Epidemiology and outcome of HIV-infected patients admitted to the ICU in the current highly active antiretroviral therapy era.

PURPOSE: To describe the epidemiology of critical disease in HIV-infected patients during the current highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era and to identify hospital mortality predictors. METHODS: A longitudinal, retrospective observational study was made of HIV-infected adults admitted to the ICU in two Spanish hospitals between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2014. Demographic and HIV-related variables were analyzed, together with comorbidities, severity scores, reasons for admission and need for organ support. The chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables, while continuous variables were contrasted with the Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test or Kruskal-Wallis test, assuming an alpha level=0.05. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios for assessing correlations to mortality during hospital stay. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to study mortality trends over time. RESULTS: A total of 283 episodes were included for analyses. Hospital mortality was 32.9% (95%CI: 21.2-38.5). Only admission from a site other than the Emergency Care Department (OR 3.64, 95%CI: 1.30-10.20; p=0.01), moderate-severe liver disease (OR 5.65, 95%CI: 1.11-28.87; p=0.04) and the APACHE II score (OR 1.14, 95%CI: 1.04-1.26; p<0.01) and SOFA score at 72h (OR 1.19, 95%CI: 1.02-1.40; p=0.03) maintained a statistically significant relationship with hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed ICU admission, comorbidities and the severity of critical illness determine the prognosis of HIV-infected patients admitted to the ICU. Based on these data, HIV-infected patients should receive the same level of care as non-HIV-infected patients, regardless of their immunological or nutritional condition.

Documento práctico del manejo de la hiponatremia en pacientes críticos / Practical document on the management of hyponatremia in critically ill patients

La hiponatremia es el trastorno electrolítico más prevalente en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. Se asocia a un aumento de la morbilidad, mortalidad y estancia hospitalaria. La mayoría de los estudios publicados hasta el momento son observacionales, retrospectivos y no incluyen pacientes críticos, lo que dificulta la extracción de conclusiones sólidas. Además, debido a la escasa evidencia científica de calidad, incluso las recomendaciones realizadas por distintas sociedades científicas recientemente publicadas difieren en aspectos importantes como son el diagnóstico o el tratamiento de la hiponatremia. Los mecanismos etiopatogénicos en los pacientes críticos suelen ser complejos. Sin embargo, hay que profundizar en ellos para llegar al diagnóstico más probable y a la pauta de tratamiento más adecuada. Todo ello, ha motivado la realización de esta revisión práctica sobre aspectos útiles en el abordaje de la hiponatremia en las Unidades de Cuidados intensivos, con el objetivo de homogeneizar el manejo de esta entidad y disponer de un algoritmo diagnóstico a nivel nacional

Hyponatremia is the most prevalent electrolyte disorder in Intensive Care Units. It is associated with an increase in morbidity, mortality and hospital stay. The majority of the published studies are observational, retrospective and do not include critical patients; hence it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Moreover, the lack of clinical evidence has led to important dissimilarities in the recommendations coming from different scientific societies. Finally, etiopathogenic mechanisms leading to hyponatremia in the critical care patient are complex and often combined, and an intensive analysis is clearly needed. A study was therefore made to review all clinical aspects about hyponatremia management in the critical care setting. The aim was to develop a Spanish nationwide algorithm to standardize hyponatremia diagnosis and treatment in the critical care patient

Practical document on the management of hyponatremia in critically ill patients. / Documento práctico del manejo de la hiponatremia en pacientes críticos.

Hyponatremia is the most prevalent electrolyte disorder in Intensive Care Units. It is associated with an increase in morbidity, mortality and hospital stay. The majority of the published studies are observational, retrospective and do not include critical patients; hence it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Moreover, the lack of clinical evidence has led to important dissimilarities in the recommendations coming from different scientific societies. Finally, etiopathogenic mechanisms leading to hyponatremia in the critical care patient are complex and often combined, and an intensive analysis is clearly needed. A study was therefore made to review all clinical aspects about hyponatremia management in the critical care setting. The aim was to develop a Spanish nationwide algorithm to standardize hyponatremia diagnosis and treatment in the critical care patient.

Programas de optimización de uso de antimicrobianos (PROA) en hospitales españoles: documento de consenso GEIH-SEIMC, SEFH y SEMPSPH / Programs for optimizing the use of antibiotics (PROA) in Spanish hospitals: GEIH-SEIMC, SEFH and SEMPSPH consensus document

Los antimicrobianos son fármacos distintos al resto. Su eficacia en la reducción de la morbilidad y la mortalidad es muy superior a la de otros grupos de medicamentos. Por otra parte, son los únicos fármacos con efectos ecológicos, de manera que su administración puede contribuir a la aparición y diseminación de resistencias microbianas. Finalmente, son utilizados por médicos de prácticamente todas las especialidades. La actual complejidad en el manejo de las enfermedades infecciosas y del aumento de las resistencias hace imprescindible el establecimiento de programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en los hospitales (PROA).Este documento de consenso define los objetivos de los PROA (mejorar los resultados clínicos de los pacientes con infecciones, minimizar los efectos adversos asociados a la utilización de antimicrobianos, incluyendo aquí las resistencias, y garantizar la utilización de tratamientos coste-eficaces) y establece recomendaciones para su implantación en los hospitales españoles. Las líneas maestras de las recomendaciones son: la constitución de un equipo multidisciplinario de antibióticos, dependiente de la Comisión de Infecciones. Los PROA necesitan ser considerados programas institucionales de los hospitales donde se desarrollen. Deben incluir objetivos específicos y resultados cuantificables en función de indicadores, y basarse en la realización de actividades encaminadas a mejorar el uso de antimicrobianos, principalmente mediante actividades formativas y medidas no impositivas de ayuda a la prescripción (AU)

The antimicrobial agents are unique drugs for several reasons. First, their efficacy is higher than other drugs in terms of reduction of morbidity and mortality. Also, antibiotics are the only group of drugs associated with ecological effects, because their administration may contribute to the emergence and spread of microbial resistance. Finally, they are used by almost all medical specialties. Appropriate use of antimicrobials is very complex because of the important advances in the management of infectious diseases and the spread of antibiotic resistance. Thus, the implementation of programs for optimizing the use of antibiotics in hospitals (called PROA in this document) is necessary. This consensus document defines the objectives of the PROA (namely, to improve the clinical results of patients with infections, to minimise the adverse events associated to the use of antimicrobials including the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance, and to ensure the use of the most cost-efficacious treatments), and provides recommendations for the implementation of these programs in Spanish hospitals. The key aspects of the recommendations are as follows. Multidisciplinary antibiotic teams should be formed, under the auspices of the Infection Committees. The PROA need to be considered as part of institutional programs and the strategic objectives of the hospital. The PROA should include specific objectives based on measurable indicators, and activities aimed at improving the use of antimicrobials, mainly through educational activities and interventions based more on training activities directed to prescribers than just on restrictive measures (AU)

[Recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Work Group (GTEI) of the Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) and the Infections in Critically Ill Patients Study Group (GEIPC) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) for the diagnosis and treatment of influenza A/H1N1 in seriously ill adults admitted to the Intensive Care Unit]. / Recomendaciones del Grupo de Trabajo Enfermedades Infecciosas (GTEI) de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC) y el Grupo de Estudio de Infecciones en el Paciente Crítico (GEIPC) de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología clínica (SEIMC) para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la gripe A/H1N1 en pacientes adultos graves hospitalizados en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos.

The diagnosis of influenza A/H1N1 is mainly clinical, particularly during peak or seasonal flu outbreaks. A diagnostic test should be performed in all patients with fever and flu symptoms that require hospitalization. The respiratory sample (nasal or pharyngeal exudate or deeper sample in intubated patients) should be obtained as soon as possible, with the immediate start of empirical antiviral treatment. Molecular methods based on nucleic acid amplification techniques (RT-PCR) are the gold standard for the diagnosis of influenza A/H1N1. Immunochromatographic methods have low sensitivity; a negative result therefore does not rule out active infection. Classical culture is slow and has low sensitivity. Direct immunofluorescence offers a sensitivity of 90%, but requires a sample of high quality. Indirect methods for detecting antibodies are only of epidemiological interest. Patients with A/H1N1 flu may have relative leukopenia and elevated serum levels of LDH, CPK and CRP, but none of these variables are independently associated to the prognosis. However, plasma LDH> 1500 IU/L, and the presence of thrombocytopenia <150 x 10(9)/L, could define a patient population at risk of suffering serious complications. Antiviral administration (oseltamivir) should start early (<48 h from the onset of symptoms), with a dose of 75 mg every 12h, and with a duration of at least 7 days or until clinical improvement is observed. Early antiviral administration is associated to improved survival in critically ill patients. New antiviral drugs, especially those formulated for intravenous administration, may be the best choice in future epidemics. Patients with a high suspicion of influenza A/H1N1 infection must continue with antiviral treatment, regardless of the negative results of initial tests, unless an alternative diagnosis can be established or clinical criteria suggest a low probability of influenza. In patients with influenza A/H1N1 pneumonia, empirical antibiotic therapy should be provided due to the possibility of bacterial coinfection. A beta-lactam plus a macrolide should be administered as soon as possible. The microbiological findings and clinical or laboratory test variables may decide withdrawal or not of antibiotic treatment. Pneumococcal vaccination is recommended as a preventive measure in the population at risk of suffering severe complications. Although the use of moderate- or low-dose corticosteroids has been proposed for the treatment of influenza A/H1N1 pneumonia, the existing scientific evidence is not sufficient to recommend the use of corticosteroids in these patients. The treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with influenza A/H1N1 must be based on the use of a protective ventilatory strategy (tidal volume <10 ml / kg and plateau pressure <35 mmHg) and positive end-expiratory pressure set to high patient lung mechanics, combined with the use of prone ventilation, muscle relaxation and recruitment maneuvers. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation cannot be considered a technique of choice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, though it may be useful in experienced centers and in cases of respiratory failure associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation or heart failure. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a rescue technique in refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome due to influenza A/H1N1 infection. The scientific evidence is weak, however, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is not the technique of choice. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation will be advisable if all other options have failed to improve oxygenation. The centralization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in referral hospitals is recommended. Clinical findings show 50-60% survival rates in patients treated with this technique. Cardiovascular complications of influenza A/H1N1 are common. Such problems may appear due to the deterioration of pre-existing cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, ischemic heart disease and right ventricular dysfunction. Early diagnosis and adequate monitoring allow the start of effective treatment, and in severe cases help decide the use of circulatory support systems. Influenza vaccination is recommended for all patients at risk. This indication in turn could be extended to all subjects over 6 months of age, unless contraindicated. Children should receive two doses (one per month). Immunocompromised patients and the population at risk should receive one dose and another dose annually. The frequency of adverse effects of the vaccine against A/H1N1 flu is similar to that of seasonal flu. Chemoprophylaxis must always be considered a supplement to vaccination, and is indicated in people at high risk of complications, as well in healthcare personnel who have been exposed.

[Programs for optimizing the use of antibiotics (PROA) in Spanish hospitals: GEIH-SEIMC, SEFH and SEMPSPH consensus document]. / Programas de optimización de uso de antimicrobianos (PROA) en hospitales españoles: documento de consenso GEIH-SEIMC, SEFH y SEMPSPH.

The antimicrobial agents are unique drugs for several reasons. First, their efficacy is higher than other drugs in terms of reduction of morbidity and mortality. Also, antibiotics are the only group of drugs associated with ecological effects, because their administration may contribute to the emergence and spread of microbial resistance. Finally, they are used by almost all medical specialties. Appropriate use of antimicrobials is very complex because of the important advances in the management of infectious diseases and the spread of antibiotic resistance. Thus, the implementation of programs for optimizing the use of antibiotics in hospitals (called PROA in this document) is necessary. This consensus document defines the objectives of the PROA (namely, to improve the clinical results of patients with infections, to minimise the adverse events associated to the use of antimicrobials including the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance, and to ensure the use of the most cost-efficacious treatments), and provides recommendations for the implementation of these programs in Spanish hospitals. The key aspects of the recommendations are as follows. Multidisciplinary antibiotic teams should be formed, under the auspices of the Infection Committees. The PROA need to be considered as part of institutional programs and the strategic objectives of the hospital. The PROA should include specific objectives based on measurable indicators, and activities aimed at improving the use of antimicrobials, mainly through educational activities and interventions based more on training activities directed to prescribers than just on restrictive measures.

Programas de optimización de uso de antimicrobianos (PROA) en hospitales españoles: documento de consenso GEIH-SEIMC, SEFH y SEMPSPH / No disponible

Los antimicrobianos son fármacos distintos al resto. Su eficacia en términos de curación y reducción de mortalidad es muy superior a la de otros grupos de medicamentos,habiéndose demostrado que la indicación de antimicrobianosinadecuados en determinadas situaciones clínicas es un factorindependiente de aumento del riesgo de mortalidad. Por otra parte, son los únicos fármacos con efectos ecológicos, de manera que su administación afecta tanto al paciente que los recibe como al resto, dado que pueden contribuir a la aparicióny diseminación de resistencias microbianas. Finalmente, sonutilizados por médicos de prácticamente todas las especialidades.La complejidad actual motivada por los avances en el conocimiento del manejo de las nfermedades infecciosas y del aumento de las resistencias hace imprescindible el establecimiento de programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en los hospitales (PROA). Este documento de consenso define los objetivos de losPROA (por este orden: mejorar los resultados clínicos de los pacientes con infecciones, minimizar los efectosadversos asociados a la utilización de antimicrobianos, incluyendo aquí la aparición y diseminación deresistencias, y garantizar la utilización de tratamientos coste-eficaces) y establece recomendaciones para suimplantación en los hospitales españoles. Las líneas maestras de las recomendaciones son las siguientes: eldiseño y desarrollo de los PROA debe basarse en la constituciónde un equipo multidisciplinar de antibióticos, dependiente de la Comisión de Infecciones. Para posibilitar su éxito, estos programas necesitan ser considerados comoparte de la propia institución sanitaria y formar parte de los objetivos de los centros donde se desarrollen (AU)

No disponible

Política de antibióticos en pacientes críticos / Antibiotic policy in critical patients

El conjunto de normas y estrategias desarrolladas para mejorar y optimizar el empleo de los antimicrobianos recibe el nombre de política de antibióticos. Los pacientes críticos ingresados en servicios de medicina intensiva presentan unas características especiales (gravedad, agentes patógenos, alteración de órganos o sistemas) que justifican el empleo de los antibióticos de forma diferencial al de otros pacientes hospitalizados. La influencia y el impacto de los antibióticos se observa en los pacientes que los reciben (respuesta clínica, evolución) y en el ecosistema que rodea al paciente (flora hospitalaria). Este impacto es especialmente visible en los pacientes críticos y en la flora endémica de las unidades de cuidados intensivos. En este artículo se describe un conjunto de normas (decálogo de normas) y estrategias (desescalada terapéutica, ciclado de antibióticos, tratamiento anticipado y parámetros farmacocinéticos/farmacodinámicos) que se han aplicado y desarrollado en los pacientes críticos para optimizar el empleo de los antimicrobianos con el objetivo de conseguir la máxima efectividad y la mínima morbilidad (AU)

The combination of guidelines and strategies developed to improve and optimize the use of antimicrobials receives the name of antibiotic policy. Critical patients admitted to the Intensive Medicine Services have special characteristics (severity, pathogen agents, organ and/or system disorders) that justify the use of antibiotics differentially than for other hospitalized patients. The influence and impact of the antibiotics are observed in the patients who receive them (clinical response, course) and in the ecosystem surrounding the patient (hospital flora). This impact is especially visible in the critical patients in the endemic flora of the ICU. This article describes a combination of guidelines (guideline decalogue) and strategies (therapeutic de-escalation, cycling of antibiotics, preemptive treatment and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters) that have been applied and developed in the critical patients to optimize the use of the antimicrobials in order to achieve the maximum effectivity and minimum morbidity (AU)

[Antibiotic policy in critical patients]. / Política de antibióticos en pacientes críticos.

The combination of guidelines and strategies developed to improve and optimize the use of antimicrobials receives the name of antibiotic policy. Critical patients admitted to the Intensive Medicine Services have special characteristics (severity, pathogen agents, organ and/or system disorders) that justify the use of antibiotics differentially than for other hospitalized patients. The influence and impact of the antibiotics are observed in the patients who receive them (clinical response, course) and in the ecosystem surrounding the patient (hospital flora). This impact is especially visible in the critical patients in the endemic flora of the ICU. This article describes a combination of guidelines (guideline decalogue) and strategies (therapeutic de-escalation, cycling of antibiotics, preemptive treatment and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters) that have been applied and developed in the critical patients to optimize the use of the antimicrobials in order to achieve the maximum effectivity and minimum morbidity.

Guías para el manejo de la neumonía comunitaria del adulto que precisa ingreso en el hospital / Guidelines for the management of community pneumonia in adult who needs hospitalization

La neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (NAC) sigue siendo un problema sanitario de primer orden. En España, la incidencia de este tipo de infección es de 162 casos por cada 100.000 habitantes, lo que supone 53.000 hospitalizaciones al año y un coste de 115 millones de euros. Además, en los últimos años se han producido avances significativos en el conocimiento de la etiología y el diagnóstico de la enfermedad. Al mismo tiempo se está consiguiendo una mejor comprensión del problema derivado del aumento de las resistencias bacterianas, y han aparecido nuevas alternativas terapéuticas para el manejo de esta enfermedad. Por todo ello, un grupo de expertos pertenecientes a tres sociedades científicas de nuestro país (Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias - SEMICYUC; Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica - SEIMC; Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica - SEPAR) se han reunido para, tras una revisión crítica de la literatura, elaborar las presentes Guías para el manejo de la NAC. En ellas se abordan aspectos de epidemiología, índices pronósticos, etiología, diagnóstico, tratamiento y prevención de la enfermedad. El objetivo que se persigue es ayudar a los clínicos en la toma de decisiones, sin olvidar destacar la importancia que tiene el conocer las características particulares de la NAC en cada zona

Community acquired pneumonia is still an important health problem. In Spain the year incidence is 162 cases per 100,000 inhabitants with 53,000 hospital admission costing 115 millions of euros per year. In the last years there have been significant advances in the knowledge of: aetiology, diagnostic tools, treatment alternatives and antibiotic resistance. The Spanish Societies of Intensive and Critical Care (SEMICYUC), Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) have produced these evidence-based Guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in Adults. The main objective is to help physicians to make decisions about this disease. The different points that have been developed are: aetiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention

[Guidelines for the management of community pneumonia in adult who needs hospitalization]. / Guías para el manejo de la neumonía comunitaria del adulto que precisa ingreso en el hospital.

Community acquired pneumonia is still an important health problem. In Spain the year incidence is 162 cases per 100,000 inhabitants with 53,000 hospital admission costing 115 millions of euros per year. In the last years there have been significant advances in the knowledge of: aetiology, diagnostic tools, treatment alternatives and antibiotic resistance. The Spanish Societies of Intensive and Critical Care (SEMICYUC), Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) have produced these evidence-based Guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in Adults. The main objective is to help physicians to make decisions about this disease. The different points that have been developed are: aetiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention.

Antibacterial treatment of invasive mechanical ventilation-associated pneumonia.

Patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) are at higher risk of acquiring nosocomial infections than patients in other hospital areas. This is the consequence of both a greater severity of illness with its implications (manipulation, invasiveness) and crossed infection from reservoirs inside the ICU. The most frequent nosocomial infection is invasive ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP) which leads to an important increase in morbidity and mortality. The most important aetiological agents in VAP are bacteria, with a marked predominance of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These aetiologies may be different depending upon the type of ICU (medical, surgical, coronary) or the presence of certain risk factors (duration of mechanical ventilation before onset of pneumonia, previous exposure to antibacterials). Susceptibilities of the aetiological agents to antibacterials may also vary according to the type of ICU and over time. Data from global studies show an increase in multiresistant bacteria but these data may not be applied to a local ICU. The availability of accurate and updated information on the most frequently encountered organisms in each ICU and their susceptibilities is very important in order to provide the most adequate treatment. A controversial issue is the selection of antibacterials. According to the latest evidence the most adequate approach is a prompt administration of empirical treatment. Based on knowledge of bacterial flora in our own ICU, the choice of an adequate therapeutic regimen will decrease both morbidity and mortality. A second issue is monotherapy versus combined therapy. The most common recommendation, with a few exceptions, is to use combined therapy until microbiological results are received. Another controversy is the choice of antibacterials in the combined regimen. The most commonly recommended combination is that of a beta-lactam with an aminoglycoside, except in early-onset pneumonia without risk factors. The use of monotherapy with a cefalosporin without antipseudomonal activity or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid is the recommended regimen. Treatment should be modified based on microbiological results. There are no well documented recommendations on the prophylactic duration of treatment and it must be based on the aetiological agent and the clinical course. In summary treatment of VAP must be prompt, empirical and combined (beta-lactam plus aminoglycoside ). However, the choice of the antibacterial regimen should follow local guidelines of treatment based upon the knowledge of the most frequently isolated bacterial flora and their susceptibilities in different clinical settings.

Pautas de tratamiento antibiótico empírico de las infecciones intraabdominales / Guidelines for empirical antibiotic treatment of intraabdominal infections

No disponible