ABSTRACT
Receipt of nebulised pentamidine in people with HIV was audited to identify if individuals were appropriately receiving nebulised pentamidine, and whether national guidelines were being followed when prophylaxis was commenced and discontinued. Of 76 people with who received nebulised pentamidine, the main indication for starting nebulised pentamidine was a co-trimoxazole adverse drug reaction. Co-trimoxazole desensitization was not attempted before starting nebulised pentamidine. The main indication for stopping nebulised pentamidine prophylaxis was when immune reconstitution occurred. This single centre audit revealed that national guidelines were being followed in most cases. The lack of information regarding the reason for starting or stopping nebulised pentamidine prophylaxis, or detail of the clinician's concerns about potential poor adherence with oral regimens of prophylaxis as a reason for choosing nebulised pentamidine prophylaxis, identifies a need for improved documentation of clinicians' decision-making. Introduction of pharmacist-led interventions/alerts using patients' electronic records, similar to those used in primary care, would enable the specialist pharmacy team to identify when and if co-trimoxazole desensitization has been offered and discussed/declined before a clinician prescribes nebulised pentamidine as well as enabling identification of those in who pentamidine prophylaxis has been continued, despite "immune reconstitution".
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Since 2015, we prescribed dolutegravir (DTG)-based two drug regimens (DTG-2DR) for 620 people [total cohort 3133 (19.8%)]. METHOD: Clinic database search 1 January 15 to 31 October 21. Demographic, tolerability and HIV related data analysed. RESULTS: In total, 620 people identified; 561 had complete data. 446 male (79.5%); median age 54 years (interquartile range 46, 59). 343 (61.1%) MSM. Nine people who initiated naïvely achieved viral suppression (100%). 546/552 (99.0%) switched or continued and were suppressed at data censor. 460/552 (83.3%) received DTG-lamivudine (DTG/3TC), 74/552 (13.4%) received DTG-rilpivirine (DTG/RPV) and 18/552 (3.3%) received DTG-emtricitabine (DTG/FTC). 70 (12.5%) switched off DTG-2DR (55 DTG/3TC, 13 DTG/RPV, two DTG/FTC) due to side-effects. 41 episodes of blip (1 off >50 copies/ml) occurred in 30 people (5.3%). 11/41 on DTG-RPV [ n â=â7 multi-tablet regimen (MTR), n â=â4 single tablet regimen (STR)]. 27/41 DTG-3TC, 3/41 DTG/FTC ( n â=â26 MTR, n â=â4 STR). Six people (1.1%) failed (confirmed viral load >200 copies/ml or persistent low level viraemia) ( n â=â4 DTG-3TC STR, n â=â1 DTG-3TC MTR, n â=â1 DTG-RPV MTR). Four failures due to low level viraemia, one due to non-adherence and one due to high viral load. Resistance tests performed for 5/6 - mutations detected only in latter person with high viral load failure (on DTG-3TC MTR) who developed triple class resistance. CONCLUSION: Majority of experience is in DTG/3TC stable switch. Minority of patients developed side-effects. Low number of virological failures, one developed integrase inhibitor resistance. Viral failure associated with MTR, commensurate with trial data showing no failure with resistance if DTG/3TC STR used. Overall DTG-2DR demonstrates high efficacy in real-world setting.
