ABSTRACT
Little is known about the pre-implementation context for a preventive HIV vaccine. We conducted interviews of individuals in Philadelphia recruited at Penn clinics and community-based organizations serving LGBTQ-identifying persons of color who 1) were cisgender men who had sex with men, or were transgender-identified, 2) had a sexually transmitted infection in the last 12 months, or sex with multiple partners within the last two weeks. We assessed acceptability, facilitators, and barriers to a hypothetical HIV vaccine using an integrated analysis approach. We interviewed 30 individuals between 2/2023-9/2023. Participants were supportive of an HIV vaccine and reported that they would strongly consider receiving one if one became available. Participants contextualized a hypothetical vaccine with the current HIV prevention context, primarily pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), indicating that they would evaluate any future vaccine in comparison to their experience within the PrEP landscape.Reported facilitators for a hypothetical HIV vaccine included vaccine access, knowledge, and understanding; their risk for HIV exposure; and perceived benefits of the vaccine. Barriers included lack of understanding of the purpose of a vaccine, stigma surrounding HIV and sexual practices that may surface towards people who seek vaccination, and potential issues with effectiveness, side effects, or lack of availability.
ABSTRACT
Behavioral economics research suggests poverty may influence behavior by reducing mental bandwidth, increasing future discounting, and increasing risk aversion. It is plausible that these decision-making processes are further impaired in the context of HIV or pregnancy. In this cross-sectional study of 86 low-income women in Philadelphia, multivariable models showed that HIV was associated with decreased mental bandwidth (one of two measures) and lower risk aversion. Pregnancy was not associated with any decision-making factors. Viral suppression was associated with greater mental bandwidth (one of two measures), and antenatal care engagement with lower future discounting. Anti-poverty interventions may be particularly beneficial to improve health behaviors in the context of HIV.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Routine birth testing of HIV-exposed infants (HEI) using point of care (POC) nucleic acid testing may allow for earlier diagnosis and treatment of infants living with HIV, but more data are needed on retention in care for those diagnosed at birth and re-testing for those with a negative HIV birth test. METHODS: POC birth testing (within 48 hours of birth) was offered to all HEI born at 10 public maternities in Zimbabwe from November 2018 to July 2019. Data were abstracted from routine registers, including information on re-testing at 6-8 weeks for infants testing HIV-negative at birth and 6-month retention in care among infants diagnosed with HIV at birth. RESULTS: Of 2854 eligible HEIs, 2806 (98.3%) received POC HIV birth testing. Thirty-nine infants with HIV were identified (1.4%), and 23 (59%) were started on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Twenty infants (51%) remained on ART at 6 months. Of the 2694 infants who tested negative at birth, 1229 (46.5%) had a documented retest at 6-8 weeks. 7 (0.6%) of those infants tested HIV-positive. CONCLUSIONS: The uptake of POC birth testing was high in study facilities, but low rates of ART initiation after a positive birth test, despite high retention on ART through 6 months, diminish the impact of POC birth testing and must be addressed. Among infants who tested negative at birth, rates of testing at 6-8 weeks of life (46%) were slightly lower than national rates of testing at the same age without a birth test (56%) during the study period. Improving infant HIV testing rates at 6-8 weeks, regardless of birth testing, should be a priority.
