ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a prevailing option for the management of severe early graft dysfunction. This systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis aims to evaluate (1) mortality, (2) rates of major complications, (3) prognostic factors, and (4) the effect of different VA-ECMO strategies on outcomes in adult heart transplant (HT) recipients supported with VA-ECMO. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a systematic search and included studies of adults (≥18 years) who received VA-ECMO during their index hospitalization after HT and reported on mortality at any timepoint. We pooled data using random effects models. To identify prognostic factors, we analysed IPD using mixed effects logistic regression. We assessed the certainty in the evidence using the GRADE framework. We included 49 observational studies of 1477 patients who received VA-ECMO after HT, of which 15 studies provided IPD for 448 patients. There were no differences in mortality estimates between IPD and non-IPD studies. The short-term (30-day/in-hospital) mortality estimate was 33% (moderate certainty, 95% confidence interval [CI] 28%-39%) and 1-year mortality estimate 50% (moderate certainty, 95% CI 43%-57%). Recipient age (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04) and prior sternotomy (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.99-2.49) are associated with increased short-term mortality. There is low certainty evidence that early intraoperative cannulation and peripheral cannulation reduce the risk of short-term death. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients who receive VA-ECMO for early graft dysfunction do not survive 30 days or to hospital discharge, and one-half do not survive to 1 year after HT. Improving outcomes will require ongoing research focused on optimizing VA-ECMO strategies and care in the first year after HT.
Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Heart Failure , Heart Transplantation , Adult , Humans , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Hospital Mortality , Patient Discharge , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
RESUMEN Introducción: La enfermedad de Chagas afecta aproximadamente a 6 millones de personas en América Latina. El 25 a 35% evoluciona hacia la Miocardiopatía Chagásica (MCh). Una opción terapéutica en sus estadios avanzados es el trasplante cardíaco (TxC). Objetivos: Comparar la supervivencia de pacientes con TxC por MCh frente a otras etiologías. Analizar la incidencia de la reactivación (Ra) de enfermedad de Chagas y su impacto en la supervivencia en este subgrupo de pacientes. Material y métodos: Se evaluaron retrospectivamente pacientes con TxC entre agosto 1998 y marzo 2021. Se analizó la supervivencia mediante curvas de Kaplan-Meier y log rank test. El diagnóstico de Ra se realizó mediante métodos moleculares, prueba de Strout en sangre periférica, tejido miocárdico y/o cutáneo. Resultados: De 606 pacientes con TxC, 39 (6,4%) presentaban MCh. Seguimiento medio 4,4 años (Rango Intercuartilo 1,2-8,6). Edad subgrupo MCh 51 años (RIC 45-60). Hombres 28 (72%). Se documentó Ra en el 38,5% de los pacientes. Supervivencia a 1, 5 y 10 años en TxC por MCh con Ra versus no Ra: 85%, 76% y 61% versus 72%, 55% y 44% (p = 0,3). Supervivencia a 1, 5 y 10 años en TxC por MCh versus TxC por otras causas: 79%, 65% y 50% versus 79%, 62% y 47% (p = 0,5). Conclusión: En nuestra serie no se encontró diferencia estadísticamente significativa en la supervivencia de los pacientes trasplantados cardíacos por MCh en comparación con aquellos trasplantados por otras causas; así como tampoco entre los pacientes que reactivaron la enfermedad de Chagas y los que no lo hicieron.
ABSTRACT Background: Chagas disease affects about 6 million people in Latin America, and 25 to 35% progress to Chagas cardiomyopathy (ChCM). Heart transplantation (HTx) is a therapeutic option in advanced stages. Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare survival of patients with HTx due to ChCM versus those transplanted for other etiologies and to analyze the incidence of Chagas disease reactivation (Ra) and its impact on survival in this group of patients. Methods: Patients undergoing HTx between August 1998 and March 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. The diagnosis of Ra was performed by molecular methods, Strout's test in peripheral blood, myocardial tissue or skin tissue. Results: Of 606 patients with Htx, 39(6,4%) presented ChCM. Median follow up was 4.4 years (interquartile range 1.2-8.6). Median age of the subgroup with ChCM was 51 years (IQR 45-60) and 28 were men (72%). Reactivation was documented in 38.5% of the patients. Survival at 1, 5 and 10 years in HTx recipients due to ChCM and Ra versus no Ra was 85%, 76% and 61% versus 72%, 55% and 44%, respectively (p = 0.3). Survival at 1, 5 and 10 years in HTx recipients due to ChCM versus HTx for other causes was 79%, 65% and 50% versus 79%, 62% and 47%, respectively (p = 0.5). Conclusion: In our series we did not find statistically significant differences in survival of heart transplant recipients due to ChCM versus those transplanted due to other reasons. Survival in patients with Chagas disease reactivation and those without reactivation was also similar.
ABSTRACT
Cardiogenic shock (CS) has a high mortality rate and often requires advanced therapies such as mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and heart transplantation (HT). Those patients who presented an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with CS and required support through MCS as bridge to HT were retrospectively analyzed in a single Center. Between January 1997 and June 2020, 524 patients received HT, 203 for ischemic-cardiomyopathy, 103 were in emergency waiting list. Eleven patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age 53 ± 11 years old; men 73%). Five primary angioplasties and 2 emergency myocardial revascularization surgeries were performed. Four patients had coronary anatomy not subject to revascularization. All received inotropic and vasopressor treatment and required intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Subsequently, two required support with a left univentricular centrifugal pump (BioMedicus®, Medtronic) and two with peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO) (Maquet®, Getinge Group). The median between AMI and HT was 15 days (range 7-21) and the mean age of the donors 28 ± 11 years. All had extensive AMI (necrotic amount 35 ± 5%) with histopathological signs of transmural necrosis and reperfusion injury. The median follow-up was 9 years (range 1-15). None died in hospitalization or during the first year after transplantation. Survival at 5 and 10 years was 73% and 55%. Emergency HT may be the best option for selected patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock refractory to conventional therapy.
El shock cardiogénico (SC) presenta una elevada mortalidad y puede requerir de terapéuticas avanzadas como la asistencia circulatoria mecánica (ACM) y el trasplante cardíaco (TC). Se analizaron en forma retrospectiva, en un único centro, aquellos pacientes que presentaron un infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM), SC y requirieron ACM puente al TC. Entre enero 1997 y junio 2020, 524 pacientes recibieron un TC, 203 por cardiopatía isquémica, 103 en lista de emergencia. Se incluyeron once pacientes con los criterios mencionados (edad media 53 ± 11 años; hombres 73%). Se realizaron 5 angioplastias primarias y 2 cirugías de revascularización miocárdica de urgencia. Cuatro pacientes presentaban anatomía coronaria no pasible de revascularización. Todos recibieron tratamiento inotrópico y vasopresor y requirieron soporte con balón de contrapulsación intra aórtico (BCIA). Dos requirieron el implante de bomba centrífuga univentricular izquierda (BioMedicus®, Medtronic) y 2 de oxigenador de membrana extracorpóreo veno-arterial (ECMO-VA) periférico (Maquet®, Getinge Group). La mediana entre IAM y TC fue 15 días (rango 7-21) y la edad de los donantes 28 ± 11 años. Todos presentaron un IAM extenso (monto necrótico 35 ± 5%) con signos histopatológicos de necrosis transmural e injuria de reperfusión. La mediana de seguimiento fue 9 años (rango 1-15). Ninguno falleció en la internación ni durante el primer año post trasplante. La supervivencia a los 5 y 10 años fue 73% y 55%. El TC en situación de emergencia ha demostrado ser, en nuestro medio, la mejor opción en aquellos pacientes con IAM y SC refractario a la terapia convencional.
Subject(s)
Heart-Assist Devices , Myocardial Infarction , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Young AdultABSTRACT
Resumen El shock cardiogénico (SC) presenta una elevada mortalidad y puede requerir de terapéuticas avanzadas como la asistencia circulatoria mecánica (ACM) y el trasplante cardíaco (TC). Se analizaron en forma retrospectiva, en un único centro, aquellos pacientes que presentaron un infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM), SC y requirieron ACM puente al TC. Entre enero 1997 y junio 2020, 524 pacientes recibieron un TC, 203 por cardiopatía isquémica, 103 en lista de emergencia. Se incluyeron once pacientes con los criterios mencionados (edad media 53 ± 11 años; hombres 73%). Se realizaron 5 angioplastias primarias y 2 cirugías de revascularización miocárdica de urgencia. Cuatro pacientes presentaban anatomía coronaria no pasible de revascularización. Todos recibieron tratamiento inotrópico y vasopresor y requirieron soporte con balón de contrapulsación intra aórtico (BCIA). Dos requirieron el implante de bomba centrífuga univentricular izquierda (BioMedicus®, Medtronic) y 2 de oxigenador de membrana extracorpóreo veno-arterial (ECMO-VA) periférico (Maquet®, Getinge Group). La mediana entre IAM y TC fue 15 días (rango 7-21) y la edad de los donantes 28 ± 11 años. Todos presentaron un IAM extenso (monto necrótico 35 ± 5%) con signos histopatológicos de necrosis transmural e injuria de reperfusión. La mediana de seguimiento fue 9 años (rango 1-15). Ninguno falleció en la internación ni durante el primer año post trasplante. La supervivencia a los 5 y 10 años fue 73% y 55%. El TC en situación de emergencia ha demostrado ser, en nuestro medio, la mejor opción en aquellos pacientes con IAM y SC refractario a la terapia convencional.
Abstract Cardiogenic shock (CS) has a high mortality rate and often requires advanced therapies such as mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and heart transplantation (HT). Those patients who presented an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with CS and required support through MCS as bridge to HT were retrospectively analyzed in a single Center. Between January 1997 and June 2020, 524 patients received HT, 203 for ischemic-cardiomyopathy, 103 were in emergency waiting list. Eleven patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age 53 ± 11 years old; men 73%). Five primary angioplasties and 2 emergency myocardial revasculariza tion surgeries were performed. Four patients had coronary anatomy not subject to revascularization. All received inotropic and vasopressor treatment and required intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Subsequently, two required support with a left univentricular centrifugal pump (BioMedicus®, Medtronic) and two with peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO) (Maquet®, Getinge Group). The median between AMI and HT was 15 days (range 7-21) and the mean age of the donors 28 ± 11 years. All had extensive AMI (necrotic amount 35 ± 5%) with histopathological signs of transmural necrosis and reperfusion injury. The median follow-up was 9 years (range 1-15). None died in hospitalization or during the first year after transplantation. Survival at 5 and 10 years was 73% and 55%. Emergency HT may be the best option for selected patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock refractory to conventional therapy.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Heart-Assist Devices , Myocardial Infarction , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Intra-Aortic Balloon PumpingABSTRACT
RESUMEN Se presenta el primer implante exitoso de asistencia ventricular izquierda como terapia de destino mediante el dispositivo de flujo continuo centrífugo con levitación magnética intracorpóreo HeartMate 3TM (Abbott) en la Argentina. El dispositivo se implantó en una paciente de 52 años portadora de miocardio no compacto con disfunción ventricular izquierda grave, hipertensión pulmonar, insuficiencia cardíaca avanzada en estadio INTERMACS 3 y contraindicación para trasplante cardíaco debido a títulos elevados de anticuerpos preformados contra el sistema HLA en crossmatch contra panel.
ABSTRACT First case of successful implantation of intracorporeal full magnetically levitated continuous centrifugal flow left ventricular assist device HeartMate 3 Abbott® as destination therapy in Argentina in a female patient, 52-years-old with non compaction cardiomyopathy, severe left ventricular dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, end-stage heart failure INTERMACS 3 and contraindication for heart transplantation due to high titers of preformed antibodies against the HLA system in panel reactive antibody assay.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Supraventricular arrhythmias (SVAs), commonly managed with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), may occur after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 514 consecutive patients (pts.) undergoing OHT between January 1990 and July 2016 in a single-center. Patients with SVAs managed with RFA were included. Mechanisms of genesis of SVAs, association with surgical techniques and outcomes, were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 514 pts undergoing OHT, 53% (272 pts.) were managed with bicaval (BC) technique and 47% (242 pts.) with biatrial (BA) technique. Mean follow-up 10 ± 8.4 years. Nine pts. (1.7%) developed SVA requiring RFA. The BC technique was performed in 4 pts., 3 pts. presented cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (CTI AFL), and 1 pt. double loop AFL. Five pts. were managed with BA technique, 4 pts. presented CTI AFL, and 1 pt. atrial tachycardia (AT). Mean time between OHT and SVA occurrence was 6.6 ± 5.5 years. The procedure was successful in 89% (8 pts.). Arrhythmia recurrence was seen in 3 pts (37%), all with BA technique. CONCLUSION: Supraventricular arrhythmias in heart transplantation may be associated with the surgical scar. Identifying the mechanism is vital to choose the appropriate treatment with radiofrequency ablation.
Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Heart Transplantation , Radiofrequency Ablation , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Heart-brain integration dynamics are critical for interoception (i.e. the sensing of body signals). In this unprecedented longitudinal study, we assessed neurocognitive markers of interoception in patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplants and matched healthy controls. Patients were assessed longitudinally before surgery (T1), a few months later (T2) and a year after (T3). We assessed behavioural (heartbeat detection) and electrophysiological (heartbeat evoked potential) markers of interoception. Heartbeat detection task revealed that pre-surgery (T1) interoception was similar between patients and controls. However, patients were outperformed by controls after heart transplant (T2), but no such differences were observed in the follow-up analysis (T3). Neurophysiologically, although heartbeat evoked potential analyses revealed no differences between groups before the surgery (T1), reduced amplitudes of this event-related potential were found for the patients in the two post-transplant stages (T2, T3). All these significant effects persisted after covariation with different cardiological measures. In sum, this study brings new insights into the adaptive properties of brain-heart pathways.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiogenic shock may require hemodynamic stabilization with short-term mechanical circulatory support devices (ST-MCS) such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and centrifugal pump (CP) as bridge to transplantion (BTT). This study aimed to describe ECMO and CP during BTT and after heart transplant. METHODS: A cohort of patients on ECMO or CP as BTT between April 2006 and April 2018 in a single hospital. RESULTS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients with ECMO (n = 14) or CP (n = 23) were included. Acute kidney injury was more prevalent during CP (28.6% vs 69.6%, P = .02). There were no differences in stroke, thrombosis, sepsis, or vasoplegia. Bleeding (0% vs 56.5%, P = .0003) and reoperation (0% vs 47.8%, P = .002) were more frequent in CP group as well as mortality (0 vs 7 [30.4%], P = .03). The remaining 30 patients (81.1%) underwent heart transplantation, without differences in primary graft dysfunction, vasoplegia, reoperation for bleeding, or hospital stay. Mortality was 23.3% at 30 days, similar in both groups, with no further deaths at median follow-up of 44.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cardiogenic shock, ST-MCS with ECMO or CP as BTT are a lifesaving approach allowing successful transplantation in the majority of cases, with good short- and long-term survival.
Subject(s)
Heart Transplantation , Heart-Assist Devices , Shock, Cardiogenic , Argentina/epidemiology , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
La utilización de soporte perioperatorio con sistema de oxigenación a través de membrana extracorpórea (ECMO) es un concepto novedoso en cirugía torácica general. Se presenta el caso de un paciente con trasplante pulmonar derecho por fibrosis pulmonar idiopática (FPI) que requirió la resección de un nódulo pulmonar homolateral con soporte de ECMO veno-venoso (VV). El soporte a través de ECMO VV es una opción viable cuando se prevén dificultades con la ventilación unipulmonar en casos seleccionados.
The use of perioperative support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) systems is a novel concept in general thoracic surgery We report the case of a male patient with a history of right lung transplant due to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who required resection of a right pulmonary nodule under veno-venous (VV) ECMO support. The use of VV-ECMO is a feasible option in selected cases when complications are expected to occur with one lung ventilation.
Subject(s)
Humans , Transplantation , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis , Lung , Lung/surgery , Thoracic Surgery , Oxygenation , Research ReportABSTRACT
Introducción: El trasplante cardíaco continúa siendo el tratamiento de elección en pacientes con miocardiopatías graves sin otras opciones terapéuticas. Los resultados alentadores del trasplante cardíaco en términos de supervivencia han permitido ampliar los criterios de selección del receptor, lo que ha llevado a la inclusión de pacientes de mayor complejidad en lista de espera. Objetivo: Analizar los resultados del trasplante cardíaco del Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro a lo largo de 21 años de seguimiento. Material y métodos: Entre febrero de 1993 y diciembre de 2014 se realizaron 442 trasplantes cardíacos ortotópicos en un único centro. Se analizaron en forma retrospectiva las historias clínicas de los pacientes, excluyéndose los pediátricos y protegiendo la confidencialidad de los datos. Para el análisis se dividió la serie en período 1 (febrero 1993 - agosto 2003) y período 2 (septiembre 2003 - diciembre 2014). Resultados: Se observó durante el segundo período una prevalencia mayor de candidatos con miocardiopatía dilatada no coronaria versus coronaria y un incremento significativo de la indicación de trasplante cardíaco en la miocardiopatía dilatada chagásica. La prevalencia de hipertensión pulmonar aumentó, realizándose un número mayor de trasplantes cardíacos en condición de emergencia, con requerimiento de inotrópicos y soporte circulatorio mecánico con balón de contrapulsación intraaórtico. Conclusiones: Se han observado cambios en el perfil clínico de los receptores de trasplante cardíaco, ingresando en lista de espera pacientes con un número mayor de comorbilidades. La cuidadosa elección de candidatos a trasplante requiere una revisión continua y un análisis individualizado de los diferentes factores que determinan la supervivencia de los pacientes y su impacto en los resultados de los programas de trasplante.
ABSTRACT
Introducción El uso de dispositivos de asistencia ventricular a corto plazo con levitación magnética permite estabilizar hemodinámicamente a pacientes en shock cardiogénico refractario en estadio INTERMACS 1 y definir la estrategia terapéutica. Objetivos Evaluar los resultados, en un único centro, del uso de bomba centrífuga de segunda generación en pacientes con shock cardiogénico refractario. Material y métodos Se analizaron retrospectivamente 15 pacientes con asistencia ventricular con bomba Levitronix CentriMag® desde 2006 a 2011. Todos los pacientes presentaban shock cardiogénico refractario con dos inotrópicos y 13 tenían balón de contrapulsación intraaórtico previo a la asistencia. Las indicaciones fueron miocardiopatías avanzadas en 8 pacientes, miocarditis viral en 1, miocardiopatía periparto en 1, shock cardiogénico poscardiotomía en 3 y falla del injerto postrasplante cardíaco en 2 pacientes. Resultados La edad media en adultos fue de 49 ± 13 años y el 66% (10/15) eran hombres. Se implantó asistencia ventricular izquierda (AVI) en 1 paciente y asistencia biventricular (ABV) en 14. El tiempo medio de asistencia fue de 6 ± 4 días (2-19). La decisión terapéutica final posimplante fue puente al trasplante cardíaco en 12 pacientes (80%), puente a la recuperación en 1 (7%) y puente a la decisión en 2 (13%). La asistencia (ABV) se explantó en 1 paciente por recuperación de la función ventricular y 8 pacientes recibieron trasplante, con una supervivencia del 60% (9/15). Requirieron reoperación por sangrado 6 pacientes (40%) y 1 presentó trombosis de las cánulas; ningún paciente presentó accidente cerebrovascular ni fallas técnicas del sistema. Fallecieron bajo asistencia 6 pacientes (40%) (5 ABV y 1 AVI): 1 por sepsis, 1 con coagulopatía grave y 4 por falla multiorgánica. De los 6 pacientes fallecidos, 2 se encontraban con shock cardiogénico poscardiotomía y 4 eran candidatos previos a trasplante cardíaco. Conclusiones En esta serie, el soporte circulatorio con bomba centrífuga Levitronix CentriMag® fue efectivo en pacientes críticos, con una supervivencia del 60%. La complicación más frecuente fue la reoperación por sangrado.
Introduction Short term use of magnetically-levitated ventricular assist devices offers hemodynamic stabilization of patients with refractory cardiogenic shock in INTERMACS stage 1, enabling a therapeutic strategy. Objective The aira of this study was to assess in a single centre the results with second generation centrifugal flow pumps in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. Methods Fifteen patients with Levitronix CentriMag® ventricular assist device implantation were retrospectively analyzed from 2006 to 2011. All patients presented refractory cardiogenic shock under two inotropic agents and 13 patients were also assisted with intra aortic balloon pump. The indications were: end stage cardiomyopathy in 8 patients, viral myocarditis in 1 patient, postpartum cardiomyopathy in 1 patient, post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 3 patients and post heart transplantation graft failure in 2 patients. Results Mean age was 49 ± 13 years, and 66% (10/15) were men. Only 1 patient underwent left ventricular assist device implantation (LVA) and 14 patients underwent biventricular assistance (BVA). Mean support duration was 6 ± 4 days (2-19). Final post-implant therapeutic decisión was bridge to heart transplantation in 12 patients (80%), bridge to reoovery in 1 patient (7%) and bridge to decisión in 2 patients (13%). One patient was successfully weaned from BVA due to ventricular function recovery and 8 patients were transplanted, with a survival rate of 60% (9/15). Reoperation due to bleeding was performed in 6 patients (40%) and 1 patient presented cannulae thrombosis. None of the patients had stroke or technical system failures. Six patients died while receiving circulatory assistance (40%) (5 BVA and 1 LVA), 1 patient due to sepsis, 1 patient due to coagulopathy and 4 patients due to múltiple system organ failure. Out of the 6 deaths, 2 patients were in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock and 4 were on heart transplantation waiting list. Conclusions In this series, circulatory support with Levitronix CentriMag® centrifugal flow pump was effective in critical patients with a survival rate of 60%. Reoperation for bleeding was the most frequent complication.
ABSTRACT
Introducción El uso de dispositivos de asistencia ventricular a corto plazo con levitación magnética permite estabilizar hemodinámicamente a pacientes en shock cardiogénico refractario en estadio INTERMACS 1 y definir la estrategia terapéutica. Objetivos Evaluar los resultados, en un único centro, del uso de bomba centrífuga de segunda generación en pacientes con shock cardiogénico refractario. Material y métodos Se analizaron retrospectivamente 15 pacientes con asistencia ventricular con bomba Levitronix CentriMag« desde 2006 a 2011. Todos los pacientes presentaban shock cardiogénico refractario con dos inotrópicos y 13 tenían balón de contrapulsación intraaórtico previo a la asistencia. Las indicaciones fueron miocardiopatías avanzadas en 8 pacientes, miocarditis viral en 1, miocardiopatía periparto en 1, shock cardiogénico poscardiotomía en 3 y falla del injerto postrasplante cardíaco en 2 pacientes. Resultados La edad media en adultos fue de 49 ± 13 años y el 66% (10/15) eran hombres. Se implantó asistencia ventricular izquierda (AVI) en 1 paciente y asistencia biventricular (ABV) en 14. El tiempo medio de asistencia fue de 6 ± 4 días (2-19). La decisión terapéutica final posimplante fue puente al trasplante cardíaco en 12 pacientes (80%), puente a la recuperación en 1 (7%) y puente a la decisión en 2 (13%). La asistencia (ABV) se explantó en 1 paciente por recuperación de la función ventricular y 8 pacientes recibieron trasplante, con una supervivencia del 60% (9/15). Requirieron reoperación por sangrado 6 pacientes (40%) y 1 presentó trombosis de las cánulas; ningún paciente presentó accidente cerebrovascular ni fallas técnicas del sistema. Fallecieron bajo asistencia 6 pacientes (40%) (5 ABV y 1 AVI): 1 por sepsis, 1 con coagulopatía grave y 4 por falla multiorgánica. De los 6 pacientes fallecidos, 2 se encontraban con shock cardiogénico poscardiotomía y 4 eran candidatos previos a trasplante cardíaco. Conclusiones En esta serie, el soporte circulatorio con bomba centrífuga Levitronix CentriMag« fue efectivo en pacientes críticos, con una supervivencia del 60%. La complicación más frecuente fue la reoperación por sangrado.(AU)
Introduction Short term use of magnetically-levitated ventricular assist devices offers hemodynamic stabilization of patients with refractory cardiogenic shock in INTERMACS stage 1, enabling a therapeutic strategy. Objective The aira of this study was to assess in a single centre the results with second generation centrifugal flow pumps in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. Methods Fifteen patients with Levitronix CentriMag« ventricular assist device implantation were retrospectively analyzed from 2006 to 2011. All patients presented refractory cardiogenic shock under two inotropic agents and 13 patients were also assisted with intra aortic balloon pump. The indications were: end stage cardiomyopathy in 8 patients, viral myocarditis in 1 patient, postpartum cardiomyopathy in 1 patient, post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 3 patients and post heart transplantation graft failure in 2 patients. Results Mean age was 49 ± 13 years, and 66% (10/15) were men. Only 1 patient underwent left ventricular assist device implantation (LVA) and 14 patients underwent biventricular assistance (BVA). Mean support duration was 6 ± 4 days (2-19). Final post-implant therapeutic decisión was bridge to heart transplantation in 12 patients (80%), bridge to reoovery in 1 patient (7%) and bridge to decisión in 2 patients (13%). One patient was successfully weaned from BVA due to ventricular function recovery and 8 patients were transplanted, with a survival rate of 60% (9/15). Reoperation due to bleeding was performed in 6 patients (40%) and 1 patient presented cannulae thrombosis. None of the patients had stroke or technical system failures. Six patients died while receiving circulatory assistance (40%) (5 BVA and 1 LVA), 1 patient due to sepsis, 1 patient due to coagulopathy and 4 patients due to múltiple system organ failure. Out of the 6 deaths, 2 patients were in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock and 4 were on heart transplantation waiting list. Conclusions In this series, circulatory support with Levitronix CentriMag« centrifugal flow pump was effective in critical patients with a survival rate of 60%. Reoperation for bleeding was the most frequent complication.(AU)
