Urinary microbiota; Which non-invasive urine collection method should we use?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to establish the optimal non-invasive urine sample collection method for the microbiota studies. METHODOLOGY: Twelve men with bladder carcinoma underwent first voided and midstream urine collection. Urine samples were analysed using V3-V4 regions of bacterial 16s ribosomal RNAs. Bacterial groups with relative abundance above 1% were analysed in first voided urine and midstream urine samples at phylum, class, order and family level. At the genus level, all of the identified bacterial groups' relative abundances were analysed. The statistical significance (P < .05) of differences between first voided and midstream urine sample microbiota was evaluated using the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: According to the analysis, 8 phyla, 14 class, 23 orders, 39 families and 29 different genera were identified in the first voided and the midstream urine samples. Statistical differences were not identified between first voided and midstream urine samples of all bacteria groups except the Clostridiales at order level (p:0.04) and Clostridia at class level (P: .04). CONCLUSIONS: Either first voided or midstream urine samples can be used in urinary microbiota studies as we determined that there is no statistically significant difference between them regarding the results of 16s ribosomal RNA analysis.

The relationship between premature ejaculation and the timing of pre-adult circumcision.

We aimed to investigate the relationship between premature ejaculation and the age when men had been circumcised before adulthood. A total of 2,768 sexually active male patients aged between 18 and 65 years were included in this study. A multicentre study was conducted prospectively with the participation of 20 centres. A survey consisting of 12 questions prepared by the researchers, as well as the validated Turkish versions of the five-item Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool, was administered to all participants. The study included 1,603 participants who met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool and self-reported ejaculation time between the participants who had been circumcised at different ages during childhood. Remembering circumcision experience with fear or anxiety did not increase the risk of sexual dysfunction compared to the participants who described their experience with happiness or with no particular emotion. There was no significant difference in Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool scores or the self-reported ejaculation time of the participants circumcised at different ages. The age of childhood circumcision, having a fearful or anxious circumcision experience, does not affect the risk of premature ejaculation in adult life.