The Prognostic Utility of Invasive Right Heart Catheterization in Patients Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

INTRODUCTION: Invasive right heart catheterization (RHC) provides valuable prognostic information in cases of severe aortic stenosis, but is not done routinely prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Therefore, we sought to investigate the prognostic utility of pre-TAVR RHC for assessing outcomes post TAVR. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective study of patients who underwent RHC prior to TAVR between June 2011 and March 2019. We evaluated abnormalities in the following variables as predictors of poor outcomes post TAVR: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PASP), mixed venous oxygen saturation (MVO2), right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI), and right atrial pressure (RAP). Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to assess the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: A total of 522 patients (mean age, 83.5 ± 4.5 years; 49.4% women) with complete invasive hemodynamic data were included. At a median follow-up of 529.5 days, there were 127 deaths and 59 heart failure hospitalizations. On multivariate analysis, PCWP ≥15 mm Hg (hazard ratio [HR], 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-2.07), PASP ≥50 mm Hg (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.17-2.36), MVO2 ≤60% (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.01-1.98), RVSWI ≥12 g•m/m²/beat (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.004-1.94), and RAP ≥10 mm Hg (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.09-2.51) were independent predictors of death or heart failure hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Preprocedural invasive RHC provides useful prognostic information. A comprehensive invasive hemodynamic assessment should be considered for risk stratification in patients undergoing TAVR.

Comparison of a Single Versus Double Perclose Technique for Percutaneous Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy for arterial closure in percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) remains under debate. METHODS: Single-center, prospective, observational study of consecutive patients undergoing TF-TAVR between March 2018 and December 2019 who underwent closure with an upfront single vs double Perclose device. Device success, access-site vascular, and bleeding complications were defined according to the Valvular Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 criteria. Inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics between groups. RESULTS: A total of 241 patients (mean age, 81.4 ± 8.5 years, 47% women) were included, of which 127 underwent an upfront single-Perclose (SP) strategy and 114 underwent an upfront double-Perclose (DP) strategy. Fifty-six percent of patients were treated with a CoreValve (Medtronic). The SP group was less likely to be on dialysis and on aspirin, but were more likely to receive a CoreValve, with larger valve sizes and larger delivery sheaths. Baseline characteristics were well balanced after IPTW adjustment. Device success rate was comparable between groups (96% in the SP group vs 93% in the DP group; P=.39). The SP technique was associated with fewer vascular complications (8.7% in the SP group vs 26.3% in the DP group; P<.01; IPTW relative risk [RR], 0.34; 95% confidence Interval [CI], 0.16-0.71) and bleeding complications (2.4% in the SP group vs 12.3% in the DP group; P<.01; IPTW RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.76) compared with the DP technique. There were no differences in 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: An upfront SP technique is equally efficacious and not associated with increased vascular and bleeding complications compared with an upfront DP technique in patients undergoing percutaneous TF-TAVR.

The role of neighborhood disadvantage in predicting mortality in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Neighborhoods have a powerful impact on health. Prior investigations into disparities associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have focused on race and access to the procedure. We sought to investigate the role of neighborhood disadvantage on mortality post-TAVR. METHODS: Patients who underwent TAVR at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center between June, 2011 and March, 2019 were evaluated. Neighborhood disadvantage was defined using the area deprivation index, an established and validated index that considers multiple socioeconomic metrics. Cutoffs used for disadvantage were national percentile ≥25% and state decile ≥6. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 668 patients (age 82.1 ± 7.5 years, 49% female) were included, of which 215 (32.2%) were from disadvantaged neighborhoods by state decile, and 167 (25%) by national percentile. At a median follow-up of 18.8 months (interquartile range 8.7-36.5 months), neighborhood disadvantage was independently associated with increased all-cause mortality (National percentile: hazard ratio [HR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-2.69; state decile: HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.21-2.34). On propensity scored analysis, neighborhood disadvantaged remained independently associated with increased all-cause mortality (National percentile: IPTW HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.52-2.28, PSM HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.11-2.51; state decile: IPTW HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.26-1.91, PSM HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.33-2.99). CONCLUSION: Living in a disadvantaged neighborhood was independently associated with increased mortality post-TAVR on multivariate and propensity score matched analysis. Further investigations into the role of neighborhood disadvantage are needed to address disparities and improve outcomes post-TAVR.

Association between mid-term worsening renal function and mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic kidney disease.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD), acute kidney injury (AKI) and worsening renal function at 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) portend poor outcomes. We sought to evaluate the association between worsening renal function at 3-6 months and mortality among patients with baseline renal dysfunction undergoing TAVR. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min undergoing TAVR between June 2011 and March 2019 at the Regional Cardiac Catheterization Lab at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles. Worsening renal function at 3-6 months post-TAVR was defined as: increase in serum creatinine >1.5 times compared to baseline, absolute increase of ≥0.3 mg/dl, or initiation of dialysis. RESULTS: Of 683 patients reviewed, 176 were included in the analysis (median age 84 [IQR 79-88] years, 56% female). Of these, 27 (15.3%) had worsening renal function. AKI post-TAVR (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.4, p = .03) and transfusion of ≥4 units red blood cells (OR 8.4, 95% CI 1.2-59, p = .03) were independent predictors of worsening renal function. Worsening renal function increased risk for mortality (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.17-4.27, p = .015) at a median follow-up of 691 days. Those with improved/stable function with baseline GFR < 60 ml/min had comparable mortality risk to those with baseline GFR ≥ 60 ml/min (18% vs. 16.5%; HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.72-1.75, p = .62). CONCLUSION: Among patients with baseline renal dysfunction, only 15% developed worsening renal function at 3-6 months after TAVR, which was associated with increased mortality. Predictors for worsening renal function include AKI and blood transfusions. Preventative measures peri-procedurally and continued monitoring post-discharge are warranted to improve outcomes.

Predictors of conduction recovery after permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

PURPOSE: Conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) requiring pacemaker (PPM) implantation are a known complication and may be reversible. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the incidence and predictors for atrioventricular (AV) conduction recovery after TAVR. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study of patients undergoing PPM implantation for conduction disorders after TAVR between June 2011 and March 2019. Conduction recovery was defined as ≤ 1% ventricular pacing (VP) on follow-up PPM interrogation. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients (mean age 83.6 ± 6.6 years, 46.8% female) were included. At a median follow-up of 438 days (interquartile range [IQR] 111-760 days), 35 patients (32%) had conduction recovery, with 50% of these occurring within the first 6 months. On multivariate analysis, predictors of conduction recovery include female sex (hazard ratio [HR] 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-6.4, p = 0.048), non-VP/non-complete heart block rhythm immediately post-TAVR (HR 5.2, 95% CI 1.5-18.1, p = 0.011), normal sinus rhythm 7 days post-TAVR (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.7-9.2, p = 0.002), and smaller valve size (mm) (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.7-0.996, p = 0.045). Significant narrowing of the QRS and resolution of new-onset left bundle branch block within 1 month post-TAVR occurred in those with conduction recovery on PPM interrogation. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients receiving new PPM implantation have conduction recovery after TAVR, with 50% occurring within the first 6 months. Patient gender, valve size, and rhythm on serial ECGs after TAVR can help identify patients that may recover AV conduction. A conservative approach rather than immediate PPM implantation may be considered in these patients.

Outcomes in the Randomized CoreValve US Pivotal High Risk Trial in Patients With a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score of 7% or Less.

Importance: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now a well-accepted alternative to surgical AVR (SAVR) for patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis at increased operative risk. There is interest in whether TAVR would benefit patients at lower risk. Objective: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS PROM) has trended downward in US TAVR trials and the STS/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry. We hypothesized that if the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS PROM) alone is sufficient to define decreased risk, the contribution to survival based on the degree of invasiveness of the TAVR procedure will decrease, making it more difficult to show improved survival and benefit over SAVR. Design, Setting, and Participants: The CoreValve US Pivotal High Risk Trial was a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial. This retrospective analysis evaluated patients who underwent an attempted implant and had an STS PROM of 7% or less. The trial was performed at 45 US sites. Patients had severe aortic stenosis and were at increased surgical risk based on their STS PROM score and other risk factors. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to self-expanding TAVR or to SAVR. Main Outcomes and Measures: We retrospectively stratified patients by the overall median STS PROM score (7%) and analyzed clinical outcomes and quality of life using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in patients with an STS PROM score of 7% or less. Results: The mean (SD) ages were 81.5 (7.6) years for the TAVR group and 81.2 years (6.6) for the SAVR group. A little more than half were men (57.9% in the TAVR group and 55.8% in the SAVR group). Of 750 patients who underwent attempted implantation, 383 (202 TAVR and 181 SAVR) had an STS PROM of 7% or less (median [interquartile range]: TAVR, 5.3% [4.3%-6.1%]; SAVR, 5.3% [4.1%-5.9%]). Two-year all-cause mortality for TAVR vs SAVR was 15.0% (95% CI, 8.9-10.0) vs 26.3% (95% CI, 19.7-33.0) (log rank P = .01). The 2-year rate of stroke for TAVR vs SAVR was 11.3% vs 15.1% (log rank P = .50). Quality of life by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire summary score showed significant and equivalent increases in both groups at 2 years (mean [SD] TAVR, 20.0 [25.0]; SAVR, 18.6 [23.6]; P = .71; both P < .001 compared with baseline). Medical benefit, defined as alive with a Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire summary score of at least 60 and a less than 10-point decrease from baseline, was similar between groups at 2 years (TAVR, 51.0%; SAVR, 44.4%; P = .28). Conclusions and Relevance: Self-expanding TAVR compares favorably with SAVR in high-risk patients with STS PROM scores traditionally considered intermediate risk. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01240902.

3-Year Outcomes in High-Risk Patients Who Underwent Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: In patients with severe aortic stenosis at increased risk for surgery, self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with improved 2-year survival compared with surgery. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether this clinical benefit was sustained over time. METHODS: Patients with severe aortic stenosis deemed at increased risk for surgery by a multidisciplinary heart team were randomized 1:1 to TAVR or open surgical valve replacement (SAVR). Three-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were obtained in those patients with an attempted procedure. RESULTS: A total of 797 patients underwent randomization at 45 U.S. centers; 750 patients underwent an attempted procedure. Three-year all-cause mortality or stroke was significantly lower in TAVR patients (37.3% vs. 46.7% in SAVR; p = 0.006). Adverse clinical outcome components were also reduced in TAVR patients compared with SAVR patients, including all-cause mortality (32.9% vs. 39.1%, respectively; p = 0.068), all stroke (12.6% vs. 19.0%, respectively; p = 0.034), and major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (40.2% vs. 47.9%, respectively; p = 0.025). At 3 years aortic valve hemodynamics were better with TAVR patients (mean aortic valve gradient 7.62 ± 3.57 mm Hg vs. 11.40 ± 6.81 mm Hg in SAVR; p < 0.001), although moderate or severe residual aortic regurgitation was higher in TAVR patients (6.8% vs. 0.0% in SAVR; p < 0.001). There was no clinical evidence of valve thrombosis in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe aortic stenosis at increased risk for surgery had improved 3-year clinical outcomes after TAVR compared with surgery. Aortic valve hemodynamics were more favorable in TAVR patients without differences in structural valve deterioration. (Safety and Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve(®) System in the Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis in High Risk and Very High Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement; NCT01240902).

2-Year Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgical or Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. pivotal trial for the self-expanding valve found that among patients with severe aortic stenosis at increased risk for surgery, the 1-year survival rate was 4.9 percentage points higher in patients treated with a self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve bioprosthesis than in those treated with a surgical bioprosthesis. OBJECTIVES: Longer-term clinical outcomes were examined to confirm if this mortality benefit is sustained. METHODS: Patients with severe aortic stenosis who were at increased surgical risk were recruited. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the self-expanding transcatheter valve (transcatheter aortic valve replacement [TAVR] group) or to aortic valve replacement with a surgical bioprosthesis (surgical group). The 2-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were evaluated in these patients. RESULTS: A total of 797 patients underwent randomization at 45 centers in the United States. The rate of 2-year all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the TAVR group (22.2%) than in the surgical group (28.6%; log-rank test p < 0.05) in the as-treated cohort, with an absolute reduction in risk of 6.5 percentage points. Similar results were found in the intention-to-treat cohort (log-rank test p < 0.05). The rate of 2-year death or major stroke was significantly lower in the TAVR group (24.2%) than in the surgical group (32.5%; log-rank test p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at increased surgical risk, the higher rate of survival with a self-expanding TAVR compared with surgery was sustained at 2 years. (Safety and Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve System in the Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis in High Risk and Very High Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement; NCT01240902).

Haemodynamic-guided fluid administration for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: the POSEIDON randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The administration of intravenous fluid remains the cornerstone treatment for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. However, no well-defined protocols exist to guide fluid administration in this treatment. We aimed to establish the efficacy of a new fluid protocol to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury. METHODS: In this randomised, parallel-group, comparator-controlled, single-blind phase 3 trial, we assessed the efficacy of a new fluid protocol based on the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation. The primary outcome was the occurrence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, which was defined as a greater than 25% or greater than 0·5 mg/dL increase in serum creatinine concentration. Between Oct 10, 2010, and July 17, 2012, 396 patients aged 18 years or older undergoing cardiac catheterisation with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 60 mL/min per 1·73 m(2) or less and one or more of several risk factors (diabetes mellitus, history of congestive heart failure, hypertension, or age older than 75 years) were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-guided volume expansion (n=196) or the control group (n=200) who received a standard fluid administration protocol. Four computer-generated concealed randomisation schedules, each with permuted block sizes of 4, were used for randomisation, and participants were allocated to the next sequential randomisation number by sealed opaque envelopes. Patients and laboratory personnel were masked to treatment assignment, but the physicians who did the procedures were not masked. Both groups received intravenous 0·9% sodium chloride at 3 mL/kg for 1 h before cardiac catheterisation. Analyses were by intention to treat. Adverse events were assessed at 30 days and 6 months and all such events were classified by staff who were masked to treatment assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01218828. FINDINGS: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury occurred less frequently in patients in the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-guided group (6·7% [12/178]) than in the control group (16·3% [28/172]; relative risk 0·41, 95% CI 0·22-0·79; p=0·005). Hydration treatment was terminated prematurely because of shortness of breath in three patients in each group. INTERPRETATION: Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-guided fluid administration seems to be safe and effective in preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation. FUNDING: Kaiser Permanente Southern California regional research committee grant.

Discontinuation of long-term clopidogrel therapy is associated with death and myocardial infarction after saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the pattern of death and myocardial infarction (MI) after clopidogrel cessation in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the saphenous vein graft (SVG). BACKGROUND: The timing and incidence of adverse events by different durations of clopidogrel therapy after SVG PCI remain unknown. METHODS: This is a cohort study of patients undergoing SVG PCI between 2000 and 2009, followed for all-cause mortality or MI after stopping clopidogrel. Incidence rates were calculated across different time periods after clopidogrel cessation. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated with multivariable regression (piecewise exponential and Poisson). RESULTS: There were 603 patients who underwent SVG PCI, of which 411 were event-free at the time of clopidogrel cessation. The incidence rate (95% confidence interval: [CI])/1,000 person-days of death or MI after stopping clopidogrel in the time intervals of 0 to 90 days, 91 to 365 days, and 1 to 2 years were 1.26 (95% CI: 0.93 to 1.70), 0.41 (95% CI: 0.30 to 0.56), and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.30 to 0.55), respectively. In multivariable analyses, the overall IRR (95% CI) for death or MI in the 0- to 90-day interval after stopping clopidogrel compared with the 91- to 365-day interval was 2.58 (95% CI: 1.64 to 4.07). Similar results were observed over a broad range of clopidogrel treatment durations (<6 months, 6 months to 1 year, 1 to 2 years, or >2 years). The results were also consistent across subgroups, including sex, stent type, stent diameter, PCI period, and diabetes status. When death alone was evaluated, there remained a significant increase in the event rate in the 0- to 90-day interval compared with the 91- to 365-day interval (IRR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.32 to 4.11). CONCLUSIONS: A clustering of events was observed in the initial 0 to 90 days after clopidogrel cessation in all treatment durations of clopidogrel investigated after SVG PCI. These results might have important implications in high-risk cohorts undergoing PCI. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the early clustering of events after clopidogrel cessation.

Bifurcation stenting with drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

AIMS: We sought to determine if outcomes differ between provisional (elective side branch stenting) compared to a routine two-stent strategy (mandatory side branch stenting) for the treatment of bifurcation stenoses of the coronary arteries using drug-eluting stents. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library from January 2000 to February 2009 for studies comparing the provisional and two-stent strategies. Six randomised controlled trials, including 1,641 patients, were identified. The relative risk (95% confidence interval) for death, MI, target lesion revascularisation, and stent thrombosis within 1-year of the index procedure for a provisional vs. two-stent strategy were 1.12 (0.42-3.02), 0.57 (0.37-0.87), 0.91 (0.61-1.35), and 0.56 (0.23-1.35), respectively. By quantitative coronary angiography, there was no difference in the difference in means (95% CI) between the provisional and two-stent strategies for percent diameter stenosis (95% CI) in the main vessel or side branch, -1.08 (-2.91 to 0.74) and 1.30 (-3.35 to 5.96), respectively. CONCLUSION: While death, stent thrombosis, and restenosis were similar between the treatment groups, MI was more common with the two-stent strategy. Thus, compared to a routine two-stent strategy, provisional stenting yields similar efficacy with superior safety and lower costs.

Sodium bicarbonate vs sodium chloride for the prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography: a randomized trial.

CONTEXT: Sodium bicarbonate has been suggested as a possible strategy for prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy, a common cause of renal failure associated with prolonged hospitalization, increased health care costs, and substantial morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To determine if sodium bicarbonate is superior to sodium chloride for preventing contrast medium-induced nephropathy in patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney dysfunction who are undergoing coronary angiography. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized, controlled, single-blind study conducted between January 2, 2006, and January 31, 2007, and enrolling 353 patients with stable renal disease who were undergoing coronary angiography at a single US center. Included patients were 18 years or older and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) or less and 1 or more of diabetes mellitus, history of congestive heart failure, hypertension, or age older than 75 years. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either sodium chloride (n = 178) or sodium bicarbonate (n = 175) administered at the same rate (3 mL/kg for 1 hour before coronary angiography, decreased to 1.5 mL/kg per hour during the procedure and for 4 hours after the completion of the procedure). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary end point was a 25% or greater decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate on days 1 through 4 after contrast exposure. RESULTS: Median patient age was 71 (interquartile range, 65-76) years, and 45% had diabetes mellitus. The groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. The primary end point was met in 13.3% of the sodium bicarbonate group and 14.6% of the sodium chloride group (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.60; P = .82). In patients randomized to receive sodium bicarbonate vs sodium chloride, the rates of death, dialysis, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular events did not differ significantly at 30 days (1.7% vs 1.7%, 0.6% vs 1.1%, 0.6% vs 0%, and 0% vs 2.2%, respectively) or at 30 days to 6 months (0.6% vs 2.3%, 0.6% vs 1.1%, 0.6% vs 2.3%, and 0.6% vs 1.7%, respectively) (P > .10 for all). CONCLUSION: The results of this study do not suggest that hydration with sodium bicarbonate is superior to hydration with sodium chloride for the prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy in patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease who are undergoing coronary angiography. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00312117.

Long-term outcomes by clopidogrel duration and stent type in a diabetic population with de novo coronary artery lesions.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether long-term clinical outcomes differed between bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) by duration of clopidogrel use among diabetic patients. BACKGROUND: There is concern that DES are associated with late adverse events such as death and myocardial infarction (MI) secondary to stent thrombosis. However, data on outcomes in diabetic patients remain limited. METHODS: We identified 749 patients with diabetes mellitus who underwent stent implantation with either BMS (n = 251) or DES (n = 498) from October 2002 to December 2004. We performed survival analysis on the full cohort and on those event-free from death, MI, or repeat revascularization at 6 months (n = 671). RESULTS: By clopidogrel duration, the event rate for death or MI was 3.2% in the >9-month group, 9.4% in the 6- to 9-month group, and 16.5% in the <6-month group, p < 0.001. For death alone, the event rate was 0.5% in the >9-month group, 4.3% in the 6- to 9-month group, and 10.0% in the <6-month group, p < 0.001. When taking BMS clopidogrel non-users as a referent in the multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) for death and nonfatal MI for DES clopidogrel users, DES clopidogrel nonusers, and BMS clopidogrel users were: HR 0.22 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.62, p = 0.005), HR 0.39 (95% CI 0.13 to 1.13, p = 0.08), and HR 0.25 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.81, p = 0.02), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Longer duration of clopidogrel use was associated with a lower incidence of death or MI in both the BMS and DES groups. Among clopidogrel nonusers, the incidence of death/MI or death did not differ by stent type.

Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the 6-month angiographic patency rates of greater saphenous veins removed during coronary artery bypass grafting with the endoscopic vein harvest or open vein harvest techniques. METHODS: Two hundred patients undergoing nonemergency on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively randomized to either endoscopic vein harvest or open vein harvest. Follow-up angiography of all vein grafts was scheduled at 6 months. Graft patency and disease grades were assigned independently by 2 interventional cardiologists. Leg wound healing was evaluated at discharge, 1 month, and 6 months for evidence of complications. RESULTS: There were 3 conversions from endoscopic vein harvest to open vein harvest because of vein factors. Leg wound complications were significantly lower in the endoscopic vein harvest group (7.4% vs 19.4%, P = .014). On multivariable analysis, endoscopic vein harvest emerged as the only factor affecting wound complications (odds ratio, 0.33). Three deaths (2 perioperative and 1 late) occurred in the endoscopic vein harvest group that were unrelated to vein graft closure. Twenty-four and 29 patients in the endoscopic vein harvest and open vein harvest cohorts, respectively, refused the follow-up 6-month angiography. Therefore a total of 144 angiograms (73 endoscopic vein harvests and 71 open vein harvests) and 336 vein grafts (166 endoscopic vein harvests and 170 open vein harvests) were available for analysis. The overall occlusion rates at 6 months were 21.7% for endoscopic vein harvest and 17.6% for open vein harvest. Additionally, there was evidence of significant disease (>50% stenosis) in 10.2% and 12.4% of endoscopic vein harvest and open vein harvest grafts, respectively. By means of ordinal hierarchic logistic regression, endoscopic vein harvest was not found to be a risk factor for vein graft occlusion or disease (odds ratio, 1.15). Significant predictors were congestive heart failure (odds ratio, 2.87), graft to the diagonal artery territory (odds ratio, 1.76), larger vein conduit size (odds ratio, 1.32), and graft flow (odds ratio, 0.90). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic vein harvest reduces leg wound complications compared with open vein harvest without compromising the 6-month patency rate. The overall patency rate depends on target and vein-related variables and patient characteristics rather than the method of vein harvesting.

Restenosis in Intervened Coronaries with Hyperhomocysteinemia (RICH).

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the contribution made by elevated serum homocysteine evels in raising the risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions. The objective of this study was to determine whether elevated homocysteine evels increase the risk of restenosis. METHODS: Two hundred and two consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stents on previously nonintervened native coronary arteries were eligible for enrollment in the study. Before the percutaneous coronary intervention, a fasting serum homocysteine evel was drawn. Patients were followed-up by their primary cardiologists for recurrence of symptoms. Those patients who had a recurrence of anginal symptoms consistent with clinical restenosis were referred for a repeat angiogram. All other patients were followed-up medically. The homocysteine evels of the patients who had repeat angiography for recurrent symptoms were compared to those who were followed-up medically. RESULTS: Age, stent ength, stent diameter, and homocysteine evels were all associated with an increased risk of restenosis in the univariate analysis. In the multiple ogistic regression model, the only variable that remained significant in relation to an increased risk of restenosis was homocysteine. There was a significant difference in the mean homocysteine evels between the restenosis group (13.7 micromol/L) and those without restenosis (9.6 micromol/L; P <.0001). A homocysteine evel > or =11.1 micromol/L was identified as the best threshold for an increased risk of restenosis with a sensitivity of 75.0% and specificity of 76.9% (OR 6.5, CI 2.3-18.6; P =.0004). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that elevated homocysteine evels strongly correlate with an increased risk of restenosis.