ABSTRACT
Objectives: This study aims to examine the effect of upper extremity performance using the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST) on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality criteria according to the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015, including chest compression rate, depth, and recoil. Patients and methods: This simulation-based study included 105 paramedic students (43 males, 62 females; median age: 19 years; range, 18 to 20 years) attending a two-year paramedic program between February 2018 and April 2018. The CKCUEST was used to determine upper extremity performance scores, including the touch number, normalized, and power score of the paramedic students. A TrueCPR® feedback device was used to measure CPR quality criteria throughout the study. The characteristics of the providers, such as height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and fat-free mass were also analyzed. Results: Adequate compression depth had a positive correlation with body fat-free mass (r=0.397, p<0.001), power score (r=0.326, p=0.001), height (r=0.326, p=0.001), weight (r=0.314, p=0.001), and BMI (r=0.204, p=0.037). Full chest recoil had a negative correlation with the power score (r=-0.249, p=0.010) and height (r=-0.219, p=0.025). None of the variables were significantly different between the groups with and without the correct compression rate. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for power score and correct compression depth as 100%, the area under the curve was 0.845 (p<0.001). Conclusion: The power score combination of upper extremity functionality and the rescuer's weight is the main factor affecting chest compression depth. However, this score is negatively correlated with full chest recoil.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Whether the use of metronome affects the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the effect of metronome use on CPR quality. METHODS: This was a prospective, simulation-based CPR manikin study. There were two phases: without and with metronome use. Chest compression was performed for 2 min, and three CPR quality criteria including chest compression depth, recoil, and rate were recorded with TrueCPR Feedback Device in both phases. RESULTS: In all, 102 resident physicians were included. The achievement of optimal chest compression depth and complete recoil was better with metronome use than without (83% and 77% vs. 78% and 39%, P ≤ 0.001, respectively). Optimal chest compression rate was also reached with metronome use because the range of the compression rate was closer to the normal limits than those without metronome use (110 [interquartile range (IQR) 109-113] vs. 120 [IQR 109-129], P ≤ 0.001). Of all the participants, 70.6% stated that metronome use had a positive effect on their performance during the CPR application and 66.7% stated that they wished to use the metronome in their daily practice. CONCLUSION: Using a metronome during simulation-based CPR improved the compression depth and recoil by fixing chest compression rate. We suggested that metronome should be used in CPR trainings of health-care professionals.