ABSTRACT
Objetivos. Estudiar si existen diferencias en los tiempos empleados en la atención al paciente, según se utilice la vía oral o intravenosa en la administración de betabloqueantes a pacientes ambulatorios sometidos a coronariografía mediante tomografía computarizada (TC). Material y métodos. Estudio prospectivo, analítico, aleatorizado y controlado. Se distribuye a 40 pacientes con frecuencia mayor de 65 latidos por minuto en 2 grupos. En el grupo 1 se administra el betabloqueante por vía oral y en el grupo 2 por vía intravenosa. Se mide el tiempo global transcurrido desde la entrada del paciente en Radiología hasta su marcha y el tiempo parcial de ocupación de sala desde que entra hasta que sale de la sala de TC. Variables secundarias: frecuencia cardíaca, tensión arterial y número de estudios concluyentes. Resultados. La mediana (rango intercuartílico) del tiempo global fue de 120 minutos (100-150) en los 19 pacientes betabloqueados por vía oral y de 35 minutos (27,5-67,5) en los 21 pacientes con medicación intravenosa (p<0,001). El tiempo parcial de ocupación de sala fue 10 minutos (6-15) en el grupo 1 y 10 minutos (9-20) en el grupo 2 (p=0,57). El descenso de la tensión arterial media es 10 mmHg con los betabloqueantes por vía intravenosa frente a 3,3 mmHg por la vía oral (p=0,01). No se hallaron diferencias significativas en la calidad diagnóstica de las exploraciones. Conclusiones. El tiempo de atención al paciente es significativamente menor con la administración intravenosa de betabloqueantes. No se demostraron diferencias en el tiempo de ocupación de sala ni en la calidad diagnóstica (AU)
Objectives. To determine whether the time employed in the radiological management of outpatients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography varies in function of whether oral or intravenous beta-blockers are administered. Material and methods. This was a prospective, analytical, randomized controlled trial. A total of 40 patients with heart rates greater than 65 beats per minute were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Patients in group 1 were administered oral beta-blockers and patients in group 2 were administered intravenous beta-blockers. We measured the overall time from entry to the radiology department to exit from the CT examination room. We also measured heart rate, blood pressure, and the number of conclusive studies. Results. The median (interquartile range) overall time was 120 (100-150) minutes in the 19 patients who received oral beta-blockers compared to 35 (27.5-67.5) minutes in the 21 patients who received intravenous beta-blockers (p<0.001). The median time that patients were in the CT examination room was 10 (6-15) minutes in Group 1 and 10 (9-20) minutes in Group 2 (p=0.57). The decrease in mean arterial pressure was 10 mmHg after the administration of intravenous beta-blockers compared to 3.3 mmHg after the administration of oral beta-blockers (p=0.01). No significant differences were found in the diagnostic quality of the examinations. Conclusions. The time employed in the radiological management of patients undergoing CT coronary angiography is significantly lower when beta-blockers are administered intravenously. There was no difference in the time patients were in the CT examination room or in the diagnostic quality of the examinations (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , /methods , Heart Rate , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/metabolism , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/pharmacokinetics , /trends , Prospective Studies , Coronary Vessels/pathology , Coronary Vessels , Heart Rate/radiation effects , 28599 , Clinical ProtocolsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the time employed in the radiological management of outpatients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography varies in function of whether oral or intravenous beta-blockers are administered. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective, analytical, randomized controlled trial. A total of 40 patients with heart rates greater than 65 beats per minute were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Patients in group 1 were administered oral beta-blockers and patients in group 2 were administered intravenous beta-blockers. We measured the overall time from entry to the radiology department to exit from the CT examination room. We also measured heart rate, blood pressure, and the number of conclusive studies. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) overall time was 120 (100-150) minutes in the 19 patients who received oral beta-blockers compared to 35 (27.5-67.5) minutes in the 21 patients who received intravenous beta-blockers (p<0.001). The median time that patients were in the CT examination room was 10 (6-15) minutes in Group 1 and 10 (9-20) minutes in Group 2 (p = 0.57). The decrease in mean arterial pressure was 10 mmHg after the administration of intravenous beta-blockers compared to 3.3 mmHg after the administration of oral beta-blockers (p = 0.01). No significant differences were found in the diagnostic quality of the examinations. CONCLUSIONS: The time employed in the radiological management of patients undergoing CT coronary angiography is significantly lower when beta-blockers are administered intravenously. There was no difference in the time patients were in the CT examination room or in the diagnostic quality of the examinations.
