Investigation of donor-derived Strongyloides stercoralis infection in multiple solid organ transplant recipients-California, Michigan, Ohio, 2022.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention led an investigation to determine if Strongyloides infection in a right kidney recipient was an existing chronic infection, or if the infection was transmitted from an infected organ donor. METHODS: Evidence regarding the organ donor and organ recipients Strongyloides testing, treatment, and risk factors were gathered and evaluated. The case classification algorithm created by the Disease Transmission Advisory Committee was utilized. RESULTS: The organ donor had risk factors for Strongyloides infection; the banked donor specimen, submitted for serology testing 112 days post-donor death, was positive. The right kidney recipient was negative for Strongyloides infection pretransplant. Strongyloides infection was diagnosed via small bowel and stomach biopsies. The left kidney recipient had risk factors for Strongyloides infection. Two posttransplant Strongyloides antibody tests were negative at 59 and 116 days posttransplant; repeat antibody tests returned positive at 158 and 190 days posttransplant. Examination of bronchial alveolar lavage fluid collected 110 days posttransplant from the heart recipient showed a parasite morphologically consistent with Strongyloides species. She subsequently developed complications from Strongyloides infection, including hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated strongyloidiasis. Based on the evidence from our investigation, donor-derived strongyloidiasis was suspected in one recipient and proven in two recipients. CONCLUSION: The results of this investigation support the importance of preventing donor-derived Strongyloides infections by laboratory-based serology testing of solid organ donors. Donor positive testing results would direct the monitoring and treatment of recipients to avoid severe complications.

Global engagement of pharmacists in test and treat initiatives: Bringing care from clinics to communities.

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has placed substantial strain on the global health care workforce, disrupting essential and nonessential services. Task sharing of test and treat services to nontraditional prescribers, such as pharmacists, can facilitate more resilient health care systems by expanding access to health services while simultaneously decreasing the pressure on traditional health care providers. Expansion of pharmacists' scope of work has historically been hindered by sociopolitical, resourcing, and competency considerations; addressing these challenges will be key to including pharmacists in testing and treatment of priority diseases. Sociopolitical considerations include migrating to flexible national legislation and scope of practices as well as engagement with other health care providers and the public to increase the acceptance of pharmacists participating in test and treat services. Resourcing issues include health care financing for test and treat services to parallel established systems or use voucher systems and service competition. In addition, pharmacists can use their training in supply chain management to ease and prevent medication stockouts in test to treat initiatives. Investments in technologies that support disease surveillance, basic reporting, and interoperability with health management information systems can integrate these initiatives into health care systems. Competency considerations comprise test and treat specific education for the pharmacy profession to equip them with the knowledge and confidence to execute successfully. Monitoring and evaluating the outcomes of these services can facilitate the scalability of test and treat initiatives. Pharmacists are uniquely positioned to bring testing and treatment from the clinic to the community.

Effects of Patient Characteristics on Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Samples for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.

We evaluated the performance of self-collected anterior nasal swab (ANS) and saliva samples compared with healthcare worker-collected nasopharyngeal swab specimens used to test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We used the same PCR diagnostic panel to test all self-collected and healthcare worker-collected samples from participants at a public hospital in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Among 1,076 participants, 51.9% were men, 57.1% were >50 years of age, 81.2% were Black (non-Hispanic), and 74.9% reported >1 chronic medical condition. In total, 8.0% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Compared with nasopharyngeal swab samples, ANS samples had a sensitivity of 59% and saliva samples a sensitivity of 68%. Among participants tested 3-7 days after symptom onset, ANS samples had a sensitivity of 80% and saliva samples a sensitivity of 85%. Sensitivity varied by specimen type and patient characteristics. These findings can help physicians interpret PCR results for SARS-CoV-2.