Ecological indicators reveal historical regime shifts in the Black Sea ecosystem.

Background: The Black Sea is one of the most anthropogenically disturbed marine ecosystems in the world because of introduced species, fisheries overexploitation, nutrient enrichment via pollution through river discharge, and the impacts of climate change. It has undergone significant ecosystem transformations since the 1960s. The infamous anchovy and alien warty comb jelly Mnemiopsis leidyi shift that occurred in 1989 is the most well-known example of the drastic extent of anthropogenic disturbance in the Black Sea. Although a vast body of literature exists on the Black Sea ecosystem, a holistic look at the multidecadal changes in the Black Sea ecosystem using an ecosystem- and ecology-based approach is still lacking. Hence, this work is dedicated to filling this gap. Methods: First, a dynamic food web model of the Black Sea extending from 1960 to 1999 was established and validated against time-series data. Next, an ecological network analysis was performed to calculate the time series of synthetic ecological indicators, and a regime shift analysis was performed on the time series of indicators. Results: The model successfully replicated the regime shifts observed in the Black Sea. The results showed that the Black Sea ecosystem experienced four regime shifts and was reorganized due to effects instigated by overfishing in the 1960s, eutrophication and establishment of trophic dead-end organisms in the 1970s, and overfishing and intensifying interspecies trophic competition by the overpopulation of some r-selected organisms (i.e., jellyfish species) in the 1980s. Overall, these changes acted concomitantly to erode the structure and function of the ecosystem by manipulating the food web to reorganize itself through the introduction and selective removal of organisms and eutrophication. Basin-wide, cross-national management efforts, especially with regard to pollution and fisheries, could have prevented the undesirable changes observed in the Black Sea ecosystem and should be immediately employed for management practices in the basin to prevent such drastic ecosystem fluctuations in the future.

Uncovering ecological regime shifts in the Sea of Marmara and reconsidering management strategies.

Ecosystem regime shifts can alter ecosystem services, affect human well-being, and trigger policy conflicts due to economic losses and reductions in societal and environmental benefits. Intensive anthropogenic activities make the Sea of Marmara ecosystem suffer from nearly all existing available types of ecosystem pressures such as biological degradation, exposure to hydrological processes, nutrient and organic matter enrichment, plastic pollution, ocean warming, resulting in deterioration of habitats. In this study, using an integrated ecosystem assessment, we investigated for the first time the historical development and ecosystem state of the Sea of Marmara. Multivariate analyses were applied to the most comprehensive and unique long-term data sets of 9 biotic and 15 abiotic variables for ecosystem state and drivers respectively, from 1986 to 2020. Observed changes were confirmed by detecting shifts in the datasets. The Sea of Marmara ecosystem was classified into three regimes: i) an early initial state regime under the top-down control of predatory medium pelagic fish and fisheries exploitation until mid-1990s, ii) a transitional regime between mid-1990s and mid-2010s as from ecosystem restructuring, and iii) an alternate state late regime with prevailing impacts of climate change from mid-2010s until 2020. During the 20 years transitional regime, three different phases were also characterized; i) the 1st phase between mid-1990s and early 2000s with its gradual change in ecosystem state from a decrease in predators and significant shift in physical drivers of the ecosystem, ii) the 2nd phase between 2000 and mid-2000s with a strong shift in ecosystem state, an ongoing increase in climate indices and fishing mortality, and a gradual decrease in water quality; and iii) the 3rd phase between mid-2000s and mid-2010s with the reorganization of the ecosystem dominated by small pelagic fish and ameliorated water quality. During late regime, we observed that most of the biotic variables, mainly fish biomass, and climate variables did not return to their initial state despite the improvement in some abiotic variables such as water quality. We identify these observed changes in the SoM ecosystem as a non-linear regime shift. Finally, we also developed concrete suggestions for improved regional management.