Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 43
Filter
1.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 362, 2023 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37718378

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The mortality risk after appendicectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis is predicted to be higher than in the general population given the associated risk of perioperative bleeding, infections and liver decompensation. This population-based cohort study aimed to determine the 90-day mortality risk following emergency appendicectomy in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy in England between January 2001 and December 2018 were identified from two linked primary and secondary electronic healthcare databases, the clinical practice research datalink and hospital episode statistics data. Length of stay, re-admission, case fatality and the odds ratio of 90-day mortality were calculated for patients with and without cirrhosis, adjusting for age, sex and co-morbidity using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 40,353 patients underwent appendicectomy and of these 75 (0.19%) had cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis were more likely to be older (p < 0.0001) and have comorbidities (p < 0.0001). Proportionally, more patients with cirrhosis underwent an open appendicectomy (76%) compared with 64% of those without cirrhosis (p = 0.03). The 90-day case fatality rate was 6.67% in patients with cirrhosis compared with 0.56% in patients without cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis had longer hospital length of stay (4 (IQR 3-9) days versus 3 (IQR 2-4) days and higher readmission rates at 90 days (20% vs 11%, p = 0.019). Most importantly, their odds of death at 90 days were 3 times higher than patients without cirrhosis, adjusted odds ratio 3.75 (95% CI 1.35-10.49). CONCLUSION: Patients with cirrhosis have a threefold increased odds of 90-day mortality after emergency appendicectomy compared to those without cirrhosis.


Subject(s)
Appendectomy , Liver Cirrhosis , Adult , Humans , Cohort Studies , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/surgery , England/epidemiology , Databases, Factual
2.
Clin Nutr ; 42(7): 1189-1201, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37244753

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is a risk-factor for adverse postoperative outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of post-discharge oral nutritional supplements (ONS) on outcomes in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: The Medline and Embase databases were searched for randomised clinical trials in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery who had received ONS for at least two weeks after discharge from hospital. The primary endpoint was weight change. Secondary endpoints included quality of life, total lymphocyte count, total serum protein and serum albumin. Analysis was performed using RevMan5.4 software. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with 2480 participants (1249 ONS/1231 controls) were included. Pooling of results revealed that a reduction in postoperative weight loss in patients taking ONS, when compared with control: overall weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.69 kg, 95% CI -2.98 to -0.41, P = 0.01. Serum albumin concentration was increased in the ONS group: WMD = 1.06 g/L, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.07, P = 0.04. Haemoglobin was also increased: WMD = 2.91 g/L, 95% CI 0.58 to 5.25, P = 0.01. Total serum protein, total lymphocyte count, total cholesterol and quality of life did not differ between the groups. Patient compliance was relatively poor across the studies and there was variability in the composition of ONS, volume consumed and surgical procedures performed. CONCLUSIONS: There was a reduction in postoperative weight loss and an improvement in some biochemical parameters in patients receiving ONS after gastrointestinal surgery. Future RCTs with more consistent methodologies are needed to investigate the efficacy of ONS after discharge from hospital following gastrointestinal surgery.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Malnutrition , Humans , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Patient Discharge , Quality of Life , Aftercare , Malnutrition/prevention & control , Serum Albumin , Weight Loss , Dietary Supplements
3.
HPB (Oxford) ; 25(2): 189-197, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36435712

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This population-based cohort study aimed to determine postoperative outcomes after emergency and elective cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Linked electronic healthcare data from England were used to identify all patients undergoing cholecystectomy between January 2000 and December 2017. Length of stay (LOS), re-admission, case fatality and the odds ratio of 90-day mortality were calculated for patients with and without cirrhosis, adjusting for age, sex and co-morbidity using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the total 69,141 eligible patients who underwent a cholecystectomy, 511 (0.74%) had cirrhosis. In patients without cirrhosis 86.55% underwent a laparoscopic procedure compared with 57.53% in patients with cirrhosis (p < 0.0001). LOS was longer in those with cirrhosis (3 IQR 1-8 vs 1 IQR 1-3 days,p < 0.0001). 90-day re-admission was greater in patients with cirrhosis, 36.79% compared with 14.95% in those without cirrhosis. 90-day case fatality after elective cholecystectomy in patients with and without cirrhosis was 2.79% and 0.43%; and 12.82% and 2.39% following emergency cholecystectomy. This equated to a 3-fold (OR 3.22, IQR 1.72-6.02) and a 4-fold (OR 4.52, IQR 2.46-8.33) increased odds of death at 90-days following elective and emergency cholecystectomy after adjusting for confounders. CONCLUSION: Patients with cirrhosis undergoing cholecystectomy have an increased 90-day risk of postoperative mortality, which is significantly worse after emergency procedures.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Humans , Cohort Studies , Cholecystectomy , Liver Cirrhosis , England , Length of Stay , Retrospective Studies
6.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 48(4): 2831-2839, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35583669

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare patterns and mechanisms of injuries during and after the UK Nationwide lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included all major trauma admissions during the 10-week period of the nationwide lockdown (09/03/2020-18/05/2020), compared with admissions in the 10-weeks following the full lifting of lockdown restrictions (04/07/20-12/09/2020). Differences in the volume, spectrum and mechanism of injuries presenting during and post-lockdown were compared using Fisher's exact and Chi-squared tests as appropriate. The associated risk of 30-day mortality was examined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 692 major trauma admissions were included in this analysis. Of these, 237 patients were admitted during the lockdown and 455 patients were admitted post-lockdown. This represented a twofold increase in trauma admission between the two periods. Characteristically, both cohorts had a higher proportion of male patients (73.84% male during lockdown and 72.5% male post-lockdown). There was a noted shift in age groups between both cohorts with an overall more elderly population during lockdown (p = 0.0292), There was a significant difference in mechanisms of injury between the two cohorts. The 3-commonest mechanisms during the lockdown period were: Road traffic accidents (RTA)-31.22%, Falls of less than 2 m-26.58%, and falls greater than 2 m causing 22.78% of major trauma admissions. However, in the post-lockdown period RTAs represented 46.15% of all trauma admissions with falls greater than 2 m causing 17.80% and falls less than 2 m causing 15.16% of major trauma injuries. With falls in the elderly associated with an increased risk of mortality. In terms of absolute numbers, there was a twofold increase in major trauma injuries due to stabbings and shootings, rising from 25 admitted patients during the lockdown to 53 admitted patients post-lockdown. CONCLUSIONS: The lifting of lockdown restrictions resulted in a twofold increase in major trauma admissions that was also associated with significant changes in both the demographic and patterns of injuries with RTA's contributing almost half of all injury presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was classed as a service evaluation and registered with the local audit department, registration number: 20-177C.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Trauma Centers , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , United Kingdom/epidemiology
7.
World J Surg ; 46(3): 531-541, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34988603

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: With the global prevalence of liver cirrhosis rising, this systematic review aimed to define the perioperative risk of mortality in these patients following appendicectomy. METHODS: Systematic searches of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, ICTRP, and Clinical trials.gov were undertaken to identify studies including patients with cirrhosis undergoing appendicectomy, published since database inception to March 2021. Studies had to report mortality. Two review authors independently identified eligible studies and extracted data. Pooled analysis of in-patient and 30-day mortality was performed. RESULTS: Of the 948 studies identified, four were included and this comprised three nationwide database studies (USA and Denmark) and one multi-centre observational study (Japan). A total of 923 patients had cirrhosis and 167,211 patients did not. In-patient mortality ranged from 0 to 1.7% in patients with cirrhosis and 0.17 to 0.3% in patients without. 30-day mortality was 9% in patients with cirrhosis compared to 0.3% in those without. One study stratified cirrhotic patients into compensated and decompensated groups. In patients with compensated cirrhosis, mortality following laparoscopic appendicectomy (0.5%) was significantly lower than open appendicectomy (3.2%). The meta-analysis highlighted a tenfold increase in perioperative mortality in cirrhotic patients (OR 9.92 (95% CI 4.67 to 21.06, I2 = 28%). All studies reported an increased length of stay in patients with cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: This review suggests that appendicectomy in the cirrhotic population is associated with increased mortality. LA may be safer in this population. Lack of information on cirrhosis severity and failure to control for age and co-morbidities make the results difficult to interpret. Further large population-based studies are required.


Subject(s)
Appendectomy , Liver Cirrhosis , Appendectomy/adverse effects , Humans , Japan , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Observational Studies as Topic
8.
World J Surg ; 46(1): 1-9, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34704146

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgeon burnout has implications for patient safety and workforce sustainability. The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of burnout among surgeons in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This cross-sectional online survey was set in the UK National Health Service and involved 601 surgeons across the UK of all specialities and grades. Participants completed the Maslach Burnout Inventory and a bespoke questionnaire. Outcome measures included emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation and low personal accomplishment, as measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). RESULTS: A total of 142 surgeons reported having contracted COVID-19. Burnout prevalence was particularly high in the emotional exhaustion (57%) and depersonalisation (50%) domains, while lower on the low personal accomplishment domain (15%). Burnout prevalence was unrelated to COVID-19 status; however, the greater the perceived impact of COVID-19 on work, the higher the prevalence of emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation. Degree of worry about contracting COVID-19 oneself and degree of worry about family and friends contacting COVID-19 was positively associated with prevalence on all three burnout domains. Across all three domains, burnout prevalence was exceptionally high in the Core Trainee 1-2 and Specialty Trainee 1-2 grades. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight potential undesirable implications for patient safety arising from surgeon burnout. Moreover, there is a need for ongoing monitoring in addition to an enhanced focus on mental health self-care in surgeon training and the provision of accessible and confidential support for practising surgeons.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Surgeons , Burnout, Psychological , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Pandemics , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2 , State Medicine , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom/epidemiology
9.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 37(3): 446-454, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34657310

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the incidence of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) in patients with acute pancreatitis and assess the effects of therapeutic anticoagulation. METHODS: Systematic searches of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were undertaken to identify studies reporting the incidence and outcomes associated with SVT in patients with acute pancreatitis. The pooled incidence, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. PROSPERO database registration no. CRD 42021230912. RESULTS: Only 18 of the 238 studies identified met the inclusion criteria. Of the 943 patients who had SVT, 264 (28.0%) received anticoagulation. The pooled incidence of SVT at first presentation of acute pancreatitis was 15% (95% CI 5 to 26%), but was 17% (95% CI 14 to 20%) in all studies. Recanalization was more likely to occur in the anticoagulation-treated than in the untreated group (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.83, P = 0.007). There were no differences in hemorrhagic complications (OR 2.27, 95% CI 0.81 to 6.37, P = 0.12) or overall mortality (OR 2.37, 95% CI 0.86 to 6.52, P = 0.10) in relation to the use of anticoagulation. The overall incidence of portal hypertension in patients was 60% (95% CI 55 to 65%). However, it was not possible to determine the incidence in each group. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of SVT in patients with acute pancreatitis is significant. Treatment with anticoagulants improved the odds of recanalization but did not increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications or overall mortality.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Pancreatitis , Venous Thrombosis , Acute Disease , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Humans , Incidence , Pancreatitis/epidemiology , Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy , Venous Thrombosis/epidemiology
10.
World J Surg ; 46(2): 441-449, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34762141

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Perioperative bleeding poses a major risk during liver surgery, which can result in increased transfusion requirements, morbidity, and mortality. Tranexamic acid (TXA) effectively reduces perioperative bleeding and transfusion requirements in trauma patients. However, there remains a lack of evidence of its use in liver surgery. This meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of TXA in liver resection and transplantation. METHOD: A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and Clinicaltrials.gov databases was undertaken to identify studies from January 1947 to September 2021. The outcomes of the need for blood transfusion, thromboembolic events and mortality were extracted from the included studies. Quantitative pooling of data was based on the random effects model. RESULTS: Six studies reporting on 429 patients were included. TXA reduced the need for perioperative blood transfusion in liver resection and transplantation (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.72). More importantly, TXA did not increase the incidence of thromboembolic events (OR 2.22; 95% CI 0.47 to 10.43) and mortality (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.13 to 2.76). CONCLUSION: TXA safely reduces the need for blood transfusion in patients undergoing liver resection and transplantation.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents , Tranexamic Acid , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Blood Transfusion , Humans , Liver , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use
12.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 37(3): 607-616, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34894289

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis undergoing colectomy have a higher risk of postoperative mortality, but contemporary estimates are lacking and data on associated risk and longer term outcomes are limited. This study aimed to quantify the risk of mortality following colectomy by urgency of surgery and stage of cirrhosis. DATA SOURCES: Linked primary and secondary-care electronic healthcare data from England were used to identify all patients undergoing colectomy from January 2001 to December 2017. These patients were classified by the absence or presence of cirrhosis and severity. Case fatality rates at 90 days and 1 year were calculated, and cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio of postoperative mortality controlling for age, gender and co-morbidity. RESULTS: Of the total, 36,380 patients undergoing colectomy, 248 (0.7%) had liver cirrhosis, and 70% of those had compensated cirrhosis. Following elective colectomy, 90-day case fatality was 4% in those without cirrhosis, 7% in compensated cirrhosis and 10% in decompensated cirrhosis. Following emergency colectomy, 90-day case fatality was higher; it was 16% in those without cirrhosis, 35% in compensated cirrhosis and 41% in decompensated cirrhosis. This corresponded to an adjusted 2.57 fold (95% CI 1.75-3.76) and 3.43 fold (95% CI 2.02-5.83) increased mortality risk in those with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis, respectively. This higher case fatality in patients with cirrhosis persisted at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Patients with cirrhosis undergoing emergency colectomy have a higher mortality risk than those undergoing elective colectomy both at 90 days and 1 year. The greatest mortality risk at 90 days was in those with decompensation undergoing emergency surgery.


Subject(s)
Colectomy , Elective Surgical Procedures , Cohort Studies , Colectomy/adverse effects , England/epidemiology , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/surgery , Retrospective Studies
13.
Clin Nutr ; 40(11): 5482-5485, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34656029

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Immune modulating nutrition (IMN) has been shown to reduce postoperative infectious complications and length of stay in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Two studies of IMN in patients undergoing surgery for head and neck cancer also suggested that this treatment might improve long-term survival and progression-free survival. In the present study, we analysed follow-up data from our previous randomised controlled trial of IMN, in patients undergoing surgery for oesophagogastric and pancreaticobiliary cancer, in order to evaluate the long-term impact on survival of postoperative IMN versus an isocaloric, isonitrogenous control feed. METHODS: This study included patients undergoing surgery for cancers of the pancreas, oesophagus and stomach, who had been randomised in a double-blind manner to receive postoperative jejunostomy feeding with IMN (Stresson, Nutricia Ltd.) or an isonitrogenous, isocaloric feed (Nutrison High Protein, Nutricia) for 10-15 days. The primary outcome was long-term overall survival. RESULTS: There was complete follow-up for all 108 patients, with 54 patients randomised to each group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups by demographics [(age, p = 0.63), sex (p = 0.49) or site of cancer (p = 0.25)]. 30-day mortality was 11.1% in both groups. Mortality in the intervention group was 13%, 31.5%, 70.4%, 85.2%, 88.9%, and 96.3% at 90 days, and 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years respectively. Corresponding mortality in the control group was 14.8%, 35.2%, 68.6%, 79.6%, 85.2% and 98.1% (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Early postoperative feeding with arginine-enriched IMN had no impact on long-term survival in patients undergoing surgery for oesophagogastric and pancreaticobiliary cancer.


Subject(s)
Arginine/administration & dosage , Enteral Nutrition/mortality , Food, Fortified , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/therapy , Postoperative Care/mortality , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Enteral Nutrition/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/mortality , Humans , Immunomodulation , Length of Stay , Male , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Period , Time Factors
14.
World J Surg ; 45(11): 3266-3277, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34383090

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Presentation at academic conferences is an important marker of research productivity. However, not all accepted abstracts progress to full publication, and there is anecdotal evidence suggesting an imbalance in sex and ethnicity amongst presenters. There is a lack of data evaluating the outcome of prize presentation sessions at academic surgical conferences in the UK. This study aimed to analyse the outcomes and demographics from presentations at prize sessions at two prestigious UK surgical conferences. METHODS: This retrospective observational study compared data on all Moynihan (Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland) and Patey (Surgical Research Society) prize presentations from 2000 to 2020. The primary outcome was rate of publication. Secondary outcomes included demographic differences in sex and ethnicity, publication according to prize outcome, academic affiliation, time to publication, and journal impact factor. RESULTS: Some 442 accepted abstracts were identified over the 21-year period, with 71.0% from the Moynihan sessions and 79.3% from the Patey sessions leading to full publications, with a median time to publication of 448 days (IQR 179-859) in journals with relatively high impact factors (median 5.00; IQR 3.15-6.36). Of the 442 prize presenters, 85 (19.2%) were female. The majority of the presenters were White males (211, 47.7%), followed by Asian males (112, 25.3%). However, there was a continuously increasing overall trend of female presenters from 2000 to 2020 (P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Publication rates from the two prize sessions were high, with presenters publishing in journals with high impact factors. There, however, was a disparity in sex and ethnicity amongst presenters.


Subject(s)
Awards and Prizes , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Ireland , Male , Publishing , Societies, Medical , United Kingdom
15.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 47(3): 637-645, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33559697

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The global pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has impacted population health and care delivery worldwide. As information emerges regarding the impact of "lockdown measures" and changes to clinical practice worldwide; there is no comparative information emerging from the United Kingdom with regard to major trauma. METHODS: This observational study from a UK Major Trauma Centre matched a cohort of patients admitted during a 10-week period of the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic (09/03/2020-18/05/2020) to a historical cohort of patients admitted during a similar time period in 2019 (11/03/2019-20/05/2019). Differences in demographics, Clinical Frailty Scale, SARS-CoV-2 status, mechanism of injury and injury severity were compared using Fisher's exact and Chi-squared tests. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses examined the associated factors that predicted 30-days mortality. RESULTS: A total of 642 patients were included, with 405 in the 2019 and 237 in the 2020 cohorts, respectively. 4/237(1.69%) of patients in the 2020 cohort tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. There was a 41.5% decrease in the number of trauma admissions in 2020. This cohort was older (median 46 vs 40 years), had more comorbidities and were frail (p < 0.0015). There was a significant difference in mechanism of injury with a decrease in vehicle related trauma, but an increase in falls. There was a twofold increased risk of mortality in the 2020 cohort which in adjusted multivariable models, was explained by injury severity and frailty. A positive SARS-CoV-2 status was not significantly associated with increased mortality when adjusted for other variables. CONCLUSION: Patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic were older, frailer, more co-morbid and had an associated increased risk of mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Infection Control , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Trauma Severity Indices , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/classification , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Wounds and Injuries/surgery
16.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 64(4): 484-496, 2021 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33496485

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer has the second highest mortality of any malignancy, and venous thromboembolism is a major postoperative complication. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the variation in incidence of venous thromboembolism after colorectal cancer resection. DATA SOURCES: Following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines (PROSPERO, ID: CRD42019148828), Medline and Embase databases were searched from database inception to August 2019 including 3 other registered medical databases. STUDY SELECTION: Two blinded reviewers screened studies with a third reviewer adjudicating any discordance. Eligibility criteria: Patients post colorectal cancer resection aged ≥18 years. Exclusion criteria: Patients undergoing completely endoscopic surgery and those without cancer resection. Selected studies were randomized controlled trials and population-based database/registry cohorts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty- and 90-day incidence rates of venous thromboembolism per 1000 person-years following colorectal cancer surgery. RESULTS: Of 6441 studies retrieved, 28 met inclusion criteria. Eighteen were available for meta-analysis reporting on 539,390 patients. Pooled 30- and 90-day incidence rates of venous thromboembolism following resection were 195 (95% CI, 148-256, I2 99.1%) and 91 (95% CI, 56-146, I2 99.2%) per 1000 person-years. When separated by United Nations Geoscheme Areas, differences in the incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism were observed with 30- and 90-day pooled rates per 1000 person-years of 284 (95% CI, 238-339) and 121 (95% CI, 82-179) in the Americas and 71 (95% CI, 60-84) and 57 (95% CI, 47-69) in Europe. LIMITATIONS: A high degree of heterogeneity was observed within meta-analyses attributable to large cohorts minimizing within-study variance. CONCLUSION: The incidence of venous thromboembolism following colorectal cancer resection is high and remains so more than 1 month after surgery. There is clear disparity between the incidence of venous thromboembolism after colorectal cancer surgery by global region. More robust population studies are required to further investigate these geographical differences to determine valid regional incidence rates of venous thromboembolism following colorectal cancer resection.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Adult , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Databases, Factual , Geography/trends , Humans , Incidence , Observational Studies as Topic , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnosis , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thrombosis/diagnosis , Venous Thrombosis/epidemiology , Venous Thrombosis/etiology , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control
20.
Clin Nutr ; 40(3): 1405-1412, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32933783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: International guidance advocates the avoidance of prolonged preoperative fasting due to its negative impact on perioperative hydration. This study aimed to assess the adherence to these guidelines for fasting in patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery in the East Midlands region of the UK. METHODS: This prospective audit was performed over a two-month period at five National Health Service (NHS) Trusts across the East Midlands region of the UK. Demographic data, admission and operative details, and length of preoperative fasting were collected on adult patients listed for emergency and elective surgery. RESULTS: Of the 343 surgical patients included within the study, 50% (n = 172) were male, 78% (n = 266) had elective surgery and 22% (n = 77) underwent emergency surgery. Overall median fasting times (Q1, Q3) were 16.1 (13.0, 19.4) hours for food and 5.8 (3.5, 10.7) hours for clear fluids. Prolonged fasting >12 h was documented in 73% (n = 250) for food, and 21% (n = 71) for clear fluids. Median fasting times from clear fluids and food were longer in the those undergoing emergency surgery when compared with those undergoing elective surgery: 13.0 (6.4, 22.6) vs. 4.9 (3.3, 7.8) hours, and 22.0 (14.0, 37.4) vs. 15.6 (12.9, 17.8) hours respectively, p < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Despite international consensus on the duration of preoperative fasting, patients continue to fast from clear fluids and food for prolonged lengths of time. Patients admitted for emergency surgery were more likely to fast for longer than those having elective surgery.


Subject(s)
Fasting/adverse effects , Preoperative Care/methods , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Adult , Aged , Clinical Audit , Dehydration/etiology , Elective Surgical Procedures , Emergency Treatment , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...