Intrathecal dexamethasone as an adjuvant for spinal anesthesia: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal anesthesia is a common anesthetic technique for lower limb and abdominal surgery. Despite its efficacy, its use is limited because of its duration and potential severe side effects, especially in high-risk patients undergoing major surgery. Adjuvants such as dexamethasone offer the potential to prolong the anesthetic effect and reduce the need for local anesthetics while reducing the incidence of serious adverse events. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone as an intrathecal adjuvant in prolonging anesthetic duration, delaying pain onset, and minimizing adverse events (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022350218). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We included randomized controlled trials conducted in adult patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for lower limb or abdominal surgery and comparing the performance of dexamethasone with alternative spinal treatments. A comprehensive systematic search was conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Cochrane Library from February to June 2023 without language restriction. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Ten studies, nine of which were at high risk of bias, were included (N.=685 patients). Overall, intrathecal dexamethasone was associated with a longer duration of sensory block, improvement in the duration or extent of postoperative analgesia, and significant shortening of block onset. The role of dexamethasone in prolonging motor block was not clear. The incidence of adverse events was low. Intrathecal dexamethasone has been shown to be a potentially valuable adjuvant to prolong the duration of sensory block and improve postoperative analgesia without increasing adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Given the wide heterogeneity of methodological approaches, further investigation is needed. Considering the limitations of the included studies and awaiting more conclusive evidence, the prudent use of dexamethasone could be recommended in those specific situations where general anesthesia or higher local anesthetics should be avoided.

Rectus sheath block added to parasternal block may improve postoperative pain control and respiratory performance after cardiac surgery: a superiority single-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The population undergoing cardiac surgery confronts challenges from uncontrolled post-sternotomy pain, with possible adverse effects on outcome. While the parasternal block can improve analgesia, its coverage may be insufficient to cover epigastric area. In this non-blinded randomized controlled study, we evaluated the analgesic and respiratory effect of adding a rectus sheath block to a parasternal block. METHODS: 58 patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy were randomly assigned to receive parasternal block with rectus sheath block (experimental) or parasternal block with epigastric exit sites of chest drains receiving surgical infiltration of local anesthetic (control). The primary outcome of this study was pain at rest at extubation. We also assessed pain scores at rest and during respiratory exercises, opiate consumption and respiratory performance during the first 24 hours after extubation. RESULTS: The median (IQR) maximum pain scores (on a 0-10 Numeric Rate Scale (NRS)) at extubation were 4 (4, 4) in the rectus sheath group and 5 (4, 5) in the control group (difference 1, p value=0.03). Rectus sheath block reduced opioid utilization by 2 mg over 24 hours (IC 95% 0.0 to 2.0; p<0.01), reduced NRS scores at other time points, and improved respiratory performance at 6, 12, and 24 hours after extubation. CONCLUSION: The addition of a rectus sheath block with a parasternal block improves analgesia for cardiac surgery requiring chest drains emerging in the epigastric area. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05764616.

Ultrasound predictors of difficult spinal anesthesia: a prospective single-blind observational study.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound showed to improve the precision and efficacy of spinal anesthesia (SA) through the identification of specific structures surrounding the intrathecal space, such as the anterior and posterior complex of dura mater (DM). The aim of this study was to verify the efficacy of ultrasonography in predicting difficult SA trough the analysis of different ultrasound patterns. METHODS: This prospective single-blind observational study involved 100 patients undergoing orthopedic or urological surgery. A first operator chose by landmarks the intervertebral space where he wanted to perform SA. Then a second operator recorded the visibility of DM complexes at ultrasound. Subsequently, the first operator, blinded to the ultrasound evaluation, performed SA, defined as "difficult" in case of failure, change of intervertebral space, operator exchange, duration >400 seconds or more than 10 needle passes. RESULTS: The ultrasound visualization of only posterior complex or the failure in visualization of both complexes showed a positive predictive value of 76% and 100%, respectively, towards difficult SA vs. 6% when both complexes were visible; P<0.001. A negative correlation was found between the number of visible complexes and both patients' age and BMI. Landmark-guided evaluation underestimated the intervertebral level in 30% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound showed a high accuracy in detecting difficult spinal anesthesia and its use should be recommended in the daily clinical practice in order to increase success rate and minimize patient discomfort. The absence of both DM complexes at ultrasound should lead the anesthetist to evaluate other intervertebral levels or consider alternative techniques.

Parasternal Intercostal Nerve Blocks in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Evidence Update and Technical Considerations.

In the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery era, parasternal intercostal nerve block has been proposed to improve pain control and reduce opioid use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However current literature has reported conflicting evidence about the effect of this multimodal pain management, as procedural variations might pose a significant bias on outcomes evaluation. In this setting, the infiltration of the parasternal plane into 2 intercostal spaces, second and fifth, with a local anesthetic spread under or above the costal plane with ultrasound guidance, seem to be standardized in theory, but significant differences might be observed in clinical practice. This narrative review summarizes and defines the optimal techniques for parasternal plane blocks in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with full median sternotomy, considering both pectointercostal fascial block and transversus thoracic plane block. A total of 10 randomized trials have been published, in adjunct to observational studies, which are heterogeneous in terms of techniques, methods, and outcomes. Parasternal block has been shown to reduce perioperative opioid consumption and provide a more favorable analgesic profile, with reduced postoperative opioid-related side effects. A trend toward reduced intensive care unit stay or duration of mechanical ventilation should be confirmed by adequately powered randomized trials or registry studies. Differences in operative technique might impact outcomes and, therefore, standardization of the procedure plays a pivotal role before reporting specific outcomes. Parasternal plane blocks might significantly improve outcomes of cardiac surgery with full median sternotomy, and should be introduced comprehensively in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols.

Not just a matter of weight: A case report of ECMO treatment in a severely obese patient.

The ELSO Guidelines list a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 among the relative contraindications to give ECMO treatment in SARS - COV2 patients. We describe a case of a 52-year-old with BMI 50.21 kg/m2, admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with severe respiratory conditions and successfully treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The application of veno-venous (VV) ECMO will evolve as far as we understand the pathophysiology of the COVID-19 disease and will probably have a determinant role in management of patient with refractory hypoxemia, whose ventilation management is difficult, even in case of severe obesity.

Linezolid Intoxication with Extreme Lactate Blood Levels Successfully Treated with Dialytic Treatment in ICU: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Lactic acidosis is a rare but life-threatening complication associated with prolonged linezolid therapy. No specific treatment is suggested, except for antibiotic therapy interruption. CASE REPORT: A 70-years-old woman faced severe linezolid intoxication after antibiotics therapy initiation for infection of a surgical sternal wound. The patient suffered from a severe increment of blood lactate and thrombocytopenia. She was admitted to ICU twice, and due to dialytic treatment, linezolid and lactate serum levels came back to normality. CONCLUSION: More studies should be conducted to evaluate the human tissue storage sites of linezolid and the influence of various factors on its clearance and plasma concentrations in critically ill patients.

Selective spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine provides better perioperative pain control than local anesthesia for ambulatory inguinal hernia repair without affecting discharging time: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Local anesthesia is the most used anesthetic technique for inguinal hernia repair, despite its unpredictability. Selective spinal anesthesia with a short-term local anesthetic guarantees rapid recovery, predictable duration and low incidence of side effects. We tried to assess the efficacy of this neuraxial technique in ambulatory setting. METHODS: One hundred thirty-two ASA I-III, aged > 18 patients scheduled for inguinal hernia repair have been randomized into two groups receiving unilateral spinal anesthesia with 40 mg of hyperbaric prilocaine (group A) or local anesthesia with mepivacaine (group B). PRIMARY ENDPOINT: intraoperative and post-operative NRS. Other outcomes: sensory block onset, need for opiates and deep sedation, surgery duration, and time to discharge. RESULTS: Group A: intraoperative NRS was 0 in 100% of patients; post-operative maximum NRS was > 3 in 12.12% of patients. Group B: mean intraoperative NRS was 4; mean post-operative NRS was 2.5. Spinal anesthesia resulted superior in controlling both intraoperative and post-operative pain (p < 0.00001; p = 0.008). Mean time of the motor block resolution in group A was 98 ± 2 min. Mean time to discharge was not significantly different between groups. Surgical time was significantly different between the two groups (mean time of 37 ± 3.2 min group A; 54 ± 6 min group B-p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia group patients had significantly less pain than local anesthesia group, both intraoperatively and post-operatively, without differences in time to discharge, incidence of complications and with improvement of surgical time. More randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this hypothesis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05136534 . Registered November 29, 2021-Retrospectively registered.

Predicting difficult spinal anesthesia: development of a neuraxial block assessment score.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia is a commonly performed procedure with unpredictable difficulty. The objective of this study was to predict a difficult lumbar spinal anesthesia with clinical elements that are easy to collect. METHODS: A questionnaire-based, observational study named NBA, conducted from February 2018 to June 2018. The questions regarded clinical elements and the eventual spinal anesthesia difficulty encountered. A total of 427 questionnaires were filled by the operators. The clinical elements were selected upon literature search and have been integrated with new ones. All the answers were recorded from the anesthesiologist performing the procedure. RESULTS: The NBA Score was derived from a total number of 427 questionnaires. Among them, 26 patients had "previous history of difficult spinal anesthesia;" 277 had "spinous processes not visible;" 83 had "spinous processes not palpable;" 77 had "spinal deformities" and 28 had "previous spinal surgery" in the puncture area; 138 patients received lumbar spinal anesthesia in lateral position. There were 328 (76.8%) single puncture successes. Seventy-nine (18.5%) patients required more than one skin puncture to obtain a successful spinal anesthesia. 20 (4.7%) required an alternative anesthesia technique (general anesthesia). Multivariate analysis indicated that each element is a risk factors for difficult spinal anesthesia, except for previous spinal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of more than one element increased the chance of a second skin puncture of more than 50%. This work proposes a simple clinical scoring system predicting the probability of a difficult spinal anesthesia.

High value of mid-regional proadrenomedullin in COVID-19: A marker of widespread endothelial damage, disease severity, and mortality.

The widespread endothelial damage due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may lead to a disruption of the adrenomedullin (ADM) system responsible for vascular leakage, increased inflammatory status, and microvascular alteration with multi-organs dysfunction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) as a marker of SARS-CoV2 related widespread endothelial damage, clinically identified by organs damage, disease severity and mortality. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection has been prospectively enrolled and demographic characteristic, clinical and laboratory data has been evaluated. In the overall population, 58% developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), 23.3% of patients died, 6.5% acute cardiac injury, 1.4% of patients developed acute ischemic stroke, 21.2% acute kidney injury, 11.8% acute liver damage, and 5.4% septic shock. The best MR-proADM cut-off values for ARDS development and mortality prediction were 3.04 and 2 nmol/L, respectively. Patients presenting with MR-proADM values ≥2 nmol/L showed a significantly higher mortality risk. In conclusion, MR-proADM values ≥2 nmol/L identify those patients with high mortality risk related to a multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. These patients must be carefully evaluated and considered for an intensive therapeutic approach.

Beyond selective spinal anesthesia: A flow pattern analysis of a hyperbaric dye solution injected in a lower-density fluid.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal anesthesia is a technique performed since more than a century and the introduction of hyperbaric anesthetics allowed the anesthesiologists to be more selective when using this technique. The aim of this study is to show the in vitro flow patterns of a hyperbaric dye solution through 27 G Quincke and Sprotte spinal needles, injected at different speeds, in a lower-density fluid. METHODS: A simulator was made using a gummy-like sponge and a disposable plastic urine glass, filled with saline solution, which has a similar density to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). A hyperbaric dye solution was composed by mixing 3 ml of plain methylene blue with 1 ml of glucose 33%. We used both 27 G Quincke and Sprotte spinal needles to perform a bevel up and a bevel down injection with both slow (15 s) and fast (4 s) injection speed of 0.5 mL hyperbaric dye solution. All the injections were performed using a preset syringe pump and recorded by a camera. RESULTS: The least selectivity was observed after a bevel up-fast injection through the 27 G Sprotte needle, followed by both bevel up and down fast injections through the 27 G Quincke needle. On the contrary, the best selectivity was observed after a bevel down-slow injection through the 27 G Sprotte needle, followed by both bevel up and down slow injections through the 27 G Quincke needle. CONCLUSION: When a 27 G Sprotte needle is used to inject a hyperbaric solution in a lower-density fluid-like CSF, the spread depends on both the bevel direction and the injection speed.