Benefit of adjuvant bisphosphonates in early breast cancer treated with contemporary systemic therapy: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Background: The absolute and relative benefits of adjuvant bisphosphonates on disease-free survival and overall survival in patients receiving contemporary systemic therapy for early breast cancer is uncertain. Methods: Data from randomized trials of adjuvant bisphosphonates that recruited patients exclusively after 2000 and reported disease free survival and overall survival was utilized. Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival in bisphosphonates and control group along with associated hazard ratios were extracted. Absolute data were weighted by sample size and hazard ratios were pooled using inverse variance and random effects modelling. Meta-regression comprising linear regression weighted by sample size (mixed effects) was performed to explore association between disease and treatment related factors and absolute differences in benefit from bisphosphonates. Results: Eleven trials comprising 24023 patients were included in the analysis. For disease free survival, pooled hazard ratio was 0.89 (0.81-0.97, p = 0.008) with a 1.5 % weighted mean difference favoring bisphosphonates over control. There was no significant overall survival benefit (0.92, 0.82-1.03, p = 0.16). Among patients receiving anthracycline and taxane based chemotherapy, there were no differences in either disease free survival (0.95, 0.80-1.12) or overall survival (1.04, 0.81-1.32). Meta-regression showed lower benefits in higher risk patients (node-positive, larger tumor size, estrogen receptor-, grade 3 or those receiving chemotherapy). Overall, 1 % (95 % CI 0.75-1.15) of patients experienced osteonecrosis of jaw related to zoledronic acid. Conclusions: Compared to the Early Breast Cancer Trialist's Collaborative Group meta-analysis, benefit from adjuvant bisphosphonates is lower in recent trials especially in higher risk patients receiving contemporary chemotherapy. The balance between benefits and risks of adjuvant bisphosphonates should be considered in individual patients.

Effectiveness of a school-based behavioural change intervention in reducing chronic disease risk factors in Chandigarh, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Background: Early behavioural risk factors such as unbalanced diets, physical inactivity and tobacco and alcohol consumption lead to chronic diseases in later life. We conducted a cluster-randomised controlled trial to measure the effect of a school-based health-promotion intervention in reducing the behavioural risk factors of chronic diseases. Methods: Twelve public schools in the Chandigarh, India were randomised to the intervention and control arm. Adolescents studying in eighth grade (n = 453), their parents (n = 395) and teachers (n = 94) were recruited for the current study. The Precede-Proceed Model was followed for intervention development. Intervention in each cluster comprised of one classroom session, four physical activity (PA) sessions every week for adolescents and four separate sessions for parents and teachers. Primary outcomes were eight binary or continuous measures of behavioural risk factors among adolescents (n = 359). Physical Activity Questionnaire-Adolescents (PAQ-A) scores were used to estimate physical activity. The ANCOVA based on cluster proportions or means was used to estimate the intervention effect accounting for baseline data. Findings: Among adolescents, the intervention reduced salt intake by 0.5 g/d (95% CI: -0.9, -0.1), proportion of current alcohol users by 5% (95% CI: -9, -0.007), and increased fruit consumption by 18 g/d (95% CI: 5, 30) and PA by 0.2 PAQ-A score (95% CI: 0.07, 0.3). However, the intervention had no effect on the sugar and vegetable intake and on smokers and tobacco chewers. Exploratory analysis revealed that among parents, PA increased by 205 metabolic equivalents task (MET) units (95% CI: 74.5, 336), fruits intake by 20 g/d (95% CI: 6, 34), and vegetable intake by 117 g/d (95% CI: 50.5, 183). Whereas salt consumption decreased by 0.5 g/d (95% CI: 0.15, 0.9) and the proportion of current alcohol users declined by 5% (95% CI: 9, -1) among parents. Vegetable consumption increased by 149 g/d (95% CI: 12, 286) among teachers. Interpretation: The intervention package implemented among adolescents by involving parents and teachers is an effective model for school-based behaviour-change interventions. Funding: MK received partial funding from the George Institute for Global Health, Hyderabad, India for the salt-reduction component of the study.

Long-term effect of sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in people living with severe obesity: a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial (SleeveBypass).

Background: Sleeve gastrectomy is the most performed metabolic surgical procedure worldwide. However, conflicting results offer no clear evidence about its long-term clinical comparability to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. This study aims to determine their equivalent long-term weight loss effects. Methods: This randomised open-label controlled trial was conducted from 2012 until 2017 in two Dutch bariatric hospitals with a 5-year follow-up (last follow-up July 29th, 2022). Out of 4045 patients, 628 were eligible for metabolic surgery and were randomly assigned to sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (intention-to-treat). The primary endpoint was weight loss, expressed by percentage excess body mass index (BMI) loss. The predefined clinically relevant equivalence margin was -13% to 13%. Secondary endpoints included percentage total kilograms weight loss, obesity-related comorbidities, quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. This trial is registered with Dutch Trial Register NTR4741: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/nl/trial/25900. Findings: 628 patients were randomised between sleeve gastrectomy (n = 312) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 316) (mean age 43 [standard deviation (SD), 11] years; mean BMI 43.5 [SD, 4.7]; 81.8% women). Excess BMI loss at 5 years was 58.8% [95% CI, 55%-63%] after sleeve gastrectomy and 67.1% [95% CI, 63%-71%] after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (difference 8.3% [95% CI, -12.5% to -4.0%]). This was within the predefined margin (P < 0.001). Total weight loss at 5 years was 22.5% [95% CI, 20.7%-24.3%] after sleeve gastrectomy and 26.0% [95% CI, 24.3%-27.8%] after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (difference 3.5% [95% CI, -5.2% to -1.7%]). In both groups, obesity-related comorbidities significantly improved after 5 years. Dyslipidaemia improved more frequently after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (83%, 54/65) compared to sleeve gastrectomy (62%, 44/71) (P = 0.006). De novo gastro-oesophageal reflux disease occurred more frequently after sleeve gastrectomy (16%, 46/288) vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (4%, 10/280) (P < 0.001). Minor complications were more frequent after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (5%, 15/316) compared to sleeve gastrectomy (2%, 5/312). No statistically significant differences in major complications and health-related quality of life were encountered. Interpretation: In people living with obesity grades 2 and 3, sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass had clinically comparable excess BMI loss according to the predefined definition for equivalence. However, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass showed significantly higher total weight loss and significant advantages in secondary outcomes, including dyslipidaemia and GERD, yet at a higher rate of minor complications. Major complications, other comorbidities, and overall HRQoL did not significantly differ between the groups. Funding: Not applicable.

Trends in prevalence, risk factor control and medications in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among US Adults, 1999-2018.

Objectives: Trends in prevalence and treatments of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains to be documented, with frequent update of relevant guidelines. We aimed to characterize trends in prevalence of ASCVD, and risk factor control and medications among ASCVD adults. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from 55,081 adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 1999-2018. Results: The age-standardized prevalence of ASCVD did not change significantly from 1999-2002 (7.9 %, 95 % CI 7.1 %-8.7 %) to 2015-2018 (7.5 %, CI 6.8 %-8.3 %) (P for trend =0.18), representing an estimated 19.9 million individuals with ASCVD in 2015-2018. The prevalence of premature ASCVD was 2.0 % (CI, 1.6 %-2.5 %). Over 60.0 % of ASCVD participants were at very-high risk. From 1999-2002 to 2015-2018, the percentage with lipid control (non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL) increased from 7.0 % (CI, 3.5 %-12.3 %) to 26.4 % (CI, 16.2 %-38.9 %). The percentage with blood-pressure control (<130/80 mmHg) increased from 51.2 % (CI, 41.0 %-61.3 %) in 1999-2002 to 57.2 % (CI, 48.4 %-65.6 %) in 2011-2014, but then declined to 52.8 % (CI, 44.4 %-81.3 %) in 2015-2018. The percentage with glycemic control (HbA1c <7.0 %) decreased from 95.0 % (CI, 90.2 %-97.9 %) to 84.0 % (CI, 75.9 %-90.3 %). The percentage who achieved all 3 targets was 18.6 % (CI, 8.2 %-33.8 %) in 2015-2018. The percentage of ASCVD participants who were taking statins increased from 1999-2002 to 2011-2014, but then leveled off. Approximately 60 % of individuals with ASCVD and less than 40 % of those with premature ASCVD were taking statins in 2015-2018. The utilization of blood-pressure-lowering drugs remained largely constant over time, whereas the use of glucose-lowering drugs increased. Conclusions: Based on NHANES data from US adults, the estimated prevalence of ASCVD remained relatively stable between 1999 and 2018. Substantial undertreatment with stains was found in individuals with ASCVD, and the percentage achieving optimal lipid control was low.

The ROCK trial-a multidisciplinary Rehabilitation intervention for sudden Out-of-hospital Cardiac arrest survivors focusing on return-to-worK: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Most cardiac arrest survivors are classified with mild to moderate cognitive impairment; roughly, 50% experience long-term neurocognitive impairment. Postarrest challenges complicate participation in society and are associated with social issues such as failure to resume social activities and impaired return to work. The effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors are sparsely described, but the body of evidence describes high probabilities of survivors not returning to work, returning to jobs with modified job descriptions, returning to part-time employment, and often in combination with extensive unmet rehabilitation needs. Hence, there is a need to develop and test a pragmatic individual targeted intervention to facilitate return to work (RTW) in survivors of OHCA. The overall aim of the ROCK trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive individually tailored multidisciplinary rehabilitation intervention for survivors of OHCA on RTW compared to usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ROCK trial is a two-arm parallel group multicentre investigator-initiated pragmatic randomized controlled superiority trial with primary endpoint measured 12 months after the cardiac arrest. Adult survivors who were part of the labour force prior to the OCHA and had at least 2 years until they are qualified to receive retirement state pensions are eligible for inclusion. Survivors will be randomized 1:1 to usual care group or usual care plus a comprehensive tailored rehabilitation intervention focusing on supporting RTW. After comprehensive assessment of individual rehabilitation needs, the intervention is ongoingly coordinated within a multidisciplinary rehabilitation team, and the intervention can be delivered for up until 12 months. Data for the primary outcome will be obtained from the national register on social transfer payments. The primary outcome will be analysed using logistic regression assessing RTW status at 12 months adjusting for the intervention and age at OHCA, sex, marital status, and occupation prior to OHCA. DISCUSSION: The ROCK trial is the first RCT to investigate the effectiveness of a rehabilitation intervention focusing on return to work after cardiac arrest. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05173740. Registered on May 2018.

Complications of Percutaneous Tendo-Achilles Lengthening for Treatment and Prevention of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review.

Percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening is an effective surgical procedure to treat and prevent forefoot and midfoot ulcerations in patients with diabetes. Patients with diabetes are prone to plantar ulcerations due to a combination of factors, such as peripheral neuropathy, decreased tendon elasticity, peripheral vascular disease, and hyperglycemia. Complications such as re-ulceration and transfer lesion to the heel, associated with a calcaneal gait secondary to over-lengthening, are possible with percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening. Although percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening is well accepted, the overall incidence of complication has not been well described. A systematic review of the reported data was performed to determine the incidence of complication for percutaneous tendo-Achilles lengthening when used for the treatment and prevention of diabetic plantar ulcerations. Nine studies involving 490 percutaneous lengthening procedures met the inclusion criteria. The overall complication rate was 27.8% (8% with transfer heel ulcerations). Given the high rate of complications associated with a percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening, careful patient selection and consideration of these risks should be considered prior to proceeding with this procedure. Additional prospective comparative analyses with standardization of surgical technique, degrees of lengthening achieved, and post-operative weightbearing and immobilization modalities are needed to decrease incidence of complication and achieve higher healing rates.

Healthy together Victoria and childhood obesity study: effects of a large scale, community-based cluster randomised trial of a systems thinking approach for the prevention of childhood obesity among secondary school students 2014-2016.

BACKGROUND: Healthy Together Victoria (HTV) was a Victorian Government initiative that sought to reduce the prevalence of overweight and obesity through targeting chronic disease risk factors including physical activity, poor diet quality, smoking, and harmful alcohol use. The intervention involved a boosted workforce of > 170 local-level staff in 12 communities; employed to deliver system activation around health and wellbeing for individuals, families and communities. A cluster randomised trial (CRT) of a systems thinking approach to obesity prevention was embedded within HTV. We present the two-year changes in overweight and obesity and associated behaviours among secondary school students across Victoria, Australia. METHODS: Twenty-three geographically bounded areas were randomised to intervention (12 communities) or comparison (11 communities). Randomly selected secondary schools within each community were invited to participate in the trial in 2014 and 2016. Students in Grade 8 (aged approximately 13-15 years) and Grade 10 (aged approximately 15-16 years) at participating schools were recruited using an opt-out approach across July-September 2014 and 2016. Primary outcomes were body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference. Secondary outcomes were physical activity, sedentary behaviour, diet quality, health-related quality of life, and depressive symptoms. Linear mixed models were fit to estimate the intervention effect adjusting for child/school characteristics. RESULTS: There were 4242 intervention children and 2999 control children in the final analysis. For boys, the two-year change showed improvement in intervention versus control for waist circumference (difference in change: - 2.5 cm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: - 4.6, - 0.5) and consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages per day (< 1 serve: 8.5 percentage points; 95% CI: 0.6, 16.5). For girls, there were no statistically significant differences between conditions. CONCLUSIONS: HTV seemed to produce favourable changes in waist circumference and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption for boys, however, no effect on BMI was observed. Although the HTV intervention was cut short, and the period between data collection points was relatively short, the changes observed in HTV contribute to the growing evidence of whole-of-community interventions targeting childhood obesity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is unregistered. The intervention itself was a policy setting delivered by government and our role was the collection of data to evaluate the effect of this natural experiment. That is, this study was not a trial from the classical point of view and we were not responsible for the intervention.

Physical activity, gestational weight gain in obese patients with early gestational diabetes and the perinatal outcome - a randomised-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Excessive gestational weight gain, especially among women with gestational diabetes, is associated with several adverse perinatal outcomes. Our study aimed to analyse the impact of the use of pedometers to supervise physical activity on maternal health and the obstetric outcomes of pregnant women with obesity and early gestational diabetes. METHODS: 124 pregnant patients were enrolled in the presented research. INCLUSION CRITERIA: singleton pregnancy, age > 18 years, gestational diabetes diagnosed in the first half of pregnancy (< 20th week of pregnancy), obesity according to the American Endocrine Society criteria. Each patient was advised to take at least 5000 steps daily. Patients were randomly assigned to pedometers (N = 62), and were recommended to monitor daily the number of steps. The group without pedometers (N = 62) was not observed. Visit (V1) was scheduled between the 28th and 32nd gestational week (GW), and visit (V2) occurred between the 37th and 39th GW. Anthropometric measurements and blood samples were collected from all patients at each appointment. Foetal and maternal outcomes were analysed at the end of the study. RESULTS: In the group supervised by pedometers, there were significantly fewer newborns with macrosomia (p = 0,03). Only 45% of patients satisfied the recommended physical activity guidelines. Patients who walked more than 5000 steps per day had significantly higher body weight at baseline (p = 0,005), but weight gain was significantly lower than in the group that did not exceed 5000 steps per day (p < 0,001). The perinatal outcome in the group of patients performing more than 5000 steps did not demonstrate significant differences with when compared to less active group. ROC curve for weight gain above the guidelines indicated a statistically substantial cut-off point for this group at the level of 4210 steps/day (p = 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring the activity of pregnant patients with gestational diabetes and obesity by pedometers did not have a significantly impact on their metabolic control and weight gain. However, it contributed to less macrosomia. Furthermore, physical activity over 5,000 steps per day positively affects weight loss, as well as contributes to improved obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

Insulin Pump Therapy vs Multiple Daily Insulin Injections for Glycemic Control in Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), characterized by the autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells and consequent insulin deficiency, leads to various complications. Management primarily focuses on optimal glycemic control through intensive insulin therapy, either via multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) using insulin pumps, which offer flexibility and improved basal insulin delivery. Despite the benefits of insulin pumps, such as reduced hypoglycemia risk and better mealtime insulin management, they pose challenges such as complexity in site changes and potential ketoacidosis due to tubing issues. This systematic review adheres to PRISMA guidelines and compares CSII with MDI in children and adolescents with T1DM, concentrating on outcomes such as glycemic control measured with HbA1c and glucose levels. The review includes studies meeting stringent criteria, encompassing a broad range of methodologies and geographies. The findings of this meta-analysis indicate the differences in glycemic control with CSII compared to MDI. However, significant heterogeneity in results and methodological variations across studies necessitate cautious interpretation. The study underscores the potential of CSII in offering better control for some patients, supporting a more personalized approach to T1DM management. It highlights the need for further research to understand the long-term effects and to refine treatment protocols, considering the variations in healthcare systems, treatment approaches, and patient demographics globally.

The methodological and reporting quality of randomized controlled trials of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for advanced differentiated thyroid cancer: Meta-research study.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) treatment have shown an improvement in overall and progression-free survival in patients with advanced differentiated thyroid cancer. However, it is necessary to evaluate these studies to assess methodological biases and inconsistencies that may impact the effects. OBJECTIVE: To map and assess the methodological quality of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) regarding randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, and selective reporting bias. METHODS: RCTs assessing the efficacy and safety of TKI for the treatment of advanced differentiated thyroid cancer were included. The search was performed in the MEDLINE database. The included RCTs were assessed for the adequacy of the methodological steps, as recommended by the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RESULTS: Nine studies were analyzed, of which 77.7% were classified as low risk of bias regarding selective reporting and 33.3% as high risk of reporting bias. The mean time between protocol registration and study publication was approximately 5.11 years. Moreover, 66.7% were classified as low risk of bias for randomization and allocation concealment, and 33.3% did not specify the randomization process and allocation concealment in a way that would allow the identification of occurrences of bias. Concerning blinding of participants and outcome assessors, 77.8% of the RCTs reported adequate blinding and were classified as having a low risk of bias, 11.1% had a high risk of bias, and 11.1% had insufficient information and were classified as having unclear risk of bias. Regarding the blinding of the outcome assessors, 33.3% did the blinding correctly, 11.1% did not blind, and 55.6% did not provide enough information. CONCLUSION: Overall, the assessed RCTs were predominantly at low risk of bias. The critical evaluation of these studies is essential to have confidence in the treatment estimated effect that will support clinical decision-making and provide information to preclude future clinical study flaws.

The effectiveness of interventions to reduce cancer-related stigma: An integrative review.

AIMS: The clinical significance of cancer-related stigma on patients' well-being has been widely established. Stigma can be perceived and internalised by cancer patients or implemented by the general population and healthcare workers. Various interventions have been carried out to reduce cancer-related stigma, but their effectiveness is not well-understood. This review aims to synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce cancer-related stigma. DESIGN: An integrative review. METHODS: This integrative review combined both qualitative and quantitative studies and followed five steps to identify problems, search for the literature, appraise the literature quality, analyse data, and present data. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (version 2018) was applied to evaluate the quality of the included studies. DATA SOURCES: Databases included Web of Science, MEDLINE, SpringerLink, Wiley Online Journals, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, OVID, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (from the inception of each database to 30 April 2021). RESULTS: Eighteen quantitative, six qualitative, and five mixed-methods studies were included in this review. Cultural factors should be considered when conducting interventions to reduce cancer-related stigma. For cancer patients, multi-component interventions have demonstrated a positive effect on their perceived stigma. For general population, interactive interventions show promise to reduce their implemented stigma towards cancer patients. For healthcare workers, there is a paucity of studies to reduce their implemented stigma. Existing studies reported inconclusive evidence, partially due to the lack of a robust study design with an adequate sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-component and interactive interventions show promise to relieve cancer-related stigma. More methodologically robust studies should be conducted in different cultures to elucidate the most appropriate interventions for different populations to reduce cancer-related stigma. IMPLICATION FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: These findings will facilitate healthcare workers to design and implement interventions to reduce cancer-related stigma, thus improving the quality of life for cancer patients. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient and public contribution.

Editorial: Global Health Concerns as Vaccine-Preventable Infections Including SARS-CoV-2 (JN.1), Influenza, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), and Measles Continue to Rise.

In December 2023, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published the updated 2024 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Adult Immunization Schedule, which is available online for access by the public and healthcare professionals. These new guidelines come at a time when the incidence of vaccine-preventable viral infections from SARS-CoV-2 (JN.1), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza, and measles are increasing in adults and children due to vaccine hesitancy, or non-compliance. This editorial aims to highlight the ongoing global health concerns for the consequences of increasing reports of vaccine-preventable infections, including SARS-CoV-2 (JN.1), influenza, RSV, and measles, to understand the causes of vaccine hesitancy, and introduce some public health measures that could improve vaccine uptake.

HPV vaccination in Africa in the COVID-19 era: a cross-sectional survey of healthcare providers' knowledge, training, and recommendation practices.

Introduction: Although the burden of cervical cancer in Africa is highest, HPV vaccination coverage remains alarmingly low in this region. Providers' knowledge and recommendation are key drivers of HPV vaccination uptake. Yet, evidence about providers' knowledge and recommendation practices about the HPV vaccine against a backdrop of emerging vaccine hesitancy fueled by the COVID-19 pandemic is lacking in Africa. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2021-2022 among healthcare providers involved in cervical cancer prevention activities in Africa. They were invited to report prior training, the availability of the HPV vaccine in their practice, whether they recommended the HPV vaccine, and, if not, the reasons for not recommending it. Their knowledge about the HPV vaccine was assessed through self-reporting (perceived knowledge) and with three pre-tested knowledge questions (measured knowledge). Results: Of the 153 providers from 23 African countries who responded to the survey (mean age: 38.5 years, SD: 10.1), 75 (54.0%) were female and 97 (63.4%) were based In countries with national HPV immunization programs. Overall, 57 (43.8%) reported having received prior training on HPV vaccine education/counseling, and 40 (37.4%) indicated that the HPV vaccine was available at the facility where they work. Most respondents (109, 83.2%) reported recommending the HPV vaccine in their practice. Vaccine unavailability (57.1%), lack of effective communication tools and informational material (28.6%), and need for adequate training (28.6%) were the most commonly reported reasons for not recommending the HPV vaccine. While 63 providers (52.9%) reported that their knowledge about HPV vaccination was adequate for their practice, only 9.9% responded correctly to the 3 knowledge questions. Conclusion: To increase HPV vaccination coverage and counter misinformation about this vaccine in Africa, adequate training of providers and culturally appropriate educational materials are needed to improve their knowledge of the HPV vaccine and to facilitate effective communication with their patients and the community.

Multicentre, parallel, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial on the prognosis of electrical impedance tomography-guided versus low PEEP/FiO2 table-guided PEEP setting: a trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies suggested that electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has the potential to guide positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration via quantifying the alveolar collapse and overdistension. The aim of this trial is to compare the effect of EIT-guided PEEP and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) network low PEEP/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) table strategy on mortality and other clinical outcomes in patients with ARDS. METHODS: This is a parallel, two-arm, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial, conducted in China. All patients with ARDS under mechanical ventilation admitted to the intensive care unit will be screened for eligibility. The enrolled patients are stratified by the aetiology (pulmonary/extrapulmonary) and partial pressure of arterial oxygen/FiO2 (≥150 mm Hg or <150 mm Hg) and randomised into the intervention group or the control group. The intervention group will receive recruitment manoeuvre and EIT-guided PEEP titration. The EIT-guided PEEP will be set for at least 12 hours after titration. The control group will not receive recruitment manoeuvre routinely and the PEEP will be set according to the lower PEEP/FiO2 table proposed by the ARDS Network. The primary outcome is 28-day survival. ANALYSIS: Qualitative data will be analysed using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test, quantitative data will be analysed using independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test will be used to evaluate the 28-day survival rate between two groups. All outcomes will be analysed based on the intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is approved by the Institutional Research and Ethics Committee of the Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Data will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05307913.

Early sepsis care with the National Early Warning Score 2-guided Sepsis Hour-1 Bundle in the emergency department: hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation pilot stepped wedge randomised controlled trial (NEWS-1 TRIPS) protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Early sepsis treatment in the emergency department (ED) is crucial to improve patient survival. Despite international promulgation, the uptake of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) Hour-1 Bundle (lactate measurement, blood culture, broad-spectrum antibiotics, 30 mL/kg crystalloid for hypotension/lactate ≥4 mmol/L and vasopressors for hypotension during/after fluid resuscitation within 1 hour of sepsis recognition) is low across healthcare settings. Delays in sepsis recognition and a lack of high-quality evidence hinder its implementation. We propose a novel sepsis care model (National Early Warning Score, NEWS-1 care), in which the SSC Hour-1 Bundle is triggered objectively by a high NEWS-2 (≥5). This study aims to determine the feasibility of a full-scale type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial on the NEWS-1 care in multiple EDs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a pilot type 1 hybrid trial and prospectively recruit 200 patients from 4 public EDs in Hong Kong cluster randomised in a stepped wedge design over 10 months. All study sites will start with an initial period of standard care and switch in random order at 2-month intervals to the NEWS-1 care unidirectionally. The implementation evaluation will employ mixed methods guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework, which includes qualitative and quantitative data from focus group interviews, staff survey and clinical record reviews. We will analyse the 14 feasibility outcomes as progression criteria to a full-scale trial, including trial acceptability to patients and staff, patient and staff recruitment rates, accuracy of sepsis screening, protocol adherence, accessibility to follow-up data, safety and preliminary clinical impacts of the NEWS1 care, using descriptive statistics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The institutional review boards of all study sites approved this study. This study will establish the feasibility of a full-scale hybrid trial. We will disseminate the findings through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and educational activities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05731349.

Effects of aquatic exercise program versus on-land exercise program on cancer-related fatigue, neuropathy, activity and participation, quality of life, and return to work for cancer patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Exercise has shown positive effects on fatigue, exhaustion, neuropathy, and quality of life in cancer patients. While on-land exercises have been studied, the aquatic environment offers unique advantages. Water's density and viscosity provide resistance, enhancing muscle strength, while hydrostatic pressure improves venous return. This trial aims to investigate the effect of aquatic exercises on time to return to work, work hours, work-related difficulties, daily life activity and participation, quality of life, exhaustion, fatigue, and neuropathy among cancer patients, compared to on-land exercise intervention group and a non-exercise group. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial will include 150 cancer patients aged 18-65 years with stage III colon cancer or breast cancer patients with lymph node involvement. Participants in the aquatic exercise intervention group will undergo an 8-week, twice-weekly group-based Ai-Chi program, while the on-land exercise group will perform identical exercise. The control group will not engage in any exercise. The primary outcome will be assessed using an employment barriers questionnaire, capturing return to work date and working hours and daily life participation and activity and quality of life. Secondary outcomes include exhaustion, fatigue, and neuropathy. Data will be collected at baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks), and at 3,12, and 24 months. Mixed variance analyses will explore relationships among groups and over time for independent variables, with separate analyses for each dependent variable. DISCUSSION: The potential benefits include an earlier return to work for patients, reducing their need for social and economic support. The study's implications on socio-economic policies are noteworthy, as a successful intervention could offer a cost-effective and non-invasive solution, improving patients' quality of life and increasing their participation in daily activities. This, in turn, could lead to a faster return to work, contributing to both personal well-being and broader societal interests by reducing reliance on social services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05427344 (22 June 2022).

Perioperative treatment with tranexamic acid in melanoma (PRIME): protocol for a Danish multicentre randomised controlled trial investigating the prognostic and treatment-related impact of the plasminogen-plasmin pathway.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammation is a hallmark of cancer and is involved in tumour growth and dissemination. However, the hallmarks of cancer are also the hallmarks of wound healing, and modulating the wound inflammatory response and immune contexture in relation to cancer surgery may represent effective targets of therapies.Repurposing anti-inflammatory drugs in a cancer setting has gained increasing interest in recent years. Interestingly, the known and thoroughly tested antifibrinolytic drug tranexamic acid reduces the risk of bleeding, but it is also suggested to play important roles in anti-inflammatory pathways, improving wound healing and affecting anti-carcinogenic mechanisms.As a novel approach, we will conduct a randomised controlled trial using perioperative treatment with tranexamic acid, aiming to prevent early relapses by >10% for patients with melanoma. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Design: investigator-initiated parallel, two-arm, randomised, blinded, Danish multicentre superiority trial. PATIENTS: ≥T2 b melanoma and eligible for sentinel lymph node biopsy (n=1204).Project drug: tranexamic acid or placebo. TREATMENT: before surgery (intravenous 15 mg/kg) and daily (peroral 1000 mg x 3) through postoperative day 4. PRIMARY OUTCOME: relapse within 2 years after surgery.Primary analysis: risk difference between the treatment arms (χ2 test). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: postoperative complications, adverse events and survival.Inclusion period: summer 2023 to summer 2026. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial will be initiated during the summer of 2023 and is approved by the National Committee on Health Research Ethics, the Danish Medicine Agency, and registered under the Data Protection Act. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Patients included in the study will adhere to normal Danish treatment protocols and standards of care, and we expect only mild and temporary side effects. Positive and negative results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, with authorships adhering to the Vancouver rules. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05899465; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier.

Priming transcranial direct current stimulation for improving hemiparetic upper limb in patients with subacute stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that modulates brain states by applying a weak electrical current to the brain cortex. Several studies have shown that anodal stimulation of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) may promote motor recovery of the affected upper limb in patients with stroke; however, a high-level clinical recommendation cannot be drawn in view of inconsistent findings. A priming brain stimulation protocol has been proposed to induce stable modulatory effects, in which an inhibitory stimulation is applied prior to excitatory stimulation to a brain area. Our recent work showed that priming theta burst magnetic stimulation demonstrated superior effects in improving upper limb motor function and neurophysiological outcomes. However, it remains unknown whether pairing a session of cathodal tDCS with a session of anodal tDCS will also capitalise on its therapeutic effects. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a two-arm double-blind randomised controlled trial involving 134 patients 1-6 months after stroke onset. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to receive 10 sessions of priming tDCS+robotic training, or 10 sessions of non-priming tDCS+robotic training for 2 weeks. The primary outcome is the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-upper extremity, and the secondary outcomes are the Wolf Motor Function Test and Modified Barthel Index. The motor-evoked potentials, regional oxyhaemoglobin level and resting-state functional connectivity between the bilateral M1 will be acquired and analysed to investigate the effects of priming tDCS on neuroplasticity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Center (reference number: Yangzhi2023-022) and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964, as revised in 2013. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300074681.