Communities organizing to promote equity: engaging local communities in public health responses to health inequities exacerbated by COVID-19-protocol paper.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted rural and under-resourced urban communities in Kansas. The state's response to COVID-19 has relied on a highly decentralized and underfunded public health system, with 100 local health departments in the state, few of which had prior experience engaging local community coalitions in a coordinated response to a public health crisis. Methods: To improve the capacity for local community-driven responses to COVID-19 and other public health needs, the University of Kansas Medical Center, in partnership with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, will launch Communities Organizing to Promote Equity (COPE) in 20 counties across Kansas. COPE will establish Local Health Equity Action Teams (LHEATs), coalitions comprised of community members and service providers, who work with COPE-hired community health workers (CHWs) recruited to represent the diversity of the communities they serve. CHWs in each county are tasked with addressing unmet social needs of residents and supporting their county's LHEAT. LHEATs are charged with implementing strategies to improve social determinants of health in their county. Monthly, LHEATs and CHWs from all 20 counties will come together as part of a learning collaborative to share strategies, foster innovation, and engage in peer problem-solving. These efforts will be supported by a multilevel communications strategy that will increase awareness of COPE activities and resources at the local level and successes across the state. Our mixed methods evaluation design will assess the processes and impact of COPE activities as well as barriers and facilitators to implementation using aspects of both the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) models. Discussion: This protocol is designed to expand community capacity to strategically partner with local public health and social service partners to prioritize and implement health equity efforts. COPE intentionally engages historically resilient communities and those living in underserved rural areas to inform pragmatic strategies to improve health equity.

A Novel Electronic Record System for Documentation and Efficient Workflow for Community Health Workers: Development and Usability Study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic added to the decades of evidence that public health institutions are routinely stretched beyond their capacity. Community health workers (CHWs) can be a crucial extension of public health resources to address health inequities, but systems to document CHW efforts are often fragmented and prone to unneeded redundancy, errors, and inefficiency. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop a more efficient data collection system for recording the wide range of community-based efforts performed by CHWs. METHODS: The Communities Organizing to Promote Equity (COPE) project is an initiative to address health disparities across Kansas, in part, through the deployment of CHWs. Our team iteratively designed and refined the features of a novel data collection system for CHWs. Pilot tests with CHWs occurred over several months to ensure that the functionality supported their daily use. Following implementation of the database, procedures were set to sustain the collection of feedback from CHWs, community partners, and organizations with similar systems to continually modify the database to meet the needs of users. A continuous quality improvement process was conducted monthly to evaluate CHW performance; feedback was exchanged at team and individual levels regarding the continuous quality improvement results and opportunities for improvement. Further, a 15-item feedback survey was distributed to all 33 COPE CHWs and supervisors for assessing the feasibility of database features, accessibility, and overall satisfaction. RESULTS: At launch, the database had 60 active users in 20 counties. Documented client interactions begin with needs assessments (modified versions of the Arizona Self-sufficiency Matrix and PRAPARE [Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patient Assets, Risks, and Experiences]) and continue with the longitudinal tracking of progress toward goals. A user-specific automated alerts-based dashboard displays clients needing follow-up and upcoming events. The database contains over 55,000 documented encounters across more than 5079 clients. Available resources from over 2500 community organizations have been documented. Survey data indicated that 84% (27/32) of the respondents considered the overall navigation of the database as very easy. The majority of the respondents indicated they were overall very satisfied (14/32, 44%) or satisfied (15/32, 48%) with the database. Open-ended responses indicated the database features, documentation of community organizations and visual confirmation of consent form and data storage on a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant record system, improved client engagement, enrollment processes, and identification of resources. CONCLUSIONS: Our database extends beyond conventional electronic medical records and provides flexibility for ever-changing needs. The COPE database provides real-world data on CHW accomplishments, thereby improving the uniformity of data collection to enhance monitoring and evaluation. This database can serve as a model for community-based documentation systems and be adapted for use in other community settings.

Day one versus day zero postoperative physical therapy among patients with lumbar spinal fusion: a length of stay comparison.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Postoperative physical therapy (PT) following lumbar spinal fusion is an effective form of postoperative rehabilitation. However, it is unknown when a postoperative PT protocol should be optimally initiated. PURPOSE: This study sought to compare lengths of stay between patients on a day zero PT protocol and those on a day one PT protocol. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective chart review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery at a large midwestern tertiary medical care center from January 1, 2018 through April 30, 2019 were eligible for their medical record's inclusion. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Length of hospital stay following surgery. METHODS: Patients were stratified by having started postoperative PT on the same day as surgery (day zero) or having started postoperative PT on the day following surgery (day one). RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were included in the study, 69 in the day zero group and 95 patients in the day one group. Most patients were female (59%, n = 98), and patients' average age was 62 years (SD = 13). Average length of stay was 61 hours (SD = 20) for those on the day zero protocol and 75 hours (SD = 32) for those on the day one protocol. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a postoperative physical therapy protocol initiated on day zero is associated with patients experiencing a shorter length of hospital stay compared to a similar PT protocol initiated on postoperative day one.

Placement of Intracranial Pressure Monitors by Non-neurosurgeons: A Follow-Up Study.

BACKGROUND: Some research suggests that physicians who are not neurosurgeons can safely place intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors. The purpose of this study was to compare intracranial pressure monitor placement complications between neurosurgeons, trauma physicians, and general surgery residents. We hypothesized that with appropriate training, general residents can safely place ICP monitors. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective chart review of all trauma patients that required ICP monitor placement between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2021, was conducted. Comparisons were made between treatment groups. RESULTS: During the study period, 194 patients required ICP monitor placement. General surgery residents placed 94.3% of ICP monitors, 3.6% were placed by attending trauma physicians, and 2.1% by neurosurgeons. No ICP monitors were placed by attending trauma physicians or neurosurgeons between 2015 and 2018. Overall, minor complications during ICP monitor placement included device malfunction (2.7%) and inaccurate readings (.5%). There were no major complications during ICP monitor placement. Post-ICP monitor placement complications included one patient who experienced a central nervous system infection (.5%) and three patients who had mechanical problems (1.5%). No complications occurred among the neurosurgeon or attending trauma physician treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Most intracranial pressure monitors in our study sample were safely placed by surgical residents. Based on our study findings and considering the shortage and downtrend of neurosurgery specialists, ICP bolt placement needs to become a core clinical skill in surgical resident programs across the United States.

Use of Ultrasound-Guided Tendon Fenestration and Injection Procedures for Treatment of Tendinosis.

Introduction: Overuse injuries such as tendinosis are a common complaint at sports medicine clinics. When conservative management for tendinosis has failed, ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration and injection procedures, such as dry needling, needling tenotomy, autologous whole blood injections, and prolotherapy, can be utilized for treatment. This study examined the effectiveness of these procedures for pain improvement and ability to return to activity for patients with tendinosis. Methods: This study involved a chart review of patients 15 years or older who underwent at least one treatment for tendinosis at a sports medicine clinic between January 1, 2014 and April 17, 2019. Eligible patients had at least one of the following procedures: 1) percutaneous dry needling, 2) percutaneous needle tenotomy, 3) autologous whole blood injection, and/or 4) prolotherapy. A Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code query was used to screen patient charts for study inclusion. Results: In total, 680 patients' data were reviewed, and 343 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients underwent a total of 598 unique procedures. Dry needling represented most procedures (62.8%, n = 375). Most patients reported diminished pain at follow up (73.0%, n = 268). Prolotherapy had the highest percentage among the follow up patients reporting diminished pain (81.0%, n = 17). Most patients were able to return to activity at follow-up (47.4%, n = 172). A greater proportion of patients with autologous whole blood injection were able to return to activity (60.7%, n = 85). Conclusions: Most patients with tendinosis who underwent tendon fenestration or injection procedures reported diminished pain at follow-up. Autologous whole blood injection may be more likely to diminish patient pain and allow return to activity than other procedure types. More research is needed across all anatomical sites to compare the generalized effectiveness of these procedures.

Prehospital Clinical Decision-Making for Medication Administration for Behavioral Emergencies.

Introduction: Prehospital behavioral emergency protocols provide guidance on when a medication may be necessary for prehospital behavioral emergency. However, the final decision of which medication to administer to a patient is made independently by paramedics. The authors evaluated circumstances in a prehospital behavioral emergency when paramedics considered chemical restraints, and factors that go into choosing which medications to administer. Methods: A qualitative research design was used involving paramedics from a Midwestern County in the United States, between November 18 and 26, 2019. A total of 149 paramedics were asked to complete a survey consisting of two open-ended questions to measure their clinical decision-making process and factors considered when selecting a medication from a behavioral emergencies protocol. An immersion-crystallization approach was used to analyze the content of the interviews. Results: There was a 53% (n = 79) response rate. Six major themes emerged regarding the paramedics' decisions to use medication for behavioral emergencies: safety of the patients and paramedics, inability to use calming techniques, severity of the behavioral emergency, inability to assess the patient due to presentation, etiology of the behavioral episode, and other factors, such as age, size, and weight of the patient. Six major themes emerged regarding factors considered when choosing medication for behavioral emergency: etiology of the behavioral emergency, patient presentation, the patients' history and age, desired effect and intended outcome of the medication, and other factors. Conclusions: Emergency medical services (EMS) paramedics relied on several factors, such as safety of all parties involved and etiology of the behavioral emergency in deciding when, and which medication to use in a behavioral emergency. The findings could help EMS administrators to develop protocols, such as how paramedics respond and treat patients with behavioral health emergencies.

Post-stroke pneumonia: Factors associated with readmission within 90 days of stroke discharge.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to identify risk and protective factors associated with post-stroke pneumonia readmission. METHOD: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 365 stroke patients who were admitted to Ascension Via Christi St. Francis Hospital in Wichita, Kansas from January 1, 2015 through January 30, 2020. This case control study used matching by age at a proportion of four control patients to one post-stroke pneumonia patient. Patients with and without post-stroke pneumonia readmission within 90 days of discharge were included in this study. RESULTS: Of the 3,952 patients diagnosed with stroke, 1.8% (n=73) patients were readmitted with post-stroke pneumonia. Compared to patients who were not readmitted for post-stroke pneumonia, patients with post-stroke pneumonia readmission were more likely to: have used a nasogastric tube during index admission, have used mechanical ventilation during index admission, or have been placed on a nothing-by-mouth diet at discharge. Being placed on nothing-by-mouth for fluids was also a predictor of post-stroke pneumonia readmission. Lack of acquired infection during the index admission was a protective factor for post-stroke pneumonia readmission. DISCUSSION: The pathophysiology of post-stroke pneumonia is multifactorial and includes consideration of dysphagia severity, bacterial colonization of the oropharynx and feeding tube, and an altered immune system. CONCLUSION: During the index admission, patients on nothing-by-mouth were more likely to be readmitted, and infection-free patients were less likely to be readmitted with post-stroke pneumonia. By identifying at-risk patients, clinicians may be able to use this information to tailor future medical interventions to prevent post-stroke pneumonia readmissions.

Falls Among Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic Compared to a Pre-pandemic Period: A Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted older adults admitted to the hospital with fall-related injuries. This research sought to determine if there was a difference in patient characteristics and hospital outcomes among older adults with fall-related injuries during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to a non-pandemic period. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients 65 years or older admitted for traumatic falls before and during COVID-19 was undertaken. Data abstracted included demographics, fall details, injury data, and hospital course. RESULTS: Of 1598 patients, 50.5% presented during COVID-19 (cases), and 49.5% presented pre-pandemic (controls). Fewer cases fell in rural areas (28.6% vs 34.1%, P = .018) and were transferred from outside hospitals (32.1% vs 38.2%, P = .011). More cases experienced alcohol (4.6% vs 2.4%, P = .017) and substance use disorders (1.4% vs .4%, P = .029). Fewer cases had subdural hemorrhages (11.8% vs 16.4%, P = .007), and more had pneumothoraxes (3.5% vs 1.8%, P = .032). More patients admitted during COVID-19 experienced acute respiratory failure (2.0% vs .0%, P < .001), hypoxia (1.5% vs .3%, P = .005), and delirium (6.3% vs 1.0%, P < .001). Fewer cases were discharged to skilled nursing facilities (50.8% vs 57.3%, P = .009) and more to home with services (13.1% vs 8.3%, P = .002). DISCUSSION: This study suggested there was a similar frequency of presentation for falls among older adults during the two study periods. Older adults with fall-related injuries experienced differences in presenting comorbidities, injury patterns, complications, and discharge locations during the study periods.

Building the Worksite Wellness Foundation Infrastructure: A Critical Component of the WorkWell KS Strategic Framework.

OBJECTIVE: Workplace health programs can be ineffective, and changes are likely to be temporary without first establishing a wellness infrastructure. This study sought to determine whether attending a WorkWell KS Building the Worksite Wellness Foundation (Foundation) workshop enabled worksites to develop this infrastructure. METHODS: Survey data were collected from worksites before attending a workshop and approximately 1 year later. Survey items were designed to assess whether the worksite was implementing best practices. RESULTS: In total, 212 worksites participated in a workshop and completed both a baseline and follow-up assessments. At follow-up, more worksites reported having a wellness committee (89.6% vs 59.7%, P < 0.001) and having wellness committee duties included in position descriptions (26.2% vs 6.4%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that Foundation workshops can support worksites' implementation of best practices to establish worksite wellness infrastructure.

Characteristics of Attempted and Completed Suicides During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe patients admitted for attempted or completed suicide during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A 1-year retrospective review was performed of adult patients admitted for attempted or completed suicide. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients included, most injuries involved firearms (37%) and cutting/piercing (30%). Sixty-three percent of patients presented with an Injury Severity Score ≥16, and 37% of injuries involved the head. Upon admission, an alcohol test was completed for 83% of patients, 56% of whom tested positive. Thirty percent of patients died from their injuries, with all but one involving a firearm. Most of those who survived to discharge (62%) were discharged to an inpatient behavioral health facility. DISCUSSION: The current study indicated a large proportion of suicides during the COVID-19 pandemic involved firearms and alcohol use. These findings point to the need for interventions aimed at preventing suicide and substance abuse during pandemic situations.

Evaluation of Outcomes and Treatment Options Among Trauma Patients with Abdominal Vascular Injuries.

Introduction: Abdominal vascular injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment options include non-operative management, open repair, and endovascular procedures. This study aimed to characterize patients and detail treatment modalities among those who sustained a traumatic abdominal vascular injury. Methods: A six-year descriptive retrospective study was conducted at a level 1 trauma center and included all adult patients who sustained an abdominal vascular injury. Data abstracted included demographics, admitting characteristics, mechanism of injury, admitting vitals, injury details, diagnostic and treatment information, hospital course, and follow-up data. Results: Fifty-seven patients were admitted with abdominal vascular injuries, however, 14 patients sustained injuries to smaller vascular branches and were excluded. Most vascular injuries involved the iliac artery (27.9%, n = 12), abdominal aorta (25.6%, n = 11), and inferior vena cava (25.6%, n = 11). Twenty-seven percent (n = 12) of patients sustained an injury to more than one vascular structure. Thirty-four percent of patients (n = 15) died before treatment of the abdominal vascular injury. Among the 28 patients (65.1%) treated for their vascular injuries, 46.4% (n = 13) were treated with open surgery, 32.1% (n = 9) were treated non-operatively, and 21.4% (n = 6) with coil embolization. Sixty-four percent of the patients (n = 18) who survived to discharge presented for follow-up care with a mean follow-up period of 3 ± 4.1 months. There were no vascular reinterventions after discharge for patients who followed up with our hospital. Conclusions: Study findings suggested that appropriately selected cases of traumatic vascular injuries may be managed non-operatively and safely, as there were no mortalities, complications, or reinterventions among these patients.

Characteristics, treatment and outcomes of HER2 positive male breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Research describing male breast cancer with HER2 overexpression is limited. This study evaluated the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of HER2 positive breast cancer in men. METHODS: Information for January 2010 through December 2017 was obtained from the SEER Research Plus database. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-two men were HER2 positive (13%) of 3594 cases of breast cancer. Compared to HER2 negative patients, these patients were younger at diagnosis (63 vs. 67 years, p < 0.001), had more poorly differentiated cancer (Grade III 53% vs. 33%, p < 0.001), and larger tumor size (28.8 vs. 24.6 mm, p < 0.001). HER2 positive males also had distant site and/or contralateral lymph node involvement more often (13% vs. 7%, p < 0.001), had higher rate of cancer-related mortality (15% vs. 10%, p = 0.002), and shorter overall survival (34 vs. 38 months, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Men diagnosed with HER2 positive breast cancer had more advanced disease at diagnosis and worse outcomes than HER2 negative men despite increased utilization of systemic therapy.

In-hospital Outcomes of Patients with Septic Shock and Underlying Chronic Atrial Fibrillation: A Propensity Matched Analysis from A National Dataset.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common arrhythmias among hospitalized patients. Among patients admitted with septic shock (SS), the new occurrence of atrial fibrillation has been associated with an increase in intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and in-hospital mortality. This is partially related to further reduction in cardiac output and thus worsening organ perfusion due to atrial fibrillation. However, there is a paucity of research on the outcomes of patients who have underlying chronic AF (UCAF) and then develop SS. This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with UCAF admitted with SS compared to patients with SS without UCAF. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of the 2016 and 2017 Nationwide Readmission Database. ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients with SS, and these patients were stratified into those with and without UCAF. Propensity matching analyses were performed to compare clinical outcomes and in-hospital mortality between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 353,422 patients with hospitalization for SS were identified, 5.8% (n = 20,772) of whom had UCAF. After 2:1 propensity matching, 20,719 patients were identified as having SS with UCAF, and 41,438 patients were identified as having SS without UCAF. Patients with SS and UCAF had a higher incidence of ischemic stroke [2.5% versus 2.2%, p = 0.012], length of stay [11.5 days versus 10.9 days, p < 0.001], mean total charges [$154,094 versus $144,037, p < 0.001] compared to those with SS without UCAF. In-hospital mortality was high in both groups, but was slightly higher among those with SS and UCAF than those with SS and no UCAF [34.4% versus 34.1%, p = 0.049]. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified UCAF as an adverse prognosticator for clinical outcomes. Patients with SS and UCAF need to be identified as a higher risk category of SS who will require more intensive management.

Variations in Postpartum Opioid Prescribing Practices among Obstetrician-Gynecologists.

Introduction: There have been many efforts to combat the United States opioid crisis that has been occurring for the past two decades, specifically with postpartum patients that often were prescribed opioids. Prior studies described how accounting for usage of inpatient opioids on the day prior to discharge had an impact on how much discharge opioids were prescribed on the day of discharge. These studies provided a guideline to use the inpatient opioid amount from the day before discharge to determine discharge opioid quantity and minimize how much was being prescribed. In July 2018, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG) published Committee Opinion 742, guidelines for obstetricians-gynecologists about post-partum pain management. Prescription pain medications (including opioids, if necessary) require a shared decision-making approach between the physician and patient to determine the medication type and quantity. This study aimed to determine if there were differences in prescribing practices based on the specific post-operative day that opioid prescriptions were written, and if there were differences in the prescribing practices for cesarean deliveries following the publication of ACOG Committee Opinion 742. Methods: This retrospective chart review included patients who had a live cesarean birth at one rural Midwest facility anytime between July 1, 2017 and February 28, 2021. This study excluded those with chorioamnionitis and those discharged after more than four days. Opioid amounts were converted to oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for comparison, and total MME was calculated for each prescription. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the day that their discharge opioid medication prescriptions were written (i.e., a day prior to discharge or the day of discharge). Patients were also stratified based on date of delivery, before or after the publication of ACOG Committee Opinion 742. Results: Of 411 cesarean patients, 93.9% (n = 386) had opioids prescribed at discharge, 86% (n = 330) of whom received a prescription written on the day of discharge. There was no difference in the quantity of MMEs, doses per day, or dosage from discharge prescriptions between those written on the day of discharge and those written on a prior day. Patients whose deliveries occurred after the publication of ACOG Committee Opinion 742 (63.9%, n = 263) received discharge prescriptions with fewer average MMEs (159.53 ± 61.64) than those whose deliveries occurred before the publication (36%, n = 148; 187.35 ± 53.42; χ2 (1, N = 411) = 17.71; p < 0.001), and they were prescribed fewer doses per day. Conclusions: After cesarean sections, the specific post-operative day did not seem to impact the prescribing trends as there were no differences in MMEs, doses per day, or dosage between prescriptions that were written on the day of discharge and before the day of discharge. Patients whose deliveries occurred after the publication of ACOG Committee Opinion 742 received discharge prescriptions with fewer MMEs, fewer doses per day, and the same dosage than those whose deliveries occurred before the publication, reflecting the overall national trend of decreasing prescription opioids over these years.