Multiomics plasma effects of switching from triple antiretroviral regimens to dolutegravir plus lamivudine.

INTRODUCTION: The DOLAM trial revealed that switching from triple antiretroviral therapy (three-drug regimen; 3DR) to dolutegravir plus lamivudine (two-drug regimen; 2DR) was virologically non-inferior to continuing 3DR after 48 weeks of follow-up. Weight increased with 2DR relative to 3DR but it did not impact on metabolic parameters. METHODS: Multiomics plasma profile was performed to gain further insight into whether this therapy switch might affect specific biological pathways. DOLAM (EudraCT 201500027435) is a Phase 4, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial in which virologically suppressed persons with HIV treated with 3DR were assigned (1:1) to switch to 2DR or to continue 3DR for 48 weeks. Untargeted proteomics, metabolomics and lipidomics analyses were performed at baseline and at 48 weeks. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify changes in key molecules between both therapy arms. RESULTS: Switching from 3DR to 2DR showed a multiomic impact on circulating plasma concentration of N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase (Q96PD5), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (A6XND0), alanine and triglyceride (TG) (48:0). Correlation analyses identified an association among the up-regulation of these four molecules in persons treated with 2DR. CONCLUSIONS: Untargeted multiomics profiling studies identified molecular changes potentially associated with inflammation immune pathways, and with lipid and glucose metabolism. Although these changes could be associated with potential metabolic or cardiovascular consequences, their clinical significance remains uncertain. Further work is needed to confirm these findings and to assess their long-term clinical consequences.

Efficacy and safety of switching to dolutegravir plus lamivudine versus continuing triple antiretroviral therapy in virologically suppressed adults with HIV at 48 weeks (DOLAM): a randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Simplified antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens are desirable for people with HIV. We investigated the efficacy and safety of switching from triple ART to dual dolutegravir plus lamivudine therapy. METHODS: DOLAM is a phase 4, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, done at six HIV clinics in Catalonia, Spain. Adults with HIV-1 receiving a triple ART regimen, aged 18 years or older, with virological suppression, a CD4 nadir of at least 200 cells per µL, who were HBsAg-negative, and without previous viral failure or resistance mutations to study drugs were eligible. Participants underwent computer-generated randomisation, stratified by the class of the third drug, and were assigned (1:1) to switch to oral dolutegravir 50 mg and lamivudine 300 mg once daily or to continue triple ART for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of people with an HIV RNA value of at least 50 copies per mL at week 48 (US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm, 8% non-inferiority margin). Both the primary and safety outcomes were evaluated in the intention-to-treat exposed population. The study is completed and was registered with EudraCT 201500027435. FINDINGS: Between July 7, 2015, and Oct 31, 2018, 265 participants were randomly assigned to switch to dolutegravir plus lamivudine (n=131) or to maintain triple ART (n=134) and all received at least one dose. Nine (7%) participants in the dual therapy group and ten (7%) in the triple therapy group were excluded before 48 weeks, mostly due to treatment discontinuations or virological failure. Participants were predominantly male (116 [87%] of 134 in the triple ART group and 111 [85%] of 131 in the dolutegravir plus lamivudine group). The difference in the proportion of participants with HIV RNA values of at least 50 copies per mL at 48 weeks between the dual therapy group (three [2%] of 131) and triple therapy group (two [1%] of 134) was 0·8 percentage points (95% CI -3·3 to 5·2), showing non-inferiority of dolutegravir plus lamivudine dual therapy compared with triple ART. 73 (56%) of 131 participants allocated to dual therapy had 150 adverse effects, compared with 78 (58%) of 134 participants allocated to triple therapy who also had 150 adverse events (p=0·68). Drug discontinuation due to adverse effects occurred in four people in the triple therapy group and three people in the dual therapy group. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show the efficacy and safety of dolutegravir plus lamivudine as a simplified therapy switch option for selected people with HIV with virological suppression on triple ART. FUNDING: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Red de Investigación en Sida, and ViiV Healthcare.

Real world effectiveness of standard of care triple therapy versus two-drug combinations for treatment of people living with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Since 1996, the standard of care (SOC) therapy for HIV treatment has consisted of a backbone of two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) paired with a third agent. Use of two-drug combinations (2DC) has been considered for selected patients to avoid toxicities associated with the use of NRTIs. This study aimed to compare the real-world outcomes of integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-containing triple therapy (TT) to dolutegravir- (DTG) and/or boosted protease inhibitor (bPI)-based 2DC in a large Spanish cohort of HIV patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using data from the VACH cohort, a prospective multicentre Spanish cohort of adult HIV patients. All treatment experienced patients initiating a TT of an INSTI combined with two NRTIs or a 2DC-containing DTG and/or a bPI between 01/01/2012 and 01/06/2017 were included. The unit of analysis was patient-regimens. The overall sample analysis was complemented with two sub-analyses. The first sub-analysis focused on patients treated with a backbone plus DTG compared to those treated with DTG+ one other antiretroviral. The second sub-analysis focused on patients with HIV RNA<50 copies/mL at baseline, irrespective of the regimen used. The following endpoints were assessed: time to discontinuation for any reason, time to switch due to virologic failure, and time to switch due to toxicity (reasons for discontinuation according to clinician report in the database). Time-to-event analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Overall 7,481 patients were included in the analysis, contributing to 9,243 patient-regimens. Patient characteristics at baseline differed among groups, with the 2DC group being significantly older and having a higher proportion of women, a longer time on ART and a higher number of previous virologic failures. Median (95% Confidence Interval [C.I.]) time to switch was 2.5 years (2.3, 2.7) in 2DC group versus 2.9 years (2.7, 3.0) in TT. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% C.I.) for discontinuation due to any reason, virologic failure and toxicity in the 2DC vs TT group were 1.29 (1.15; 1.44), 2.06 (1.54; 2.77) and 1.18 (0.94; 1.48), respectively. Results were consistent in the two sub-analyses. CONCLUSION: In this analysis, time to discontinuation and probability of remaining free of virologic failure were significantly higher in patients on INSTI-based TT compared to DTG- and/or bPI-containing 2DC, with no differences in toxicity.

Triggering receptor (TREM-1) expressed on myeloid cells predicts bacteremia better than clinical variables in community-acquired pneumonia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Some clinical variables are associated with bacteremia in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The aim of this study was to analyse the accuracy of the soluble form of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) to predict positive blood cultures in comparison with established clinical prognostic variables. METHODS: In addition to collecting clinical and laboratory information, a commercially available immunoassay kit was used to measure the serum sTREM-1 levels on the first day of admit ion in patients with CAP. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the ability of sTREM-1 and commonly used clinical variables to identify bacteremia. RESULTS: Blood cultures yielded a pathogen in 13 (10.4%) out of 124 patient samples. The microorganisms isolated were Streptococcus pneumoniae (11 patients) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (2 patients). The presence of pleuritic chest pain, tachycardia and extreme white cell count (WCC) were associated with bacteremia. However, ROC curve analysis showed an accuracy of sTREM-1 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.95), which was higher than pleuritic chest pain (AUC 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.84), tachycardia (AUC 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.88) and extreme WCC (AUC 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.85) for predicting positive blood cultures. Low admission sTREM-1 serum values had a high negative predictive value for excluding bacteremia (sTREM-1 <120 pg/mL = 98.8%). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that the determination of sTREM-1 serum levels on admission may be more accurate than clinical variables for identifying bacteremic patients.