Transforaminal epidural steroid injection for radiculopathy and the evolution to surgical treatment: a pragmatic prospective observational multicenter study.

Aim: The aim of this study is to analyze the real-world outcomes of transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) in all patients with radiculopathy and their long-term outcomes. Methods: Patients with radiculopathy and failure of conservative treatment were included in a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study. Results: In total, 117 patients were treated with one or two TFESIs. The mean duration of follow-up was 116 (±14) weeks. In total 19,6% (95% CI: 12.9-28.0%) patients were treated with surgery after insufficient symptom improvement. The evolution to surgery was not associated with etiology, symptom duration or previous spine surgery. Conclusion: Real-world data confirms that TFESIs is an effective treatment with satisfactory results in about 80% of patients for a period of 2 years.

This study focusses on evaluating the real-world effectiveness of transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) in treating radiculopathy, a condition characterized by back and leg pain due to compressed spinal nerves. This nerve compression can originate from different problems.A total of 117 patients with radiating leg pain were included in this study. The infiltrations were administered, and the primary outcome was the need for spinal surgery within 2 years. The findings revealed that approximately 20% of patients eventually required surgery due to unsatisfactory results after injections. However, for patients with satisfactory outcomes, there was a notable reduction in back and leg pain, disability and pain medication usage, along with an improved quality of life.Importantly, the results suggested that TFESIs could be considered as a treatment option in daily clinical practice, also after a prolonged duration of symptoms.Despite certain limitations, such as the absence of a control group undergoing immediate surgical treatment, the real-world data supported the effectiveness of TFESIs in treating radiculopathy. This information provides valuable insights for spine surgeons and pain physicians in understanding the prognosis of TFESIs across diverse patient scenarios.

Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion as a Feasible Treatment for Thoracolumbar Spondylodiscitis: A Multicenter Belgian Case-Series.

BACKGROUND: Spondylodiscitis is, after tissue sampling, initially managed with intravenous antibiotics. In patients with treatment failure, surgical debridement and stabilization is considered. An anterior or posterior approach has already been reported as a successful surgical access, but is associated with a large exposure and a significant morbidity. METHODS: We present a multicenter Belgian case-series on the use of a minimally invasive extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure with add-on percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for patients with a need for surgical debridement and tissue samples or intractable back pain due to spondylodiscitis. Patient characteristics, microbiology results, antibiotic treatment, pre- and postoperative Visual Analogue Pain Score (VAS) scores, time to bony consolidation, complications and duration of the hospital stay were collected. RESULTS: Seven patients with one level spondylodiscitis were included. The mean age 64 years with a mean preoperative VAS score of 8.86 ( ± 0.90). Postoperative VAS score significantly decreased to 2.57 (-70.3%, P < 0.001). Mean antibiotic treatment duration was 8 weeks. Median duration of the hospital stay was 14 days. Patients were followed for 1 year. Complete bony consolidation was observed in 6 out of 7 patients after 1 year. One patient had a stable pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that extreme lateral interbody fusion topped off with a percutaneous pedicle screw fixation might be a feasible, safe and valuable choice to surgically treat patients with spondylodiscitis with fast and important improvement in VAS. Further prospective research might strengthen the sparsely existing literature of minimally invasive surgery for spondylodiscitis to provide the best possible care.

Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion) versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in Spinal Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine are often treated with posterior interbody fusion surgery (posterior lumbar interbody fusion [PLIF]) for spinal instability or intractable back pain with neurologic impairment. Several lateral, less invasive procedures have recently been described (lateral lumbar interbody fusion [LLIF]/direct lateral interbody fusion/extreme lateral interbody fusion [XLIF]). The aim of this systematic review is to compare structural and functional outcomes of lateral surgical approaches to PLIF. METHODS: We conducted a MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library search for studies focusing on outcomes and complications comparing LLIF (direct lateral interbody fusion/XLIF) and PLIF. The systematic review was reported using the PRISMA criteria. RESULTS: In total, 1000 research articles were identified, of which 5 studies were included comparing the outcomes and complications between the lateral and posterior approach. Three studies found significantly less perioperative blood loss with a lateral approach. Average hospital stay was shorter in populations who underwent the lateral approach compared with PLIF. Functional outcomes (visual analog scale score/Oswestry Disability Index) were similar or better with LLIF. In most of the included studies, complication rates did not differ between the posterior and lateral approach. Most of the neurologic deficits with XLIF/LLIF were temporary and healed completely within 1 year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A lateral approach (XLIF/LLIF) is a good and safe alternative for PLIF in single-level degenerative lumbar diseases, with comparable functional outcomes, shorter hospital stays, and less blood loss. Future prospective studies are needed to establish the role of lateral minimally invasive approaches in spinal degenerative surgery.

Decompression of the internal auditory canal via the retrosigmoid approach in a patient with Camurati-Engelmann disease: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Camurati-Engelmann disease (CED) is a rare condition characterized by hyperostosis of the long bones and skull base. Symptoms include contractures and pain in affected extremities but can also include manifestations of cranial hyperostosis such as intracranial hypertension, Chiari malformation, exophthalmia, frontal bossing, and several cranial neuropathies due to cranial foraminal stenosis. OBSERVATIONS: This report describes a 27-year-old patient with suspected CED who developed progressive intermittent facial nerve paresis, hemifacial spasms, and a decrease in hearing. There were no symptoms of increased intracranial pressure or vertigo. Radiological evaluation showed a significant thickening of the skull base with serious bilateral internal auditory canal stenosis. Because of the progressive nature of the aforementioned cranial neuropathies in combination with the correlating severe radiological compression, a surgical decompression of the facial nerve and vestibulocochlear nerve was performed via a retrosigmoid approach with intraoperative monitoring. Postoperative facial nerve function was intact. Hearing and vestibular function were unchanged. There were no more episodes of facial nerve palsy or spasm. LESSONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report to describe decompression of the internal auditory canal via a retrosigmoid approach for symptomatic facial and cochlear nerve compression in a patient with CED.

Complete Transection of Optic Nerve After Endovascular Coiling of a Large Ophthalmic Artery Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: We describe a patient who developed delayed blindness of the left eye at 5 weeks after endovascular coiling of a large ophthalmic aneurysm. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 44-year-old male was admitted with visual decline due to compression of the optic nerve by a large ophthalmic aneurysm. The aneurysm was treated by endovascular coiling, but visual function was unchanged. One month and 7 days later, the patient developed sudden blindness of the affected eye, despite complete angiographical occlusion of the aneurysm. Surgical exploration in an attempt to restore vision showed a fully thrombosed aneurysm but, surprisingly, complete transection of the optic nerve just proximal to its entry into the optic canal. CONCLUSIONS: This report describes a rare complication of a sudden increase in size of a large ophthalmic aneurysm despite successful endovascular occlusion.