Subcortical contributions to salience network functioning during negative emotional processing.

Core regions of the salience network (SN), including the anterior insula (aINS) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), coordinate rapid adaptive changes in attentional and autonomic processes in response to negative emotional events. In doing so, the SN incorporates bottom-up signals from subcortical brain regions, such as the amygdala and periaqueductal gray (PAG). However, the precise influence of these subcortical regions is not well understood. Using ultra-high field 7-Tesla functional magnetic resonance imaging, this study investigated the bottom-up interactions of the amygdala and PAG with the SN during negative emotional salience processing. Thirty-seven healthy participants completed an emotional oddball paradigm designed to elicit a salient negative emotional response via the presentation of random, task-irrelevant negative emotional images. Negative emotional processing was associated with prominent activation in the SN, spanning the amygdala, PAG, aINS, and dACC. Consistent with previous research, analysis using dynamic causal modelling revealed an excitatory influence from the amygdala to the aINS, dACC, and PAG. In contrast, the PAG showed an inhibitory influence on amygdala, aINS and dACC activity. Our findings suggest that the amygdala may amplify the processing of negative emotional stimuli in the SN to enable upstream access to attentional resources. In comparison, the inhibitory influence of the PAG possibly reflects its involvement in modulating sympathetic-parasympathetic autonomic arousal mediated by the SN. This PAG-mediated effect may be driven by amygdala input and facilitate bottom-up processing of negative emotional stimuli. Overall, our results show that the amygdala and PAG modulate divergent functions of the SN during negative emotional processing.

Prevalence and treatment implications of ICD-11 complex PTSD in Australian treatment-seeking current and ex-serving military members.

Background: Despite growing support for the distinction between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD) as separate diagnoses within the ICD-11 psychiatric taxonomy, the prevalence and treatment implications of CPTSD among current and ex-serving military members have not been established. Objective: The study aims were to a) establish the prevalence of provisional ICD-11 CPTSD diagnosis relative to PTSD in an Australian sample of treatment-seeking current and ex-serving military members, and b) examine the implications of CPTSD diagnosis for intake profile and treatment response. Methods: The study analysed data collected routinely from Australian-accredited treatment programmes for military-related PTSD. Participants were 480 current and ex-serving military members in this programmes who received a provisional ICD-11 diagnosis of PTSD or CPTSD at intake using proxy measures. Measures of PTSD symptoms, disturbances in self-organisation, psychological distress, mental health and social relationships were considered at treatment intake, discharge, and 3-month follow-up. Results: Among participants with a provisional ICD-11 diagnosis, 78.2% were classified as having CPTSD, while 21.8% were classified as having PTSD. When compared to ICD-11 PTSD, participants with CPTSD reported greater symptom severity and psychological distress at intake, and lower scores on relationship and mental health dimensions of the quality of life measure. These relative differences persisted at each post-treatment assessment. Decreases in PTSD symptoms between intake and discharge were similar across PTSD (d RM  = -0.81) and CPTSD (d RM  = -0.76) groups, and there were no significant post-treatment differences between groups when controlling for initial scores. Conclusions: CPTSD is common among treatment-seeking current and ex-serving military members, and is associated with initially higher levels of psychiatric severity, which persist over time. Participants with CPTSD were equally responsive to PTSD treatment; however, the tendency for those with CPTSD to remain highly symptomatic post-treatment suggests additional treatment components should be considered.

Antecedentes: A pesar del creciente apoyo para la distinción entre trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT) y trastorno de estrés postraumático complejo (TEPTC) como diagnósticos separados dentro de la taxonomía psiquiátrica de la CIE-11, la prevalencia y las implicaciones en el tratamiento del TEPTC dentro de miembros militares activos o en retiro no han sido establecidas.Objetivo: Los objetivos del estudio fueron a) establecer la prevalencia de TEPTC provisional según CIE-11 en relación al TEPT en una muestra australiana de miembros militares activos o en retiro en busca de tratamiento, y b) examinar las implicaciones del diagnóstico de TEPTC para el perfil de ingreso y respuesta a tratamiento.Método: El estudio analizó datos recolectados de forma rutinaria por programas de tratamiento australianos acreditados para TEPT relacionado a militares. Los participantes fueron 480 miembros activos o en retiro ingresados a este programa bajo el diagnóstico provisional de TEPT o TEPTC según CIE-11 a través de indicadores indirectos. Al ingreso, egreso y a los 3 meses de seguimiento, se consideraron mediciones de los síntomas de TEPT, alteraciones en la organización del Yo, estrés psicológico, salud mental y relaciones sociales.Resultados: Dentro de los participantes con un diagnóstico provisional según CIE-11, el 78,2% fue clasificado como portador de TEPTC, mientras que un 21,8% fue clasificado como portador de TEPT. Al ser comparados con TEPT según CIE-11, los participantes con TEPTC reportaron al ingreso una mayor severidad en la sintomatología y en el estrés psicológico, y menores puntajes en las dimensiones de medida de calidad de vida de salud mental y relaciones sociales. Estas diferencias relativas persistieron en cada seguimiento posterior al tratamiento. Las disminuciones en los síntomas de TEPT entre el ingreso y el egreso fueron similares entre los grupos con TEPT (d RM = -0.81) y TEPTC (d RM = -0.76), y no hubo diferencias significativas post-tratamiento entre los grupos al controlarlos según los puntajes iniciales. Conclusiones: El TEPTC es común dentro de miembros militares activos o en retiro en busca de tratamiento, y está asociado a mayores niveles de severidad psiquiátrica inicial, la cual persiste a lo largo del tiempo. Los participantes con TEPTC respondieron igualmente al tratamiento del TEPT; sin embargo, la tendencia de aquéllos con TEPTC de permanecer altamente sintomáticos tras el tratamiento sugiere componentes de tratamiento adicionales que deberían ser considerados.

Neural patterns during anticipation predict emotion regulation success for reappraisal.

The ability to exert control over emotions, termed emotion regulation (ER), is vital for everyday functioning. ER success may be influenced by processes relating to the anticipation (prior to active regulation) and implementation (during active regulation) of ER strategy use. We investigated whether brain activity patterns recorded using electroencephalography (EEG) during the first second of anticipation and implementation of two ER strategies-distraction and reappraisal-were related to regulation success. Participants viewed negative images that evoked disgust and sadness. Before each image was presented, participants were cued to either passively view the image or decrease their emotional responses. ER success scores were calculated from subsequent self-reported disgust and sadness ratings. Using multivariate support vector regression, ER success scores were predicted from spatiotemporal patterns of event-related potentials during the first second of anticipation and implementation phases of each ER strategy. For both sadness and disgust, reappraisal success could be predicted during anticipation, while distraction success could be predicted during implementation. These findings suggest that early anticipatory cognitive processes are a key determinant of reappraisal success, but may not be similarly important for distraction. This may be because reappraisal is more cognitively demanding than distraction, requiring enhanced preparation of mental resources.

Adjustment Disorder: Current Developments and Future Directions.

Despite its high prevalence in clinical and consultant liaison psychiatry populations, adjustment disorder research has traditionally been hindered by its lack of clear diagnostic criteria. However, with the greater diagnostic clarity provided in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - fifth edition (DSM-5) and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 11th edition (ICD-11), adjustment disorder has been increasingly recognised as an area of research interest. This paper evaluates the commonalities and differences between the ICD-11 and DSM-5 concepts of adjustment disorder and reviews the current state of knowledge regarding its symptom profile, course, assessment, and treatment. In doing so, it identifies the gaps in our understanding of adjustment disorder and discusses future directions for research.