Fluid collections in and around the pancreas in acute pancreatitis.

The advent of computed tomographic scan with its wide use in the evaluation of acute pancreatitis has opened up a new topic in pancreatology i.e. fluid collections. Fluid collections in and around the pancreas occur often in acute pancreatitis and were defined by the Atlanta Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis in 1992. Two decades since the Atlanta Conference additional experience has brought to light the inadequacy and poor understanding of the terms used by different specialists involved in the care of patients with acute pancreatitis when interpreting imaging modalities and the need for a uniformly used classification system. The deficiencies of the Atlanta definitions and advances in medicine have led to a proposed revision of the Atlanta classification promulgated by the Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. The newly used terms "acute peripancreatic fluid collections," "pancreatic pseudocyst," "postnecrotic pancreatic/peripancreatic fluid collections," and "walled-off pancreatic necrosis" are to be clearly understood in the interpretation of imaging studies. The current treatment methods for fluid collections are diverse and depend on accurate interpretations of radiologic tests. Management options include conservative treatment, percutaneous catheter drainage, open and laparoscopic surgery, and endoscopic drainage. The choice of treatment depends on a correct diagnosis of the type of fluid collection. In this study we have attempted to clarify the management and clinical features of different types of fluid collections as they have been initially defined under the 1992 Atlanta Classification and revised by the Working Group's proposed categorization.

Hemodynamic monitoring in the elderly undergoing elective colon resection for cancer.

Controversy surrounds the use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs). We evaluated the influence of preoperative hemodynamic monitoring and optimization on the outcome in elderly patients undergoing elective resection for colon cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of all elderly patients (age > 65 years) who had undergone elective colon resection during 1985 to 1995. Sixty patients had preoperative insertion of PAC; 217 patients were managed without PAC. Charts were reviewed for Goldman's cardiac risk index (CRI), preoperative risk factors, and hospital mortality. On the basis of CRI the patients were divided into two groups (< 10 and > or = 10). There was no significant difference between PAC or no-PAC patients for age, previous myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal insufficiency, hemoglobin, and albumin. There were 12 deaths (4.3%). CRI, which was a significant predictor of mortality in the no-PAC group (2.2% mortality for CRI < 10 vs 15.8% for CRI > or = 10; P < 0.001), was insignificant in the PAC group (2.5% mortality for CRI < 10 vs 5% for CRI > or = 10, P = not significant). Although preoperative optimization using PAC was not beneficial in the low-CRI group it resulted in a threefold reduction in mortality (5% vs 15.8%) in the high-CRI group. We conclude that preoperative optimization of cardiovascular function using a PAC is only beneficial in reducing mortality in high-risk (CRI > or = 10) elderly patients undergoing elective colon resection.