ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 infection is a potentially life-threatening infection in immunocompromised pediatric patients, and its management has rapidly evolved during the pandemic. To control SARS-CoV-2 infection over time, the scenario changed for the better with the introduction of specific treatments such as antiviral drugs, vaccines, and monoclonal antibodies, together with drugs blocking the inflammatory cytokine cascade and improvements in supportive care. AREAS COVERED: This paper discusses the therapeutic strategies to apply for patients affected by COVID-19 in the pediatric population, with a focus on the immunocompromised patients. EXPERT OPINION: Treatment in pediatric patients retraces the therapies investigated and approved in adults and must be calibrated on the basis of the severity of the infection (anti-spike monoclonal antibody, antivirals, anti-inflammatory drugs, and immunomodulators). Transmission prevention policies and vaccination reduce the risk of infection, while early intervention in the immunocompromised patients at high-risk of progression to severe-critical COVID-19 may reduce the period of viral shedding and the need for hospitalization, intensive care admission, and death. In hemato-oncological patients, the delayed treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 disease represents a frequent complication and its impact on the patient outcome remains a matter of research for the next few years.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , Child , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Immunologic Factors , Anti-Inflammatory Agents , Antiviral AgentsABSTRACT
The effectiveness of quinolone prophylaxis in high-risk hematological pediatric patients is controversial. A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, including studies that involved children and young adults undergoing chemotherapy for acute leukemia or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) who received quinolone prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis. A meta-analysis was performed on bloodstream infections and neutropenic fever. Data regarding the impact of prophylaxis on overall survival, antibiotic exposure, antibiotic-related adverse effects, antibiotic resistance, Clostridium difficile infections, fungal infections, length of hospitalization, and costs were reviewed in the descriptive analysis. Sixteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 10 of them met the criteria for quantitative analysis. Quinolone prophylaxis was effective in reducing the rate of bloodstream infections and neutropenic fever in pediatric acute leukemia compared with no prophylaxis, but it had no significant effect in HSCT recipients. Prophylaxis was associated with a higher rate of bacterial resistance to fluoroquinolones and higher antibiotic exposure.