Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Atten Disord ; 27(7): 743-756, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37144295

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the real-world efficacy, safety, and functional outcomes of PRC-063 (multilayer-release methylphenidate) versus lisdexamfetamine (LDX) in ADHD subjects in a phase IV, open-label study. METHOD: The primary endpoint was the change in the ADHD-DSM-5 Rating Scale (ADHD-5-RS) total score from baseline to Month 4. Secondary endpoints included a non-inferiority comparison between PRC-063 and LDX and measures of functioning and evening behavior. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three pediatric and 112 adult subjects were enrolled. Mean ADHD-5-RS scores (standard deviation) were reduced in pediatric (-16.6 [10.4]) and adult (-14.8 [10.6]) subjects treated with PRC-063 (p < .001). PRC-063 was non-inferior to LDX in the pediatric population but not in the adult population. Significant improvements were demonstrated in quality of life and functionality. Both medications were well-tolerated; more adverse events led to study discontinuation in pediatric subjects treated with LDX versus PRC-063. CONCLUSION: PRC-063 and LDX significantly improved ADHD symptomatology and functioning and were well-tolerated.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Central Nervous System Stimulants , Methylphenidate , Humans , Adult , Child , Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate/therapeutic use , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/chemically induced , Methylphenidate/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Dextroamphetamine/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Double-Blind Method , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
2.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 42(4): 980-8, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26806441

ABSTRACT

This work identifies effective computable features from the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), to develop a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for breast ultrasound. Computerized features corresponding to ultrasound BI-RADs categories were designed and tested using a database of 283 pathology-proven benign and malignant lesions. Features were selected based on classification performance using a "bottom-up" approach for different machine learning methods, including decision tree, artificial neural network, random forest and support vector machine. Using 10-fold cross-validation on the database of 283 cases, the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was 0.84 from a support vector machine with 77.7% overall accuracy; the highest overall accuracy, 78.5%, was from a random forest with the AUC 0.83. Lesion margin and orientation were optimum features common to all of the different machine learning methods. These features can be used in CAD systems to help distinguish benign from worrisome lesions.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/standards , Machine Learning , Pattern Recognition, Automated/standards , Ultrasonography, Mammary/methods , Ultrasonography, Mammary/standards , Female , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Models, Biological , Observer Variation , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Support Vector Machine , United States
3.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol ; 17(5): 675-88, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17979587

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of a novel long-duration multilayer-release (MLR) methylphenidate (MPH) formulation and immediate-release (IR) MPH in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a randomized, double-blind, crossover comparison of once-daily MLR and twice-daily IR-MPH in home and school settings in children with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) diagnosis of ADHD. Patients completed a 1-week baseline followed by two active medication titration phases. Each phase of treatment was 1-4 weeks of titration with an additional stable dose week. The final dose was based on efficacy and adverse events for each patient. Efficacy measures included Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) and Conners' Parent and Teacher Rating Scales (CPRS and CTRS). The Clinical Assessment of Side Effects (CASE) scale assessed frequency of adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 90 enrolled patients, aged 6.4-17.5 years, 79 (88%) completed the study. Stable daily doses were 32.0 and 32.5 mg for MLR and IR-MPH, respectively. All efficacy parameters were significantly improved from baseline. A total of 73.2% and 81.0% of patients on MLR and IR-MPH were rated as "much" or "very much improved" on the CGI. A total of 77.4% and 81.1% of patients were normalized on the CPRS-R and 78.9 and 90.4% of patients were normalized on the CTRS-R for MLR and IR-MPH, respectively. The mean CASE score was not different from baseline for either treatment.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Methylphenidate/administration & dosage , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Child , Cross-Over Studies , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Methylphenidate/adverse effects , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 68(2): 268-77, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17335326

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new biphasic multilayer-release (MLR) methylphenidate formulation in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: Adults 18 to 60 years of age with a DSM-IV diagnosis of ADHD entered a no-medication baseline week and were then randomly assigned to once-daily MLR methylphenidate or matching placebo. Patients were titrated to optimal effect over 1 to 3 weeks followed by 2 weeks of treatment on a stable dose. The same titration protocol was repeated with the alternate treatment. Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI) and Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales (Self-rated, CAARS-S, and Observer-rated, CAARS-O) were collected at weekly clinic visits. The study was conducted between October 2003 and April 2004. RESULTS: Fifty patients were randomly assigned to treatment, and 39 were analyzed in a per-protocol population (23 men, 16 women; mean age = 37.9 years). CGI-Improvement scores of subjects taking MLR methylphenidate were significantly improved compared with placebo (Global Improvement: 2.6 vs. 3.7; p = .0015). MLR methylphenidate produced improvements over placebo on the ADHD Index T scores of the CAARS-S (12.2 vs. 5.4 [change from baseline score]; p = .0083) and the CAARS-O (10.9 vs. 6.6 [change from baseline score]; p = .1404). The most frequent adverse events for MLR methylphenidate and placebo were headache (26% and 24%, respectively), anorexia (22% and 6%), insomnia (22% and 8%), nervousness (20% and 4%), and nausea (16% and 8%). There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily MLR methylphenidate produces significant improvements in ADHD symptoms and situational behavior in adult patients with ADHD, with a prolonged duration of effect and minimal side effects, thus having the potential to improve compliance and, therefore, treatment outcomes in routine clinical use.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Cross-Over Studies , Delayed-Action Preparations , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Methylphenidate/administration & dosage , Methylphenidate/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...