Effectiveness of an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour as a personalised secondary prevention strategy for patients with coronary artery disease: main outcomes of the SIT LESS randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: A high sedentary time is associated with increased mortality risk. Previous studies indicate that replacement of sedentary time with light- and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity attenuates the risk for adverse outcomes and improves cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with cardiovascular disease are more sedentary compared to the general population, while daily time spent sedentary remains high following contemporary cardiac rehabilitation programmes. This clinical trial investigated the effectiveness of a sedentary behaviour intervention as a personalised secondary prevention strategy (SIT LESS) on changes in sedentary time among patients with coronary artery disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation. METHODS: Patients were randomised to usual care (n = 104) or SIT LESS (n = 108). Both groups received a comprehensive 12-week centre-based cardiac rehabilitation programme with face-to-face consultations and supervised exercise sessions, whereas SIT LESS participants additionally received a 12-week, nurse-delivered, hybrid behaviour change intervention in combination with a pocket-worn activity tracker connected to a smartphone application to continuously monitor sedentary time. Primary outcome was the change in device-based sedentary time between pre- to post-rehabilitation. Changes in sedentary time characteristics (prevalence of prolonged sedentary bouts and proportion of patients with sedentary time ≥ 9.5 h/day); time spent in light-intensity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; step count; quality of life; competencies for self-management; and cardiovascular risk score were assessed as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Patients (77% male) were 63 ± 10 years and primarily diagnosed with myocardial infarction (78%). Sedentary time decreased in SIT LESS (- 1.6 [- 2.1 to - 1.1] hours/day) and controls (- 1.2 [ ─1.7 to - 0.8]), but between group differences did not reach statistical significance (─0.4 [─1.0 to 0.3]) hours/day). The post-rehabilitation proportion of patients with a sedentary time above the upper limit of normal (≥ 9.5 h/day) was significantly lower in SIT LESS versus controls (48% versus 72%, baseline-adjusted odds-ratio 0.4 (0.2-0.8)). No differences were observed in the other predefined secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with coronary artery disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation, SIT LESS did not induce significantly greater reductions in sedentary time compared to controls, but delivery was feasible and a reduced odds of a sedentary time ≥ 9.5 h/day was observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register: NL9263. Outcomes of the SIT LESS trial: changes in device-based sedentary time from pre-to post-cardiac rehabilitation (control group) and cardiac rehabilitation + SIT LESS (intervention group). SIT LESS reduced the odds of patients having a sedentary time >9.5 hours/day (upper limit of normal), although the absolute decrease in sedentary time did not significantly differ from controls. SIT LESS appears to be feasible, acceptable and potentially beneficial, but a larger cluster randomised trial is warranted to provide a more accurate estimate of its effects on sedentary time and clinical outcomes. CR: cardiac rehabilitation.

Sedentary Behaviour Intervention as a Personalised Secondary Prevention Strategy (SIT LESS) for patients with coronary artery disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation: rationale and design of the SIT LESS randomised clinical trial.

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are more sedentary compared with the general population, but contemporary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes do not specifically target sedentary behaviour (SB). We developed a 12-week, hybrid (centre-based+home-based) Sedentary behaviour IntervenTion as a personaLisEd Secondary prevention Strategy (SIT LESS). The SIT LESS programme is tailored to the needs of patients with CAD, using evidence-based behavioural change methods and an activity tracker connected to an online dashboard to enable self-monitoring and remote coaching. Following the intervention mapping principles, we first identified determinants of SB from literature to adapt theory-based methods and practical applications to target SB and then evaluated the intervention in advisory board meetings with patients and nurse specialists. This resulted in four core components of SIT LESS: (1) patient education, (2) goal setting, (3) motivational interviewing with coping planning, and (4) (tele)monitoring using a pocket-worn activity tracker connected to a smartphone application and providing vibrotactile feedback after prolonged sedentary bouts. We hypothesise that adding SIT LESS to contemporary CR will reduce SB in patients with CAD to a greater extent compared with usual care. Therefore, 212 patients with CAD will be recruited from two Dutch hospitals and randomised to CR (control) or CR+SIT LESS (intervention). Patients will be assessed prior to, immediately after and 3 months after CR. The primary comparison relates to the pre-CR versus post-CR difference in SB (objectively assessed in min/day) between the control and intervention groups. Secondary outcomes include between-group differences in SB characteristics (eg, number of sedentary bouts); change in SB 3 months after CR; changes in light-intensity and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity; quality of life; and patients' competencies for self-management. Outcomes of the SIT LESS randomised clinical trial will provide novel insight into the effectiveness of a structured, hybrid and personalised behaviour change intervention to attenuate SB in patients with CAD participating in CR. Trial registration number NL9263.

Safety and long-term effects of renal denervation: Rationale and design of the Dutch registry.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous renal denervation (RDN) has recently been introduced as a treatment for therapy-resistant hypertension. Also, it has been suggested that RDN may be beneficial for other conditions characterised by increased sympathetic nerve activity. There are still many uncertainties with regard to efficacy, safety, predictors for success and long-term effects. To answer these important questions, we initiated a Dutch RDN registry aiming to collect data from all RDN procedures performed in the Netherlands. METHODS: The Dutch RDN registry is an ongoing investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre cohort study. Twenty-six Dutch hospitals agreed to participate in this registry. All patients who undergo RDN, regardless of the clinical indication or device that is used, will be included. Data are currently being collected on eligibility and screening, treatment and follow-up. RESULTS: Procedures have been performed since August 2010. At present, data from 306 patients have been entered into the database. The main indication for RDN was hypertension (n = 302, 99%). Patients had a mean office blood pressure of 177/100 (±29/16) mmHg with a median use of three (range 0-8) blood pressure lowering drugs. Mean 24-hour blood pressure before RDN was 157/93 (±18/13) mmHg. RDN was performed with different devices, with the Simplicity™ catheter currently used most frequently. CONCLUSION: Here we report on the rationale and design of the Dutch RDN registry. Enrolment in this investigator-initiated study is ongoing. We present baseline characteristics of the first 306 participants.

Acute myocardial infarction due to coronary artery embolism in a patient with atrial fibrillation.

A 66-year-old female was referred for primary coronary intervention because of acute inferior STelevation myocardial infarction. Electrocardiography also showed atrial fibrillation. Coronary angiography showed a distal occlusion of the right coronary artery. Two different wires did not pass the occlusion, but dislodged the apparent thrombus more distally. No abnormalities were seen in the course of the recanalised part of the vessel. The sequential angiographic images together with the presence of atrial fibrillation are highly suggestive of coronary embolism as the cause of the myocardial infarction. Anticoagulation and rate control strategy was initiated. The patient was discharged in good condition. (Neth Heart J 2009;17:297-9.).

Outcome and quality of life one year after percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians.

BACKGROUND: While percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly being performed in octogenarians, little is known about the quality of life (QOL) one year after PCI. We assessed the one-year outcome and QOL after PCI. METHODS: Outcome and QOL at one year were assessed in patients of 80 years and older who underwent PCI at our institution. We used the RAND-36 Health Survey to assess health-related QOL at follow-up. The EuroSCORE was used for reference risk assessment. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients (mean age 82.7+/-2.9 years; 60% female) underwent PCI. Acute PCI was performed in 36% of the patients. Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class before the procedure was class III for 28% and class IV for 64%. Of the patients, 98% were in the highest-risk group (additive EuroSCORE 6+). The overall PCI success rate was 94%. Mortality at one year was 19% (38% acute vs. 12% elective PCI). At followup, general health was rated as fairly good and better then before PCI (CCS I and II: 77%). RAND-36 scores for the mental component were better than scores for the physical component. Physical functioning (41+/-28) and role limitations caused by physical health problems (32+/-37) had the worst scores. The mental component vitality had the lowest (55+/-20) and mental health the highest (70+/-21) score. Social functioning was in general good (67+/-26). CONCLUSION: Octogenarians have a high mortality risk following PCI, especially in acute PCI. In survivors QOL is acceptable with a better mental than physical score. In general, PCI in octogenarians has a positive effect on health perception, with less symptoms of angina pectoris. (Neth Heart J 2008;16:117-22.).

Measurement of leg blood pressure: the most straightforward way to the diagnosis.

Two adult patients with presumed primary hypertension are presented. In the first patient the diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta was straightforward while in the second patient there was a substantial delay in reaching the correct diagnosis. A 32-year-old patient was analysed for hypertension in the outpatient clinic. At physical examination a systolic cardiac murmur was present and leg blood pressure was not measurable. Magnetic resonance imaging angiography showed a severe coarctation of the thoracic aorta with extensive distended collateral blood vessels. A second patient was a 31-year-old man referred with longstanding hypertension and an unsatisfactory blood pressure response to treatment. Previously, a diagnosis of primary hypertension was made. Renal computed tomography angiography excluded renal artery stenosis as a cause of hypertension but disclosed many distended collateral blood vessels in the musculus rectus abdominis and in the upper abdominal area. Leg blood pressure was measured and further analysis revealed a coarctation of the aorta. Both patients illustrate and emphasise the importance of leg blood pressure measurement at a first analysis of adult hypertensive patients and should always be performed when hypertension is accompanied by murmurs or weak femoral pulsations.

Bone marrow cell therapy after acute myocardial infarction: the HEBE trial in perspective, first results.

During the last decennium, the role of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) has been underscored in the healing process after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although these cells improve left ventricular recovery after AMI in experimental studies, results from large-scale randomised trials investigating BMMC therapy in patients with AMI have shown contradictory results. To address this issue the HEBE study was designed, a multicentre, randomised trial, evaluating the effects of intracoronary infusion of BMMCs and the effects of intracoronary infusion of peripheral blood mononuclear cells after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary endpoint of the HEBE trial is the change in regional myocardial function in dysfunctional segments at four months relative to baseline, based on segmental analysis as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. The results from the HEBE trial will provide detailed information about the effects of intracoronary BMMC therapy on post-infarct left ventricular recovery. In addition, further analysis of the data and material obtained may provide important mechanistic insights into the contribution of BMMCs to natural recovery from AMI as well as the response to cell therapy. This may significantly contribute to the development of improved cell-based therapies, aiming at optimising post-infarct recovery and preventing heart failure. (Neth Heart J 2008;16:436-9.).

[Antithrombotic therapy during percutaneous coronary interventions]. / Antitrombotische therapie rondom percutane coronaire interventie.

Antithrombotic therapy is essential during percutaneous coronary interventions for the prevention of peri-procedural death and myocardial infarction. The most commonly used agents are aspirin, clopidogrel and heparin in patients treated by percutaneous angioplasty or receiving an arterial stent. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists such as abciximab are indicated during percutaneous interventions in high-risk-patients as well as, in principle, in all patients with an acute coronary syndrome with ST-segment elevation undergoing primary percutaneous angioplasty. In patients with so-called drug-eluting stents, clopidogrel should be continued for several months longer than the usual 30 days.

Lower body positive pressure by anti-G garment inflation: a suitable method to increase pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in healthy elderly subjects.

In a study on non-invasive assessment of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), we sought a method to increase PCWP non-invasively. We hypothesized that inflation of an anti-G garment was suitable to increase PCWP non-invasively in healthy elderly subjects. In 20 subjects, aged 70 +/- 4 years (mean +/- SD), before, immediately after, and 4 min after anti-G garment inflation to 52 mmHg, PCWP and mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) were measured with a Swan-Ganz catheter, and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) with Finapres, in supine and semi-recumbent position. Supine, PCWP (mmHg, mean +/- SD) increased from 9.9 +/- 2.1 to 15.5 +/- 3.9** immediately after inflation and 13.4 +/- 3.7** at 4 min; semi-recumbent from 8.9 +/- 2.0 to 17.5 +/- 3.3** and 14.7 +/- 2.9** (*P<0.05, **P< 0.001 versus before inflation). MPAP (mmHg) increased after inflation: supine 16.9 +/- 2.3 to 22.3 +/- 4.6** and 20.6 +/- 3.9** and semi-recumbent 15.7 +/- 2.8 to 24.3 +/- 5.1** and 22.5 +/- 3.5**, suggesting that increased preload was the primary effect of anti-G garment inflation. Supine MAP (mmHg) increased from 96.0 +/- 11.3 to 101.4 +/- 13.4** and 100.5 +/- 12.7* and semi-recumbent from 102.0 +/- 8.9 to 108.3 +/- 11.4** and 106.0 +/- 11.3*, suggesting an effect of increased afterload as well. The latter was supported by an increase in total peripheral resistance (d s cm(-5)) from 1346 +/- 299 to 1441 +/- 384 after 4 min (P = 0.057) and from 1461 +/- 341 to 1532 +/- 406 (P = 0.054), supine and semi-recumbent respectively, while cardiac output remained unchanged. Complications did not occur. We conclude that in healthy elderly subjects, anti-G garment inflation is a safe, non-invasive, method to induce a significant increase in PCWP. Our findings justify its application in future studies in which non-invasive temporary increase in PCWP is required.

Dutch guidelines for interventional cardiology: institutional and operator competence and requirements for training.

Interventional cardiology is an expanding field within cardiovascular medicine and today it is generally accepted that cardiologists require specific training, knowledge and skills. Hospitals where coronary interventions are performed must be properly equipped and able to provide specialised care. Percutaneous coronary interventions are frequently used for coronary revascularisation. The public should have confidence in the uniformity of high quality care. Therefore, such quality of care should be maintained by certification of the individual operators, general guidelines for institutional requirements and formal audits. The Netherlands Society of Cardiology (NVVC) will be implementing a new registration system for cardiologists with a subspecialisation that will include registration for interventional cardiology. The NVVC asked the Working Group of Interventional Cardiology (WIC) to update the 1994 Dutch guidelines on operator and institutional competence, and requirements for training in interventional cardiology in order to incorporate them into the official directives. The present guidelines represent the expert opinion of the Dutch interventional cardiology community and are in accordance with international regulations. After two rounds of discussion, the NVVC approved the guidelines in November 2004 during the autumn meeting.

Fibrinolysis and primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: call for a more refined perspective.

The latest meta-analysis comparing fibrinolysis with primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) has fuelled the discussion regarding the best reperfusion therapy for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. As far as patients presenting to centres with intervention facilities are concerned, the superiority of primary PCI has been unequivocally demonstrated. However, only a small proportion of patients with St-elevation myocardial infarction primarily present to an intervention centre, the majority go to a hospital without these facilities. The optimal reperfusion strategy for patients presenting to a nonintervention centre or for patients presenting in the prehospital setting has been studied less extensively and the question remains as to whether all these patients should be transferred to an intervention centre to undergo primary PCI. The available data to date on interhospital transport for primary PCI do show a mortality benefit for primary PCI. Yet, as far as inferences to clinical practice are concerned, it remains to be seen whether these studies are truly representative: almost half of patients in the transportation trials received streptokinase, they were treated relatively late, and the subsequent revascularisation strategy was rather conservative. The impact of primary PCI as compared with prehospital fibrinolysis in patients presenting in the prehospital setting has so far only been addressed in the randomised CAPTIM trial, without significant differences in outcome. Additional studies are warranted, with early treatment as primary focus. For patients presenting to non-intervention centres or prehospitally, the impact of triage, and of combined pharmaco-invasive reperfusion strategies are promising fields of further exploration.