Volumetric Assessment of Nonfunctional Pituitary Adenoma Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery: An Assessment of Long-Term Response.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is widely used to manage recurrent or residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs). Studies on the long-term volumetric response of NFPAs to SRS are lacking. Such a post-SRS volumetric study will allow us to set up appropriate radiographic follow-up protocols and predict tumor volumetric response. METHODS: Two providers independently performed volumetric analyses on 54 patients who underwent single-session SRS for a recurrent/residual NFPA. In the case of discrepancy between their results, the final volume was confirmed by an independent third provider. Volumetry was performed on the 1-, 3-, 5-, 7-, and 10-year follow-up neuroimaging studies. RESULTS: Most patients showed a favorable volumetric response, with 87% (47/54) showing tumor regression and 13% (7/54) showing tumor stability at 10 years. Year 3 post-SRS volumetric results correlated (R 2 = 0.82, 0.63, 0.56) with 5-, 7-, and 10-year outcomes. The mean interval volumetric reduction was 17% on year 1; further interval volumetric reduction was 17%, 9%, 4%, and 9% on years 3, 5, 7, and 10, respectively. CONCLUSION: Year 3 post-SRS volumetric response of patients with residual or recurrent NFPAs is predictive of their 7-10-year follow-up response. For patients demonstrating NFPA regression in the first 1-3 years, interval follow-up MRI's can likely be performed at 2-year periods unless otherwise clinically indicated. Further studies are needed to better define the volumetric response to adenomas more than a decade after SRS.

3D fast low-angle shot (FLASH) technique for 3T contrast-enhanced brain MRI in the inpatient and emergency setting: comparison with 3D magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) technique.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of a 1-min contrast-enhanced 3D-FLASH pulse sequence for detecting intracranial enhancing lesions compared to standard contrast-enhanced 3D-MPRAGE pulse sequence. METHODS: Contrast-enhanced 3D-FLASH (acquisition time 49 s) and contrast-enhanced 3D-MPRAGE (4 min 35 s) pulse sequences were performed consecutively in 110 inpatient/emergency department 3T MRI brain examinations and analyzed by two independent neuroradiologist readers. For each sequence, the readers recorded (1) number of enhancing intracranial lesions; (2) intracranial susceptibility artifact (presence or absence; mm depth of intracranial signal loss); and (3) motion artifact (none, mild, moderate, severe). Inter and intra-reader agreement and reader accuracy relative to a reference standard were determined, and sequence comparison with respect to susceptibility and motion artifacts was performed. RESULTS: There was substantial intra-reader, inter-sequence agreement [reader 1, κ = 0.70 (95% CI: [0.60, 0.81]); reader 2, κ = 0.70 (95% CI: [0.59, 0.82])] and substantial intra-sequence, inter-reader agreement [3D-MPRAGE assessment, κ = 0.76 (95% CI: [0.66, 0.86]); 3D-FLASH assessment, κ = 0.86 (95% CI: [0.77, 0.94]) for detection of intracranial enhancing lesions. For both readers, the diagnostic accuracy of 3D-FLASH and 3D-MPRAGE was similar (3D-MPRAGE: 86.4 and 88.1%; 3D-FLASH: 88.2 and 84.5%), with no inter-sequence diagnostic accuracy discordancy between the sequences for either reader. 3D-FLASH was associated with less susceptibility artifact (p < 0.001 both readers) and less motion artifact (p < 0.001 both readers). CONCLUSION: On 3T brain MRI in the inpatient and emergency department setting, 1-min 3D-FLASH pulse sequence achieved comparable diagnostic performance to 4.5 min 3D-MPRAGE pulse sequence for detecting enhancing intracranial lesions, with reduced susceptibility and motion artifacts.