ABSTRACT
Most anticancer molecules are administered in body-size-based dosing schedules, bringing up unsolved issues regarding pharmacokinetic data in heavy patients. The worldwide spread of obesity has not been matched by improved methods and strategies for tailored drug dosage in this population. The weight or body surface area (BSA)-based approaches may fail to fully reflect the complexity of the anthropometric features besides obesity in cancer patients suffering from sarcopenia. Likewise, there is a lack of pharmacokinetic data on obese patients for the majority of chemotherapeutic agents as well as for new target drugs and immunotherapy. Therefore, although the available findings point to the role of dose intensity in cancer treatment, and support full weight-based dosing, empirical dose capping often occurs in clinical practice in order to avoid toxicity. Thus a panel of experts of the Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM), Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD), Società Italiana Endocrinologia (SIE), and Società Italiana Farmacologia (SIF), provides here a consensus statement for appropriate cytotoxic chemotherapy and new biological cancer drug dosing in obese patients.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Neoplasms , Physicians , Consensus , Humans , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Obesity/complicationsABSTRACT
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a common cause of cancer-related death, due to difficulties in detecting early-stage disease, to its aggressive behaviour, and to poor response to systemic therapy. Therefore, developing strategies for early diagnosis of resectable PC is critical for improving survival. Diabetes mellitus is another major public health problem worldwide. Furthermore, diabetes can represent both a risk factor and a consequence of PC: nowadays, the relationship between these two diseases is considered a high priority for research. New-onset diabetes can be an early manifestation of PC, especially in a thin adult without a family history of diabetes. However, even if targeted screening for patients at higher risk of PC could be a promising approach, this is not recommended in asymptomatic adults with new-onset diabetes, due to the much higher incidence of hyperglycaemia than PC and to the lack of a safe and affordable PC screening test. Prompted by a well-established and productive multidisciplinary cooperation, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), the Italian Medical Diabetologists Association (AMD), the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), and the Italian Society of Pharmacology (SIF) here review available evidence on the mechanisms linking diabetes and PC, addressing the feasibility of screening for early PC in patients with diabetes, and sharing a set of update statements with the aim of providing a state-of-the-art overview and a decision aid tool for daily clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Physicians , Consensus , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Humans , Medical Oncology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The surgical success rate in macroprolactinomas is quite low, while medical treatment is more effective in reducing PRL levels and tumour mass. In this study the effectiveness of surgical, medical and radiant approaches on clinical symptoms, PRL levels and tumour size were compared in a large series of patients with macroprolactinomas. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients (63 males and 69 females) were followed-up. Eighty-three patients were operated by trans-sphenoidal (TSS) approach: 18 underwent only TSS, 10 were operated and then irradiated; 30 patients underwent TSS and dopamine agonists, 25 were treated by TSS, radiotherapy and dopamine agonists. One hundred and four patients were treated by medical therapy: 49 patients were only administered dopamine agonists and 55 were given dopamine agonists after unsuccessful surgery and/or radiotherapy. RESULTS: In 83 patients serum PRL levels decreased from 1873+/-319.9 ng/ml to 831.6+/-297.8 ng/ml after trans-sphenoidal surgery: a significant PRL reduction was obtained in 18 cases (22%) and a full PRL normalization was found in 15 patients (18%). The pituitary adenoma was completely removed in the 15 cases, in whom serum PRL normalized. Sexual function was restored in 57 percent; of women and in 29 percent; of men. In contrast, dopaminergic drugs normalized PRL levels (from 1590.5+/-232.7 to 19.2+/-4.8 ng/ml) in 93/104 patients (89 percent;). Sexual function was restored in 74 percent; of women and in 75 percent; of men. Radiotherapy, performed after unsuccessful TSS, was ineffective in normalizing PRL levels. CONCLUSIONS: Medical therapy should be considered the first choice treatment in macroprolactinomas, while the surgical approach is recommended when neurological compressive symptoms are present and in patients resistant or intolerant to dopamine agonists. Radiotherapy may be indicated only in the patients in whom medical and surgical therapy have not been successful.
