ABSTRACT
Neuropathic pain may be present in a proportion of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Its presence may lead to the requirement of altered management approaches in these conditions. This study investigated the prevalence of neuropathic pain in OA as compared to that in RA. Patients with OA and RA were included cross-sectionally if they had no other known neuropathic disorder. The PainDETECT questionnaire was used to assess neuropathic pain. WOMAC and CDAI scores were used to assess disease severity in OA and RA respectively. 69 patients with OA with a mean WOMAC score of 53.30 ± 16.39 and 98 patients with RA with a mean CDAI of 25.48 ± 16.99 were compared. The median PainDETECT score for OA was 13 (0-30) and RA was 5 (0-37) [p<0.001]. 15 patients with OA and six patients with RA were highly likely to have neuropathic pain, while 15 patients with OA and 30 patients with RA were classified as possibly having neuropathic pain. Thus, the proportion of patients free from neuropathic pain was higher in the RA group (63.3%) than in the OA group (39.1%) [p = 0.003]. Both the prevalence and the severity of neuropathic pain were significantly higher in OA than in RA. These findings suggest that neuropathic pain is an important factor in OA, as in RA, and must be considered in management as well as in future research in both these conditions.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In this era of evidence-based medicine, only systematic research can help in providing judicious and precise healthcare to individual patients based on updated knowledge and skills. However, many medical professionals do not feel competent and confident enough to conduct research. One of the reasons could be the lack of a research-based curriculum in undergraduate courses. The National Medical Council has also stressed the need for formal training in research methodology for healthcare professionals. The research methodology workshops help to familiarize the participants with basic, clinical, and translational research required to impart optimum patient care. The objective of our study was to evaluate a research methodology workshop conducted for postgraduate students by assessing the participant's knowledge, feedback, and expected impact using Kirkpatrick's evaluation model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quasi-experimental, single-group study was conducted among 132 first-year postgraduate students. The four levels of Kirkpatrick's model were applied for evaluation. Feedback forms, scores of the pretest and posttest, quality of the research proposal drafted by the postgraduates for their thesis, and finally successful submission of the research proposal were the components used to evaluate the four levels of outcome of Kirkpatrick's model. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data collected were compiled and tabulated into MS Excel. Proportions were calculated for categorical variables and mean and standard deviation (SD) for scores. A comparison of means between pre- and postworkshop scores was made with paired t-test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0 software. RESULTS: Out of 132 participants, 29% (38) were males and 71% (94) were females. The mean ± SD pretest and posttest scores at a 95% confidence interval were 10.55 ± 2.537 and 12.43 ± 2.484, respectively. The difference was found to be statistically significant by paired sample t-test (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Participant feedback is vital for improving research methodology workshops. The workshop met the overall requirements of the participants. There was a significant improvement in the knowledge of participants after the workshop completion.
ABSTRACT
Systemic vasculitides are among the less common disorders encountered in routine rheumatology practice. The low incidence and heterogeneous presentation at onset can potentially lead to delayed diagnosis. Not recognizing these in the early phase may prove detrimental, as some vasculitis may progress to a catastrophic course with major morbidity or mortality. The causes of diagnostic delay may vary among different types of vasculitis and may also be disease-, patient-, or physician-related. Disease-related factors include the myriad presentations with diverse and non-specific symptoms, mimicking other conditions like infections. In addition, some forms have prolonged prodromal phases before evident organ damage. Limited awareness among healthcare professionals, particularly outside rheumatology, and a lack of readily available diagnostic tools contribute to missed diagnoses. Delays in seeking care due to non-specific symptoms or lack of access to specialist care can worsen outcomes. The economic burden also increases with delayed diagnosis and damage accrual when the disease remains unrecognized or untreated for prolonged periods. Although the causes of vasculitis are numerous, including secondary causes, in this review, we focus on diagnostic delays in primary vasculitides and suggest potential steps to identify and treat these diseases early. These include educating both healthcare professionals and the public about the signs and symptoms of vasculitis; expanding the rheumatology workforce and facilitating timely referrals; implementing readily available and reliable tests for early detection; and streamlining care and diagnostic pathways. Such measures have the potential to improve the overall outcomes of the disease, with prolonged remission, minimal damage accrual, and improved quality of life.
Subject(s)
Delayed Diagnosis , Systemic Vasculitis , Humans , Systemic Vasculitis/diagnosis , Rheumatology , Time Factors , Predictive Value of Tests , PrognosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: An additional dose of COVID-19 vaccine is being offered to vaccinated people, especially those immunocompromised. The most widely available vaccines in India are the adenoviral vector-based AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) and the heat-inactivated (BBV152). This study investigated the efficacy of both vaccines in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD). OBJECTIVES: To compare final anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers, neutralization of pseudovirions by these antibodies, and T cell responses between patients of AIRD who had received the third dose of AZD1222 and BBV152 vaccines. METHODS: Patients with stable AIRD who had completed two doses of COVID-19 vaccination but had a suboptimal response (anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody<212) were randomized (1:1) to receive either AZD1222 or BBV152 as a booster dose. Patients with previous hybrid immunity or those who developed COVID-19 during the trial were excluded. Antibody titers, neutralization of Wuhan and Omicron pseudovirions, and interferon release by T cells (enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot)) in response to the Spike antigen were measured four weeks after this booster dose. RESULTS: 146 were screened, 91 were randomized, and 67 were analyzed per protocol. The third dose improved antibody titers (p<0.001), neutralization of the Wuhan strain (p<0.001), and T cell interferon release (p<0.001) but not neutralization of the Omicron strain (p=0.24). Antibody titers were higher (p<0.005) after ADZ1222 boost (2,414 IU (interquartile range (IQR): 330-10,315)) than BBV1222 (347.7 IU (0.4-973)). Neutralization of the Wuhan stain was better (AZD1222: 76.6%(23.0-95.45) versus BBV152 (32.7% (0-78.9), p=0.03 by ANCOVA). Neutralization of Omicron (0 (0-28.4) vs 0 (0-4.8)) and T cell interferon release (57.0 IU (23.5-95) vs 50.5 IU (13.2-139)) were similar. CONCLUSION: The third dose improved all parameters of immunogenicity in AIRD patients with previous inadequate responses except Omicron neutralization. The vector-based vaccine exhibits notable efficacy, particularly in antibody titers and neutralizing the Wuhan strain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2021/12/038928.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Reactive arthritis (ReA) provides a unique opportunity to comprehend how a mucosal infection leads to inflammatory arthritis at a distant site without the apparent invasion of the pathogen. Unfortunately, conventional stool cultures after ReA provide limited information, and there is a dearth of metagenomic studies in ReA. The objective of this study was to identify gut microbiota associated with the development of ReA. METHODS: Patients with ReA or undifferentiated peripheral spondyloarthritis (UpSpA) were included if they presented within 4 weeks of the onset of the current episode of arthritis. Metagenomic DNA was extracted from the stools of these patients and of 36 age- and sex-similar controls. Sequencing and analysis were done using a standard 16S ribosomal pipeline. RESULTS: Of 55 patients, there was no difference between the gut microbiota of postdiarrheal ReA(n = 20) and of upSpA (n = 35). Comparing the gut microbiota of patients vs healthy controls, the patients had significantly higher alpha and beta diversity measures. After stringency filters, Proteobacteria had high abundance while Firmicutes had lesser as compared with the controls. Six families were overexpressed in patients, while another five were overexpressed in controls. Sixteen genera and 18 species were significantly different between patients and controls. At the species level there was strong association of Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium septicum Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Empedobacter brevis, Roseburia hominis, Bacillus velezensis, and Crassaminicella with ReA. CONCLUSION: The microbiota of classical gut-associated ReA and upSpA is similar. Patients have higher diversities in their gut microbiota compared with healthy controls. Both known and previously unreported species associated with ReA/upSpA were identified.
ABSTRACT
There is uncertainty regarding the effect of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD) who are on immunosuppressive drugs. We did a multicity cross-sectional seroprevalence study conducted in five different cities in India before COVID-19 immunization. Patients with a diagnosis of AIRD and DMARDs were included. Relatives of the patients, preferably staying in the same household with no known rheumatic diseases served as controls. Serum IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the spike protein and nucleoprotein (NP) were assayed in eight hundred and eighty nine sera (subjects with disease = 379 and in subjects without disease = 510). IgG antibodies to either RBD and/or NP were positive in 135 (36%) subjects with AIRD as compared to 196 (38%) controls. The seroprevalence of anti-RBD and anti-NP varied between different cities but was not significantly different between subjects with and without disease in Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Bengaluru and Bhubaneswar. However, the occurrence of IgG antibodies to RBD was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in subjects with disease (28/65;43%) as compared to subjects without disease (42/65;65%) in Kolkata, where the positivity rate was lower in connective tissue disease group than in inflammatory arthritis group. Overall, patients with rheumatic diseases on DMARDs have IgG antibodies to RBD and NP of SARSCoV-2 at a comparable level with that of subjects without disease, but the level of antibodies to RBD is lower in patients with connective tissue disease on immunosuppressive drugs in one centre.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Autoimmune Diseases , COVID-19 , Rheumatic Diseases , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cities , Cross-Sectional Studies , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Autoimmune Diseases/epidemiology , Immunoglobulin G , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , Antibodies, ViralABSTRACT
This study aimed to assess the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of breakthrough infection (BI) following coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), a risk group associated with an immune-suppressed state and high cardiopulmonary disease burden. Cross-sectional data from fully vaccinated respondents with SSc, non-SSc autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs), and healthy controls (HCs) were extracted from the COVAD database, an international self-reported online survey. BI was defined according to the Centre for Disease Control definition. Infection-free survival was compared between the groups using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. Cox proportional regression was used to assess the association between BI and age, sex, ethnicity, and immunosuppressive drugs at the time of vaccination. The severity of BI in terms of hospitalization and requirement for oxygen supplementation was compared between groups. Of 10,900 respondents, 6836 fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: 427 SSc, 2934 other AIRDs, and 3475 HCs. BI were reported in 6.3% of SSc, 6.9% of non-SSc AIRD, and 16.1% of HCs during a median follow-up of 100 (IQR: 60-137) days. SSc had a lower risk for BI than HC [hazard ratio (HR): 0.56 (95% CI 0.46-0.74)]. BIs were associated with age [HR: 0.98 (0.97-0.98)] but not ethnicity or immunosuppressive drugs at the time of vaccination. Patients with SSc were more likely to have asymptomatic COVID-19, but symptomatic patients reported more breathlessness. Hospitalization [SSc: 4 (14.8%), HCs: 37 (6.6%), non-SSc AIRDs: 32(15.8%)] and the need for oxygenation [SSc: 1 (25%); HC: 17 (45.9%); non-SSc AIRD: 13 (40.6%)] were similar between the groups. The incidence of BI in SSc was lower than that in HCs but comparable to that in non-SSc AIRDs. The severity of BI did not differ between the groups. Advancing age, but not ethnicity or immunosuppressive medication use, was associated with BIs.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Rheumatic Diseases , Scleroderma, Systemic , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/complications , Survival Analysis , Rheumatic Diseases/complications , Scleroderma, Systemic/complications , Surveys and Questionnaires , Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresABSTRACT
MIS-C is a rare, highly inflammatory state resembling incomplete Kawasaki disease, temporarily associated with COVID-19. The pathogenesis is not completely known. RNAseq was carried out on whole blood of six treatment-naïve MIS-C patients. This was compared against RNAseq transcriptomics data of five healthy controls (HC), four Kawasaki Disease (KD) and seven systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA). Using PCA, MIS-C clustered separately from HC, KD and sJIA. Amongst the top 50 significant genes in the three comparisons with HC, KD, and sJIA, common genes were: TMCC2, ITGA2B, DMTN, GFI1B, PF4, QSER1, GRAP2, TUBB1. DSEA revealed that maximum number of hits for overexpressed pathways was for NABA matrisome activation when MIS-C was compared against HC. Cytokine stimulated cellular activation pathways, specifically IL-10 were downregulated. MIS-C had more activated pathways of neutrophil degranulation and acquired immune activation but less of coagulation system or heat-shock system involvement as compared to KD. As compared to sJIA, humoral immune response and complements were activated. Matrisome activation was higher, with increased cell-cell interaction and ECM signalling. This analysis revealed novel insights into the pathogenesis of MIS-C, including the potential role of matrisomes, humoral immune system and down-regulated interleukin-10 pathways.
ABSTRACT
Articular syndrome is often the presentation of a person's various rheumatic or related diseases. It includes both arthralgia and arthritis, with objective signs of joint inflammation defining the latter. This syndromic approach to joint pain enables a scientific method for early diagnosis of common rheumatic conditions without compromising the recognition of uncommon conditions. This review explores common rheumatic conditions associated with articular syndrome, including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It supports the early differentiation of uncommon but emerging entities such as reactive arthritis (ReA). The aim of the review is to comprehensively overview various forms of articular syndrome to update rheumatologists' and allied health specialists' knowledge. Epidemiology, clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic strategies are discussed in the context of articular syndrome. The challenges emerging in the peri-pandemic COVID-19 era are highlighted. The improved understanding of the spectrum of clinical conditions and disease states presenting with articular syndrome may facilitate early diagnosis, optimal management, and enhanced patient outcomes within the realm of rheumatology.
ABSTRACT
Curcumin has anti-inflammatory properties but current evidence is limited to advocate its use in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We explored whether curcumin could maintain remission in patients with RA while tapering conventional synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARD). In this patient-and investigator-blinded trial, adults with RA in sustained remission for more than six months were randomized to oral curcumin (1 g) with piperine (5 mg) twice daily or matching placebo. Patients who had received biological DMARDs or curcumin supplements in the last 6 months were excluded. csDMARD were tapered and stopped sequentially as per a fixed protocol. The primary outcome was flare-free survival at 52 weeks. The secondary outcomes were flare rate, correlation of serum curcuminoid levels with flares and safety. 200 patients (100 per arm) entered the trial with comparable baseline characteristics. Per protocol analysis included 92 and 93 participants in the curcumin and the placebo group, respectively. Flare-free survival at week 52 was similar between both groups (60% versus 64%; p = 0.76). The median time to flare was similar [Curcumin: 219 days (IQR: 123) versus placebo: 214 days (95.8); p = 0.067]. Cox proportionate regression modelling showed that the flare-free survival was independent of serum curcuminoid levels [adjusted HR = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-1.0)]. The model showed that flare-free survival was not associated with age, gender, seropositivity, or csDMARD used at baseline. No serious adverse effects were noted. Curcumin did not impact the flare-free survival in patients with RA in remission during the tapering of csDMARDs despite achieving adequate serum levels.Trial registration: CTRI/2018/04/013279.
ABSTRACT
The global health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic overwhelmed the capacity of healthcare systems to cope with the rapidly spreading infection and its associated complications. Among these complications, autoimmune phenomena such as systemic vasculitis emerged as a significant challenge. Both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the vaccines developed to combat it appeared to induce clinical manifestations resembling various types of systemic vasculitis, affecting large, medium, and small vessels. These virus- or vaccine-induced vasculitides exhibited a distinct natural history and course from de novo vasculitis, as they were more responsive to steroid therapy and some mild cases even resolved spontaneously. Notably, there have been no confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination triggering variable vessel vasculitis like Behcet's disease or Kawasaki disease. IgA vasculitis, which is predominantly a pediatric condition, was more prevalent in adults after COVID-19 infection and they had a favorable outcome with glucocorticoid treatment. The impact of immunosuppression, especially B-cell-depleting agents, on the immunogenicity of the vaccine was evident, but there was no significant increase in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in these patients compared to the general population. Considering their relatively benign course, these post-COVID or post-vaccine vasculitides seem to be amenable to 0.8 to 1 mg/kg prednisolone or equivalent, which could be gradually tapered. The need for immunosuppression and the duration of steroid therapy should be determined on an individual basis. While the world still reels from the perils of a deadly pandemic, the aftermath continues to haunt. Our narrative review aims to explore the effects of COVID and the vaccine on systemic vasculitis, as well as the effect of disease and immunosuppression on the immunogenicity of the COVID vaccine.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Systemic Vasculitis , Vasculitis , Adult , Child , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vasculitis/etiology , Phenotype , SteroidsABSTRACT
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multi-system autoimmune disease with varied dermatological manifestations that are almost universal. Overall, lupus disease has a major effect on the quality of life in these patients. We assessed the extent of cutaneous disease in early lupus and correlated it with the SLE quality-of-life (SLEQoL) index and disease activity measures. Patients diagnosed as SLE with the skin involved were recruited at the first presentation and were assessed for cutaneous and systemic disease activity using the cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease area and severity index (CLASI) and the Mexican-SLE disease activity index (Mex-SLEDAI), respectively. Quality of life was assessed with the SLEQoL tool while systemic damage was captured by the SLICC damage index. Fifty-two patients with SLE who had cutaneous involvement were enrolled (40, 76.9% females) with a median disease duration of 1 month (1-3.7). The median age was 27.5 years (IQR: 20-41). Median Mex-SLEDAI and SLICC damage index were 8(IQR: 4.5-11) and 0 (0-1), respectively. The median CLASI activity and damage scores were 3 (1-5) and 1 (0-1), respectively. Overall, there was no correlation between SLEQoL with CLASI or CLASI damage. Only the self-image domain of SLEQoL correlated with total CLASI (ρ = 0.32; p = 0.01) and CLASI-D (ρ = 0.35; p = 0.02). There was a weak correlation of CLASI with the Mexican-SLEDAI score (ρ = 0.30; p = 0.03) but not with the SLICC damage index. In this cohort of early lupus, cutaneous disease activity in lupus had a weak correlation with systemic disease. Cutaneous features did not appear to influence the quality of life except in the self-image domain.
Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Female , Humans , Adult , Male , Quality of Life , Cross-Sectional Studies , Skin , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/diagnosis , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
One of the common cutaneous symptoms of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that may have major psychosocial effects in a female is diffuse alopecia. Although Janus kinase inhibitors have shown encouraging results in the treatment of SLE and of alopecia areata in recent studies, tofacitinib in treating refractory alopecia caused by SLE has been rarely documented. The Janus kinases (JAKs) are intracellular tyrosine kinases that play a significant role in the pathophysiology of SLE by participating in a wide range of inflammatory cascades. Here, we reported a 33-year-old SLE patient with long standing (3 years) refractory alopecia who took tofacitinib and observed a substantial increase in hair growth. This was sustained at 2-years follow-up even after tapering off glucocorticoids completely. In addition, we reviewed the literature to look for further evidence to support the use of JAK inhibitors for alopecia in SLE.
Subject(s)
Alopecia Areata , Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Female , Adult , Alopecia/drug therapy , Alopecia Areata/drug therapy , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Janus KinasesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Data on the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the durability of protection against the prevalent Omicron variant are scarce, especially in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs). Hence, we prospectively studied Omicron breakthrough infections in patients with AIRDs and attempted to isolate associated risk factors. METHODS: Patients with AIRDs who had completed primary vaccination with either AZD1222 or BBV152 vaccines were included and prospectively followed up from January 2022 onwards for the development of breakthrough Omicron infections. The time interval from the last event [2nd dose of vaccination (V) or past COVID-19 infection (I) whichever was later] to Omicron infection was recorded. Patients were divided based on the events and their order of occurrence into V + V, V + I, I + V, V + I + V, and V + V + I groups. The incidence of breakthrough infections and their predictors were studied with a focus on the vaccine type and hybrid (H) immunity (vaccinated individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection). RESULTS: We included 907 patients with AIRDs (53.5 ± 11.7 years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:5.1), and the majority of patients had received AZD1222 (755, 83.2%). Breakthrough infections were observed in 158 of 907(17.4%) of which 97 (10.4%) were confirmed by RT-PCR. Breakthrough infections were significantly greater in the V versus the H group (15.7% and 3.5%, log-rank test, p = < 0.01). Among the hybrid group, the order of infection and vaccination had no bearing on the risk of breakthrough infections. On multivariate analysis, breakthrough infections were significantly lesser in the H versus the V group [HR: 0.2(0.1-0.4); p = 0.01]. CONCLUSION: The risk of breakthrough Omicron infections in fully vaccinated patients with AIRDs was 17.4% with a significantly lower risk in patients with hybrid immunity.
Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , COVID-19 , Rheumatic Diseases , Humans , Female , Male , COVID-19 Vaccines , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Breakthrough InfectionsABSTRACT
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a cardiovascular event whose risk is increased in most inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). Mechanisms that increase VTE risk include antiphospholipid antibodies (APLs), particularly anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta2glycoprotein I antibodies and lupus anticoagulant present together, and inflammation-mediated endothelial injury. Patients with IRDs should receive long-term anticoagulation drugs when the risk of VTE recurrence is high. In the light of recent warnings from regulatory agencies regarding heightened VTE risk with Janus kinase inhibitors, these drugs should be initiated only after a careful assessment of VTE risk in those with IRDs.
Subject(s)
Antiphospholipid Syndrome , Rheumatic Diseases , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Antibodies, Antiphospholipid , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/complications , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/diagnosis , Inflammation , Rheumatic Diseases/complicationsABSTRACT
Relapse in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Utility of ANCA for prediction of relapses is still controversial. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and WebOfScience were searched, screened and confirmed for inclusion [PROSPERO No: CRD42020220308]. Studies measuring serial ANCA by ELISA or indirect immunofluorescence (IF), reporting relapses with sufficient data to calculate sensitivity and specificity were included. Diagnostic odds ratio (OR), sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios (LR) were synthesized using a bivariate mixed-effect regression model. Sub-group analysis included a comparison between ELISA and IIF, anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO) and -proteinase 3(PR3), and type of rise in ANCA. For meta-analysis of survival outcomes, hazard ratios were synthesized using a random-effect model. QUADAS-2 was used for assessing quality of studies, I2 statistic for heterogeneity Begg's test for publication bias. 2946 abstracts and 43 full-texts were reviewed to identify 26 eligible studies that included 2623 patients with AAV and 848 relapses. Overall heterogeneity was high [I2 = 99%] and the overall risk of bias was low to moderate. ANCA positivity by either ELISA or immunofluorescence for predicting relapse of AAV had a sensitivity of 0.70(95% CI 0.58-0.81), specificity of 0.66(0.55-0.76), positive LR of 2.1(1.6-42.7) and negative LR of 0.44(0.30-0.60). ELISA performed marginally better [OR: 5(3-7)] than IIF [OR: 4(2-9)] with similar sensitivity, specificity, PLR and NLR. The area under the curve for PR3 was 0.74(0.7-0.77), while that for MPO was not computed as the number of eligible studies was only three. In the survival analysis, the hazard ratio for relapse was 3.11(1.7-5.65). The meta-analysis shows modest accuracy of ANCA in predicting relapses of ANCA vasculitis and supports the use of serial ANCA monitoring as a biomarker for relapse.
Subject(s)
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis , Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic , Humans , Myeloblastin , Biomarkers , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Recurrence , PeroxidaseABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Understanding the pathogenesis of COVID-19 is integral for its successful treatment. METHODS: Available literature on the relationship between COVID-19, heat shock proteins (HSP), and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS) system were searched and used to hypothesize how HSP can be targeted in COVID-19. RESULTS: During SARS-CoV-2 cellular entry, the ACE-2 receptor is downregulated. This leads to the augmentation of angiotensin-2/AT1 receptor axis along with attenuation of the ACE-2/angiotensin1-7/Mas axis. Heat shock proteins are key stabilizing molecules in various pathways.In the heart and vessels, HSP-90 and HSP-60 can facilitate angiotensin-2-mediated myocardial injury and endothelial cell activation. HSP-60-TLR4/CD14 complex formation stabilizes IκB-kinase (IKK) potentiating NF-κB activation. HSPs in lungs and kidneys have antioxidant, vasodilatory, and anti-inflammatory actions and may be protective against the effects of RAAS. Stress-induced HSP-70 has a role in complement-mediated microvascular injury such as has been demonstrated in COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 can induce autophagy via Beclin-1 and ER (endoplasmic reticular) stress via BIP. These two can be potential targets in the HSP environment. CONCLUSION: Various HSP molecules can modulate the effects of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS) system and thus may have a potential role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation , COVID-19 , Renin-Angiotensin System , Humans , COVID-19/etiology , COVID-19/metabolism , Heat-Shock Proteins/metabolism , Autophagy , SARS-CoV-2 , Protein BindingABSTRACT
Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases with a previous infection by the SARS-CoV-2 virus have exaggerated responses to a single dose of COVID-19 vaccination as compared to fully vaccinated infection naive patients. The second dose is currently recommended at an extended gap after the infection, but the information available regarding response to the second dose in this subgroup is limited. Patients with AIRDs previously infected with COVID-19, who have received at least one dose of AZD1222/ChAdOx1 (n = 200) were included and stratified based on vaccine doses (V), and infection (I) into I + V, I + V + V, V + I, V + V + I. Anti-RBD (receptor binding domain) antibodies were compared across the four groups. In 49 patients of the I + V + V group (AZD12222), paired sera were compared for antibody levels and neutralization after each vaccine dose. Thirty patients with hybrid immunity after BBV152 and 25 with complete vaccination without infection were included as controls. The highest anti-RBD antibody levels were observed in the V + V + I group (18,219 ± 7702 IU/ml) with statistically similar titers in the I + V + V (10,392 ± 8514 IU/ml) and the I + V (8801 ± 8122 IU/ml). This was confirmed in the 49 paired samples that paradoxically showed a lowering of antibody titers after the second dose [9626 (IQR: 4575-18,785)-5781 (2484-11,906); p < 0.001]. Neutralization of the Delta variant was unaffected but Omicron neutralization was significantly reduced after the second dose [45.7 (5.3-86.53)-35% (7.3-70.9); p = 0.028]. Ancillary analyses showed that only the hybrid immune sera could neutralize the Omicron variant and AZD1222 hybrids performed better than BBV152 hybrids. The second dose of AZD1222 did not boost antibody titers in patients with RD who had COVID-19 previously. In the analysis of paired sera, the second dose led to a statistically significant reduction in antibody titers and also reduced neutralization of the Omicron variant.
Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , COVID-19 , Rheumatic Diseases , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adaptive Immunity , Antibodies, ViralABSTRACT
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) are characterized by necrotizing inflammation of small and medium-size vessels that often manifest with devastating multi-organ effects. They present with a myriad of systemic features and require potent immunosuppression. Since they are uncommonly encountered in clinical practice, it is necessary to understand physicians' knowledge and perceptions about this group of diseases. An online questionnaire was designed featuring 28 questions based on relevant global practice guidelines, recommendations, and previous online surveys on AAV. The questionnaire was validated by a core group of specialists with an interest in AAV. It was shared via social networking sites and entries were restricted to physicians. Only completed entries were analyzed with descriptive statistics. A total of 113 respondents from 21 different countries responded of whom the commonest were rheumatologists, internists, and general practitioners. Forty-five (40%) ran clinics dedicated to AAV patients as a part of their practice. They commented on organs involved in AAV; vasculitis secondary to infections, drugs or other rheumatic diseases; various tests useful for AAV diagnosis; and drug choices for induction and maintenance. They mentioned their experience regarding COVID-19 in AAV patients as well as vasculitic manifestations of COVID-19. Various methods to mitigate cardiovascular risks in AAV were mentioned. Finally, the respondents indicated how medical education needed to be strengthened to increase awareness and knowledge regarding AAV. This survey helped to inform about various perceptions regarding AAV across countries, including current practices and recent evolution of management. It also provided information on treatment of the COVID-19 in AAV patients. This survey showed that there is still a lack in understanding the prevalent definitions and there is gap between guidelines and current practice. Key Points ⢠Perception about ANCA-associated vasculitis differ across countries. ⢠The number of cases encountered across 21 different countries are limited implying a need for multi-national cooperation to study this disease further. ⢠The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the approach towards ANCA-associated vasculitis by the various clinicians.