Past antihypertensive medication use is associated with lower levels of small vessel disease and lower Aß plaque stage in the brains of older individuals.

AIMS: This study assesses the association of antihypertensive medication use on the severities of neuropathological cerebrovascular disease (CVD excluding lobar infarction) in older individuals. METHODS: Clinical and neuropathological data were retrieved for 149 autopsy cases >75 years old with or without CVD or Alzheimer's disease and no other neuropathological diagnoses. Clinical data included hypertension status, hypertension diagnosis, antihypertensive medication use, antihypertensive medication dose (where available) and clinical dementia rating (CDR). Neuropathological CVD severity was evaluated for differences with anti-hypertensive medication usage. RESULTS: Antihypertensive medication use was associated with less severe white matter small vessel disease (SVD, mainly perivascular dilatation and rarefaction), with a 5.6-14.4 times greater likelihood of less severe SVD if medicated. No significant relationship was detected between infarction (presence, type, number and size), lacunes or cerebral amyloid angiopathy and antihypertensive medication use. Only increased white matter rarefaction/oedema and not perivascular dilation was associated with Alzheimer's pathology, with a 4.3 times greater likelihood of reduced Aß progression through the brain if white matter rarefaction severity was none or mild. Antihypertensive medication use was associated with reduced Aß progression but only in those with moderate to severe white matter SVD. CONCLUSIONS: This histopathological study provides further evidence that antihypertensive medication use in older individuals is associated with white matter SVD and not with other CVD pathologies. This is mainly due to a reduction in white matter perivascular dilation and rarefaction/oedema. Even in those with moderate to severe white matter SVD, antihypertensive medication use reduced rarefaction and Aß propagation through the brain.

Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility.

Research must be well designed, properly conducted and clearly and transparently reported. Our independent medical research institute wanted a simple, generic tool to assess the quality of the research conducted by its researchers, with the goal of identifying areas that could be improved through targeted educational activities. Unfortunately, none was available, thus we devised our own. Here, we report development of the Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA), and its application to publications from our institute's scientists. Following consensus meetings and external review by statistical and methodological experts, 11 items were selected for the final version of the QuOCCA: research transparency (items 1-3), research design and analysis (items 4-6) and research reporting practices (items 7-11). Five pairs of raters assessed all 231 articles published in 2017 and 221 in 2018 by researchers at our institute. Overall, the results were similar between years and revealed limited engagement with several recommended practices highlighted in the QuOCCA. These results will be useful to guide educational initiatives and their effectiveness. The QuOCCA is brief and focuses on broadly applicable and relevant concepts to open, high-quality, reproducible and well-reported science. Thus, the QuOCCA could be used by other biomedical institutions and individual researchers to evaluate research publications, assess changes in research practice over time and guide the discussion about high-quality, open science. Given its generic nature, the QuOCCA may also be useful in other research disciplines.

Is routine laboratory testing in healthy young patients taking isotretinoin necessary: a critically appraised topic.

CLINICAL QUESTION: Is monitoring of liver function, lipids and full blood count necessary in healthy people taking isotretinoin? BACKGROUND: Routine blood testing was recommended in the original licence for Roaccutane™ (isotretinoin) in 1983. In recent years, less frequent monitoring has been suggested by various authors. DATA SOURCES: We performed four individual systematic searches of the MEDLINE database, via PubMed, from origin to 2 May 2021, supplemented by a hand search of all references in the identified papers. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were any description of clinical symptoms, laboratory abnormalities and/or physical findings, and any paper that explicitly described the patients as asymptomatic, during treatment with oral isotretinoin. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers (J.A. and D.J.) assessed articles for eligibility of inclusion. Evaluation of the data was done also by two of the authors (A.A., D.J. and J.A.) for each section, with the aim to use the presented evidence including guidelines, databases, case series, case reports, cohort studies and randomized clinical trials to delineate the clinical presentation and frequency of adverse events that might be amenable to laboratory monitoring. RESULTS: We identified 407 papers in our searches and reviewed 125 papers in four sections. Overall, reported adverse events were very rare (< 1 in 10 000) and were either idiosyncratic or not preventable by monitoring, accompanied by symptoms, or seen in identifiable predisposed individuals who might benefit from monitoring because of pre-existing conditions. RECOMMENDATION FOR CLINICAL CARE: We could not find evidence to support the benefit of monitoring to detect adverse events. We suggest that in healthy young people laboratory monitoring for oral isotretinoin is unnecessary and risks detecting nonserious biochemical abnormalities. However, we recognize that new information about adverse events may change that recommendation.

Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy in a Routine Neuropathology Service in Australia.

Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a neuropathological diagnosis defined by a unique pattern of hyperphosphorylated tau (p-tau) accumulation that begins in neocortical regions of the brain. It is associated with a range of neuropsychological symptoms, but a definitive diagnosis can only be made by postmortem brain examination. In 2018, we instituted CTE screening for all autopsy brains as part of our routine departmental protocol by performing p-tau immunohistochemistry on a restricted set of 3 neocortical blocks (frontal, temporal, and parietal). This strategy allowed us to identify 4 cases of low-stage CTE from 180 consecutive autopsies. Two of the 4 cases had a documented history of brain injury; for the remaining 2 cases, there was a long history of treatment-resistant tonic/clonic epilepsy suggesting that undocumented brain injuries may have occurred. Our experience indicates that 3-block CTE screening is useful in identifying CTE in routine practice. The results of this study further support the association between prior head injuries and CTE and demonstrate that, albeit uncommon, CTE does occur in the general population. Our findings suggest that p-tau screening should be routinely pursued in brain autopsy, particularly where there is a documented or likely history of traumatic brain injury.

A newly growing asymptomatic facial lesion.

A 23-year-old man presenting with a 1-year history of a lesion of the right cheek. We highlight this case for awareness as this tumour may mimic other benign lesions, such as pilomatrixoma or benign cysts, as it does not have any uniquely identifying clinical or dermoscopic features. Additionally, it is of concern as malignant transformation can occur and therefore surgery should be considered as both for diagnostic and therapeutic benefit.

Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy as a Preventable Environmental Disease.

In this Perspective we explore the evolution of our understanding of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) and its relationship with repetitive head injury. As with many neurodegenerative conditions, there is an imperfect correspondence between neuropathology and clinical phenotype, but unlike other neurodegenerative diseases, CTE has a discrete and easily modifiable risk factor: exposure to repetitive head injury. Consequently, evaluation of the evidence regarding exposure to repetitive head injury and CTE risk should be undertaken using public or occupational health frameworks of medical knowledge. The current debate over the existence of CTE as a disease of concern is fuelled in part by immediate medico-legal considerations, and the involvement of high-profile athletes, with inevitable media interest. Moving beyond this debate has significant potential to address and reduce disease impact in the near future, and provide novel insights into mechanisms underlying abnormal protein accumulation in CTE and other neurodegenerative diseases.

British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of adults with delusional infestation 2022.

The overall objective of the guideline is to provide up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for the management of delusional infestation (DI) in adults. Linked Comment: I. Coulson. Br J Dermatol 2022; 187:457.

Topical potassium permanganate solution use in dermatology: comparison of guidelines and clinical practice.

In this small study we wish to highlight the difference that exists between the nationally recommended dilution of 0.01% (1 in 10 000) with the dilution used in our routine patient care 0.00125% (1 in 80 000) when preparing potassium permanganate soaks. We suggest that patient and clinician education should emphasize the importance of visual assessment rather than formulaic calculations in the safe preparation of potassium permanganate solution.

Decision-making in dermatologic surgery.

Good clinical decision-making is important in dermatologic surgery. Experience and knowledge help considerably, but take time to acquire. However, how the clinician thinks is also a significant contributory factor. How we think is influenced by many factors, including our beliefs, prejudices, confidence and variables like how we are feeling at that moment physically and emotionally. Thought process can be either fast and subconscious or slow and analytical. Fast thinking contributes to the majority of decision-making and is especially prone to a range of biases which may contribute to suboptimal clinical outcomes. We wish to highlight and illustrate common biases in thinking encountered by the dermatologic surgeon.