ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chronic subdural hematoma embolization, an apparently simple procedure, can prove to be challenging because of the advanced age of the target population. The aim of this study was to compare 2 arterial-access strategies, femoral versus patient-tailored CTA-based frontline access selection, in chronic subdural hematoma embolization procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a monocentric retrospective study. From the March 15, 2018, to the February 14, 2019 (period 1), frontline femoral access was used. Between February 15, 2019, and March 30, 2020 (period 2), the choice of the frontline access, femoral or radial, was based on the CTA recommended as part of the preoperative work-up during both above-mentioned periods. The primary end point was the rate of catheterization failure. The secondary end points were the rate of access site conversion and fluoroscopy duration. RESULTS: During the study period, 124 patients (with 143 chronic subdural hematomas) underwent an embolization procedure (mean age, 74 [SD, 13] years). Forty-eight chronic subdural hematomas (43 patients) were included during period 1 and were compared with 95 chronic subdural hematomas (81 patients) during period 2. During the first period, 5/48 (10%) chronic subdural hematoma embolizations were aborted due to failed catheterization, significantly more than during period 2 (1/95, 1%; P = .009). The rates of femoral-to-radial (P = .55) and total conversion (P = .86) did not differ between the 2 periods. No significant difference was found regarding the duration of fluoroscopy (P = .62). CONCLUSIONS: A CTA-based patient-tailored choice of frontline arterial access reduces the rate of catheterization failure in chronic subdural hematoma embolization procedures.
Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Femoral Artery/surgery , Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic/surgery , Radial Artery/surgery , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Aged , Catheterization , Computed Tomography Angiography/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment FailureABSTRACT
The spine is the most common site of skeletal metastases. Treatment decisions for patients with spinal metastases can be challenging and greatly depend on survival prognosis. Surgery remains a valuable weapon in the therapeutic arsenal. A review of the literature describing the role of surgery, the various surgical approaches and the prognostic scores available for the management of spinal metastases was performed and summarized. Surgery for spinal metastases has 3 main objectives: management of pain, achievement of mechanical stability and preservation or restoration of neurological function. A variety of surgical approaches are available and depend on location of tumor, presence of instability, neurological status, oncologic prognosis, general performance status and subsequent treatment measures. The goal of any therapeutic course for a spinal metastasis is the best oncologic and functional result with the least aggressive treatment. Novelty surgical and adjunctive measures allow a multidisciplinary approach to the metastatic spine.
