, with 82% in LMICs. ETI is reimbursed in 35 HICs, but only one LMIC. Four years after approval, there are 14,911 people diagnosed with CF who live in a country where ETI is inaccessible. This increases to 76,199 when including the estimated undiagnosed population. CONCLUSIONS: Equitable access to CFTR modulators must become a top priority for the international CF community. ETI costs up to $322,000 per year but could be manufactured for $5000 to allow access under a voluntary license. Given the extent of disparities, other mechanisms to improve access that circumvent the manufacturer should also be considered.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Preconception Health Risk Factors and Access to Care.

Background: Black birthing people have significantly higher risks of maternal mortality and morbidity compared with White people. Preconception chronic conditions increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, yet little is known about disparities in preconception health. This study applies an intersectional framework to examine the simultaneous contributions of racial marginalization and economic deprivation in determining disparities in preconception risk factors and access to care. Methods: Using data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2016-2020 (N = 123,697), we evaluated disparities by race and income in self-reported preconception hypertension, diabetes, obesity, depression, and smoking, as well as preconception insurance coverage and utilization of health care. We estimated linear regression models and calculated predicted probabilities. Results: Black respondents experienced higher probabilities of preconception obesity and high blood pressure at every income level compared with White respondents. Higher income did not attenuate the probability of obesity for Black respondents (linear trend p = 0.21), as it did for White respondents (p < 0.001). Conversely, while White respondents with low income were at higher risk of preconception depression and smoking than their Black counterparts, higher income was strongly associated with reduced risk, with significantly steeper reductions for White compared with Black respondents (difference in trends p < 0.001 for both risk factors). White respondents had higher probabilities of utilizing preconception care across all income levels, despite similar probabilities of insurance coverage. Conclusions: Higher income does not protect against the risk of preconception obesity and other preconception risk factors for Black birthing people as it does for White birthing people. Results point to the need to consider multiple forms of intersecting structural factors in policy and intervention research to improve preconception and maternal health.

Características de usuarios de un centro de salud asociados al estado de vacunación contra COVID-19 / Characteristics of users of a health center associated with COVID-19 vaccination status

Introducción: Para alcanzar óptimas coberturas de vacunación contra la COVID-19 se requiere identificar y abordar sus determinantes. El objetivo del estudio fue analizar las características sociodemográficas-clínicas y el nivel de conocimientos básicos sobre la enfermedad asociados al estado de vacunación contra la COVID-19. Métodos: Estudio observacional analítico de corte transversal, con 379 usuarios de un centro de salud. En una ficha se registró variables sociodemográficas-clínicas y sobre el estado de vacunación y con la Escala KNOW-PCOVID-19 se midió los conocimientos básicos sobre COVID-19. Para el análisis se usó la prueba Chi cuadrado y un modelo de regresión logística para estimar el OR con IC 95%. Resultados: El 83,38% de participantes tenían dosis completas de la vacuna contra COVID-19; 15.30% dosis incompletas y 1,32% no tenía dosis alguna. Las características asociadas a mayor posibilidad de vacunación incompleta fueron tener ocupación de “ama de casa” (ORa 2.94;IC:1.01-9.61) y afiliación religiosa “cristiana” (ORa 3.38;IC:0.51-7.43); mientras que ser adulto (ORa 0.39; IC: 0.19-0.79) y adulto mayor (ORa 0.13;IC:0.03-0.51), sexo femenino (ORa 0.38; IC:0.15 -0.95) y no ser gestante (ORa 0.21;IC:0.08-0.57) se asociaron a menor propensión de vacunación incompleta. No se encontró asociación con los conocimientos básicos sobre la enfermedad.Conclusión: El porcentaje de usuarios con vacunación completa contra COVID-19 fue alta; siendo la ocupación, religión, edad, sexo y el no embarazo, características asociadas al estado de vacunación. Estas variables deben ser consideradas en la planificación y diseño de estrategias específicas y pertinentes a fin de aumentar las coberturas de vacunación. (AU)

Introduction: To achieve optimal vaccination coverage against COVID-19, it is necessary to identify and address its determinants. The aim of the study was to analyze the sociodemographic-clinical characteristics and the level of basic knowledge about the disease associated with COVID-19 vaccination status. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical observational study was conducted with 379 users of a health center. Sociodemographic-clinical variables and vaccination status were recorded on a card, and basic knowledge about COVID-19 was measured with the KNOW-PCOVID-19 Scale. The Chi-square test and a logistic regression model were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: 83.38% of participants had had full doses of the COVID-19 vaccine; 15.30% had incomplete doses and 1.32% had received no doses. The characteristics associated with a higher possibility of incomplete vaccination were having the occupation of housewife (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.94; 95%CI:1.01-9.61) and Christian religious affiliation (OR 3.38; 95%CI:0.51-7.43); while being an adult (aOR 0.39; 95%CI: 0.19-0.79) and older adult (aOR 0.13; 95%CI: 0.03-0.51), female sex (aOR 0.38; 95%CI: 0.15 -0.95) and not being pregnant (aOR 0.21; 95%CI: 0.08-0.57) were associated with a lower propensity for incomplete vaccination. No association was found regarding basic knowledge about the disease. Conclusion: The percentage of users fully vaccinated against COVID-19 was high. Occupation, religion, age, sex, and non-pregnancy were characteristics associated with vaccination status. These variables should be considered in the planning and design of specific and relevant strategies to increase vaccination coverage. (AU)

Retiro no electivo del Catéter Central de Inserción Periférica: estudio transversal / Remoção não eletiva do Cateter Central de Inserção Periférica: estudo transversal / Non-elective removal of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter: cross-sectional study

Introducción: El catéter central de inserción periférica es un dispositivo intravenoso que se ha vuelto cada vez más necesario por sus numerosos beneficios, especialmente en los niños.Objetivo: Describir la prevalencia y causas de retiros no electivos de Catéteres Centrales de Insertación Periférica insertados en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos. Métodos: Se trata de un estudio transversal, con enfoque cuantitativo, realizado en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos de un hospital universitario de Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, entre enero de 2017 y diciembre de 2019. Los datos se obtuvieron del libro de registro de catéteres presentes en el sector de estudio. Resultados: Se observó una alta tasa de retiros no electivos de este catéter en los años estudiados: 56,6%, 41,6% y 40% respectivamente, destacándose, en todos los años, la obstrucción como la principal complicación que provocó su retiro, seguida de la rotura y la tracción. Conclusiones: Identificar las principales complicaciones y capacitar al equipo de enfermería en estrategias preventivas son acciones que apuntan a reducir esta prevalencia.

Introdução: O cateter central de inserção periférica é um dispositivo intravenoso que vem se mostrando cada vez mais necessário diante dos inúmeros benefícios, sobretudo para as crianças. Objetivo: Descrever a prevalência e causas de remoções não eletivas dos Cateteres Centrais de Inserção Periférica inseridos em uma Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica. Enfermería GlobalNº 74 Abril 2024Página 317Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo transversal de abordagem quantitativa, realizado em uma Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica de um hospital de ensino de Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, entre janeiro de 2017 e dezembro de 2019. Os dados foram obtidos do livro de registro de cateteres presente no setor do estudo. Resultados: Observou-se elevado índice de remoções não eletivas desse cateter nos anos estudados: 56,6%, 41,6% e 40% respectivamente, destacando-se, em todos os anos, a obstrução como a principal complicação que causou a retirada, seguida de ruptura e tração. Conclusões: Identificar as principais complicações e capacitar a equipe de enfermagem sobre estratégias preventivas são ações que visam obter uma redução dessa prevalência. (AU)

Introduction: Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter is an intravenous device that has become increasingly necessary due to its numerous benefits, especially for children.Objective: Describing the prevalence and causes of non-elective removals of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters inserted in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study, with a quantitative approach, conducted in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of a teaching hospital in Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, between January 2017 and December 2019. Data were obtained from the record book of catheters present in the study sector. Results: A high rate of non-elective removals of this catheter was observed in the studied years: 56.6%, 41.6% and 40%, respectively, highlighting, in all years, obstruction as the main complication that caused removal, followed by rupture and traction.Conclusions: Identifying the main complications and training the nursing team on preventive strategies are actions aimed at reducing this prevalence. (AU)

Implementation of Formal Curriculum on Health Care Disparities in Military Family Medicine Residency.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires education on health care disparities (HCD), but research assessing formal curricula is limited. To improve knowledge and confidence in HCD, the family medicine residency program at Darnall Army Medical Center implemented a formal HCD curriculum. METHODS: During the 2021-2022 academic year, starting July 2021, a formal HCD curriculum was implemented for family medicine residents and faculty. Ten lectures on HCDs and implicit bias were given over the course of the year. Residents and faculty were asked to incorporate HCD into their regular continuing medical education lectures. ACGME survey data as well as a pre- and postcurriculum survey were used to assess HCD knowledge and confidence. Descriptive statistics and a paired-sample t tests were calculated to compare pre- to postcurriculum changes. RESULTS: The percentage of residents who reported that they had received HCD education increased from 72% on the 2021 ACGME survey to 100% in 2022 (N=18). We found a significant (P<.05) improvement in knowledge and confidence across 11 of 12 questions on the pre- and postcurriculum survey. CONCLUSIONS: A formal curriculum in a military family medicine residency setting was effective for improving self-reported HCD knowledge and confidence.

Addressing healthcare disparities in homeless neurosurgical patients: A comprehensive literature review on strategies for equitable care and improved outcomes.

Background: Homelessness is a growing concern in the US, with 3.5 million people experiencing it annually and 600,000 on any given night. Homeless individuals face increased vulnerability to 30-day hospital readmissions and higher mortality rates, straining the healthcare system and exacerbating existing disparities. This study aims to inform neurosurgeons on evidence-based strategies to reduce readmission and mortality rates among homeless patients by reviewing the literature on the impact of medical respite on 30-day readmission rates. The study aims to gauge the efficacy of medical respite in reducing hospital readmissions and improving health outcomes for homeless individuals. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase/Medline, and Cochrane databases, as well as consulting the National Institute for Medical Respite Care and the Department of Health Care Access and Information. Ten articles were chosen from an initial 296 to investigate the impact of respite programs on readmission rates among homeless patients. Results: Homeless patients experience high readmission rates due to various factors. Interventions such as respite programs and a comprehensive approach to healthcare can lower these rates. Collaboration between hospitals and medical respites has proven particularly effective. Conclusion: Inadequate healthcare for homeless individuals leads to increased readmissions, longer hospital stays, and higher costs. Medical respites are a viable solution, but limited resources hamper their effectiveness. Therefore, it is crucial to facilitate cooperation between hospitals, respites, and other entities. Future research should focus on disparity in neurosurgical procedures and explore alternative services. An interdisciplinary approach is key to addressing healthcare inequalities.

Unveiling spatial disparities in basic medical and health services: insights from China's provincial analysis.

Based on the panel data of 31 provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) in China from 2012 to 2019, this paper constructs the evaluation index system of basic medical and health services in China from seven dimensions: medical and health facilities, health expenditure, medical services, traditional Chinese medicine hospital services, maternal and child health care, people's health and medical security, disease control and public health. The entropy method was used to measure the level of basic medical and health services in China, and its spatial differences and convergence characteristics were further investigated. In this study, we employ the entropy weight method, σ convergence, and ß convergence as our primary methodologies. The entropy weight method is used to evaluate the variability of each indicator, determine the weights of indicators, and quantify the information content of the data. σ convergence illustrates the process by which the variance of a sample decreases over time. ß convergence refers to the gradual approach of variables within an economic system towards their long-term equilibrium level over time. The results show that: (1) The scores of basic medical and health services in China's four major regions (including Northeast, East, Central and West) remain in a relatively stable state, with small fluctuations and great room for improvement; (2) There are significant regional differences in the level of basic medical and health services in China, and the intra-regional differences are much greater than the inter-regional differences; (3) There is no significant σ convergence observed in China and its four major regions; however, there is a notable presence of ß convergence.

Factors influencing inequality in government health expenditures within African regional economic communities.

BACKGROUND: The unequal distribution of government health spending within African regional economic groupings is a significant barrier to achieving Universal Health Coverage and reaching health-related Sustainable Development targets. It also hampers the progress toward achieving the African Union's vision of an integrated and prosperous Africa, free of its heavy disease burden. Based on panel data from 36 countries nested into eight Regional Economic Communities (RECs), this study probes the effects of countries' macro-level factors on government health expenditure disparities within eight regional economic communities from 2000 to 2019. METHOD: We use the multilevel linear mixed-effect method to show whether countries' trade gains, life expectancy at birth, poverty, urbanization, information and communication technology, and population aging worsen or reduce the differences for two government health expenditure indicators. RESULTS: The insignificant effect of GDP per capita suggests that in most regional economic groupings, the health sector is still not considered a high-priority sector regarding overall government expenditures. Countries' poverty levels and urbanization increase the domestic general government health expenditure disparities as a percentage of general government expenditure within the regional groupings. However, trade gains and ICT diffusion reduce these disparities. Furthermore, the results reveal that external health expenditure per capita and life expectancy at birth positively impact within-regional inequalities in the domestic general government health expenditure per capita. In contrast, GDP per capita and trade gains tend to reduce them. CONCLUSIONS: This study enriches the research on the determinants of government health expenditure inequality in Africa. Policies that can spur growth in trade and ICT access should be encouraged. Countries should also make more efforts to reduce poverty. Governments should also develop policies promoting economic growth and planned urbanization.

Discursive analysis of nursing care toward childhood fever and its contextual differences: An ethnomethodological study.

Fever is the most common clinical sign during infancy. Nurses deal with fever in children most directly and it is an integral aspect of their role as pediatric nurses. The objective of this study is to analyze the perceptions, knowledge and attitudes toward childhood fever of nurses in three health contexts: pediatric hospitalization, pediatric emergency and primary care. To respond this objective, a qualitative study with ethnomethodological approach has been carried out. In-depth interviews were conducted and theoretical clinical cases were presented to nurses working in pediatrics in the three settings studied. After the analysis of the discourses, the codes were classified into three categories: static and number-centric knowledge, dependent nursing attitude, and unconscious model nurses. On the one hand, when we analyze and compare the perceptions, attitudes and knowledge of the nurses between the different contexts, we find differences that consist mainly of what the context requires of them. On the other hand, in general and regardless of the context, the nurses interviewed place themselves in a traditional framework when faced with the phenomenon of fever in children.

Societal Burden of Trauma and Disparities in Trauma Care.

Trauma imposes a significant societal burden, with injury being a leading cause of mortality worldwide. While numerical data reveal that trauma accounts for millions of deaths annually, its true impact goes beyond these figures. The toll extends to non-fatal injuries, resulting in long-term physical and mental health consequences. Moreover, injury-related health care costs and lost productivity place substantial strain on a nation's economy. Disparities in trauma care further exacerbate this burden, affecting access to timely and appropriate care across various patient populations. These disparities manifest across the entire continuum of trauma care, from prehospital to in-hospital and post-acute phases. Addressing these disparities and improving access to quality trauma care are crucial steps toward alleviating the societal burden of trauma and enhancing equitable patient outcomes.

Disparities in access to multidisciplinary cancer consultations and treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients: A SEER-Medicare analysis.

PURPOSE: Disparities in access to multidisciplinary cancer consultations (MDCc) persist, and the role of physician relationships remains understudied. This study examined the extent to which multilevel factors, including patient characteristics and patient-sharing network measures reflecting the structure of physician relationships, are associated with MDCc and receipt of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus surgery among early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Result (SEER)-Medicare data for patients diagnosed with stage I-IIA NSCLC in 2016-2017. We assembled patient-sharing networks and identified cancer specialists who were locally unique for their specialty, herein referred to as "linchpins". The proportion of linchpin cancer specialists for each hospital referral region (HRR) was calculated as a network-based measure of specialist scarcity. We used multilevel multinomial logistic regression to estimate associations between study variables and the receipt of MDCc and multilevel logistic regression to examine the relationship between MDCc and patient's first treatment. RESULTS: Our study included 6,120 patients with stage I-IIA NSCLC, of which 751 (12.3%) received MDCc, 1,729 (28.3%) only consulted a radiation oncologist, 2,010 (32.8%) only consulted a surgeon, and 1,630 (26.6%) had no consultations with either specialist within two months following diagnosis. Compared with patients residing in an HRR with a low proportion of linchpin surgeons, those in an HRR with a high proportion of linchpin surgeons had a 2.99 (95% CI: 1.87-4.78) greater relative risk of exclusively consulting a radiation oncologist (vs. MDCc) and a 2.70 (95% CI: 1.68-4.35) greater relative risk consulting neither specialist (vs. MDCc). Patients who received MDCc were 5.32 (95% CI: 4.27-6.63) times more likely to receive SBRT (vs. surgery). CONCLUSIONS: Physician networks are associated with receipt of MDCc and treatment, underscoring the potential for leveraging patient-sharing network analysis to improve access to lung cancer care.

Health Care Access Dimensions and Racial Disparities in End-of-Life Care Quality among Patients with Ovarian Cancer.

This study investigated the association between health care access (HCA) dimensions and racial disparities in end-of-life (EOL) care quality among non-Hispanic Black (NHB), non-Hispanic White (NHW), and Hispanic patients with ovarian cancer. This retrospective cohort study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-linked Medicare data for women diagnosed with ovarian cancer from 2008 to 2015, ages 65 years and older. Health care affordability, accessibility, and availability measures were assessed at the census tract or regional levels, and associations between these measures and quality of EOL care were examined using multivariable-adjusted regression models, as appropriate. The final sample included 4,646 women [mean age (SD), 77.5 (7.0) years]; 87.4% NHW, 6.9% NHB, and 5.7% Hispanic. In the multivariable-adjusted models, affordability was associated with a decreased risk of intensive care unit stay [adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-0.98] and in-hospital death (aRR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.98). After adjustment for HCA dimensions, NHB patients had lower-quality EOL care compared with NHW patients, defined as: increased risk of hospitalization in the last 30 days of life (aRR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.03-1.30), no hospice care (aRR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.04-1.44), in-hospital death (aRR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.03-1.57), and higher counts of poor-quality EOL care outcomes (count ratio:1.19, 95% CI: 1.04-1.36). HCA dimensions were strong predictors of EOL care quality; however, racial disparities persisted, suggesting that additional drivers of these disparities remain to be identified. SIGNIFICANCE: Among patients with ovarian cancer, Black patients had lower-quality EOL care, even after adjusting for three structural barriers to HCA, namely affordability, availability, and accessibility. This suggests an important need to investigate the roles of yet unexplored barriers to HCA such as accommodation and acceptability, as drivers of poor-quality EOL care among Black patients with ovarian cancer.

Household fuel and direct carbon emission disparity in rural China.

Universal access to clean fuels in household use is one explicit indicator of sustainable development while currently still billions of people rely on solid fuels for daily cooking. Despite of the recognized clean transition trend in general, disparities in household energy mix in different activities (e.g. cooking and heating) and historical trends remain to be elucidated. In this study, we revealed the historical changing trend of the disparity in household cooking and heating activities and associated carbon emissions in rural China. The study found that the poor had higher total direct energy consumption but used less modern energy, especially in cooking activities, in which the poor consumed 60 % more energy than the rich. The disparity in modern household energy use decreased over time, but conversely the disparity in total residential energy consumption increased due to the different energy elasticities as income increases. Though per-capita household CO2 and Black Carbon (BC) emissions were decreasing under switching to modern energies, the disparity in household CO2 and BC deepened over time, and the low-income groups emitted âˆ¼ 10 kg CO2 more compared to the high-income population. Relying solely on spontaneous clean cooking transition had limited impacts in reducing disparities in household energy and carbon emissions, whereas improving access to modern energy had substantial potential to reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions and its disparity. Differentiated energy-related policies to promote high-efficiency modern heating energies affordable for the low-income population should be developed to reduce the disparity, and consequently benefit human health and climate change equally.

Social determinants of health and disparities in pediatric trauma care: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDH), including "the conditions in which individuals are born, grow, work, live and age" affect child health and well-being. Several studies have synthesized evidence about the influence of SDH on childhood injury risks and outcomes. However, there is no systematic evidence about the impact of SDH on accessing care and quality of care once a child has suffered an injury. We aim to evaluate the extent to which access to care and quality of care after injury are affected by children and adolescents' SDH. METHODS: Using Cochrane methodology, we will conduct a systematic review including observational and experimental studies evaluating the association between social/material elements contributing to health disparities, using the PROGRESS-Plus framework: place of residence, race/ethnicity/culture/language, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socioeconomic status, and social capital and care received by children and adolescents (≤ 19 years of age) after injury. We will consult published literature using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Academic Search Premier and grey literature using Google Scholar from their inception to a maximum of 6 months prior to submission for publication. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment for included studies. The risk of bias will be assessed using the ROBINS-E and ROB-2 tools respectively for observational and experimental study designs. We will analyze data to perform narrative syntheses, and if enough studies are identified, we will conduct a meta-analysis using random effects models. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide a synthesis of evidence on the association between SDH and pediatric trauma care (access to care and quality of care) that clinicians and policymakers can use to better tailor care systems and promote equitable access and quality of care for all children. We will share our findings through clinical rounds, conferences, and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023408467.

Greater need but reduced access: a population study of planned and elective surgery rates in adult mental health service users.

AIMS: Timely access to surgery is an essential part of healthcare. People living with mental health (MH) conditions may have higher rates of chronic illness requiring surgical care but also face barriers to care. There is limited evidence about whether unequal surgical access contributes to health inequalities in this group. METHODS: We examined 1.22 million surgical procedures in public and private hospitals in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, in 2019. In a cross-sectional study of 76,320 MH service users aged 18 and over, surgical procedure rates per 1,000 population were compared to rates for 6.23 million other NSW residents after direct standardisation for age, sex and socio-economic disadvantage. Rates were calculated for planned and emergency surgery, for major specialty groups, for the top 10 procedure blocks in each specialty group and for 13 access-sensitive procedures. Subgroup analyses were conducted for hospital and insurance type and for people with severe or persistent MH conditions. RESULTS: MH service users had higher rates of surgical procedures (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR]: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.51-1.56), due to slightly higher planned procedure rates (aIRR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.19-1.24) and substantially higher emergency procedure rates (aIRR: 3.60, 95% CI: 3.51-3.70). Emergency procedure rates were increased in all block groups with sufficient numbers for standardisation. MH service users had very high rates (aIRR > 4.5) of emergency cardiovascular, skin and plastics and respiratory procedures, higher rates of planned coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary angiography and cholecystectomy but lower rates of planned ophthalmic surgery, cataract repair, shoulder reconstruction, knee replacement and some plastic surgery procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Higher rates of surgery in MH service users may reflect a higher prevalence of conditions requiring surgical care, including cardiac, metabolic, alcohol-related or smoking-related conditions. The striking increase in emergency surgery rates suggests that this need may not be being met, particularly for chronic and disabling conditions which are often treated by planned surgery in private hospital settings in the Australian health system. A higher proportion of emergency surgery may have serious personal and health system consequences.