ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Three-column spinal osteotomies (3-CO) are powerful techniques used to correct spinal deformity. These surgeries are associated with an elevated risk of complications. While outcomes have been reported in the literature with 2 years follow-up, longer-term outcomes of three-column osteotomies remain understudied. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine patient reported outcomes and complications for three-column osteotomies at 5 years. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected spinal deformity cases database. PATIENT SAMPLE: All consecutive adult patients at a single spine surgery center treated with either a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) or vertebral column resection (VCR) for spinal deformity, and with a minimum 5-year follow-up were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual-analog scale (VAS) for back pain score (0 to 10), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (0 to 100), number of complications, revision rate, sagittal balance, lumbar lordosis at preoperative and at 5-year visit. METHODS: Data was extracted from a prospectively collected spinal deformity surgery database continuously updated since 2002 with data from operative reports, patients' medical visit notes and patients' self-reported VAS and ODI questionnaires completed at each office visit. Radiographic measurements were performed on standing full-length spine radiographs taken at pre-op and 5-year visits. Descriptive statistics, comparison of means and proportions among groups, and a logistic regression analysis were conducted using the statistical software package SPSS version 28. Statistical significance was set at p<.05. RESULTS: Of 127 consecutive adult patients with minimum of 5-year follow-up undergoing a 3-CO posterior spinal surgery for spinal deformity were identified and included in the study, 79 (62%) were treated with PSO, and 48 (38%) with VCR. Both PSO and VCR groups demonstrated significant improvements in VAS (PSO pre-op: 6.7, 5-year: 4.6, p<.001; VCR pre-op: 7.1, 5-year: 5.2, p<.001), and ODI (PSO pre-op: 52.9, 5-year: 45.4, p<.001; VCR pre-op: 57.5, 5-year 43.0, p<.001) that were maintained at 5 years. Major and minor complications occurring within 5 years were not statistically different between the PSO and VCR groups (major: 59.5% vs 56.3%, p=.85; minor: 45.6% vs 37.5%, p=.46). The rate of revision surgery within 5 years was 39.4% overall. Of the fifty patients requiring revision, 37.5% were for nonunion, 27.1% instrumentation failure, 14.6% proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), 12.5% vertebral fracture, 6.3% motor weakness, and 2.1% infection. Improvements in lumbar lordosis were maintained at 5 years in both the PSO (29.9° vs 47.2°, p<.001) and VCR (34.6° vs 48.5°, p<.001) groups while sagittal balance maintained significant improvement in the VCR group (9.5 cm vs 6.3 cm, p=.008) but not the PSO (11.4 cm vs 9.3 cm, p=.065). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing three-column osteotomies had a major complication rate of 57.5% and a minor complication rate of 42.5% after 5 years. Improvements in lumbar lordosis were maintained at 5-year follow-up, but sagittal balance was only maintained in the VCR group. Despite these radiographic findings, both VCR and PSO groups maintained significant clinical improvements in both VAS and ODI scores at 5-year follow up.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To determine if performing a simultaneous laminectomy at an unfused level adjacent to an instrumented fusion increases the risk of adjacent segment disease(ASD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Laminectomy adjacent to instrumented fusion has uncertain outcomes. The increased mechanical forces at the unfused laminectomy may lead to more ASD. Few studies have examined the development of ASD with regards to laminectomy performed adjacent to instrumented fusions. METHODS: 789 patients underwent instrumented lumbar fusion and laminectomy at the same level(s) (n=676) or with an additional adjacent level laminectomy (n=113) with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Diagnoses were degenerative spondylosis (n=241), degenerative spondylolisthesis (n=485) and isthmic spondylolisthesis (n=63) in addition to central stenosis. Primary outcome measures included development of ASD, time to development of ASD, revision surgery, and time to revision surgery. RESULTS: The adjacent laminectomy group developed ASD at a significantly greater rate of 57.5% (n=65), compared with 35.2% (n=238) of the non-adjacent laminectomy group (P<0.001). Revision surgery rate was also greater in the adjacent laminectomy group (22.1% v 13.5%, P<0.001). There was no difference in time to revision surgery (31.1 v 32.6 mo, P=0.71) or time to ASD development (31.2 v 32.3 mo, P=0.72). ODI and VAS scores did not differ, nor did patient baseline demographics including sex, BMI, Charleston Comorbidity Index, and tobacco use. The exception was the adjacent laminectomy group average age was 67.6 while the non-adjacent laminectomy group average age was 62.3 (P<0.001). However, age was not found to be an independent predictor of ASD development (P=0.44). CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be cautious when performing a laminectomy adjacent to an instrumented fusion, as this increases the rate of ASD as well as revision surgery.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative analysis of prospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sacroiliac (SI) screw fixation ipsilateral to hand dominance compared to bilateral fixation impacts personal hygiene (wiping) after toileting. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with long arthrodesis (≥T12-pelvis) who had undergone primary unilateral or bilateral SI fixation with a minimum of 2-years-follow-up. RESULTS: 117 consecutive patients were included and separated into 2 groups: bilateral SI fixation (BL, n = 61) and unilateral SI fixation (UNI, n = 56), with no difference in age. Of UNI patients, 10.7% (6) performed personal hygiene with a different hand after surgery, compared to 6.6% (4) of patients who received BL fixation (P = 0.422). All UNI patients who switched hands were right-hand dominant, and 5/6 received right-sided fixation. There was no statistical difference found between number of levels fused (<8, 9-11, or >11 levels) and changes in personal hygiene habits. Over a third of patients from both groups had difficulty performing personal hygiene after fusion (UNI = 39.3% BL = 36.1%, P = 0.719). CONCLUSION: SI screws increase the difficulty of performing personal hygiene; yet, the side of unilateral screws does not significantly change personal hygiene habits when compared to bilateral screw placement. Moreover, the length of the construct does not have a significant impact on ability to perform personal hygiene, cause changes in habits, or require the assistance of another individual. However, among our sample of individuals, bilateral fixation did result in a higher rate of revision instrumentation.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine if local administration of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) reduces postoperative pain scores and narcotic use in spinal deformity patients. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing elective spinal fusion (7 or more levels) for scoliosis or kyphosis were selected for inclusion. Patients received either periincisional injections of combined liposomal and standard bupivacaine (n = 90, group L) or standard bupivacaine only (n = 69, group C). Perioperative pain scores (VAS [visual analogue scale]), opioid use, length of stay, functional outcome (ODI [Oswestry Disability Index]), and perioperative complications were recorded. No external funding was received for this study. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age was 54.2 years of age). No significant baseline demographic differences were noted between the 2 groups. Group L experienced slight improvements in pain control on postoperative day (POD) 1 (P = .02). No difference in pain scores were otherwise noted. Group L transitioned off of intravenous (IV) narcotics faster with 52.6% less IV use by POD3 (P = .03). No differences in total narcotic consumption, perioperative complications, lengths of stay, and functional outcome scores were otherwise noted between the 2 cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The use of LB in adult spinal deformity surgery does not appear to provide clinically important improvements in postoperative pain at the manufacturer's recommended dosage. Furthermore, while patients receiving LB may transition more quickly off of IV narcotics, this does not appear to translate into an overall decrease in narcotic consumption, hasten return of bowel function, or decrease hospital lengths of stay. Future prospective randomized control trials are warranted. The use of varying dosages of LB may also help further clarify the true efficacy of LB in the setting of spinal deformity surgery.
