A pre-visit video/question prompt list intervention to increase youth question-asking about attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during pediatric visits.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of an ADHD question prompt list with video intervention to increase youth question-asking and provider education about ADHD during visits. METHODS: English-speaking youth ages 11-17 with ADHD and their caregivers were enrolled from two pediatric clinics. Youth were randomized to intervention or usual care groups. Intervention group adolescents watched the video and then completed an ADHD question prompt list before their visits. Multivariable regression was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Twenty-one providers and 102 of their patients participated. Intervention group youth were significantly more likely to ask one or more questions about ADHD and its treatment than usual care youth (odds ratio=5.4, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI)= 1.8, 15.9). Providers were significantly more likely to educate youth who asked one or more questions during visits about more ADHD medication areas (unstandardized beta=0.98, 95 % CI=0.31 to 1.64) and more non-medication strategies for ADHD (unstandardized beta=0.50, 95 % CI=0.13 to 0.88). CONCLUSION: The intervention increased youth question-asking about ADHD and its treatment. Providers provided more education to youth who asked one or more questions about ADHD and its treatment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Providers and practices should consider having youth complete ADHD question prompt lists and watch the video before visits to increase youth question-asking during visits.

Disseminating a health information website to teens using a three-pronged approach with social media outreach.

Objective: To disseminate iuveo.org, a new health information website, primarily to teens in the United States using a three-pronged approach of social media, in-person, and emails. Methods: Dissemination methods included a combination of in-person, email, and social media campaigns starting in August 2022 to reach teens and stakeholders focused on teen health. Following the Social Marketing Theory framework, a social media campaign was implemented utilizing Instagram and X (formerly Twitter). Website analytics, including monthly usage of iuveo, was measured utilizing Google Analytics. The intrinsic analytics from X and Instagram were also tracked. Results: From August 2022-July 2023, iuveo attracted 1338 unique users to the website. In the same time frame, 1085 accounts were reached on Instagram, and 14,367 impressions were received on X. Most website users (84.8%) were classified as 'direct' acquisition, meaning that they directly typed in the URL or clicked on a link, and 7.3% of users visited iuveo from a social media platform. Conclusion: A three-pronged dissemination strategy is beneficial when disseminating a new health information website. Innovation: Utilizing a three-pronged approach with a social media campaign based on Social Marketing Theory, a health information website was disseminated to youth in the United States.

A Previsit Intervention's Influence on Glaucoma Topics Discussed between Black Patients and Providers.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to conduct a randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a previsit glaucoma video/question prompt list intervention, and to examine the impact on how often providers educate Black patients about glaucoma and glaucoma medication topics during visits. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial of a glaucoma question prompt list/video intervention. PARTICIPANTS: Black patients with a diagnosis of glaucoma who are taking 1 or more glaucoma medications and report being nonadherent. METHODS: One hundred eighty-nine Black patients with glaucoma were enrolled and assigned to either a usual care or an intervention group where they watched a video emphasizing the importance of asking questions and received a glaucoma question prompt list to complete before clinic visits. Visits were audio-taped and patients were interviewed after visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether the provider educates about different glaucoma and glaucoma medication topics. RESULTS: Patients in the intervention group were significantly more likely to ask providers 1 or more questions about glaucoma and its treatment. Providers were significantly more likely to educate intervention patients about their diagnosis (P = 0.001), intraocular pressure (P = 0.03), the likelihood of the need for long-term therapy (P = 0.001), and the physical changes associated with glaucoma (P = 0.001) than usual-care patients. Providers were also significantly more likely to educate intervention patients about the purpose of their medications (P = 0.03) and side effects (P = 0.001) than usual-care patients. Providers only educated 29% of patients about adherence (33% of intervention group patients and 25% of usual-care patients). Few providers educated patients about barriers and fears/concerns in using glaucoma medications, the cost of medications and insurance coverage, how to administer eye drops, and nasolacrimal occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention significantly increased provider education about many glaucoma and glaucoma medication topics. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Co-designing a website with and for youth, so they can better manage their health.

Objective: To co-design a website aimed to empower youth to ask questions to encourage productive, meaningful conversations with their health care providers. Methods: The research team recruited adolescent stakeholders (ages 11-17) through flyers distributed at local Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA) locations, clinics, and school nurses. Eleven adolescents who had at least one chronic medical condition were selected as members of the two youth advisory boards. Youth participated in five co-design meetings to give input on website content and refinement over a two-and-a-half-year period. The youth reviewed the website in various stages of development. Results: Youth wanted a website with simple, straightforward language that would be understood by someone between the ages of 11-17 years with a reputable URL. The website content includes ADHD, asthma, vaping/smoking, diabetes, seizures, anxiety, panic disorder, depression, addiction, stimulants, bullying, eating disorders, and sexually transmitted infections. Youth wanted general background content, helpful resources, question prompt lists, and videos encouraging youth involvement in care. Conclusions: A credible co-designed website with information on different health topics that contains question prompt lists and videos for utilization during health care visits has the potential to increase adolescent involvement in their care. Innovation: This website is an innovative intervention aimed at informing and encouraging youth to be more actively involved in their care across a range of healthcare conditions.

Improving Black Patient Question-Asking and Provider Education During Glaucoma Visits.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to conduct a randomized, controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a previsit glaucoma video/question prompt list intervention to increase Black patient question-asking and provider education about glaucoma and glaucoma medications during visits. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial of a glaucoma question prompt list/video intervention. PARTICIPANTS: Black patients with a glaucoma diagnosis who were currently taking 1 or more glaucoma medications and reported being nonadherent. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-nine Black patients with glaucoma were enrolled into a randomized, controlled trial and assigned to either a usual care or an intervention group where they watched a video emphasizing the importance of asking questions and received a glaucoma question prompt list to complete before clinic visits. Visits were audiotaped and patients were interviewed after visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were if the patient asked 1 or more questions about glaucoma and glaucoma medications and the number of glaucoma and glaucoma medication areas the provider educated the patient about during the visit. RESULTS: Patients in the intervention group were significantly more likely to ask 1 or more questions about glaucoma than patients in the usual care group (odds ratio, 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-10.4). Patients in the intervention group were significantly more likely to ask 1 or more questions about glaucoma medications than patients in the usual care group (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.5-5.4). Patients in the intervention group were significantly more likely to receive more areas of education about glaucoma from their providers during visits (ß = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.49-1.4). Patients who asked 1 or more questions about glaucoma medications were significantly more likely to receive more areas of education about glaucoma medications from providers (ß = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.5). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention increased patient question-asking about glaucoma and glaucoma medications and provider education about glaucoma. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Provider use of a participatory decision-making style with African American patients with glaucoma.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether non-adherent African American patients with glaucoma who received a question prompt list and video intervention were more likely to be given treatment options, have their input included into treatment regimens, and rate their providers as using more of a participatory decision-making style. METHODS: African American patients with glaucoma taking one or more glaucoma medications and reported being non-adherent were randomized to a pre-visit video and glaucoma question prompt list intervention or usual care. RESULTS: 189 African American patients with glaucoma participated. Providers gave patients treatment choices during 5.3% of visits and included patient input into treatment regimen decisions during 2.1% of visits. Male patients and patients with more years of education were significantly more likely to rate their providers as using more of a participatory decision-making style. CONCLUSION: African American patients with glaucoma rated their providers high on using a participatory decision-making style. Yet, providers infrequently presented non-adherent patients with medication treatment options, and it was rare for providers to include patient input into treatment decisions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Providers should provide non-adherent patients with different glaucoma treatment options. Non-adherent African American patients with glaucoma should be encouraged to ask their providers for different medication treatment options.

Acceptance of a Pre-visit Intervention to Engage African American Glaucoma Patients during Visits.

SIGNIFICANCE: The glaucoma question prompt list/video intervention was well received by patients. Eighty-seven percent of patients recommended that other patients should watch the educational video before their visits, and 89% said that other patients should complete the question prompt list before visits. PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to (a) describe patient feedback on a glaucoma question prompt list/video intervention designed to motivate African American patients to be more engaged during visits and (b) examine patient demographics associated with acceptance of the intervention. METHODS: We are conducting a randomized controlled trial of a glaucoma question prompt list/video intervention. African American patients with glaucoma were enrolled and assigned to a control group or an intervention group where they watched a video emphasizing the importance of asking questions and received a prompt list to complete before visits. All patients were interviewed after visits and are being followed up for 12 months. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-nine African American patients with glaucoma were enrolled into the larger trial. Of the 93 patients randomized to the intervention group, 89% said that patients should complete the prompt lists before visits, and 87% recommended that patients should watch the video before visits. Older patients were significantly less likely to believe that other patients should watch the video before their visits (t = -3.7, P = .04). Patients with fewer years of education were significantly more likely to rate the video as being more useful than patients with more years of education (Pearson correlation, -0.27; P = .01). Patients who reported being less adherent on the visual analog scale were more likely to rate the video as being more useful (Pearson correlation, -0.23; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the question prompt list/video was accepted by the majority of African American patients who received the intervention.

A Contemporary Analysis of Dual Inflatable Penile Prosthesis and Artificial Urinary Sphincter Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Inflatable penile prostheses and artificial urinary sphincters are used to treat men with erectile dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence, respectively. After prostate cancer treatment men often experience erectile dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence. Dual prosthetic implantation can improve the quality of life of these men. We evaluated reoperation outcomes in men who underwent dual implantation compared to each device implanted individually. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried the SPARCS (New York State Department of Health Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative) database for men who underwent inflatable penile prosthesis and/or artificial urinary sphincter insertion between 2000 and 2014. The primary outcomes were the inflatable penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter reoperation rates (revision, replacement or removal). Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the association of dual implantation with reoperation. Adjusted time to event analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Median followup in the inflatable penile prosthesis cohort was 66 months (IQR 25-118) and in the artificial urinary sphincter cohort it was 69 months (IQR 27-121). Compared with men who received a penile prosthesis alone those with a penile prosthesis and an artificial urinary sphincter had a higher likelihood of undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis reoperation at 1 year (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.32-3.27, p <0.01) and 3 years (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.69-3.99, p <0.01). Compared with an artificial urinary sphincter alone patients with an inflatable penile prosthesis and an artificial urinary sphincter did not have a higher likelihood of undergoing artificial urinary sphincter reoperation at 1 year (p = 0.76) or 3 years (p = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Combined inflatable penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter insertion portends a higher likelihood of inflatable penile prosthesis reoperation at 1 and 3 years. However, artificial urinary sphincter outcomes remain comparable. These findings should be used to better counsel patients about the risk of reoperation when undergoing dual implantation.