Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(3): e242091, 2024 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38477917

ABSTRACT

Importance: Protracted wars, which disproportionately affect low-resource countries, exacerbate the challenges faced by cancer care systems, with lung cancer being the most affected as the most fatal oncological condition. Objective: To characterize the presentation and survival of patients with lung cancer during the decade-long Syrian war. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients at a large oncology center in Syria during the first 8 years of the Syrian armed conflict (2011-2018). All patients with a new diagnosis of lung cancer were included. Variables investigated included histological subtypes, TNM classification (tumor, lymph nodes, and metastasis), and staging at diagnosis as well as the yearly follow-ups up to 5 years after presentation. Exposure: The Syrian war divided the country into temporary regions with different political influences and heterogeneously impacted health care accessibility among these regions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Change in prevalence of advanced lung cancer cases at presentation; change in overall survival odds. Results: The study included 5160 patients from all Syrian governorates (mean [SD] age, 59.6 [10.8] years; 4399 men [85.3%]). New diagnoses sharply declined during the first 3 years of the war, with partial recovery afterward. Regardless of their tempo-geographical regions, 60% to 80% of the yearly diagnoses presented with metastases. The 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 13.1% (423 of 3238 patients with follow-up results) and 0.1% (2 of 1853 patients), respectively. Patients who presented from regions more involved in the armed conflicts showed poorer survival rates with odds ranging between 0.51 (95% CI, 0.44-0.59) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.49-0.74) across follow-ups for up to 2 years in comparison with patients presenting from safer regions. War-related health care inaccessibility explained a greater percentage of the variability in survival (Nagelkerke R2 = 7.5%; P < .001) than both patients' age and the stage of the disease combined (Nagelkerke R2 = 3.9%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The Syrian war has been associated with a marked decline in the management of patients with lung cancer, with limited access to specialized care, delayed diagnoses, and substantial decrease in survival rates correlating with the intensity of armed conflict in the respective regions. The profound repercussions of the prolonged armed conflict on patients with lung cancer in Syria necessitates urgent comprehensive strategies to improve the accessibility and quality of health care services, especially in conflict-ridden zones.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Syria , Cohort Studies , Armed Conflicts , Head
2.
J Prev Med Hyg ; 62(2): E520-E528, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34604595

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although breast cancer has a lower incidence in developing countries, mortality rates are higher, mainly due to delay in diagnosis and the poor diagnostic and therapeutic capacities. Although screening tests have been available for quite a long time, delayed and advanced presentation is still common, especially in developing countries. The decade-long Syrian crisis has severely crippled the healthcare system and depleted the already-limited capacities of the healthcare services, which under prioritized the care provided to unurgent cases like breast cancer. This study aimed to investigate the practices of breast cancer screening among breast cancer patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted in Al-Beiruni Hospital at Damascus University in 2019, through personal interviews using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 519 patients with breast cancer. One-hundred twenty (23.2%) of them reported undergoing one or more of the different screening methods at least once every six months prior to diagnosis. Several factors had a statistically significant association with the probability of undergoing or performing screening methods including living in large cities, having fewer children, having a full-time or part-time job, and the level of education. Patients who reported having a relative diagnosed previously with breast cancer or any other malignancies were also more likely to screen themselves. Inaccessibility to healthcare services, which was exaggerated by the armed conflicts, had a significant association with less practicing of the screening methods too (OR: 0.4 [0.3-0.7]). CONCLUSION: The Syrian war and its direct and indirect consequences negatively affected screening practices of breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Syria , Warfare
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...