Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Rev. esp. quimioter ; 32(6): 532-538, dic. 2019. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-190612

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gram-positive bacteria are the leading cause of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide with remarkable pharmacokinetic properties and high bactericidal activity against most Gram-positive bacteria. Although clear evidence regarding its effectiveness in bone and joint infections lacks, recent studies suggest a promising role of dalbavancin in PJI. METHODS: From June 1st 2016 to May 1st 2018, all patients diagnosed of PJI and treated with DAL alone or in combination with other drugs were retrospectively evaluated. Dalbavancin susceptibility of every isolate was studied following CLSI criteria. The primary objective was to assess the clinical efficacy and tolerability of the drug in patients with PJI. A cost-analysis was performed following the DALBUSE study methodology. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated with dalbavancin, eight with total hip arthroplasty infection (THAi) and eight with total knee arthroplasty infection (TKAi). Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. were the microorganisms involved. No major side effects were detected. Infection resolved in 12 patients. In 2 patients the treatment failed, and another patient died due to unrelated causes. One patient is currently being treated for hematogenous-spread knee infection secondary to prosthetic aortic arch endocarditis. After discontinuation of dalbavancin, and excluding patients who died or with clinical failure, the median follow up of the cohort was 503 days (interquartile range IQR, 434.5 to 567 days). We calculate that US$ 264,769 were saved. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that dalbavancin treatment for PJI caused by Gram-positive bacteria is a safe and effective option that reduces hospital stay and costs. Future reports are needed to confirm these findings


INTRODUCCIÓN: Las bacterias grampositivas son la principal causa de infección periprotésica (IPP). Dalbavancina es un lipoglicopéptido con interesantes propiedades farmacocinéticas y una importante actividad bactericida frente a la mayoría de grampositivos. Aunque aún necesitamos mayor evidencia en relación con su uso en infección osteoarticular, estudios recientes sugieren un papel importante de dalbavancina en la IPP. MÉTODOS: Desde el 1 de Junio de 2016 al 1 de Mayo de 2018, todos los pacientes diagnosticados con IPP y tratados con dalbavancina sola o en combinación con otros fármacos fueron evaluados de forma retrospectiva. La sensibilidad a dalbavancina de los aislamientos fue evaluada según las recomendaciones de CLSI. El objetivo primario fue determinar la eficacia y tolerabilidad del fármaco en pacientes con IPP. Se realizó un análisis de coste siguiendo la metodología descrita en el estudio DALBUSE. RESULTADOS: Dieciséis pacientes fueron tratados con dalbavancina, ocho con infección de prótesis total de cadera y ocho con infección de prótesis total de rodilla. Staphylococcus spp. y Enterococcus spp. fueron los microorganismos implicados. No hubo efectos adversos relevantes. La infección se resolvió en 12 pacientes. En dos pacientes el tratamiento falló, y otro paciente falleció por causas no relacionadas. Un paciente es actualmente en tratamiento supresor por infección por diseminación hematógena de prótesis total de rodilla a partir de endocarditis protésica aórtica. Tras la discontinuación de dalbavancina, y exceptuando los pacientes fallecidos y/o con fallo terapéutico, el seguimiento medio fue de 503 días (rango intercuartílico 434.5-567 dias). Se estimó un ahorro de 264.769 dólares USA. CONCLUSIONES: Este estudio sugiere que dalbavancina para el tratamiento de IPP causada por microorganismos grampositivos es segura y una opción eficaz que reduce la estancia hospitalaria y los costes. Se precisan más comunicaciones para confirmar estos datos


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/etiology , Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects , Knee Prosthesis/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Teicoplanin/analogs & derivatives , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , Teicoplanin/administration & dosage
3.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 12(8): 547-556, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31208965

ABSTRACT

Human papillomavirus genotype 16 (HPV16) is by far the genotype most strongly associated with cervical cancer; viral variant and/or viral load of HPV16 could modulate this association. The objective was to determine the association between the viral variant and viral load of HPV16 and the presence of cervical high-grade lesions. This cross-sectional study included all women in whom HPV infection was found by cervical smear during routine gynecologic health checks. Women with single or multiple HPV16 infections (n = 176) were selected for viral variant and viral load analysis. Smear results were classified using the Bethesda system. HPV types were classified according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by logistic regression, adjusted for age, immigrant status, and coinfection with other high-risk genotypes. No statistically significant associations were found regarding the detected viral variants. A viral load above the median (>1,367.79 copies/cell) was associated with a significant risk of high-grade epithelial lesion or carcinoma, after adjusting for age, immigrant status, coinfections, and viral variant: (adjusted OR 7.89; 95% CI: 2.75-22.68). This relationship showed a statistically significant dose-response pattern after categorizing by viral load tertiles: adjusted OR for a viral load greater than the third tertile was 17.23 (95% CI: 4.20-70.65), with adjusted linear P trend = 0.001. In patients infected with HPV16, viral load is associated with high-grade intraepithelial lesions or cervical carcinoma. This could be useful as prognostic biomarker of neoplastic progression and as screening for cervical cancer.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Human papillomavirus 16/isolation & purification , Mass Screening/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Cross-Sectional Studies , DNA, Viral/genetics , DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Disease Progression , Female , Genotype , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Spain , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vaginal Smears , Viral Load , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology
8.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 112, 2018 01 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29382323

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The new nine-valent vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV) includes the four HPV genotypes (6, 11, 16, and 18) that are targeted by the older quadrivalent HPV vaccine, plus five additional oncogenic types (31, 33, 45, 52, and 58) remain significantly associated with high grade lesions. We aimed to determine the prevalence of high-risk HPV genotypes in unvaccinated subjects and the association of these genotypes with the incidence of high-grade lesions. We also assessed which, if either, of these two HPV vaccines could have prevented these cases. METHODS: This cross-sectional study, conducted from 4 January 2010 to 30 December 2011, was composed of 595 women attending the Hospital General Universitario de Elche (Spain) gynaecology department who were positively screened for opportunistic cervical cancer by pap smears and HPV detection during a routine gynaecological health check. The pap smear results were classified using the Bethesda system. HPV genotyping was performed with the Linear Array HPV genotyping test, and viruses were classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer assessment of HPV carcinogenicity. Odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated by logistic regression, adjusting for age and immigrant status. The prevented fraction among those exposed (PFe-adjusted) was determined as a measure of impact. RESULTS: At least one of the additional five high-risk HPV genotypes present in the nine-valent HPV vaccine was detected in 20.5% of subjects. After excluding women with genotype 16 and/or 18 co-infection, high-risk genotypes (31, 33, 45, 52, and 58) were associated with a higher risk of intraepithelial lesion or malignancy: adjusted OR = 3.51 (95% CI, 1.29-9.56), PFe-adjusted = 0.72 (95% CI, 0.22-0.90). Genotypes that are still non-vaccine-targeted were detected in 17.98% of the women, but these were not significantly associated with high-grade lesions. CONCLUSION: The greater protection of the nine-valent HPV vaccine is likely to have a positive impact because, in the absence of genotype 16 or 18 infection, these five genotypes on their own remained significantly associated with high-grade lesions.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaccination Coverage , Adult , Female , Genotype , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Human papillomavirus 16/pathogenicity , Human papillomavirus 18/genetics , Human papillomavirus 18/pathogenicity , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Spain/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vaginal Smears
9.
Chemotherapy ; 59(6): 453-7, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25138309

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of different systems for eliminating duplicates in order to optimize the calculation of the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. METHODS: We compare the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criterion, time criteria and the criterion recommended by the European Antimicrobial Surveillance System (EARSS). RESULTS: Multiple isolates of MRSA are frequently recovered from successive cultures from the same patient (the average isolation rate of MRSA is 2.72), which demonstrates the importance of eliminating duplicates. When CLSI criterion data are compared to those obtained using other criteria, a significant increase in the number of S. aureus isolates was found applying time criteria (up to 36%) or the EARSS criterion (13%). There is also an increase in the methicillin resistance rate (between 3.31 and 3.96%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the EARSS method, with the proper quality controls and latest software tools available, is the best for determining the true situation of MRSA.


Subject(s)
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Prevalence , Respiratory System/microbiology , Skin/microbiology , Soft Tissue Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...