Bibliometría e indicadores de actividad científica (XI). Otros recursos útiles en la evaluación: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, 1findr, Dimensions y Lens.org / Bibliometrics and indicators of scientific activity (XI): Other useful resources in the evaluation: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, 1findr, Dimensions and Lens.org

Para acceder a los criterios de calidad de las publicaciones científicas se necesitan recursos que sistematicen y organicen la información, con el fin de que pueda consultarse de la manera más rápida y efectiva posible. Actualmente, Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) y Scopus (Elsevier), junto con sus herramientas de impacto Journal Citation Reports (JCR) y SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR), respectivamente, son los recursos más utilizados. Sin embargo, en la última década han surgido nuevas iniciativas de distintas procedencias que ofrecen servicios para el mismo fin, pero con diferentes matices. Este trabajo pretende dar a conocer 7 herramientas que presentan información científica e indicios de calidad, aparte de Web of Science y Scopus. Los recursos que se describen son Google Scholar, Google Scholar Citations, Google Scholar Metrics, Microsoft Academic, Lens.org, 1findr y Dimensions, haciendo hincapié en dónde se encuentra localizado el indicador de calidad que ofrece. Además del indicador habitual "citas recibidas", se señalan otros, como el índice h, el índice h5, las altmétricas o las citas recibidas por patentes

To access the quality criteria of scientific publications, resources are needed to systematize and organize the information, so that it can be consulted as quickly and effectively as possible. Currently, Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) and Scopus (Elsevier), together with their impact indicators Journal Citation Reports (JCR) and SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR), respectively, are the most used. However, in the last decade new initiatives have emerged from different sources that offer services for the same purpose, but with different features. This work aims to show seven tools which offer scientific information and quality indicators, beyond Web of Science and Scopus. The resources described are Google Scholar, Google Scholar Citations, Google Scholar Metrics, Microsoft Academic, Lens.org, 1findr and Dimensions, emphasizing the location of the quality indicator that it offers. In addition to the usual "citations received" indicator, others such as the h index, the h5 index, the altmetrics or the citations received by patents are indicated

Bibliometría e indicadores de actividad científica (VI). Indicadores de colaboración (2). Análisis de redes sociales aplicado a la Pediatría / Bibliometrics and indicators of scientific activity (VI). Collaboration indicators (2). Analysis of social networks applied to Pediatrics

El análisis de redes sociales partió del ámbito de la Sociología como una herramienta de análisis que ha ido adquiriendo un importante aparato teórico-metodológico aplicado a numerosos campos de la ciencia. Este trabajo es una descripción somera del análisis de redes sociales y sus factores más importantes para poder entender e interpretar una red. Se especifican las tipologías de redes que se pueden observar, los elementos de los grafos que conforman una red, los niveles de análisis que se pueden aplicar y los indicadores de centralidad que se pueden calcular. Además, se detallan algunos de los estudios que se pueden realizar mediante esta herramienta. De ellos, se exponen unos ejemplos, dentro del campo de la pediatría, de análisis de la colaboración científica (coautoría entre autores e instituciones) y de copresencia o coocurrencia (presencia en el mismo documento de investigadores, palabras clave o instituciones) (AU)

The social network analysis was originated in the field of sociology as an analysis tool which has been acquiring an important theoretical methodological apparatus making it usable in many fields of science. This work aims at describing the analysis of social networks and those main factors most needed in order to understand and interpret a network. It includes the different networks typologies which may be observed, the elements of the graphs that make up a network, the levels of analysis that can be applied and the indicators of centrality that can be calculated. In addition, some of the studies that can be done using this tool are offered. Several examples in the field of Pediatrics are exposed such as the analysis of scientific collaboration (co-authoring between authors and institutions) and the analysis of co-occurrence (measure of the presence of researchers, keywords or institutions in a document) (AU)

Fuentes de información bibliográfica (V). Fuentes de información sobre libros y tesis doctorales / Sources of bibliographical information (V). Sources of information about books and PhD thesis

Los libros son publicaciones que abordan de forma monográfica un tema. Constituyen una fuente de información de gran relevancia en el ámbito académico y científico. Existen diferentes tipos de libros en función de su propósito, contenido y destinatarios. En el presente trabajo, se exponen las características de las principales tipologías documentales de libros: manuales, monografías, tratados, obras de referencia y tesis doctorales. Asimismo, se identifican las principales fuentes de información para identificar y localizar estas publicaciones, entre las que cabe destacar la Base de Datos de Libros Editados en España, los catálogos de biblioteca y, en relación con las tesis doctorales, las bases de datos Teseo y Tesis Doctorales en Red. También se exponen algunas iniciativas destacadas para acceder a los libros electrónicos(AU)

The books are publications that deal with a subject in a specialized way. They are an important source of information for scientific and academic purposes and there exist different types of books according to their purpose, contents and users for whom they were designed. In the present work, the characteristics manuals, monographs, treatises, reference books and doctoral thesis or dissertations are exposed. Likewise, main sources of information to identify and locate books are identified, among which can be enhanced the Data base of the edited book in Spain, library cataloges and thesis/dissertation databases Teseo and Tesis Doctorales on line. Also, some outstanding initiatives to access to electronic books are exposed(AU)

Consumption of anabolic steroids in sport, physical activity and as a drug of abuse: an analysis of the scientific literature and areas of research.

OBJECTIVE: The consumption of anabolic steroids (AS) has been growing continuously in recent years. It has gone beyond the sports world; AS are now widely used as drugs of abuse in connection with bodybuilding. This study sets out to assess the state of scientific research in the area. DESIGN: Bibliometrics were employed to evaluate the literature retrieved from the principal relevant bibliographic databases: MEDLINE, SportDiscus, the Science Citation Index Expanded and the Social Sciences Citation Index. The core journals were identified along with the leading authors and research groups and their institutional affiliations. Techniques based on social network analysis were applied in order to build up a concept map of research. RESULTS: 1325 documents were retrieved. They were produced by 3131 different researchers giving a Collaboration Index of 3.32. The institutions with the most productive authors were Ball State University (Muncie, IN, USA), the Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Nantes (ENVN), the Institut Municipal dInvestigació Mèdica (IMIM) (Barcelona, Spain), the Institute of Biochemistry of the German Sport University Cologne (DSHS), Iowa State University, Maastricht University and the University of Iowa. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that there has been an upward trend in the number of research projects. The sources used complemented one another, as 78.04% of the documents retrieved were unique to one source. The productivity ranking was headed by sports medicine journals, followed by journals of chemistry, physiology, endocrinology and substance abuse. Besides sporting activities, the most important research clusters were those connected with bodybuilding and with youth groups.