ABSTRACT
Myofibroblastoma is a rare tumor that was originally described in the breast but has since been found in extra-mammary locations, where it been renamed mammary-type myofibroblastoma (MTM). We describe a case of MTM occurring in the anterior compartment of the thigh, which was initially interpreted as a possible a liposarcoma on MRI. Two subsequent biopsy samples and eventual excision revealed the tumor to have the characteristic pathology of MTM. This benign tumor, albeit rare, needs to be considered in the imaging differential diagnosis of fat containing deep soft tissue masses of the extremity.
Subject(s)
Liposarcoma , Neoplasms, Muscle Tissue , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Liposarcoma/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neoplasms, Muscle Tissue/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms, Muscle Tissue/surgery , Thigh/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Studies have reported agreement between computed tomography (CT) and renography for the determination of split kidney function. However, their correlation with post-donation kidney function remains unclear. We compared CT measurements with renography in assessment of split kidney function (SKF) and their correlations with post-donation kidney function. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective cohort study of 248 donors from January 1, 2009-July 31, 2019 were assessed. Pearson correlations were used to assess post-donation kidney function with renography and CT-based measurements. Furthermore, we examined high risk groups with SKF difference greater than 10% on renography and donors with post-donation eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73m2. RESULTS: 62% of donors were women with a mean (standard deviation) pre-donation eGFR 99 (20) and post-donation eGFR 67 (22) mL/min/1.73m2 at 31 months of follow-up. Post-donation kidney function was poorly correlated with both CT-based measurements and renography, including the subgroup of donors with post-donation eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73m2 (r less than 0.4 for all). There was agreement between CT-based measurements and renography for SKF determination (Bland-Altman agreement [bias, 95% limits of agreement] for renography vs: CT volume, 0.76%, -7.60-9.15%; modified ellipsoid,1.01%, -8.38-10.42%; CC dimension, 0.44%, -7.06-7.94); however, CT missed SKF greater than 10% found by renography in 20 out 26 (77%) of donors. CONCLUSIONS: In a single centre study of 248 living donors, we found no correlation between CT or renography and post-donation eGFR. Further research is needed to determine optimal ways to predict remaining kidney function after donation.
