Hiding in plain sight: Misinterpretation of immunogenic DPB epitopes within G/P groups. Short running title: The impact of HLA G and P codes on DPB.

The clinical impact of HLA DP antibodies is poorly understood, resulting in variable clinical strategies for transplant candidates and recipients with donor-directed HLA-DP antibodies. Complicating matters further, the DPB naming convention is not based on allelic homology and requires sequence alignments to identify potential immunogenic epitopes. Historically, G and P codes, which consolidated alleles that were identical over Exon 2, were used to simplify the reporting of HLA Class II typing as differences outside of Exon 2 have not been considered immunogenic (i.e., able to induce an antibody response). Herein, we present four cases demonstrating that polymorphisms at codons 96R/K and 170I/T, in Exon 3 of DPB, are targets for alloantibody recognition. These regions "hide in plain sight" due to the current use of G/P code-level typing, potentially leading to incorrect compatibility assessments (i.e., virtual crossmatches) and misinterpreted antibody responses. The unintentional crossing of an HLA-DPB donor-specific antibody (DSA) in a solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant may lead to unforeseen deleterious clinical outcomes. Our data underscore the complexities of DPB histocompatibility assessments and highlight the need for adaptable systems that align with evolving research and clinical outcomes.

Mitigating the Prozone-Like Effect in HLA Antibody Testing: A Case Report of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange for Antibody-Mediated Rejection Post-Heart Transplantation.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a cornerstone treatment for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) post-organ transplantation, aiming to eliminate pathogenic donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). However, limitations in HLA antibody interpretation due to the prozone-like effect (PLE) can lead to inaccurate assessment of treatment efficacy. We present a case of a heart transplant recipient with suspected AMR, where an unexpected increase in DSA levels post-TPE prompted investigation into PLE. Solid-phase Luminex assays were employed to detect HLA antibodies. Serum was run neat as well as after treatment with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Nephelometry was used to detect complement levels. Laboratory analysis of pre-TPE serum revealed higher DSA levels with EDTA treatment, characteristic of PLE. Complement measurements supported complement-mediated interference in the pre-TPE sample. This case underscores the importance of being aware that PLE can occur in HLA testing and can impact the interpretation of TPE efficacy for AMR.

A case of Tn polyagglutination discovered by an ABO blood group discrepancy.

BACKGROUND: Tn syndrome is an acquired form of polyagglutination arising from somatic mutations of hematopoietic stem cells. Tn red blood cells (RBCs) are agglutinable by naturally occurring anti-Tn antibodies in most adult sera. Current ABO typing reagents are monoclonal and do not detect polyagglutination on forward typing. However, herein we describe a case of Tn activation that was suspected due to cross-reactivity with a monoclonal anti-A reagent. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 63-year-old man with myeloproliferative neoplasm, who historically typed as group O, demonstrated unexpected mixed field reactivity with anti-A reagent using a gel-based method. However, manual tube testing was consistent with the patient's historical group O type. RESULTS: Lectin testing demonstrated reactivity with Salvia sclarea and Glycine soja, but not Arachis hypogea. The patient's RBCs produced positive crossmatches with healthy donor sera, but reactivity was eliminated by ficin pretreatment of the RBCs. Ficin treatment also resolved typing discrepancies on gel-based typing. No reactivity was noted using cord blood sera, and N antigen expression was diminished upon phenotyping. Tn activation was confirmed by detection of a novel 4-nucleotide deletion (c.395-398del) in exon 3 of C1GALT1C1 resulting in a truncated glycosyltransferase. CONCLUSION: This case of acquired Tn polyagglutination due to a novel mutation was first suspected from an ABO phenotyping discrepancy. It highlights the cross-reactivity of anti-A reagent with Tn antigen when tested on a common gel-based method. Furthermore, the case demonstrates that review of patient history and test information can clarify discrepancies and guide resolution.