The Glanular-Frenular Collar (GFC) technique: Dual approach to hypospadias reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: The Glanular-Frenular Collar (GFC) technique has evolved since it was first described in 2017. The technique involves reconstruction of the septum glandis, which has been overlooked in the history of hypospadias, and formation of the frenulum, creating the ventral wall of the glanular urethra without dissecting the glans, leaving room for the formation of the navicular fossa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present a case of distal hypospadias corrected with the GFC technique and demonstrate the important steps of the surgical technique. RESULTS: The aesthetic result corresponded to the normal anatomy of the glans and frenular triangle, and the functional result showed a free and wavy shape of urine that resembled the normal flow from the urethra. DISCUSSION: In the normal anatomy of the penis, the wings of the glans are separated ventrally by the septum glandis and the frenulum. The navicular-shaped glanular urethra and its vertical, elliptical opening are covered by the fibroelastic septum glandis, unlike the penile urethra, which is surrounded by the corpus spongiosum. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction of hypospadias should include the formation of a septum glandis, frenulum, and navicular fossa. The GFC technique demonstrates the importance of a dual surgical approach for glanular and penile urethra reconstruction.

Effects of extensive mobilization and tension anastomosis in anorectal reconstruction (experimental study).

PURPOSE: Anorectoplasty and pull-through procedure can be performed with extensive mobilization or tension anastomosis, which can compromise bowel blood perfusion. We aimed to analyze the hypoxia biomarker values and histopathological findings in both conditions to correlate the occurrence of anal stenosis and defecation disorders in experimental models. METHODS: We created anorectal reconstruction models with impaired vascularization of the anorectum (group I) and tension anastomosis (group II) in rats. A third group of animals underwent sham operation (group III) and another as controls (group IV). Hypoxia biomarker values were assessed in all groups. The histopathological changes on the postoperative days 3 and 35, anal stenosis and defecation disorders on day 35 were compared. RESULTS: Hypoxia biomarker values confirmed postoperative ischemia in groups I-III compared to control. Group I and II rats had a similarly pronounced ischemia with histopathologic changes in the anorectum on the postoperative day 3 and accompanied by severe fibrosis on day 35. Compared to the sham operation, both groups showed defecation disorders with significant anal stenoses. CONCLUSION: Extensive rectal mobilization to about the same extent as tension anastomosis has a major impact on postoperative rectal ischemia, resulting in severe fibrotic changes in the anorectum and defecation disorders in the long term.

Looking beyond the dartos fascia and tunica vaginalis: reviewing the stance of common adjuvant covering biomaterials in hypospadiology.

Hypospadias, one of the commonest congenital anomalies in boys, can have a spectrum of clinical presentation based on the location of the meatus and the presence of chordee. The surgical repair of hypospadias involves great precision, especially in proximal varieties and redo/complex cases of hypospadias. Hypospadiologists have put in tremendous efforts to improve the outcomes of these children. The utilization of adjuvant biomaterials is one such effort that has gained significant attention over the recent years. Biomaterials are used to cover the urethral suture line in instances where the ideal covering agents (dartos fascia and tunica vaginalis) are unavailable. We reviewed the mechanism of action, current stance, and advantages/disadvantages of three commonly used adjuvant agents, i.e. autologous platelet concentrates, tissue glues, and acellular dermal matrixes. Although individual studies have highlighted the therapeutic benefits of these adjuvants, the available literature has a limited level of evidence. Moreover, it is believed that the application procedure of these covering agents needs to be scrutinized in future studies. In addition, it is suggested that the application of any covering agent right up to the meatus is non-anatomical and redundant. Well-designed randomized controlled trials with a uniform application procedure and comparing different covering agents need to be conducted in the future before any definite conclusion is drawn.