[Colitis Suggested to be Related to Nivolumab in a Gastric Cancer Patient with a History of Ulcerative Colitis: A Case Report].

We experienced a case in which long-term use of nivolumab in a patient with a history of ulcerative colitis led to disease control of gastric cancer. The case is a 77-year-old man. The patient had a history of ulcerative colitis and remained in remission on mesalazine 1500 mg/d. With continuous monitoring, nivolumab could be continued up to 16 courses, but was withdrawn due to the appearance of diarrhea (grade 1) and bloody stools, which was relieved with prednisolone (PSL) 40 mg/d. After two more courses, diarrhea (grade 3) appeared again, which improved with PSL 60 mg/d and increased dose of mesalazine. It is difficult to distinguish whether colitis that occurs after nivolumab administration is due to relapse exacerbation or irAE. The onset of irAE colitis is often reported within 3 months, and the fact that this patient developed irAE colitis after 8 months, despite having ulcerative colitis, is considered novel. In the future, we hope to accumulate cases so that immune checkpoint inhibitors can be used safely in patients with ulcerative colitis, and to establish appropriate methods for their use.

Factors associated with a reduction in the quality of life of patients with chronic hepatitis C treated by ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated factors associated with a reduction in the quality of life and their OR of patients with chronic hepatitis C who underwent ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy. METHODS: The subjects were 141 outpatients who had undergone ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy under a diagnosis of genotype I chronic hepatitis C or Child-Pugh A compensated cirrhosis at Hitachi General Hospital. The patient background before ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy, laboratory data and the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire scores during ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy were investigated. The Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire consists of 29 questions, and the mean value is calculated as the overall score through a 7-step assessment by patients. Using two divisions: a Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire score of <7 (symptoms are present) and that of 7 (no symptoms), as objective variables, patients with a Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire score of <7 were defined as having a reduced quality of life. Independent factors significantly associated with a reduction in the quality of life were extracted using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Based on the multivariate analysis, an alanine aminotransferase level of ≥23 U/L (OR: 4.380, 95% CI: 1.394 to 13.756) was extracted as an independent factor associated with a reduction in the quality of life (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: An increase in the baseline level of alanine aminotransferase was found to play a role in the reduction in the quality of life of patients with chronic hepatitis C who had undergone ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy.

[Side Effect Management in the Early Stages of Cabozantinib Administration].

In 2 patients with postoperative lung metastases from renal cell carcinoma, we administered cabozantinib at a starting dose of 40 mg. The side effects were proteinuria(Grade 2), hand-foot syndrome(Grade 2), and hypertension(Grade 3), which subsided following dose reduction and drug suspension. We believe that a low starting dose of cabozantinib might be a suitable regimen for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

[Evaluation of Risk Factors for Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated with Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors].

OBJECTIVE: Risk factors for immune-related adverse events(irAEs)associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) remain to be obscure. Therefore, we evaluated the patient background and clinical findings to identify risk factors for the development of irAEs. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 86 patients treated with ICIs between August 2018 and March 2020. They were classified into 2 groups who developed irAEs(irAE group)and did not develop irAEs(non-irAE group). RESULTS: The median age of the subjects was 70 years(39-84 years), and there were 65 males. The underlying disease was non-small cell lung cancer in 51 patients, gastric cancer in 14, renal cell cancer in 9, urothelial cancer in 11, and MSI-high small bowel cancer in 1. The irAE group, in whom treatment with ICIs was discontinued, included 16 patients(18.6%), and the non-irAE group included 70 patients(81.4%). The median number of treatment cycles was 8(1-91), and the median treatment period was 4 months(1-45 months). Evaluation in our hospital revealed no significant background factors, such as gender, age, or the treatment period, as risk factors for the development of eras. Lung disorders were frequently observed after the third-line treatment and in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSION: At present, the prediction of the development of irAEs is difficult. Careful follow-up observation and early irAEs management are important. In addition, further studies are necessary to identify risk factors for the development of irAEs.

[QOL Assessment in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Receiving Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvir or Simeprevir/Peginterferon/Ribavirin in Clinical Practice].

Recently, a clinical study using a Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) showed that ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF)-treated patients' QOL was more favorable than that of IFN/ribavirin (RBV)-treated patients. However, no study has reported QOL assessment in clinical practice. In this study, we compared the QOL between patients treated with LDV/SOF and those treated with simeprevir (SMV)/peginterferon (Peg-IFN)/RBV to provide QOL information in clinical practice. The subjects were 169 patients with type I chronic hepatitis C or compensated cirrhosis C (Child-Pugh Grade A) who were treated with SMV/Peg-IFN/RBV or LDV/SOF in Hitachi General Hospital. The QOL was assessed ≥2 weeks after the start of administration using the Japanese version of the CLDQ (Kida et al., 2008 version). The total CLDQ score in the LDV/SOF group was significantly higher than in the SMV/Peg-IFN/RBV group (6.59 vs. 6.38, respectively, p=0.007). In particular, the scores for 4 domains (abdominal symptoms, systemic symptoms, activity, and emotional function) in the former were significantly higher than in the latter (p<0.05). Furthermore, the rates of patients scoring 7 (no symptom) on 8 items in the former were significantly higher than in the latter (p<0.05). In clinical practice, LDV/SOF-treated patients' QOL was more favorable than that of those receiving conventional treatment with IFN and RBV. This study may make it possible for health care professionals to provide clinical QOL information on LDV/SOF therapy to patients. Furthermore, QOL information may promote decision-making for treatment, leading to effective treatment.

[Impact of Physician Order Support Duties on de novo Hepatitis Prevention].

"Immunosuppression and hepatitis B measures and guidelines for chemotherapy" were announced in 2009. However, a fulminant case that appeared when the guidelines were not observed was reported, and de novo hepatitis prevention is an urgent problem. The rate of compliance with these guidelines as of January 2014 was 20.4%, but this rose to 34.3%after the alert indication for de novo hepatitis prevention was set on an electronic chart system from June 2014. The rate of compliance increased to 63.9% at a hospital where de novo hepatitis alerts were put on clinical cards in April 2015, but it gradually decreased thereafter. HBV-DNA measurement was 100% in compliance with the guidelines from August 2016 when HB antigen, HB antibody, and anti-hepatitis B core antigen measurements were all performed in March 2016 because the pharmacists practiced physician order support duties at that time. This helped to reduce the burden on physicians, and the physician order support duties by the pharmacist were educational. Thus, de novo hepatitis prevention may contribute to safe cancer chemotherapy.

[A Case of Rectal Cancer and Multiple Liver Metastases Treated Using mFOLFOX and Bevacizumab under Maintenance Dialysis].

A 50s man receiving dialysis for chronic kidney disease due to IgA nephropathy underwent laparoscopic reversal via Hartmann 's procedure for rectal cancer and multiple liver metastases, followed by chemotherapy for the liver metastases. Following a single course of mFOLFOX therapy, bevacizumab was administered for 8 courses, resulting in tumor shrinkage and a decrease in tumor marker levels. The initial doses were 60mg/m2 oxaliplatin and 280(bolus injection)and 1,680mg/m2 (continuous infusion)of 5-FU. Subsequently, these doses were adjusted to be administered every 3 weeks. No serious adverse events other than neutropenia(Grade3 ), anorexia(Grade1 ), and hiccups(Grade1)were noted.

[Team Approaches for and Future Challenges to Promoting Perioperative Oral Management].

When the medical fee system was revised in 2012, the category of perioperative oral management was newly organized. However, the calculation of additional fees for such management required referral from medical to dental departments. In addition, requests for such management were limited, possibly owing to an increased burden on doctors engaged in outpatient services. This study examined the usefulness of an approach to promote patients' use of dental services by increasing their awareness of the importance of oral management. In this approach, pharmacists explained doctors' instructions to patients at a chemotherapy center within the study facility. Explanations were provided to 114 patients, 75 (65.8%) of whom subsequently used dental services in the facility. For patients using dental services, oral care was performed most frequently (40; 53.3%), followed by invasive procedures (23; 30.7%). Furthermore, the facility's ethics committee approved a survey to measure the satisfaction of patients undergoing chemotherapy at the center. Of the 110 patients invited to participate in the survey, 77(70.0%) did not respond. Researchers concluded the low response rate was associated with patients' belief that dental services were intended primarily for treating oral cavities and their lack of awareness of the importance of preventive dental care. However, in 2014, the number of calculations of additional fees for perioperative oral management markedly increased each month after the above-mentioned approach, from 62 (January) to 162 (December). Both the hospital-to family and family-to-hospital dentist referral rates significantly increased, from 11.2% and 10.7%, respectively (June 2013), to 21.0% and 41.9%, respectively(June 2014). Future evaluations of the outcomes of perioperative oral management and promoting cooperation between medical and dental communities may be necessary.

[Initial Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Tablets Containing Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride--Safety Measures Devised by a Multidisciplinary Team Including a Pharmaceutical Outpatient Clinic].

In May 2014, tablets containing both trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (Lonsurf® tablets) were launched in Japan ahead of other countries, for the treatment of advanced/relapsed unresectable colorectal cancer. The benefits of these tablets in terms of a new therapeutic option have been demonstrated. However, the manufacturer has requested healthcare professionals to help develop safety measures for the appropriate and safe use of the tablets. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the tablets in 16 patients who received the tablets at our hospital. Among the 4 evaluable patients, none achieved a complete or partial response. One patient (25.0%) had stable disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Guidelines outlined in the General Rules of the Study of Colorectal Cancer (The 8th Edition). Lonsurf® is considered to be a third-line (or later) treatment. Among the 16 cases studied, Lonsurf® was used as a third-, fourth-, and fifth-line treatment in 9, 6, and 1 cases, respectively. Therefore, Grade 3 or worse toxicities were a potential concern. Despite a high incidence of Grade 3 or worse neutropenia (7 of the 16 patients [43.8%]), none of the patients were hospitalized due to neutropenia or other treatment-related adverse events. Pharmacists have made 126 proposals to physicians regarding the use of Lonsurf®, 121 (96.0%) of which have been adopted. All of the adverse reactions experienced by our patients were resolved after supportive therapy.

[Appropriate dosing of fosaprepitant for colon cancer patients].

After fosaprepitant (FOS)was added to the National Health Insurance drug reimbursement price list, we switched the route of administration of antiemetics from oral to intravenous in chemotherapy regimens for colon cancer to improve patient medication adherence. However, because the number of patients reporting application-site disorders after administration of FOS increased, we monitored the incidence of these disorders in patients with colon cancer to identify ways to avoid them. In our prospective study, patients receiving conventional FOS dosing regimens (control group)were compared with those receiving diluted FOS solutions (study group). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the incidence of application-site disorders, and contrary to expectations, the incidence was higher in the study group than in the control group. On the basis of the principle of non-maleficence and the availability of alternative therapies using oral aprepitant (APR), we terminated this study early and adopted the basic strategy that all patients with application-site disorders, except for those with central venous access devices, should be treated with oral APR after confirming their preferences.

[An assessment tool for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and intervention outcomes].

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting(CINV)is the most unpleasant side effect for patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Moderately emetic anticancer drugs show a wide range of emetic frequencies, and the use or nonuse of antiemetics is optionally described without specifics. In the present study, we clarified the state of CINV presentation caused by moderately emetic anticancer drugs using the MASCC Antiemesis Tool, a nausea-and-vomiting evaluation tool developed by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer(MASCC)for patients with colorectal cancer. Of the 32 subjects, 5 (15.6%)had vomiting and 22(68.8%)experienced nausea. The timing of their occurrence and their nausea scores were accurately and easily clarified. This study's findings suggested that the current regimens need to be reviewed, particularly because all patients exhibited late nausea; therefore, we modified our antiemetic regimens through the Cancer Chemotherapy Regimen Review Board of this hospital. After the modification was introduced, significant improvement was seen in the control of both acute and late nausea/vomiting.

[Examination of the usefulness of the pharmacists' outpatient clinic for treatment with oral molecule-targeting drugs].

BACKGROUND: In the author's hospital, pharmacists' outpatient clinics were initiated in April 2010, and the department of breast surgery there has provided guidance on oral anti-cancer medication, but with difficulty in adopting proposals for supportive therapy made after the doctor's consultation on the same day. Under such circumstances, this study examined methods for conducting interviews with patients before the doctor's consultation in cases where oral molecular-targeted drugs are necessary. OBJECTIVE: To promote next-generation skill-mix team medicine in order to improve the continuity of treatment and optimize therapeutic effects. METHODS: Patients being treated with oral molecular-targeted drugs in Hitachi General Hospital were studied. INTERVENTION: Outcomes were assessed through medication-monitoring reports, while conducting a questionnaire regarding duties of pharmacists coordinating molecular-targeted drugs. RESULTS: Within the study period, 245/259(94. 6%)of proposals for prescriptions were adopted in 95 patients, among which 212/245(86. 5%) proposed supportive therapy. Improvement in conditions was observed in all patients treated with supportive therapy. The mean duration of sorafenib administration among 19 patients before and after the pharmacist's intervention was 66±20. 3 and 102±30. 8 days, respectively. The main reason for the need of pharmacists coordinating molecular-targeted drugs was: security among all patients; "support for adverse event management"among all doctors; and "proposals for prescription" among all nurses. DISCUSSION: The mean duration of sorafenib administration prolonged by the pharmacist's intervention and consequent reduction in side effects may have directly improved the continuity of treatment. Furthermore, when reflecting on each prescription, the pharmacist's expertise may have facilitated pharmacological intervention. In the future, it may also be necessary to promote pharmacist-led consultations supporting patients' informed choice of drugs.

[Nutritional assessment using MUST(Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool) in outpatient chemotherapy].

OBJECTIVE: We set out to see if nutritional assessment(management)using MUST could be useful for patients undergoing outpatient chemotherapy. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 197 patients undergoing outpatient chemotherapy between June 2010 and November 2010. The results of MUST, serum albumin levels, and nutritional intervention were investigated. RESULTS: High- and medium-risk patients requiring nutritional therapy was comprised of 17/78 breast cancer(21. 8%), 16/63 hematologic malignancy(25. 4%), and 26/56 colonic cancer(46. 4%)patients.Moreover, the serum albumin level in high- and medium-risk patients was likely to decrease compared to low-risk patients, suggesting the usefulness of MUST. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: It is important to assess nutritional status focusedon simplicity, objectivity, andspeedin outpatient chemotherapy. Assessment of patients' nutritional status and cancer treatment compliance are expected to be improved using MUST.

[Reported use of thalidomide in multiple myeloma: presentation of problems in the Thaled® outpatient department].

BACKGROUND: Thalidomide was approved in Japan for multiple myeloma treatment in October 2008. A program called the Thalidomide Education and Risk Management System (TERMS®) was established to help ensure that every effort is made to use the drug safely. PURPOSE: We report the use of thalidomide to treat multiple myeloma, and describe problems arising in the Thaled® outpatient department. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multiple myeloma patients treated with thalidomide at Hitachi General Hospital. INTERVENTION: Monitoring of the efficacy and safety of thalidomide, and a questionnaire survey conducted at the Thaled® outpatient department. RESULTS: The thalidomide response rate was 41. 7%. In 5 cases, all patients received steroids along with thalidomide. After auto-PBSCT, 1 of 2 cases demonstrated a good response (PR 1). After treatment with bortezomib, 1 of 2 cases demonstrated a good response (MR 1). After auto-PBSCT and treatment with bortezomib, 1 of 4 cases demonstrated a good response (PR 1). In a case demonstrating hematotoxicity Grade 3 (in addition to neutropenia), administration was discontinued. Regarding problems in the Thaled® outpatient department, the medical staff indicated that TERMS® is a very complicated program, while the patients requested prolongation of the prescription days and reduction of the economic burden of medication costs. CONCLUSION: Thalidomide showed some success in treating multiple myeloma either after auto-PBSCT or following treatment with bortezomib. In the case demonstrating hematotoxicity Grade 3 (in addition to neutropenia), grave complications could have very easily developed, thus underscoring the importance of careful monitoring. Based on a questionnaire survey conducted in the Thaled® outpatient department, the medical staff made comments and patients raised issues that should be examined in the future.