Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Microbiol ; 55(6): 473-9, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17924164

ABSTRACT

In the present study, several conventional methods to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were compared with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of mecA gene-positive isolates. Cefoxitin E-test was also evaluated as a possible phenotypic method of MRSA detection. Oxacillin agar screen and PBP2' latex agglutination methods were found to be more sensitive than oxacillin and cefoxitin disk-diffusion methods. Cefoxitin disk diffusion was found to be the most specific. A combination of oxacillin agar screening with cefoxitin disk diffusion, or oxacillin disk diffusion with PBP2', improved sensitivity and specificity. Cefoxitin E-test with the current break points had low sensitivity and specificity (33.3% and 75%, respectively) for the detection of MRSA. However, changing the break points to or= 6 microg/ml for sensitive and resistant, respectively, greatly improved both. Changing the 30-microg cefoxitin disk-diffusion break points to

Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Methicillin Resistance , Methicillin/pharmacology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Cefoxitin , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Humans , Latex Fixation Tests , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Penicillin-Binding Proteins , Phenotype , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL