Influence of HLA-A, B, and -DRB1 genes and panel-reactive antibodies on the waitlist time for kidney transplantation in the state of Sao Paulo-Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Brazil ranks second in the absolute number of transplants. However, the supply remains insufficient to meet the demands, resulting in a lengthy waitlist. This study aimed to analyze whether the frequency of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and the value of calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) would influence the waiting time for kidney transplantation. METHODS: The HLA-A, B, and -DRB1 frequencies and the cPRA value were analyzed in 11,186 kidney transplant candidates included in the waitlist from 2006 to 2016. RESULTS: The most frequent alleles were HLA-A*02, HLA-B*35, and HLA-DRB1*13. The overall mean length of stay on the list was 986 ± 1001 days. The mean waiting time for the three most frequent alleles of the HLA-A and B loci showed no significant difference when compared with the least frequent alleles; however, for the HLA-DRB1 locus, the most frequent alleles showed a shorter waiting time. In the association between HLA and PRA, the average length of stay on the list increased according to the candidate's degree of sensitization, regardless of the analyzed HLA frequency. CONCLUSION: The length of stay on the waitlist is influenced by the frequency of the HLA alleles of the DRB1 locus and the degree of sensitization.

Different Patterns of Foxp3 Gene Expression in Pre-and Post-Transplantation Kidney Biopsies and the Effect of Use Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Trafficking of regulatory T cells (Tregs) modulates the inflammatory response after kidney transplantation (KTx). There is scarce information on whether circulating and intragraft Tregs are similarly affected by immunosuppressive drugs and the type of deceased kidney donor. METHODS: FOXP3 gene expression was measured in the pretransplant kidney biopsies (PIBx) from donors who met extended (ECD) and standard (SCD) criteria donors. In the third month after KTx, the patients were divided according to tacrolimus (Tac) or everolimus (Eve) and the type of kidney they had received. FOXP3 gene expression in the peripheral blood (PB) and kidney biopsies (Bx) was analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: FOXP3 gene expression in the PIBx was higher in ECD kidneys. FOXP3 gene expression in the PB and Bx was greater in Eve- than in Tac-treated patients. However, SCD recipients treated with Eve (SCD/Eve) had higher FOXP3 expression than ECD/Eve. CONCLUSION: Pretransplant kidney biopsies from ECD kidneys had higher FOXP3 gene expression than SCD, and the use of Eve may affect the expression of the FOXP3 gene only in SCD kidneys.

Impact of an Electronic Alert in Combination with a Care Bundle on the Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury.

Early diagnosis is essential for the appropriate management of acute kidney injury (AKI). We evaluated the impact of an electronic AKI alert together with a care bundle on the progression and mortality of AKI. This was a single-center prospective study that included AKI patients aged ≥ 18 years, whereas those in palliative care, nephrology, and transplantation departments were excluded. An AKI alert was issued in electronic medical records and a care bundle was suggested. A series of classes were administered to the multidisciplinary teams by nephrologists, and a clinical pharmacist audited prescriptions. Patients were categorized into pre-alert and post-alert groups. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the pre-alert (n = 1613) and post-alert (n = 1561) groups. The 30-day mortality rate was 33.6% in the entire cohort and was lower in the post-alert group (30.5% vs. 36.7%; p < 0.001). Age, pulmonary disease, malignancy, and ICU admission were associated with an increase in 30-day mortality. The electronic AKI alert together with a care bundle and a multidisciplinary education program was associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality in patients with AKI.

Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis / Desfechos clínicos da COVID-19 em pacientes submetidos à hemodiálise crônica e diálise peritoneal

Abstract Background: The reported incidence and fatality rate of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in patients receiving chronic dialysis are higher than in the general population. We sought to study the outcomes following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) in a single center in Brazil. Methods: Of the 522 patients on dialysis evaluated between March 1, 2020, and October 1, 2021, those presenting symptoms or with a history of close contact with COVID-19 patients were tested with reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction of samples from nasopharyngeal swabs. Results: Of the 522 patients, 120 were positive for COVID-19 infection, of which 86% were on HD and 14% in the PD program. The incidence per 10,000 inhabitants was higher in the HD group than in the PD group (2,423.5 vs. 1,752.5). The mortality per 10,000 inhabitants (470.5 vs. 927.8) and the fatality rate (19.4 vs. 52.9%, p = 0.005) were higher in the PD group. The PD group also had a higher need for hospitalization, intensive care, and mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: We advise caution when considering strategies to transfer patients from HD to the PD program to minimize the risk of COVID-19 for patients on HD.

Resumo Antecedentes: A incidência e a taxa de letalidade da síndrome respiratória aguda grave por coronavírus 2 relatadas em pacientes em diálise crônica são mais elevadas do que na população em geral. Procuramos estudar os desfechos após o diagnóstico da doença por coronavírus 2019 (COVID-19) em pacientes submetidos à hemodiálise crônica (HD) ou diálise peritoneal (DP) em um único centro no Brasil. Métodos: Dos 522 pacientes em diálise avaliados entre 1º de Março de 2020 e 1º de Outubro de 2021, aqueles que apresentaram sintomas ou tiveram histórico de contato próximo com pacientes com COVID-19 foram testados com reação em cadeia da polimerase de transcrição reversa por meio de amostras de esfregaços nasofaríngeos. Resultados: Dos 522 pacientes, 120 foram positivos para infecção por COVID-19, dos quais 86% estavam em HD e 14% no programa de DP. A incidência por 10.000 habitantes foi maior no grupo HD do que no grupo DP (2.423,5 vs. 1.752,5). A mortalidade por 10.000 habitantes (470,5 vs. 927,8) e a taxa de letalidade (19,4 vs. 52,9%, p = 0,005) foram mais elevadas no grupo DP. O grupo DP também apresentou uma maior necessidade de hospitalização, terapia intensiva e ventilação mecânica. Conclusões: Recomendamos cautela ao considerar estratégias de transferência de pacientes do programa de HD para o de DP a fim de minimizar o risco de COVID-19 para pacientes em HD.

Paired kidney donation: are we going beyond reasonable limits in living-donor transplantation? / Doação renal pareada: estamos passando dos limites razoáveis no transplante entre vivos?

Abstract The growing demand for transplant kidneys requires strategies to increase organ supply and avoid long waiting periods on the list. The increase in the number of transplants from living donors involves the growth in the use of unrelated donors and paired kidney donation. Most of these transplants are performed in the USA, where they already represent, respectively, 34% and 16% of total transplants from living donors. In Latin America, and especially in Brazil, there is no collective enthusiasm for these modalities, either at the request of transplanters or that of the community, with the region's priority being to increase transplants from deceased donors, which growth can be up to three-fold. Concerning transplants from matched donors, the possible conflicting results between donors can generate public challenges and they risk compromise the concepts of equal opportunities for transplant candidates, with the possibility of generating resistance to organ donation, especially in regions with socioeconomic limitations and disparities in access to qualified health care and education. This donation model involves challenging ethical and logistical issues, which are subject to questionings, starting with an act of exchange between two pairs until reaching embarrassing proposals, which can compromise the altruistic character of organ donation, and thus not be universally incorporated.

Resumo A demanda crescente por rins para transplante requer estratégias para aumentar a oferta de órgãos e evitar longos períodos de espera em lista. O aumento no número de transplantes com doador vivo envolve o crescimento da utilização de doadores não aparentados e a doação renal pareada. A maior parte desses transplantes são realizados nos EUA, onde já representam, respectivamente, 34% e 16% do total de transplantes com doador vivo. Na América Latina, e especialmente no Brasil, não existe entusiasmo coletivo por essas modalidades, quer por demanda dos transplantadores ou da comunidade, sendo prioridade da região incrementar o transplante com doador falecido, cujo crescimento pode ser de até três vezes. Na modalidade de transplantes com doadores pareados, os possíveis resultados conflitantes entre doadores podem gerar questionamentos públicos e riscos que comprometem os conceitos de equidade de oportunidades para os candidatos a transplante, com possibilidade de gerar resistência à doação de órgãos, especialmente em regiões com limitações socioeconômicas e disparidades de acesso aos atendimentos de saúde e educação qualificados. Esse modelo de doação envolve questões éticas e logísticas desafiadoras, que estão sujeitas a questionamentos, começando por um ato de troca entre dois pares até alcançar propostas constrangedoras, o que pode comprometer o caráter altruístico da doação de órgãos, e assim não ser universalmente incorporado.

Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: The reported incidence and fatality rate of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in patients receiving chronic dialysis are higher than in the general population. We sought to study the outcomes following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) in a single center in Brazil. METHODS: Of the 522 patients on dialysis evaluated between March 1, 2020, and October 1, 2021, those presenting symptoms or with a history of close contact with COVID-19 patients were tested with reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction of samples from nasopharyngeal swabs. RESULTS: Of the 522 patients, 120 were positive for COVID-19 infection, of which 86% were on HD and 14% in the PD program. The incidence per 10,000 inhabitants was higher in the HD group than in the PD group (2,423.5 vs. 1,752.5). The mortality per 10,000 inhabitants (470.5 vs. 927.8) and the fatality rate (19.4 vs. 52.9%, p = 0.005) were higher in the PD group. The PD group also had a higher need for hospitalization, intensive care, and mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: We advise caution when considering strategies to transfer patients from HD to the PD program to minimize the risk of COVID-19 for patients on HD.

Distinct global DNA methylation and NF-κB expression profile of preimplantation biopsies from ideal and non-ideal kidneys.

BACKGROUND: Epigenetic mechanisms may affect the ideal and non-ideal kidneys selected for transplantation and their inflammatory gene expression profile differently and may contribute to poor clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Study the Global DNA methylation and the expression profiles of the DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) in preimplantation kidney biopsies from ideal and non-ideal kidneys (expanded criteria donor (ECD) and with KDPI > 85%). METHODS: In a sample consisting of 45 consecutive pre-implantation biopsies, global DNA methylation levels were detected by LINE-1 repeated elements using bisulfite pyrosequencing. DNMT gene expression was assessed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and NF-κB protein expression by immunofluorescence. RESULTS: ECD kidneys displayed increased methylation levels in LINE-1, and DNMT1 and DNMT3B expression was upregulated when comparing ECD to standard criteria donor kidneys. Similarly, kidneys with KDPI > 85% exhibited increased LINE-1 methylation and DNMT1 upregulation when compared to a KDPI ≤ 85%. NF-κB protein expression levels were greatly increased in both types of non-ideal kidneys compared to ideal kidneys. Moreover, hypermethylation of LINE-1 was associated with cold ischemia time > 20 h and ECD kidney classification. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that global DNA hypermethylation and high expression of NF-κB occurred in both types of non-ideal kidneys and were associated with prolonged cold ischemia time. Global DNA methylation can be a useful tool to assess non-ideal kidneys and hence, could be used to expand the pool of kidneys donors.

Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Kidney Transplant and on Chronic Dialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: The reported fatality rates of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in patients receiving maintenance dialysis or kidney transplant are higher than in the general population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in chronic dialysis patients (DPs) compared with kidney transplant recipients (KTxRs). METHODS: A study evaluating 266 COVID-19-positive patients (112 DPs and 154 KTxRs) was conducted in a single center from March 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. All patients were confirmed for COVID-19 infection by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction or antigen test. RESULTS: KTxRs were younger (49 ± 12.4 vs 61 ± 14.6 years; P < .0001) and had significantly fewer coexisting disorders than the DPs. A higher percentage of KTxRs required hospitalization (70% vs 49.4%, P = .002) and intensive care unit admission (39% vs 25%, P = .01). The fatality rate was 24% in both groups. DISCUSSION: There is no consensus among studies about the higher fatality rate between KTxRs and DPs who develop COVID-19. In our study, we also did not find a different fatality rate. CONCLUSION: In spite of KTxRs being younger and having fewer coexisting disorders, compared with DPs, they presented a higher hospitalization and intensive care unit necessity rate but a similar fatality rate.

Paired kidney donation: are we going beyond reasonable limits in living-donor transplantation?

The growing demand for transplant kidneys requires strategies to increase organ supply and avoid long waiting periods on the list. The increase in the number of transplants from living donors involves the growth in the use of unrelated donors and paired kidney donation. Most of these transplants are performed in the USA, where they already represent, respectively, 34% and 16% of total transplants from living donors. In Latin America, and especially in Brazil, there is no collective enthusiasm for these modalities, either at the request of transplanters or that of the community, with the region's priority being to increase transplants from deceased donors, which growth can be up to three-fold. Concerning transplants from matched donors, the possible conflicting results between donors can generate public challenges and they risk compromise the concepts of equal opportunities for transplant candidates, with the possibility of generating resistance to organ donation, especially in regions with socioeconomic limitations and disparities in access to qualified health care and education. This donation model involves challenging ethical and logistical issues, which are subject to questionings, starting with an act of exchange between two pairs until reaching embarrassing proposals, which can compromise the altruistic character of organ donation, and thus not be universally incorporated.

Development and validation of a simple web-based tool for early prediction of COVID-19-associated death in kidney transplant recipients.

This analysis, using data from the Brazilian kidney transplant (KT) COVID-19 study, seeks to develop a prediction score to assist in COVID-19 risk stratification in KT recipients. In this study, 1379 patients (35 sites) were enrolled, and a machine learning approach was used to fit models in a derivation cohort. A reduced Elastic Net model was selected, and the accuracy to predict the 28-day fatality after the COVID-19 diagnosis, assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC), was confirmed in a validation cohort. The better calibration values were used to build the applicable ImAgeS score. The 28-day fatality rate was 17% (n = 235), which was associated with increasing age, hypertension and cardiovascular disease, higher body mass index, dyspnea, and use of mycophenolate acid or azathioprine. Higher kidney graft function, longer time of symptoms until COVID-19 diagnosis, presence of anosmia or coryza, and use of mTOR inhibitor were associated with reduced risk of death. The coefficients of the best model were used to build the predictive score, which achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.767 (95% CI 0.698-0.834) in the validation cohort. In conclusion, the easily applicable predictive model could assist health care practitioners in identifying non-hospitalized kidney transplant patients that may require more intensive monitoring. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04494776.

Reasons for Disparities in Access to Kidney Transplantation.

Clinical Background: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment for most patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), providing better survival and quality of life and lower cost when compared to dialysis. Epidemiology: Despite robust evidence showing the superiority of KT over dialysis, a significant percentage of ESKD patients worldwide do not access this treatment. Challenges: Barriers resulting in inequalities and inequities in access to KT involves chronic kidney disease (CKD) diagnosis and management, including difficulties in accessing dialysis therapy before KT; suboptimal referral and enlistment to KT; and imbalance between supply and demand for organs. Low socioeconomic status has an important role in that scenario. Prevention and Treatment: Strategies to minimize disparities in access to KT involve public policies to ensure access to CKD diagnosis and treatment, health education, continuous training of health providers, infrastructure, and allocation policies.

SARS-CoV-2 assessment in an outpatient dialysis facility of a single center in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: The reported incidence and fatality rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients receiving maintenance dialysis are higher than those of the general population. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to characterize the clinical characteristics and outcomes following COVID-19 infection in this population in a single center in Brazil. METHODS: Out of 497 dialysis patients evaluated between March 1st, 2020 and February 1st, 2021, those presenting symptoms or history of close contact with COVID-19 patients were tested. Disease severity was categorized as mild, moderate, or severe. RESULTS: Out of the 497 patients, 8.8% tested positive for COVID-19. These patients were predominantly male (59%), mean age 57.5 ± 17. Hospitalization was required for 45.4% of patients and 15.9% received mechanical ventilation. Symptoms such as fever, cough, dyspnea and asthenia were more frequent in the severe group. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, C- reactive protein, glutamic oxalacetic transaminase and lactic dehydrogenase were significantly higher in the severe group, while hemoglobin and lymphocyte counts were significantly lower. Chest CT >50% of ground glass lesions was the risk factor associated with severe disease and need for hospitalization. The incidence of a thromboembolic event was of 22.7% in this population. The incidence, mortality, and case fatality rates were 954.4/10,000 patients, 151.8/10,000 patients, and 15.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence, mortality and case fatality rates in our cohort were significantly higher than those reported for the general population. To institute appropriate control measures and early vaccination in dialysis facilities is imperative to prevent the spread of COVID-19 infection.

High mortality among kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019: Results from the Brazilian multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant (KT) recipients are considered a high-risk group for unfavorable outcomes in the course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). AIM: To describe the clinical aspects and outcomes of COVID-19 among KT recipients. METHODS: This multicenter cohort study enrolled 1,680 KT recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 between March and November 2020, from 35 Brazilian centers. The main outcome was the 90-day cumulative incidence of death, for the entire cohort and according to acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement. Fatality rates were analyzed according to hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mechanical ventilation (MV) requirement. Multivariable analysis was performed by logistic regression for the probability of hospitalization and death. RESULTS: The median age of the recipients was 51.3 years, 60.4% were men and 11.4% were Afro-Brazilian. Comorbidities were reported in 1,489 (88.6%), and the interval between transplantation and infection was 5.9 years. The most frequent symptoms were cough (54%), myalgia (40%), dyspnea (37%), and diarrhea (31%), whereas the clinical signs were fever (61%) and hypoxemia (13%). Hospitalization was required in 65.1%, and immunosuppressive drugs adjustments were made in 74.4% of in-hospital patients. ICU admission was required in 34.6% and MV in 24.9%. In the multivariable modeling, the variables related with the probability of hospitalization were age, hypertension, previous cardiovascular disease, recent use of high dose of steroid, and fever, dyspnea, diarrhea, and nausea or vomiting as COVID-19 symptoms. On the other hand, the variables that reduced the probability of hospitalization were time of COVID-19 symptoms, and nasal congestion, headache, arthralgia and anosmia as COVID-19 symptoms. The overall 90-day cumulative incidence of death was 21.0%. The fatality rates were 31.6%, 58.2%, and 75.5% in those who were hospitalized, admitted to the ICU, and required MV, respectively. At the time of infection, 23.2% had AKI and 23.4% required RRT in the follow-up. The cumulative incidence of death was significantly higher among recipients with AKI (36.0% vs. 19.1%, P < 0.0001) and in those who required RRT (70.8% vs. 10.1%, P < 0.0001). The variables related with the probability of death within 90 days after COVID-19 were age, time after transplantation, presence of hypertension, previous cardiovascular disease, use of tacrolimus and mycophenolate, recent use of high dose of steroids, and dyspnea as COVID-19 symptom. On the other hand, the variables that reduced the risk of death were time of symptoms, and headache and anosmia as COVID-19 symptoms. CONCLUSION: The patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were long-term KT recipients and most of them had some comorbidities. One in every five patients died, and the rate of death was significantly higher in those with AKI, mainly when RRT was required.

SARS-CoV-2 assessment in an outpatient dialysis facility of a single center in Brazil

ABSTRACT Background: The reported incidence and fatality rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients receiving maintenance dialysis are higher than those of the general population. Objective: This study sought to characterize the clinical characteristics and outcomes following COVID-19 infection in this population in a single center in Brazil. Methods: Out of 497 dialysis patients evaluated between March 1st, 2020 and February 1st, 2021, those presenting symptoms or history of close contact with COVID-19 patients were tested. Disease severity was categorized as mild, moderate, or severe. Results: Out of the 497 patients, 8.8% tested positive for COVID-19. These patients were predominantly male (59%), mean age 57.5 ± 17. Hospitalization was required for 45.4% of patients and 15.9% received mechanical ventilation. Symptoms such as fever, cough, dyspnea and asthenia were more frequent in the severe group. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, C- reactive protein, glutamic oxalacetic transaminase and lactic dehydrogenase were significantly higher in the severe group, while hemoglobin and lymphocyte counts were significantly lower. Chest CT >50% of ground glass lesions was the risk factor associated with severe disease and need for hospitalization. The incidence of a thromboembolic event was of 22.7% in this population. The incidence, mortality, and case fatality rates were 954.4/10,000 patients, 151.8/10,000 patients, and 15.9%, respectively. Conclusions: The incidence, mortality and case fatality rates in our cohort were significantly higher than those reported for the general population. To institute appropriate control measures and early vaccination in dialysis facilities is imperative to prevent the spread of COVID-19 infection.

Therapeutic potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells and renal progenitor cells in experimental chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global public health problem. Cell therapy using pluripotent stem cells represents an attractive therapeutic approach for the treatment of CKD. METHODS: We transplanted mitomycin C (MMC)-treated human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) and renal progenitor cells (RPCs) into a CKD rat model system. The RPC and hiPSC cells were characterized by immunofluorescence and qRT-PCR. Untreated 5/6 nephrectomized rats were compared to CKD animals receiving the same amount of MMC-treated hiPSCs or RPCs. Renal function, histology, and immunohistochemistry were evaluated 45 days post-surgery. RESULTS: We successfully generated hiPSCs from peripheral blood and differentiated them into RPCs expressing renal progenitor genes (PAX2, WT1, SIX2, and SALL1) and podocyte-related genes (SYNPO, NPHS1). RPCs also exhibited reduced OCT4 expression, confirming the loss of pluripotency. After cell transplantation into CKD rats, the body weight change was significantly increased in both hiPSC and RPC groups, in comparison with the control group. Creatinine clearance (CCr) was preserved only in the hiPSC group. Similarly, the number of macrophages in the kidneys of the hiPSC group reached a statistically significant reduction, when compared to control rats. Both treatments reduced positive staining for the marker α-smooth muscle actin. Histological features showed decreased tubulointerstitial damage (interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy) as well as a reduction in glomerulosclerosis in both iPSC and RPC groups. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we describe that both MMC-treated hiPSCs and RPCs exert beneficial effects in attenuating CKD progression. Both cell types were equally efficient to reduce histological damage and weight loss caused by CKD. hiPSCs seem to be more efficient than RPCs, possibly due to a paracrine effect triggered by hiPSCs. These results demonstrate that the use of MMC-treated hiPSCs and RPCs improves clinical and histological CKD parameters, avoided tumor formation, and therefore may be a promising cell therapy strategy for CKD.

Impact of Cold Ischemia Time on Kidney Transplant: A Mate Kidney Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Longer cold ischemia time (CIT) is a deleterious factor for kidney transplant (KTx) outcomes and may lead Tx teams to graft discard. Because the CIT in Brazil is overall very high, the objective of this study was to compare outcomes among mate recipients of KTx with distinct CIT. METHODS: We studied 106 mate recipients of KTx in a single center followed for 1-year post-Tx. Mate kidneys were analyzed comparing the first and the second recipient to be transplanted. In a second analysis, we grouped mate recipients according to the CIT: ≤ 20 hours, > 20 hours, and mixed CIT. RESULTS: Seventy percent were standard criteria donors, with a mean Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of 61.5 ± 28%. KTx recipients presented an overall delayed graft function (DGF) rate of 82%, lasting 12 ± 7 days. The analysis of pairs considering the first and second recipient to be transplanted resulted in a longer CIT for the second (23.6 h vs 27 h; P = .001), and we did not find differences of outcomes after 1-year follow-up. Comparing pairs according to CIT (> 20h and ≤ 20h), DGF was higher in the CIT group > 20 hours (87.5% vs 58%; P = .002), with no differences of outcomes in 1-year follow-up. The logistic regression analysis shows that CIT > 20 hours is a risk factor for DGF in our study. CONCLUSION: CIT > 20 hours is a risk factor for DGF, therefore strategies to reduce the CIT are always necessary.