ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Appropriate drug prescribing in the pediatric population is challenging, given this age group's unique pharmacokinetics. This has inevitably led to a high incidence of adverse drug reactions in this population. To address this issue, the Pediatric Pharmacy Association (PPA) compiled a list of 67 drugs that are inappropriately used in the pediatric population called the Key Potentially Inappropriate Drugs "KIDs list". AIM: To estimate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) use in pediatric wards based on the KIDs list criteria. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted and included pediatric patients who were admitted to five pediatric wards during 3 years (2019-2021). The drugs in the KIDs list were matched to the hospital formulary and 11 matched drugs were included in the study. For each individual drug, the patient's electronic file was reviewed to determine the prescription appropriateness according to the KIDs list criteria. RESULTS: Among 3,166 pediatric patients admitted to pediatric wards, a total of 415 patients received a PIM listed in the KIDs list. The mean age was 8.6 (± 4.9) years old, and 60.0% (n = 251/415) were males. The overall prevalence of PIM use was 13.0% (n = 415/3166). Among the prescribed PIM, metoclopramide was the most commonly prescribed PIM 42.8% (n = 178/415), followed by tramadol 37.6% (n = 156/415). CONCLUSION: Given the high prevalence of inappropriate medication use in the pediatric wards, future research on strategies and interventions should be recommended to limit the use of PIMs and provide safer alternatives for the pediatric population.
Subject(s)
Inappropriate Prescribing , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List , Humans , Child , Male , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Prevalence , Adolescent , InfantABSTRACT
Objectives: Schizophrenia, unipolar depression, bipolar disorder, bipolar mania, and bipolar depression are a few of the severe psychiatric diseases that affect millions of individuals and their overall life quality. This study aimed to look at differences in TGA, TC, HDL, LDL, and FPG levels in people who were going through acute episodes of listed diseases. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional prospective study was carried out in Jordan between January and November of 2023, involving all patients with the aforementioned diseases who attended three psychiatric clinics. This study encompassed results from 1187 patients (women N = 675, 56.87%) who were classified into the following ranges: <25, 25-45, 45-65, and >65. Results: The average level of LDL was the highest in bipolar depression (112.442 ± 36.178 mg/dL) and the lowest in bipolar mania (111.25 ± 33.14 mg/dL). The average level of HDL was the highest in schizophrenia (58.755 ± 16.198 mg/dL) and the lowest in bipolar depression (45.584 ± 12.128 mg/dL). Both average levels of TC and TGA were the highest in patients with bipolar depression (188.403 ± 37.396 mg/dL and 149.685 ± 96.951 mg/dL, respectively) and the lowest in bipolar mania (164.790 ± 40.488 mg/dL and 100.679 ± 54.337 mg/dL, respectively). The average level of FPG was the highest in unipolar depression (94.00 ± 21.453 mg/dL) and the lowest in bipolar mania (89.492 ± 14.700 mg/dL). Conclusions: The results confirmed that lipid and glucose abnormalities were more common in people with schizophrenia and mood disorders (unipolar and bipolar).
ABSTRACT
Background: The health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is suboptimal because of the disease's life-threatening nature, the requirement for long-term lifestyle modifications, and the treatment regimens following MI. This study aimed to evaluate HRQOL and its associated factors in MI patients. Material and Methods: This study was conducted on patients with MI who attended the outpatient cardiology clinic at a major teaching hospital in Jordan. The EQ-5D-3L questionnaire was used to assess HRQOL of the study participants. Quantile regression analysis was conducted to identify the variables associated with HRQOL. Results: The study included 333 patients with a history of MI, with a median age of 58 (57-60). The median of the total EQ-5D score was 0.65 (0.216-0.805). Regression results revealed that male patients (Coefficient= 0.110, 95%Cl (0.022-0.197), P=0.014) and not being diagnosed with diabetes (Coefficient= 0.154, 95%Cl (0.042-0.266), P=0.007) were associated with increased HRQOL. On the other hand, low income (Coefficient= -0.115, 95%Cl (-0.203 - -0.026), P=0.011), not receiving DPP-4 (Dipeptidyl Peptidase -4) inhibitors (Coefficient= -0.321 95%Cl (-0.462 - -0.180), P<0.001), and having low (Coefficient= -0.271, 95%Cl (-0.395 - -0.147), P<0.001) or moderate (Coefficient= -0.123, 95%Cl (-0.202 - -0.044), P=0.002) medication adherence was associated with decreased HRQOL. Conclusion: The current study demonstrated diminished HRQOL among patients with MI, highlighting the necessity of tailoring interventions to tackle medication adherence barriers in this population. Personalized interventions such as educational programs, counseling, and reminders that consider each patient's needs and circumstances can greatly enhance medication adherence and, thus, the HRQOL of MI patients. Individuals with lower income levels, female patients, and those with diabetes should be the specific targets of these interventions.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated factors associated with anxiety and depression in COPD outpatients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 702 COPD outpatients from two major Jordanian hospitals using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was conducted. RESULTS: Significant associations were found with gender (Anxiety OR: 5.29, 95%CI: 2.38-11.74; Depression OR: 0.20, 95%CI: 0.08-0.51), disease severity (Anxiety OR: 2.97, 95%CI: 1.80-4.91; Depression OR: 15.95, 95%CI: 5.32-52.63), LABA use (Anxiety OR: 16.12, 95%CI: 8.26-32.26; Depression OR: 16.95, 95%CI: 8.33-34.48), medication count (Anxiety OR: 0.73, 95%CI: 0.59-0.90; Depression OR: 0.51, 95%CI: 0.40-0.64), mMRC score (Anxiety OR: 2.41, 95%CI: 1.81-3.22; Depression OR: 2.31, 95%CI: 1.76-3.03), and inhalation technique (Anxiety OR: 0.95, 95%CI: 0.93-0.97; Depression OR: 0.92, 95%CI: 0.90-0.95). Other factors associated with anxiety included high income, urban living, diabetes, hypertension, LAMA use, and fewer COPD medications. Depression was also linked with heart disease, increased age, and longer disease duration. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anxiety and depression among COPD patients necessitates targeted interventions. Future research that recruits a more diverse sample in multiple sites and establishes the cause-effect relationship between the study predictors and outcome could provide a more robust conclusion on factors associated with anxiety and depression among COPD patients.
Subject(s)
Depression , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Humans , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/epidemiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Outpatients , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Parenteral nutrition (PN) can be associated with several treatment-related problems (TRPs) and complications in neonatal settings. Thus, understanding the extent and type of these problems and related factors is pivotal to prevent negative consequences of these preparations. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess factors affecting TRPs in neonatal patients receiving PN. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of neonates receiving PN in NICU and other wards. We collected their demographics, and laboratory workup. TRPs related to PN preparations as well as their pharmacotherapy were the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Medical charts of 96 neonate were reviewed. The most encountered TRPs related to patients' pharmacotherapy were the lack of frequent monitoring (34.2%) and low dose (17.5%). For PN-related TPRs, a mismatch between patients' nutritional needs and PN composition was observed in third of the patients. Statistically significant positive correlations between number of medications during hospital stay and number of reported TRPs [(r = 0.275, p < 0.01) and (r = 0.532, p < 0.001)] were observed. CONCLUSION: In neonates who receive parenteral nutrition (PN), TRPs are often observed. These problems primarily arise from issues in patients' pharmacotherapy, namely monitoring and dosing. Identifying the risk factors for these TRPs emphasizes the full and effective integration of clinical pharmacists into the healthcare team, which can serve as a potential preventive strategy to lower the occurrence of TRPs.
Subject(s)
Parenteral Nutrition , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Parenteral Nutrition/adverse effects , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
A validated self-reported questionnaire was used to evaluate pharmacists' knowledge about isotretinoin and their awareness of isotretinoin dispensing practice. The majority were not able to recognize the initial dose of isotretinoin, the potential side effects such as dyslipidemia and liver toxicity, the potential interaction with tetracycline and Vitamin A and the contraindications of isotretinoin. Around 41.3 % of the pharmacists dispensed isotretinoin without a prescription, and the majority did not recognize that isotretinoin should be dispensed for only 30 days, should not be dispensed without an emphasis on the appropriate indication, and did not know the appropriate duration of isotretinoin therapy. Male gender and postgraduate degree were associated with better awareness, while increased work experience and postgraduate degree were associated with better knowledge about isotretinoin therapy. Nevertheless, both male and female pharmacists demonstrated equivalent knowledge levels. The current study demonstrates the need to implement educational programs to improve pharmacists' knowledge and awareness about isotretinoin and its dispensing practice.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is linked with high morbidity and mortality, particularly among the elderly. Because of the high incidence and accompanying financial expenses, accurate diagnosis and adequate care of this group hospitalized with CAP are required. The purpose of the study was to assess the level of adherence to CAP national guidelines at a private hospital, as well as the impact of adherence to these national recommendations on clinical outcomes. Methods: Data from electronic medical records of adult patients hospitalized with CAP between 2018 and 2019 were retrieved for a quantitative observational retrospective cohort research. Results: This study comprised 159 patients, with 76 patients (47.8%) receiving therapy according to the recommendations of the guidelines. A total of 75 (98.7%) of those patients were hospitalized across the ICU wards. In contrast, 98.4% (64/65) of patients who had received empiric antibiotic treatment within isolation floors were non-compliant. There was a statistically significant relationship between the level of adherence to CAP clinical guidelines and the following variables: The 72-hour reassessment (P = 0.01), medications altered OR retained when culture findings were revealed (P = 0.01), primary diagnosis (P = 0.028), and total intended period of antibiotic therapy (P = 0.007). Conclusions: According to the findings of this study, higher adherence to the guidelines amongst ICU patients was linked to better outcomes, such as a significant reduction in the overall planned period of antibiotic therapy. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Pneumonia , Community-Acquired Infections , Guideline Adherence , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Jordan , Hospitals, Private , Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
Background: Hospital pharmacists can play an important role in the detection, prevention, and reporting of adverse drug reaction (ADR) since they interact with patients in hospital settings. The ADR reporting practice by Pharm D students, who represent the future hospital pharmacists, has not been adequately investigated in the literature. Objective: To evaluate Pharm D students' knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding ADR reporting, and the associated barriers and motivators to ADR reporting during clinical training at different hospital sites in Jordan. Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted on sixth year pharm D students during clinical training at different hospital departments in different hospital sites Jordan. In addition to socio-demographic variables, a structured self-reported questionnaire was used to assess students' knowledge, attitude, practice, barriers, and motivators towards ADR reporting. Binary logistic regression was used to explore the variables associated with the study outcomes. Results: A total of 497 students participated in the study. The participants showed inadequate knowledge regarding ADR reporting, with a mean knowledge score of 3.20 (±1.78). On the other hand, the study participants showed positive attitude towards ADR reporting with a total mean score of 13.6 (±1.96). However, the ADR reporting practice was low with a mean score of 5.78 (±1.88). Not knowing how to report (60.2%) and not knowing where to report (55.9%) were the most common barriers to ADR reporting, while the most reported motivators for ADR reporting were seriousness of reaction (84.1%) and involvement of new drug (51.1%). Logistic regression analysis showed that time from the start of training (OR = 0.510; 95%CI = 0.305-0.852; P = 0.010), female gender (OR = 1.759; 95%CI = 1.083-2.857; P = 0.022), and attending a course/workshop about pharmacovigilance (OR = 0.213; 95%CI = 0.137-0.332; P = 0.00) were significant predictors of knowledge about ADR reporting. Increased age (OR = 0.93; 95%CI = 0.880-0.997; P = 0.041) and low knowledge (OR = 0.564; 95%CI = 0.380-0.837; P = 0.004) were significantly associated with negative attitude toward ADR reporting. Female gender (OR = 0.481; 95%CI = 0.302-0.766; P = 0.002) and attitude level (OR = 1.837; 95%CI = 1.205-2.802; P = 0.005) were significant predictors of ADR reporting practice. Conclusions: Pharm D students showed positive attitude towards ADR reporting, however, the knowledge and practice of ADR reporting were inadequate and the participants reported several barriers. Therefore, the topic of ADR reporting and pharmacovigilance, as well as, educational training programs need to be included in future pharmacy curriculum in order to improve students' awareness and practice of ADR reporting.
ABSTRACT
Background: Despite the availability of effective pharmacotherapy for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), health outcomes are suboptimal due to poor adherence to the prescribed treatment. Limited research has been conducted to investigate medication non-adherence and its associated factors among patients with RA. Objective: This study aimed to assess medication adherence and to explore the factors associated with medication non-adherence among outpatients with RA in Jordan. Methods: The current cross-sectional study was conducted at outpatient rheumatology clinics at two teaching hospitals in Jordan. Variables including socio-demographics and biomedical variables, in addition to disease and medication characteristics, were collected using medical records and custom-designed questionnaire. Medication adherence was assessed using the validated 5-item Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology. Stepwise Logistic Regression analysis was performed to identify the factors that are independently and significantly associated with medication non-adherence. Results: A total of 261 patients participated in the study, from which, 43.3% were found non-adherent. Binary regression analysis results revealed that low monthly income (OR= 0.239, CI= 0.130-0.440, P<0.01), the presence of chronic respiratory disease (OR= 2.727, CI= 1.059-7.022, P<0.05), lower medication necessity scores (OR= 1.177, CI= 1.10-1.259, P<0.01) and higher concerns about RA medications (OR= 0.917, CI= 0.860-0.978, P<0.01) were significant and independent predictors of medication non-adherence in patients with RA. Conclusion: Future pharmaceutical care and clinical pharmacy service programs should emphasize medications benefits and minimizing medication-related concerns by selecting safe medications and providing guidance on mitigating side effects, particularly for RA patients who have low income and those who suffer from other comorbid diseases. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Treatment Adherence and Compliance , Outpatients , Cross-Sectional Studies , Jordan , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pharmaceutical PreparationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of evidence regarding the real-world effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. This was the first study to evaluate the effectiveness of four types of vaccines against asymptomatic and symptomatic infection, and COVID-19 outcomes among the general population. METHODS: This was a matched comparison group quasi-experimental study conducted in Jordan between 1 January and 29 August 2021. In the first part of the study, 1200 fully vaccinated individuals were matched with 1200 unvaccinated control participants. In order to measure vaccine effectiveness, the infection rates of both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups were calculated. The second part of the study included measuring specific anti-SARS CoV-2 immune cells and antibodies. RESULTS: BNT162b2 (Pfizer, New York, NY, USA) showed a significantly higher effectiveness against asymptomatic COVID-19 infection (91.7%) and hospitalization (99.5%) than BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm, Beijing, China) (88.4% and 98.7%, respectively) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK) (84.3%, and 98.9%, respectively). The effectiveness rates of the Sputnik V (Gamaleya Research Institute, Moscow, Russia) vaccine against asymptomatic, symptomatic, and hospitalization were 100%, 100%, and 66.7%, respectively. The highest median anti-spike (S) IgG values were seen in individuals who received BNT162b2 (2.9 AU/mL) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (2.8 AU/mL) vaccines. The levels of anti-S IgG were significantly decreased after 7 months of vaccination with BNT162b2 and BBIBP-CorV. There were significant decreases in the median number of neutralizing antibodies one month and seven months after receiving BNT162b2 (from 88.5 to 75.2 4 Bioequivalent Allergen Unit per milliliter/mL), BBIBP-CorV (from 69.5 to 51.5 BAU/mL), and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (from 69.2 to 58.BAU/mL) vaccines. The highest percentage of T cells specific to COVID-19 vaccine was found in individuals who received BNT162b2 (88.5%). CONCLUSION: All four vaccines evaluated in this study showed effectiveness against asymptomatic COVID-19 infection, symptomatic infection, hospitalization, and death. Furthermore, BNT162b2, BBIBP-CorV, and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 induced high levels of immunology markers within one month of vaccination.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The study aims to examine the extent to which the updated ACC/AHA management of blood cholesterol guideline (2018) is implemented in practice and to assess the value of the clinical pharmacist interventions in improving physicians' adherence the guidelines recommendations. METHODS: We utilized in this study an interventional before-after design. The study was conducted on 272 adult patients who visited the study site internal medicine clinics and were candidates for statin therapy based on the 2018 ACC/AHA guidelines for cholesterol management. Adherence to guideline recommendations was measured before and after clinical pharmacists' interventions by calculating the percentage of patients receiving statin therapy as per guideline recommendation, the type and intensity (moderate or high intensity) of statin therapy used, and the need for additional non-statin therapy. RESULTS: Adherence with guideline recommendations was significantly improved from 60.3% to 92.6% (X2 = 79.1, p = 0.0001) after clinical pharmacist interventions. Among patients who were on statin therapy, the percentage of those who were on proper statin intensity increased significantly from 47.6% to 94.4% (X2 = 72.5, p = 0.0001). The combination of statins with non-statin therapies such as ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors increased from 8.5% to 30.6% (X2 = 95, p<0.0001) and from 0.0% to 1.6% (X2 = 6, p = 0.014), respectively. The use of other lipid-lowering agents was diminished from 14.6% to 3.2% (X2 = 19.2, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Collaboration between physicians and clinical pharmacists is a crucial strategy to improve patients' treatment and hence, achieve better health outcomes among patients suffering from dyslipidemia.
Subject(s)
Cardiology , Cardiovascular Diseases , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Hypercholesterolemia , Adult , Humans , United States , Proprotein Convertase 9 , Pharmacists , Hypercholesterolemia/drug therapy , Hypercholesterolemia/chemically induced , Cholesterol , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Guideline AdherenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19), Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV), and Sputnik V coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have been granted emergency approval in many nations, their safety has never been studied and compared in one community-based study. This study aimed to investigate and compare the incidence, nature, severity, and predictors of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) with COVID-19 vaccines. METHOD: This was a prospective observational study conducted in Jordan between 1 January and 21 September 2021. A team of pharmacists and nurses (n = 407) collected the local and systemic AEFIs of four COVID-19 vaccines by prospectively contacting participants registered in the national vaccination program platform. A red-flag technology was inserted to classify and track rare and serious AEFIs. RESULTS: This study included 658,428 participants who were vaccinated with 1,032,430 doses; 610,591, 279,606, 140,843, and 1390 participants received the first and second doses of the BNT162b2, BBIBP-CorV, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and Sputnik V vaccines, respectively. The overall incidence of AEFIs was 28.8%, and the overall rates of systemic, local, and immediate hypersensitivity AEFIs were 22.2%, 18.8%, and 0.5%, respectively. The highest proportions of immediate hypersensitivity AEFIs and systemic AEFIs were reported after administration of the Sputnik V vaccine and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 first dose, respectively. The most severe AEFIs were reported after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 first dose and BNT162b2 second dose. The hospitalization and mortality rates after vaccination were 20 in 10,000 and 1 in 10,000, respectively. Based on red-flag tracking, the top three outcome events were lymphadenopathy (157.9/100,000), anxiety disorders (136.6/100,000), and lower respiratory tract infection (100.9/100,000), with Guillain-Barré syndrome (1.8/100,000), vasculitis (3.0/100,000), and myopericarditis (4.8/100,000) being the least common. CONCLUSION: The incidence rates of local, systemic, and immediate hypersensitivity AEFIs of four COVID-19 vaccines occur frequently. High incidence rates of rare and serious AEFIs were reported in this study. Younger participants, females, those who had previously had COVID-19, and smokers were more likely to encounter AEFIs.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Hypersensitivity, Immediate , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/chemically induced , Jordan/epidemiology , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Objectives: The present study was carried out to identify and report the pattern of antibiotics prescribing to determine the adherence to the international empirical and therapeutic guidelines of antibiotic use. Methods: A point prevalence survey took place at a selected date of January 26, 2020, in which data collection was performed to all the patients present in the hospital who used at least one systemic antibiotic agent as an inpatient from 00:00 am until midnight of that day. This was performed using European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC audit tool). The participated hospital in this point prevalence study represents a major government hospital in the UAE. Descriptive statistics were used and results were expressed using standard statistical methods. Results: Out of the 125 hospitalized patients, a total of 41 (32.8%) patients were included in the survey and treated with different trends of antibiotics on the date point prevalence survey. The total number prescribed antibiotics was 54 with a higher percentage of treatment indication (70.4%), compared to prophylaxis indication (29.6%). The combinations of penicillins win in being the most commonly used agents by a percent of 31.5%, including the use of Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid by 22.2% and Piperacillin-tazobactam with 9.3%. The compliance with local/international guidelines accounts for 78.0% of the treated & prophylaxis patients. Conclusions: Considerable results have been obtained which can assure the quality improvement of the antibiotic use in the studied hospital. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Secondary Care , Hospitals , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Arab Emirates , PrevalenceABSTRACT
Objectives: Internationally, pharmacists have shown a pivotal role in alleviating the unprecedented spread of the COVID-19 as they are the first touchpoint to patients. The aim of this study to evaluate the UAE pharmacists' knowledge about and practice in the global COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted during a period from August 2020 to January 2021. A well-designed standardized English-based questionnaire was developed based on current literature and employed for this study. Findings: The results showed that 45.7% of the participated pharmacists expected to have a good level of knowledge about COVID-19 transmission, symptoms and treatment. Among the participated community pharmacists, around 25.7% educated their patients and 17.0% counseled the public about the current available therapeutic options for managing COVID-19 symptom. Most practiced activities hospital pharmacists (17.4%) was exploring new drug therapies or uses, while few hospital pharmacists (13.0%) participated in the antimicrobial stewardship programs and monitored antibiotic uses for COVID-19 cases and co-infections. Pharmacists at age ≥40 years old and have an experience of ≥10 years in the pharmacy field were more knowledgeable about COVID-19 with higher scores (p <0.001 and p= 0.001; respectively). Conclusions: The study revealed an appropriate average knowledge and practice toward COVID-19 among community and hospital pharmacists.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe antimicrobial prescribing patterns in hospitalized adult patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, and to determine the relationship between antimicrobial agent used and non-survival amongst the studied COVID-19 patients. Methods: This is an observational, retrospective study. Specialty Clinic Hospital in Jordan is selected as the study setting for this conducted study. The study comprised of all hospitalized adult patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 infection who were admitted to the hospital between October 2020 and December 2020. Findings: A total of 216 hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 were included in the analysis. The majority of patients were prescribed antibiotic agents (n=149, 69.0%). Almost half of the patients have been prescribed antivirals agent (n=111, 51.4%). Survivals were significantly more likely to have been prescribed third generation cephalosporin (19.8% vs 3.4%, p=0.02). Non-survivals were significantly more likely to be older in age (mean age: 70.5 vs 62.7 years, p=0.009), have higher mean Charleston Comorbidity Index Score (3.7 vs 2.7, p=0.01), have at least one comorbidity (93.1% vs 71.1%, p=0.008), had shortness of breath at admission (72.4% vs 50.8%, p=0.023) and were admitted to the ICU during current admission (96.6% vs 18.7%, p<0.001) compared to survivors. Non-survivals were significantly more likely to had increased levels of WBC count (41.4% vs 19.7%; p=0.034), increased neutrophiles count (72.4% vs 39.4%; p=0.004) and higher mean C-reactive protein (167.2 vs 103.6; p=0.001) at admission. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrated factors are associated with the non-survival, and additionally benchmarked the mortality rate, amongst the studied COVID 19 patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The relationship between COVID-19 patient's clinical characteristics and disease manifestation remains incompletely understood. The impact of ethnicity on mortality of patients with COVID-19 infection is poorly addressed in the literature. Emerging evidence suggests that many risk factors are related to symptoms severity and mortality risk, emphasizing the necessity of fulfilling this knowledge gap that may help reducing mortality from COVID-19 infections through tackling the risk factors. AIMS: To explore epidemiological and demographic characteristics of hospitalized COVID-19 patients from different ethnic origins living in the UAE, compare them to findings reported across the globe and determine the impact of these characteristics and ethnicity on mortality during hospitalization. METHODS: A single center, retrospective chart review study of hospitalized COVID-19 patients was conducted in a large COVID-19 referral hospital in UAE. The following outcomes were assessed: patients' clinical characteristics, disease symptoms and severity, and association of ethnicity and other risk factors on 30-day in hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 3296 patients were recruited in this study with an average age of 44.3±13.4 years old. Preliminary data analysis indicated that 78.3% (n = 2582) of cases were considered mild. Average duration of hospital stay was 6.0±7.3 days and 4.3% (n = 143) were admitted to ICU. The most frequently reported symptoms were cough (32.6%, n = 1075) and fever (22.2%, n = 731). The 30-day mortality rate during hospitalization was 2.7% (n = 90). Many risk factors were associated with mortality during hospitalization including: age, respiratory rate (RR), creatinine, and C-reactive protein, oxygen saturation (SaO2), hemoglobin, hematocrit, ferritin, creatinine, C-reactive protein, anemia, COPD, Chronic kidney disease, dyslipidemia, Vitamin-D Deficiency, and ethnic origin (p <0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that higher mortality rates during hospitalization was associated with anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease, and Middle Eastern origin (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The results indicated that most COVID-19 cases were mild and morality rate was low compared to worldwide reported mortality. Mortality rate during hospitalization was higher in patients from Middle East origin with preexisting comorbidities especially anemia, COPD, and chronic kidney disease. Due to the relatively small number of mortality cases, other identified risk factors from univariate analysis such as age, respiratory rate, and Vitamin-D (VitD) deficiency should also be taken into consideration. It is crucial to stratify patients on admission based on these risk factors to help decide intensity and type of treatment which, possibly, will reduce the risk of death.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/ethnology , COVID-19/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/pathology , COVID-19/therapy , Comorbidity , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acuity , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , United Arab Emirates/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Pregnant women with COVID-19 require special attention and care, since the infection does not only affect the mother, but also her neonate and adversely affects pregnancy outcomes. The main goal of this retrospective cohort study is to investigate association between the maternal COVID-19 severity and risk of developing adverse neonatal outcomes. Patients were stratified into asymptomatic/mild and moderate to severe COVID-19. The following neonatal outcomes were assessed: gestational age at the time of delivery, birth weight, neonatal infection, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. The average age of patients was 28.5 ± 1.4 years old and majority were multigravida (74.0%, n = 148). Of total 200 pregnant women with COVID-19, 26.5% (n = 53) had moderate/severe disease and presented with higher incidence of preterm delivery and low birth weight (88.7%, n = 47; p < 0.001). In addition, more than half of the newborns delivered by mothers with severe disease were infected by SARS-COV-2 (58.5%, n = 31) and majority were admitted to the NICU (95.0%, n = 52). Based on the multivariate logistic regression analysis, pregnant women with moderate to severe COVID-19 were at much higher risk of preterm delivery, lower birth weight, neonatal infection, as well as neonatal ICU admission (p < 0.001). In addition, multigravida women were at higher risk for preterm delivery and lower birth weight (p = 0.017 and p = 0.02; respectively). Appropriate protective measures and early detection of suspected COVID-19 should be addressed for more favorable obstetric outcomes.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Premature Birth/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Patient Acuity , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe antimicrobial prescribing patterns in hospitalized adult patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, and to determine the relationship between antimicrobial agent used and non-survival amongst the studied COVID-19 patients. Methods: This is an observational, retrospective study. Specialty Clinic Hospital in Jordan is selected as the study setting for this conducted study. The study comprised of all hospitalized adult patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 infection who were admitted to the hospital between October 2020 and December 2020. Findings: A total of 216 hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 were included in the analysis. The majority of patients were prescribed antibiotic agents (n=149, 69.0%). Almost half of the patients have been prescribed antivirals agent (n=111, 51.4%). Survivals were significantly more likely to have been prescribed third generation cephalosporin (19.8% vs 3.4%, p=0.02). Non-survivals were significantly more likely to be older in age (mean age: 70.5 vs 62.7 years, p=0.009), have higher mean Charleston Comorbidity Index Score (3.7 vs 2.7, p=0.01), have at least one comorbidity (93.1% vs 71.1%, p=0.008), had shortness of breath at admission (72.4% vs 50.8%, p=0.023) and were admitted to the ICU during current admission (96.6% vs 18.7%, p<0.001) compared to survivors. Non-survivals were significantly more likely to had increased levels of WBC count (41.4% vs 19.7%; p=0.034), increased neutrophiles count (72.4% vs 39.4%; p=0.004) and higher mean C-reactive protein (167.2 vs 103.6; p=0.001) at admission. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrated factors are associated with the non-survival, and additionally benchmarked the mortality rate, amongst the studied COVID 19 patients. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Pandemics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Anti-Infective Agents , Drug Prescriptions , Jordan , Retrospective Studies , HospitalizationABSTRACT
Objectives: Internationally, pharmacists have shown a pivotal role in alleviating the unprecedented spread of the COVID-19 as they are the first touchpoint to patients. The aim of this study to evaluate the UAE pharmacists knowledge about and practice in the global COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted during a period from August 2020 to January 2021. A well-designed standardized English-based questionnaire was developed based on current literature and employed for this study. Findings: The results showed that 45.7% of the participated pharmacists expected to have a good level of knowledge about COVID-19 transmission, symptoms and treatment. Among the participated community pharmacists, around 25.7% educated their patients and 17.0% counseled the public about the current available therapeutic options for managing COVID-19 symptom. Most practiced activities hospital pharmacists (17.4%) was exploring new drug therapies or uses, while few hospital pharmacists (13.0%) participated in the antimicrobial stewardship programs and monitored antibiotic uses for COVID-19 cases and co-infections. Pharmacists at age ≥40 years old and have an experience of ≥10 years in the pharmacy field were more knowledgeable about COVID-19 with higher scores (p <0.001 and p= 0.001; respectively). Conclusions: The study revealed an appropriate average knowledge and practice toward COVID-19 among community and hospital pharmacists. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Pharmacists , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Arab EmiratesABSTRACT
Objectives: The present study was carried out to identify and report the pattern of antibiotics prescribing to determine the adherence to the international empirical and therapeutic guidelines of antibiotic use. Methods: A point prevalence survey took place at a selected date of January 26, 2020, in which data collection was performed to all the patients present in the hospital who used at least one systemic antibiotic agent as an inpatient from 00:00 am until midnight of that day. This was performed using European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC - audit tool). The participated hospital in this point prevalence study represents a major government hospital in the UAE. Descriptive statistics were used and results were expressed using standard statistical methods. Results: Out of the 125 hospitalized patients, a total of 41 (32.8%) patients were included in the survey and treated with different trends of antibiotics on the date point prevalence survey. The total number prescribed antibiotics was 54 with a higher percentage of treatment indication (70.4%), compared to prophylaxis indication (29.6%). The combinations of penicillin's win in being the most commonly used agents by a percent of 31.5%, including the use of Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid by 22.2% and Piperacillin-tazobactam with 9.3%. The compliance with local/international guidelines accounts for 78.0% of the treated & prophylaxis patients. Conclusions: Considerable results have been obtained which can assure the quality improvement of the antibiotic use in the studied hospital.