Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 70(2): 221-4, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14993636

ABSTRACT

Previous studies using methods varying from traditional serologic tests to molecular biology techniques have shown that in northeastern Brazil, Entamoeba dispar was more prevalent than E. histolytica. In this study, the prevalence was established by using E. histolytica stool antigen detection kits and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with genomic DNA extracted from cultured trophozoites in all four-nuclei, amoeba-positive samples from a population living in Macaparana in northeastern Brazil. Among 1,437 stool samples analyzed, only 59 (4.1%) were positive for four nuclei amoeba. However, all of these samples were negative in an immunoenzymatic assay for the presence of E. histolytica-specific galactose adhesin. Of 59 cultivated samples, only 31 showed trophozoites. Extraction of DNA from these 31 samples, followed by the PCR, showed that 23 samples (74.19%) were positive for E. dispar and no amplification was observed for pathogenic E. histolytica. The remaining eight samples were negative for both species. These findings are consistent with those previously reported.


Subject(s)
DNA, Protozoan/analysis , Entamoeba histolytica/isolation & purification , Entamoeba/isolation & purification , Entamoebiasis/epidemiology , Feces/parasitology , Animals , Antigens, Protozoan/analysis , Brazil/epidemiology , Entamoeba/genetics , Entamoeba/immunology , Entamoeba histolytica/genetics , Entamoeba histolytica/immunology , Entamoebiasis/parasitology , Humans , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prevalence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...