Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia Updated Consensus Statement on Perioperative Blood Glucose Management in Adult Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery.

WHAT OTHER GUIDELINES ARE AVAILABLE ON THIS TOPIC: Since the publication of the SAMBA Consensus Statement for perioperative blood glucose management in the ambulatory setting in 2010, several recent guidelines have been issued by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), the Endocrine Society, the Centre for Perioperative Care (CPOC), and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI) on DM care in hospitalized patients; however, none are specific to ambulatory surgery. HOW DOES THIS GUIDELINE DIFFER FROM THE PREVIOUS GUIDELINES: Previously posed clinical questions that were outdated were revised to reflect current clinical practice. Additional questions were developed relating to the perioperative management of patients with DM to include the newer therapeutic interventions.

Pro-Con Debate: Should Critically Ill Patients Undergo Procedures at Bedside or in the Operating Room?

Nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) is a fast-growing field in anesthesiology, wherein anesthesia care is provided for surgical procedures performed outside the main operating room (OR) pavilion. Advances in medical science and technology have led to an increasing number of procedures being moved out of the operating room to procedural suites. One such NORA location is the intensive care unit (ICU), where a growing number of urgent and emergent procedures are being performed on medically unstable patients. ICU-NORA allows medical care to be provided to patients who are too sick to tolerate transport between the ICU and the OR. However, offering the same, high-quality, and safe care in this setting may be challenging. It requires special planning and a thorough consideration of the presence of life-threatening comorbidities and location-specific and ergonomic barriers. In this Pro-Con commentary article, we discuss these special considerations and argue in favor of and against routinely performing procedures at the bedside in the ICU versus in the OR.

2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting: Carbohydrate-containing Clear Liquids with or without Protein, Chewing Gum, and Pediatric Fasting Duration-A Modular Update of the 2017 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting.

These practice guidelines are a modular update of the "Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: Application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures." The guidance focuses on topics not addressed in the previous guideline: ingestion of carbohydrate-containing clear liquids with or without protein, chewing gum, and pediatric fasting duration.

A Blueprint for Success: Implementation of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Mandated Anesthesiology Oversight for Procedural Sedation in a Large Health System.

In 2009, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the §482.52 Condition of Participation (CoP) that the director of anesthesia services (DAS) is responsible for all anesthesia administered in the hospital, including moderate and deep procedural sedation provided by nonanesthesiologists. Although this mandate was issued several years ago, many anesthesiology departments remain uncertain as to how best to implement it, who needs to be involved, what resources are needed, and how to leverage this oversight to improve quality of care and patient safety. This article reviews the CMS CoP interpretive guidelines and other regulations as they relate to procedural sedation, outlines the components and benefits of anesthesiology oversight, and describes the tools and structure to implement these guidelines. In addition, we discuss some of the challenges surrounding this implementation. This initiative continues to evolve and expand as needs change and experience develops.

2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway.

The American Society of Anesthesiologists; All India Difficult Airway Association; European Airway Management Society; European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care; Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care; Learning, Teaching and Investigation Difficult Airway Group; Society for Airway Management; Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia; Society for Head and Neck Anesthesia; Society for Pediatric Anesthesia; Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists; and the Trauma Anesthesiology Society present an updated report of the Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway.

A Blueprint for Success: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Clinical Operations Within a Bronchoscopy Suite.

Building an efficient facility for advanced bronchoscopic procedures involves many considerations. This review places particular emphasis on anesthesiology services, based on experience at a tertiary/quaternary care referral academic medical center. Topics include equipment requirements, applicable clinical standards, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Patient flow arrangements for both outpatients and inpatients, from preoperative care to discharge/disposition, are highlighted. The importance of effective business planning, personnel training, leadership, communication, team building, quality of care, and patient safety are also discussed.

Updates and controversies in anesthesia for advanced interventional pulmonology procedures.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Advanced bronchoscopic procedures continues to grow, and are now commonly used to diagnose and/or treat a variety of pulmonary conditions that required formal thoracic surgery in past decades. Pharmacologic developments have provided new therapeutic options, as have technical advances in both anesthesia and interventional pulmonology. This review discusses technical and clinical issues and advances in providing anesthesia for advanced bronchoscopic procedures. It also discusses some controversial issues that have yet to be fully resolved. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss anesthetic considerations for new procedures such as the new technology used in electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy, and bronchoscopic cryotherapy. We also review new ventilation strategies as well as pharmacologic advances and recent trends in the utilization of anesthetic adjuvants, and the use of short-acting opioids like remifentanil, and alpha agonist sedatives such as dexmedetomidine. SUMMARY: The anesthetic framework and the discussions presented here should help forge effective communication between the interventional pulmonologist and the anesthesiologist In the Bronchoscopy Suite nonoperating room anesthesia with the goal of enhancing patient safety.

Extracorporeal Oxygenation Techniques in Adult Critical Airway Obstruction: A Review.

Extracorporeal life support has been increasingly utilized in different clinical settings to manage either critical respiratory or heart failure. Complex airway surgery with significant or even total perioperative airway obstruction represents an indication for this technique to prevent/overcome a critical period of severe hypoxaemia, hypoventilation, and/or apnea. This review summarizes the current published scientific evidence on the utility of extracorporeal respiratory support in airway obstruction associated with hypoxaemia, describes the available methods, their clinical indications, and possible limitations. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using veno-arterial or veno-venous mode is most commonly employed in such scenarios caused by endoluminal, external, or combined obstruction of the trachea and main bronchi.

Expert Consensus Statement on the Perioperative Management of Adult Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Surgery and Free Tissue Reconstruction From the Society for Head and Neck Anesthesia.

The perioperative care of adult patients undergoing free tissue transfer during head and neck surgical (microvascular) reconstruction is inconsistent across practitioners and institutions. The executive board of the Society for Head and Neck Anesthesia (SHANA) nominated specialized anesthesiologists and head and neck surgeons to an expert group, to develop expert consensus statements. The group conducted an extensive review of the literature to identify evidence and gaps and to prioritize quality improvement opportunities. This report of expert consensus statements aims to improve and standardize perioperative care in this setting. The Modified Delphi method was used to evaluate the degree of agreement with draft consensus statements. Additional discussion and collaboration was performed via video conference and electronic communication to refine expert opinions and to achieve consensus on key statements. Thirty-one statements were initially formulated, 14 statements met criteria for consensus, 9 were near consensus, and 8 did not reach criteria for consensus. The expert statements reaching consensus described considerations for preoperative assessment and optimization, airway management, perioperative monitoring, fluid management, blood management, tracheal extubation, and postoperative care. This group also examined the role for vasopressors, communication, and other quality improvement efforts. This report provides the priorities and perspectives of a group of clinical experts to help guide perioperative care and provides actionable guidance for and opportunities for improvement in the care of patients undergoing free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction. The lack of consensus for some areas likely reflects differing clinical experiences and a limited available evidence base.

Bronchoscopy challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bronchoscopy is an aerosol-generating procedure that creates unique challenges for healthcare providers to reduce the potential spread of the COVID-19 respiratory pathogen. As part of the initial response, Cleveland Clinic postponed elective surgeries including bronchoscopy. We established a 5-tier system for prioritizing the urgency of bronchoscopy procedures. When elective bronchoscopies were resumed, we established protocols to reduce aerosolization and potential virus transmission risks such as using an airborne infection-isolation room and changing to total intravenous anesthesia. Also, we established guidelines for periprocedural care and use of personal protective equipment including requirements for wearing N95 masks for all bronchoscopy procedures.

Recent trends in airway management.

Clinical airway management continues to advance at a fast pace. To help update busy anesthesiologists, this abbreviated review summarizes notable airway management advances over the past few years. We briefly discuss advances in video laryngoscopy, in flexible intubation scopes, in jet ventilation, and in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We also discuss noninvasive ventilation in the forms of high-flow nasal cannula apneic oxygenation and ventilation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) masks. Emerging concepts related to airway management, including the physiologically difficult airway and lower airway management, new clinical subspecialties and related professional organizations such as Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy, the Society for Head and Neck Anesthesia, and fellowship training programs related to advanced airway management are also reviewed. Finally, we discuss the use of checklists and guidelines to enhance patient safety and the value of large databases in airway management research.

Partnership with Interventional Pulmonologist: An Anesthesiologist's Perspective.

Via the emergence of new bronchoscopic technologies and techniques, there is enormous growth in the number of procedures being performed in nonoperating room settings. This, coupled with a greater focus from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for mandated anesthesiology oversight of procedural sedation for bronchoscopy by the pulmonologists has led to a more frequent working partnership between interventional pulmonologists and anesthesiologists. This article offers the interventional pulmonologist insight into how the anesthesiologist thinks and approaches anesthetic care delivery.

The effects of dexamethasone, light anesthesia, and tight glucose control on postoperative fatigue and quality of life after major noncardiac surgery: A randomized trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The postoperative period is associated with an inflammatory response that may contribute to a number of complications including postoperative fatigue (POF) that impair patients' quality of life (QoL). We studied the impact of three potentially anti-inflammatory interventions (steroid administration, tight intraoperative glucose control, and light anesthesia) on POF and QoL in patients having major noncardiac surgery. DESIGN: A randomized Trial. SETTING: Operating room and postoperative recovery area/ICU/hospital floors. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to perioperative IV dexamethasone (a total of 14 mg tapered over 3 days) versus placebo, intensive versus conventional glucose control (target 80-110 vs. 180-200 mg·dL-1), and light versus deep anesthesia (Bispectral Index target of 55 vs. 35) in a 3-way factorial design. MEASUREMENTS: In this planned sub-analysis, QoL was measured using SF-12 preoperatively and on postoperative day (POD) 30. POF was measured using Christensen VAS, pre-operatively, POD 1, and POD 3. We assessed the effect of each intervention on POF and on the physical and mental components of SF-12 summary scores with repeated-measures linear regression models. MAIN RESULTS: 326 patients with complete data were included in the SF-12 analysis and 306 were included in the QoL analysis. No difference was found between any of the intervention groups on fatigue or mean 30-day physical and mental components of SF-12 scores, after adjusting for preoperative score and imbalanced baseline variables (all P-value >0.07 for POF and >0.40 for QoL). CONCLUSIONS: Steroid administration, tight intraoperative glucose control, and light anesthesia do not improve quality of life or postoperative fatigue after major surgery.

Nil per os guidelines: what is changing, what is not, and what should?

Preoperative nil per os (NPO) guidelines have been in existence since the recognition of the risk of perioperative aspiration. These guidelines aim at reducing the risk for gastric content aspiration to the lowest possible, to avoid associated morbidity, unplanned hospital and/or an intensive care admission. Thus, such guidelines are not only considered for patients having major surgeries, but more so in those having ambulatory surgery including those performed at non-operating room anesthesia locations. NPO guidelines have always been controversial due to the paucity of data in support of one recommendation versus another and have seen multiple changes and updates by the issuing national anesthesiology societies as new evidence emerges. At the present time, they have become increasingly permissive, such that the ingestion of clear fluids is now encouraged up to two hours before elective surgery. This has added more fuel to the already heated controversies regarding NPO guidelines and contributed to the experienced variability among different local NPO policies adopted by different clinicians. In this article, we attempt to discuss many of these controversies, including the relationship between NPO duration and the risk of aspiration, NPO and the choice of airway device, NPO and operating room efficiency and NPO for procedural sedation.

The association between preinduction arterial blood pressure and postoperative cardiovascular, renal, and neurologic morbidity, and in-hospital mortality in elective noncardiac surgery: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: The association between preinduction blood pressure (BP) and postoperative outcomes after noncardiac surgery is poorly understood. Whether this association depends on the presence of risk factors for poor cardiovascular outcomes remains unclear. Accordingly, we evaluated the association between preinduction BP and its different components; isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) and wide pulse pressure (WPP), and postoperative complications in patients with and without revised cardiac risk index (RCRI) components. METHODS: We analysed consecutive patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery at Cleveland Clinic. Separate analyses were undertaken for patients with and without any RCRI components. Preinduction BP was assessed both continuously and according to hypertension stages. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between the BP values and composite of in-hospital mortality as well as cardiovascular, renal, and neurologic morbidity. We considered the following potential confounding factors in our analysis; year of surgery, age, sex, race, BMI, and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association surgical procedure risk classification. RESULTS: Of 58 276 patients, 10 512 had one or more RCRI components. For those with no RCRI, no significant relationship was found between preinduction BP and outcome after adjustment for confounders. For patients with RCRI, the adjusted incidence was the greatest among those with normal preinduction SBP and DBP of less than 70 mmHg. Among patients with preinduction DBP greater than 75 mmHg, risk rose slightly with increasing SBP. However, we found no association between preinduction hypertension stages, ISH, or WPP and the composite outcome in patients with and without RCRI. CONCLUSION: Preinduction low DBP less than 70 mmHg or SBP greater than 160 mmHg and not ISH, nor WPP were associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications in noncardiac surgery patients with one or more RCRI components.