Model creation and deformation for the automatic segmentation of the brain in MR images.

In this paper a method for the automatic segmentation of the brain in magnetic resonance images is presented and validated. The proposed method involves two steps 1) the creation of an initial model and 2) the deformation of this model to fit the exact contours of the brain in the images. A new method to create the initial model has been developed and compared to a more traditional approach in which initial models are created by means of brain atlases. A comprehensive validation of the complete segmentation method has been conducted on a series of three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo image volumes acquired both from control volunteers and patients suffering from Cushing's disease. This validation study compares results obtained with the method we propose and contours drawn manually. Averages differences between manual and automatic segmentation with the model creation method we propose are 1.7% and 2.7% for the control volunteers and the Cushing's patients, respectively. These numbers are 1.8% and 5.6% when the atlas-based method is used.

Effect of geometrical distortion correction in MR on image registration accuracy.

In this article we investigate the effect of geometrical distortion correction in MR images on the accuracy of the registration of X-ray CT and MR head images for both a fiducial marker (extrinsic point) method and a surface-matching technique. We use CT and T2-weighted MR image volumes acquired from seven patients who underwent craniotomies in a stereotactic neurosurgical clinical trial. Each patient had four external markers attached to transcutaneous posts screwed into the outer table of the skull. The MR images are corrected for static field inhomogeneity by using an image rectification technique and corrected for scale distortion (gradient magnitude uncertainty) by using an attached stereotactic frame as an object of known shape and size. We define target registration error (TRE) as the distance between corresponding marker positions after registration and transformation. The accuracy of the fiducial marker method is determined by using each combination of three markers to estimate the transformation and the remaining marker to calculate registration error. Surface-based registration is accomplished by fitting MR contours corresponding to the CSF-dura interface to CT contours derived from the inner surface of the skull. The mean point-based TRE using three noncollinear fiducials improved 34%-from 1.15 to 0.76 mm-after correcting for both static field inhomogeneity and scale distortion. The mean surface-based TRE improved 46%-from 2.20 to 1.19 mm. Correction of geometrical distortion in MR images can significantly improve the accuracy of point-based and surface-based registration of CT and MR head images. Distortion correction can be important in clinical situations such as stereotactic and functional neurosurgery where 1 to 2 mm accuracy is required.

Registration of 3-D images using weighted geometrical features.

The authors present a weighted geometrical feature (WGF) registration algorithm. Its efficacy is demonstrated by combining points and a surface. The technique is an extension of Besl and McKay's (1992) iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. The authors use the WGF algorithm to register X-ray computed tomography (CT) and T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) volume head images acquired from eleven patients that underwent craniotomies in a neurosurgical clinical trial. Each patient had five external markers attached to transcutaneous posts screwed into the outer table of the skull. The authors define registration error as the distance between positions of corresponding markers that are not used for registration. The CT and MR images are registered using fiducial paints (marker positions) only, a surface only, and various weighted combinations of points and a surface. The CT surface is derived from contours corresponding to the inner surface of the skull. The MR surface is derived from contours corresponding to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-dura interface. Registration using points and a surface is found to be significantly more accurate then registration using only points or a surface.